This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Community Heritage Program 2012/2013 - Oatlands Gaol Restoration and Interpretation Project'.


Your Community Heritage
Application form 2011 - 2012
Submission Receipt
Receipt Number
Submission Date
YCH-893268-287
20 Dec 2011 3:28:28 PM
Office use only
Originating Round
Manager
SAP Delegate
External ID
Start Date
Finish Date
Part 1: Eligibility and Site Information
Eligibility
Before determining which sub-program you wish to apply for please answer the following general eligibility questions to determine if you 
are eligible to apply for funding. Additional information can be found on page 5 of the guidelines.
Are you a legal entity (as outlined in the guidelines) able to enter into a funding agreement with the 
Yes
No
Commonwealth Government? *
Do you have any overdue final reports and/or acquittals for any previous Commonwealth Government 
Yes
No
grant, such as Jobs Fund (Heritage Projects), National Historic Sites, Commemorating Eminent 
Australians, National Heritage Investment Initiative, Indigenous Heritage Program, Community Action 
Grant and/or ad hoc Australian Government heritage related grants? *
Have you received any grant funding for the same activities? *
Yes
No
Are you applying on behalf of a Commonwealth Government department, agency or authority? *
Yes
No
Sub-program selection
Please select which sub-program/s you wish to apply for and list your preference in priority order [1 to 5].
Protecting National Historic Sites
Preference  *
1
Recovering from Natural Disasters
Commemorating Eminent Australians
S.22
Site Location
Where is the heritage place located?
Street number *
Street name *
Street Type *
2
Mason
Street
Suburb/Town *
State *
Postcode *
OATLANDS
TAS
7120
Site Information
Ver. 20111117-1002 v5.4
Page 1 of 23

Place type
Please select the most appropriate button. * 
NB: used for statistical data only.
Agricultural Building/Farm/Site
Cemetery
Community Building
Domestic Residence
Friendly Society (Lodge) Hall
Gaol
Garden Structure/Building
Government Building
Hotel/Accommodation Facility
Institute Building eg educational
Jetty or Landing Place
Lighthouse
Lime Kiln
Memorial
Migrant Facility
Mine
Museum
Park/Reserves Building
Place of Worship
Port/Harbour Building
Railway Structure
Telegraph Office
Theatre
Town Hall
Tramway Structure
Visitor Facility
Other
Indigenous Site
Place use
What is the major current use of the building? Please select the most appropriate button. *
Private
Public
Mixed (Private & Public)
Not Used
Heritage Listing
Please indicate highest level of heritage listing your place has achieved? *
World Heritage List
National Heritage List
State/Territory register
Local register/heritage overlay
ID and/or official title of heritage listing *
Tasmanian Heritage Register - Ref 11031
Please provide a summary of this site's heritage significance.  *
The Oatlands Gaol (1836) was the largest regional gaol in colonial Tasmania. Designed by famed architect John Lee-Archer, the 
gaol was an experiment in penal design responding to Governor Arthur's desire to revolutionise the system.  Built by convict labour 
from local sandstone, the gaol operated for exactly 100 years, before the site was partly demolished.  The gaol is significant as it 
represents the colonial ideals of penal reform, and the extant Gaoler's Residence is a fine example of a Georgian sandstone 
domestic building associated with a penal institution. The building is an iconic part of the Oatlands townscape, and accordingly has 
a high level of community value.   
Part 2: Applicant Details
Ver. 20111117-1002 v5.4
Page 2 of 23

Organisation Details
Information provided in this section must relate to the entity that will enter into a funding agreement with the Commonwealth  
Government should the proposal be approved.
ABN Details
Does your organisation have an  
Yes
No
Australian Business Number (ABN)? *
Australian Business Number (ABN) *
68 653 459 589
Legal name *
SOUTHERN MIDLANDS COUNCIL
This is the name that appears on all official documents and legal papers. It may be different to your trading name
Trading name *
Southern Midlands Council
Entity type *
Local Government Entity
Is your organisation incorporated? *
Yes
No
Are you GST registered? *
Yes
No
Applicant type
Of the following, which type of individual/organisation do you consider yourself to be? Please select the most appropriate button. * 
NB: used for statistical data only.
Company
Educational institution
Family trust
Historical society
Indigenous organisation
Local government/agency
National Trust
Other community group
Private individual
Private partnership
Religious institution
State/Territory government/agency
Other
Please provide a brief description of your organisation’s primary role/activities. *
Southern Midlands Council is a local government entity formed under the Tasmanian Local Government Act 1992.  Aside from the 
statutory functions of a local government, Southern Midlands Council is very proactive in non-core activities such as community 
capacity building, health and welfare, heritage site management, etc.
Official contact person for the application
The official contact is the person with the authority to sign a funding agreement with the Commonwealth Government and be held legally 
responsible and accountable for the use of the grant funding.
Title: *
Mr
Mrs
Miss
Ms
Other
First name *
Last name *
Tim
Kirkwood
Position in organisation
General Manager
Phone (business hours) *
Phone (mobile)
S.22
S.22
Email
xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xxx.xx
Ver. 20111117-1002 v5.4
Page 3 of 23

Postal address of official contact person for application
(for PO Box or Locked Bag address, select a 'Street type' of 'Postal Box')
Street number *
Street name *
Street Type *
71
High 
Street
Suburb/Town *
State *
Postcode *
OATLANDS
TAS
7120
Previous Funding
Have you received any Commonwealth Government, State or 
Yes
No
Territory grants in the last 5 years or any emergency relief 
payments since 1 January 2009 for similar activities, or for the 
same site? *
Completion date/ 
Funding 
Program Title
Granting organisation
Expected 
amount
completion date
Volunteer Grant
DFHCSIA
30/09/2011
$4,000.00
Volunteer Grant
DFHCSIA
30/09/2012
$5,000.00
Part 3: Protecting National Historic Sites
Project Title *
Oatlands Gaol Walls Restoration Project
Please give your project a succinct name in the following format:  “Title of Place or structure– description of project”. Please limit your 
Project Title to no more than 12 words.

What is the name of the place or structure? *
Oatlands Gaol
Is the Project Manager for this sub-program the Official Contact  
Yes
No
Person in the Applicant Details tab? *
Owner's consent
As the applicant, are you also the owner of the place or structure? *
Yes
No
Objectives and Proposed Activities
Provide an outline of your proposed project.  Please outline how your proposed project will contribute to the protection, 
conservation and enhancement of the values of the nationally significant historic heritage site.  * 
Please provide details of no more than 2000 characters (approx 350 words).
This project aims to conserve and stabilise the sandstone perimeter walls of the Oatlands  Gaol (1836).  When the site was 
partially demolished in 1937, the walls were left partially ruined and without capstones. Ingress of water for the last 70+ years 
has resulted in some collapse, and continuing damage to the structural integrity of the walls.  This project involves repair, partial 
reconstruction and total capping of the walls to stop further deterioration.  In 1939 the original archway which housed the main 
gaol gates was moved to the local school yard - current owners permission has been gained to move the archway back to its 
original location, which also forms part of this project.  By moving the arch, a very significant part of the site will be restored, and 
by conserving the walls, the future of this significant historic site is more secure. 
Eligibility
Is the site listed on:  *
the World Heritage List
the National Heritage List
another national, State orTerritory register and is considered nationally significant for its historic values
Ver. 20111117-1002 v5.4
Page 4 of 23

Please explain how you consider this site to be nationally significant  * 
Please provide details of no more than 2000 characters (approx 350 words)
The Oatlands Gaol was the largest regional gaol in colonial Tasmania, able to hold 200 men and 70 women. Historical 
records show that it was built to Governor Arthur's specifications based on the Auburn Prison in the US, as an 
experiment in reforming the colonial penal system - a reform which failed, therefore Oatlands Gaol is the only known 
example of that particular type of gaol design in Australia, therefore unique and nationally significant.  The Oatlands 
Gaol was the only regional gaol in Tasmania which was associated with a Supreme Court House, therefore the only 
regional gaol in the colony where people were regularly executed.  The gaol operated as a Colonial gaol for 50 years, 
as a Municipal gaol for 30 years, and as a State run gaol for 20 years, therefore the architectural and archaeological 
remains of the site have the potential to demonstrate the evolving penal system of Australia over 100 years.   
Which of the following activities are you applying for under Protecting National Historic Sites?  Please select the option that most closely 
aligns with your project. You may select more than one option.  *
Development of a management or master plan or improved management arrangements.
Building the sustainability of a site, including thorough planning and development of facilities to enhance visitor  
understanding and access.
Research activities which contribute to development of conservation policies to protect the heritage values.
Conservation or restoration activities identified in a management plan.
Conservation Management Plan  *
If you are proposing works, you must have a current conservation plan in place for your site or other planning documents that include 
conservation management planning. 
Please indicate which pages of the plan refer to the activities that you are applying for funding to undertake and attach those pages to 
your application form.
Relevant page number/s of 
Activity
management plan 
Capping and stabilisation of walls & relocation of gaol arch (as per Conservation 
190-191
Management Plan)
Restoration of walls (as per Master Plan)
12
Relocation of Gaol Arch (as per Arch Relocation Plan)
Whole document.
Ongoing restoration and management of the Oatlands Gaol (as per SMC Heritage 
23-25
Strategy).
Supporting documentation can be uploaded in Part 8 of this form
Technical Advisor for the project
Please provide details of the Technical (eg. heritage) Advisor you are engaging to undertake the project activity. Please include their 
qualifications, relevant experience and contact details. The application must include evidence that the works will be carried out in 
accordance with heritage best practice as contained in the Burra Charter, and are endorsed by a heritage advisor, in consultation with 
the local Council.
Supporting documentation can be uploaded in Part 8 of this form.
Organisation *
Southern Midlands Council
Title: *
Mr
Mrs
Miss
Ms
Other
First name *
Last name *
Brad
Williams
Phone (business hours) *
Phone (mobile)
0418303184
Ver. 20111117-1002 v5.4
Page 5 of 23

Qualifications/Experience
BA(hons) Archaeology.  MA Cultural Heritage Management.  Member - Tasmanian Heritage Council.
Selection Considerations
The following considerations will be taken into account when assessing your application:
Where relevant you may refer to information contained elsewhere in your application form.
Value for money
Outline how your project budget and costs represent good value for money.  *
Please provide details of no more than 2000 characters (approx 350 words).
This project is considered to be good value for money as it is largely a preventative conservation project.  If the 
stabilisation and capping of the gaol walls is not undertaken, then degradation will continue - and cause the cost of 
future restoration work to escalate.  The planning documents which have been developed over the last few years for the 
site have carefully and pragmatically planned the restoration, so that any funds spent are prioritised and work is 
undertaken to a high standard.  With significant expenditure already undertaken on the Gaoler's Residence and the 
overall research and interpretation of the site, this next stage of the project will reap benefit from those previous works. 
 
In September 2011, a select tender process was held in order to gain quotes for these works.  Tender documentation  
was sent to seven stonemasonry firms.   Only two firms provided a quotation for the gaol arch relocation (the best quote 
has been used here), and only one firm provided a quotation for wall restoration/capping.  This is not unexpected, given 
the extreme shortage of specialist stonemasons in Tasmania.  For this reason, three quotations cannot be provided, 
however further information on the select tender process (hence attempt to gain best value for money) can be provided 
if necessary (advice was sought from the Department on this matter).   
Outline the ongoing commitment to the management of the site eg. provision for an ongoing maintenance regime following any 
funded works.  *
Please provide details of no more than 2000 characters (approx 350 words).
Within the overarching framework of the Southern Midlands Historic Heritage Strategy 2009-13, the Oatlands Gaol 
Master Plan sets out the long term goals for management of the site as a publicly accessible heritage facility, 
incorporating the Gaoler's Residence as a small museum (opening Mid-2012) and the gaol yard as meaningfully 
interpreted public open space.  The Oatlands Gaoler's Residence Use and Development Plan (endorsed July 2010) 
further elaborates on the ongoing access and sustainability of the place.  Council have recurrent funding for 
maintenance of the place, as well as a small allowance for ongoing restoration works.  Council own and manage a suite 
of significant public heritage sites, including Callington Windmill (1827), the Oatlands Supreme Court House (1829) and 
Roche Hall (1883) - with all of those projects Council has demonstrated a commitment to the accessibility and 
sustainability of the key heritage sites of the district. 
If applicable describe the degree to which your project is innovative.
Please provide details of no more than 2000 characters (approx 350 words).
The entire Oatlands Gaol project is considered innovative, as it has taken a neglected and unused heritage site, and 
invigorated it into a public heritage asset.  Although the gaol buildings have largely been demolished, the 2200 square 
metre gaol yard, enclosed by the perimeter walls, is a valuable opportunity to provide meaningfully interpreted public 
open space in the centre of Oatlands.  The site is rich in archaeological remains, which in time will be further 
investigated, exposed and interpreted to further regain this 'lost' site (an annual student excavation program is now in its 
second season or archaeological investigation).  The relocation of the gaol arch to its original location is also 
considered innovative, as it takes a lost part of the site, and reinvigorates it within its original context.  Seldom are there 
feasible opportunities for the relocation of heritage to its correct context. 
 
The overall vision for the Oatlands Gaol site is to establish a heritage and archaeological skills training facility within the 
perimeter walls - the basis for that vision has already been achieved with the establishment of a conservation lab, 
heritage office and collections store in the Gaoler's Residence.  Whilst the entire redevelopment of the gaol is still a long 
way off (a long-term concept plan has been developed, further to the Oatlands Gaol Master Plan), the innovative vision 
is accepted by Council as a key goal - and the conservation and restoration of the site as resources permit are integral 
to achieving that vision.   
Where applicable, demonstrate how you will promote the project or its outcomes, following its completion. eg. will you develop an 
ongoing  communications plan, involve local media in the project, or advertise the completed works to the local community.
Please provide details of no more than 2000 characters (approx 350 words).
The Oatlands Gaol Restoration Project has thus far attracted a great amount of media - this year alone there has been 
Ver. 20111117-1002 v5.4
Page 6 of 23

two two-page newspaper articles on the project, as well as mention in Qantas magazine, and a 10 minute segment on 
Stateline (ABC TV).  Similar media channels would be used to promote the currently proposed works.  The opening of 
the recently restored Oatlands Gaoler's Residence is scheduled for mid-2012 (or may be pushed back should the 
currently proposed project go ahead) - for which Heritage Tasmania has offered to assist in the development of a 
communications strategy to publicise the event (and acknowledge all stakeholders and funding bodies).   
Priority of the project
How would you describe the significance of the place or structure?  *
Please provide details of no more than 2000 characters (approx 350 words).
A comprehensive statement of significance is contained in the Oatlands Gaol Conservation Management Plan 2006 
(pp163-164).  Points drawn from that statement include: 
 
The Oatlands Gaol is of historic cultural heritage significance because: 
- It demonstrates over 180 years of penal use, from colonial, municipal and state gaol, to military and ongoing police 
use. 
- It is a rare example of a substantial colonial sandstone gaol, and an even rarer example of a gallows site. 
- It is a very significant and substantial archaeological site, with the potential to yield remains which would enhance our 
understanding of the site and related themes. 
- The Gaoler's residence is a fine example of an Old Colonial Georgian residence. 
- It's prominent position in central Oatlands makes it a key townscape element with a high level of recognition by and 
significance to the community. 
- It is associated with many prominent Colonial people, including Architect John Lee-Archer and Governor George 
Arthur, and in particular represents Governor Arthur's attitude towards penal reform in Colonial Australia. 
 
 
Please describe the priority, urgency or need for the project.  What will be the impact of not proceeding with this project?  *
Please provide details of no more than 2000 characters (approx 350 words).
This project is considered urgent - and is the highest priority for Council.  The gaol walls are rapidly deteriorating with 
the constant ingress of water. Failure to adequately stabilise and weatherproof the walls will eventually result in 
structural collapse, which will irreversibly damage the heritage site, and possibly cause a public danger.  The gaol arch 
in its current location is in seriously degraded condition, with large pieces of stone falling off and if it is not relocated (or 
if substantial works are not undertaken to stabilise it) soon, it will need to be fenced off as a public danger. 
Ongoing benefits of the project
Outline the degree to which:
 •  the project will promote an appreciation and/or understanding of the place or structure, and how it will assist in long term 
protection, 
    conservation and enhancement of the heritage values of the place.  *
Please provide details of no more than 2000 characters (approx 350 words).
The re-location of the Oatlands Gaol arch will enhance an understanding of the site by reinstating a very prominent site 
feature.  The reinstatement of the arch will assist in interpreting the sheer scale of the site, and restore a large part of 
the facade of the complex.  The arch currently sits in an inappropriate context - which confuses visitors as to the exact 
site of the gaol.   
 
Stabilisation and capping of the gaol walls is critical for their long-term conservation.  Failure to undertake this work will 
result in continued degradation, and eventual loss of that part of the site.    
 •  the project delivers multiple and/or longer term outcomes eg. improves education, increases spending by the community, 
    involves assets and resources that can be re-used, improves public access (if appropriate), imparts a sense of community 
    belonging/builds social cohesion, increases tourism opportunities, increases employment opportunities, reduces maintenance 
    costs and/or contributes to property appreciation.  *
Please provide details of no more than 2000 characters (approx 350 words).
Aside from the conservation outcomes detailed above, this project will result in the following wider benefits: 
- Less maintenance of the site in future as it will have been stabilised. 
- Removal of public danger through the site disintegrating. 
- Creation of local employment during the restoration process. 
- Creation of meaningful public spaces. 
- Enhancement of the community's knowledge of the size, layout and significance of the site. 
Ver. 20111117-1002 v5.4
Page 7 of 23

- Increases and enhances tourism and visitor opportunities. 
- Maximises the educational and interpretive potential of the site. 
Capacity of applicant to deliver
Describe how personnel within your organisation have the capacity to:
 •  effectively manage the implementation of your project/s.  *
Please provide details of no more than 2000 characters (approx 350 words).
The project will be managed by Brad Williams, SMC's Consultant Manager of Heritage Projects, with project oversight 
gained through monthly reports to Council and the General Manager.  Financial management will be provided by 
Sharyn Rawnsley, Council's Senior Finance Officer.  Relevant skills of these Council officers are outlined below - and all 
have substantial experience in managing similar projects.  
 •  achieve the proposed timelines eg. relevant approvals and/or licences are able to be obtained within suitable timeframes.  *
Please provide details of no more than 2000 characters (approx 350 words).
A development application for these works is to be lodged in early January 2012 (all documentation has been prepared 
ready for lodgment) - regardless of whether the project is fully funded at this stage or not (i.e. partial implementation will 
occur should full funding not be gained).  Legislation requires the approvals process to take no more than 42 days, 
therefore commencement in the second quarter of 2012 is feasible.   
 
Build-time is expected to be 3-4 months - 6 months have been allocated as a contingency for bad weather etc. 
 
 •  manage risks to the project through adequate risk mitigation planning.  *
Please provide details of no more than 2000 characters (approx 350 words).
Southern Midlands Council has a comprehensive risk management manual, which sets out all procedures and policies 
for risk management across the agency.  This is subject to regular update and audit, and is applicable to the physical 
risks perceived around this project (e.g. site safety, public safety, disaster management etc).  
 
Council has budgeted for a 15% cost overrun contingency in the event of unforeseen costs/complicatons  related to the 
project. 
 
As outlined above, a contingency for time-overruns has been made.  
 
Describe the relevant skills and experience of the project team members and whether adequate resources are available (eg. 
infrastructure, facilities and equipment) to successfully deliver this project.  *
Please provide details of no more than 2000 characters (approx 350 words).
The Project Manager, Brad Williams, has been working as Council's Manager of Heritage Projects for 8 years.  During 
which time, he has managed or been involved with a number of high profile heritage projects, such as restoration of the 
Oatlands Supreme Court House, reconstruction of the Callington Windmill, and restoration of the Oatlands Gaol, as well 
as a number of archaeological, interpretation, adaptive reuse and streetscape projects.  Project updates will be 
provided to Council monthly to ensure that the project is meeting milestones.  
 
Financial management of the project will be overseen by Sharyn Rawnsley, Council's Senior Finance Officer, who has 
over 10 years experience in that role. 
 
The preferred tenderer for the works (if funded) is Robert Whitney, a local stonemason with over 20 years experience, 
who has undertaken all stone restoration works on the Oatlands Gaol to date.  The company which Robert works for is 
Heritage Building Solutions Pty Ltd, which is a building company with a wide ranging team and access to all necessary 
advice and equipment.  
Where you are outsourcing works to an external party (such as a consultant) please explain who you intend to engage and what 
their tasks will be.
Please provide details of no more than 2000 characters (approx 350 words).
The likely third-party construction contractor (stonemason) will undertake all of the construction/stonemasonry and 
disassembly/stabilisation work (including scaffolding, safety fencing etc).  It is intended to engage Robert Whitney of 
Heritage Building Solutions, who has provided the most competitive quotation, and has a long history of working on that 
site.  Formal appointment of this contractor will only occur after confirmation of funding.  
Ver. 20111117-1002 v5.4
Page 8 of 23

 
The proposed works have already been detailed development application documentation.  The planning documents 
(outlined above) have been developed in-house by Brad Williams (Manager Heritage Projects) over the last few years.  
 
Detailed documentation for the Gaol Arch relocation have been developed by outside consultants - Architect Peter 
Cripps, and Engineer Peter Holmes (therefore that outsourcing will not form part of the currently proposed project -  
having already been undertaken and paid for). 
 
Project Delivery
Project timeframe
Please indicate in weeks, how long you expect to take to complete your project in its entirety.  *
32
Project Plan
Please add lines as necessary to the table to provide a complete project plan. The project plan provided should be as comprehensive 
as possible and in line with the size and nature of your project. These activities may be implemented concurrently. Please note that a 
lack of detail provided may affect the success of your application.
Activity
Timeframe
Project Resources
Explain exactly what activities will be undertaken in  No. of 
Indicate the resources required for each activity
each stage (enter n/a if a stage is not applicable to 
weeks to 
your project)
complete 
activity
Stage 1: Planning, Approvals and Risk Management
Submission of already prepared planning approvals  6
Plans and documentation have already been 
documentation.
prepared.
Stage 2: Arranging Contractors and/or Materials
Formal award of tender.
2
Project manager.
Stage 3: Undertaking the Project
Disassemble gaol arch, move stone to original site 
3
Stonemason and apprentice.  Scaffolding, safety 
at gaol. 
fencing, lifting gear, cartage contractor. 
Make good current arch site after disassembly
1
Labourer, small excavator.  Basic landscape 
supplies.
Re-erect arch at original site
4
Stonemason and apprentice.  Scaffolding, safety 
fencing, lifting gear.
Re-build infill wall between arch and gaoler's 
4
Stonemason and apprentice.  Scaffolding, safety 
residence (after making good existing base)
fencing, lifting gear.  Replacement stone (new local 
sandstone).
Remove vegetation and clean existing wall tops, 
3
Stonemason and labourer.  Scaffolding, safety 
making selected repairs to gain a level top. 
fencing, lifting gear.
Undertake repairs and rebuilds to stabilise walls.
3
Stonemason and apprentice.  Scaffolding, safety 
fencing, lifting gear.
Re-point walls where necessary.
3
Stonemason and apprentice.  Scaffolding.
Apply lime mortar capping to all exposed wall tops.
3
Stonemason and apprentice.  Scaffolding. 
Stage 4: Final Report Preparation and Acquittal
Acquittal report, audit and submission.
4
Project Manager, Finance Officer, Auditor.
Budget Table  *
Ver. 20111117-1002 v5.4
Page 9 of 23

Please add lines as necessary to the table to provide a complete project budget. The project budget provided should be as 
comprehensive as possible and in line with the size and nature of your project. Please note that a lack of budget information may 
affect the success of your application.  
Please use this table format, not a different spreadsheet layout. You should also include a provision for the cost of preparation of audit 
reports at the completion of the project. All costs must include GST. 
For expenses relating to consultants and/or contractors over $10,000 you must include 3 quotes or you may be considered ineligible (if 
this is not possible please contact the department).  Please refer to Part 11 of the guidelines for restrictions on project expenses.
Supporting documentation can be uploaded in Part 8 of this form.
Activity to be funded 
A. Applicant contributions  B. Other contributions 
C. Program 
D. Total activity costs
Description of item
(from your organisation for 
(from other sources for each  funding 
each activity)
activity)
requested 
List the cash  List the in 
List the cash  List the  
List the 
Add the amounts from 
contributions  kind 
contributions  in kind 
amount for 
columns A, B and C. The 
contributions 
contributions
each activity
total cost of each activity 
should include GST payable 
CASH
IN KIND
CASH
IN KIND
    
Gaol arch relocation. Incl  
$75,240.00
$75,240.00
cartage, lifting materials  
(as per quote Inc. GST)
Scaffolding (Inc. GST)
$11,000.00
$11,000.00
Project management (Inc. 
$8,800.00
$8,800.00
GST)
Purchase of new stone for 
$33,000.00
$22,000.00
$55,000.00
repairs/rebuild (Inc. GST)
Wall stabilisation, re-
$82,500.00
$82,500.00
pointing, repairs and 
capping (as per quote Inc. 
GST)
Audit Total #
$1,100.00
$1,100.00
Total project costs
$108,240.00
$19,800.00
$0.00
$0.00
$105,600.00
$233,640.00
# Note: A grant funding limit of $1,500 applies to the audit total.
Third party budget contributions – as indicated in your Project Budget
Has your organisation been granted co-contributions from an eligible third party (eg. not the Australian  
Government or your own organisation – see the Your Community Heritage guidelines for further detail on  
Yes
No
what contributions are acceptable), which help make up the required 50%+ co-contribution to the project? *
S.22
Ver. 20111117-1002 v5.4
Page 10 of 23

S.22

S.22

S.22

S.22

S.22

S.22

S.22

S.22

S.22

S.22

S.22

S.22

S.22