link to page 1 link to page 1 link to page 1
11 January 2022
Private and Confidential
Mr Julian Fidge
By email only: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx
Dear Mr Fidge
Decision about your request for documents
I am writing about your request for documents
1 which we received on 17 December 2021.
As an authorised decision maker,
2 this letter sets out a summary of my decision and outlines:
3
•
a summary of your request;
•
a list of the materials used to reach the decision;
•
the reasons for the decision; and
•
information about your review rights.
Your request
As you’ll know, we wrote to you on 30 December 2021 to provide you with information about the FOI
process and to acknowledge that we would consider your request for the following documents:
Please provide an overview of the amounts of money you have spent on training in the
financial years ending in 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021, and the subject areas in which
training was provided in those years.
At this time, we explained that we are legally required to make a decision about your request within
30 days. In your case, this means that we are required to make a decision by 17 January 2022.
How I made my decision
In reaching my decision I referred to:
•
the terms of your request;
•
searches conducted in relation to the scope of your request;
•
internal consultation with relevant business units;
1 Made under under the
Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth).
2 Under section 23 of the
Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth).
3 In accordance with section 26 of the
Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth).
Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency | National Boards
GPO Box 9958 Melbourne VIC 3001 Ahpra.gov.au 1300 419 495
Ahpra and the National Boards regulate these registered health professions: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health practice, Chinese
medicine, chiropractic, dental, medical, medical radiation practice, midwifery, nursing, occupational therapy, optometry, osteopathy,
paramedicine, pharmacy, physiotherapy, podiatry and psychology.
link to page 2
•
the FOI Act;
•
the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law, as enforced in each state and territory (the
National Law); and
•
FOI Guidelines issued by the Australian Information Commissioner.
Decision
I have conducted searches of Ahpra’s information holdings and have sought internal consultation
with relevant business units in relation to your request for ‘
an overview of the amounts of money you
have spent on training in the financial years ending in 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 and 2021, and the
subject areas in which training was provided in those years’.
Following these searches and consultations, I have concluded that there are no discrete documents
available that meet the terms of your request. It is important to understand that primarily, the FOI Act
is concerned with documents that already exist.
Although a discrete document within the scope of your request does not exist, I am also required to
consider whether a document could be produced by Ahpra in accordance with section 17 of the FOI
Act:
17 Requests involving use of computers etc.
(1)
Where:
(a)
a request (including a request in relation to which a practical refusal reason
exists) is made in accordance with the requirements of subsection 15(2) to an
agency;
(b)
it appears from the request that the desire of the applicant is for information that
is not available in discrete form in written documents of the agency; and
(ba) it does not appear from the request that the applicant wishes to be provided with
a computer tape or computer disk on which the information is recorded; and
(c)
the agency could produce a written document containing the information in
discrete form by:
(i)
the use of a computer or other equipment that is ordinarily available to the
agency for retrieving or collating stored information; or
(ii)
the making of a transcript from a sound recording held in the agency;
the agency shall deal with the request as if it were a request for access to a written
document so produced and containing that information and, for that purpose, this Act
applies as if the agency had such a document in its possession.
(2)
An agency is not required to comply with subsection (1) if compliance would
substantially and unreasonably divert the resources of the agency from its other
operations.
Production of a document under section 17 is dependent on the agency being able to produce a
written document containing the requested information in discrete form by using a computer in a
manner that is ‘ordinarily available’ to it to retrieve or collate stored information. In
Collection Point
Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation4 (referenced in the Australian Information Commissioner’s FOI
4 [2013] FCAFC 67.
Page 2 of 5
link to page 3 link to page 3 link to page 3 link to page 3
Guidelines),
5 the Full Federal Court of Australia held that the reference in section 17(1)(c)(i) to a
‘computer or other equipment that is ordinarily available’ means:
6
‘a functioning computer system including software, that can produce the requested document
without the aid of additional components which are not themselves ordinarily available … [T]he
computer or other equipment … must be capable of functioning independently to collate or
retrieve stored information and to produce the requested document.’
The Court found that this will be a question of fact in the individual case and may require
consideration of ‘the agency’s ordinary or usual conduct and operations’.
7
Following my enquiries into the practicality of producing a document in accordance with section 17, I
have been advised by the relevant internal business unit that Ahpra’s computer systems do not
currently enable us to easily produce a report or other discrete document detailing the information
you seek at the level of specificity requested.
Ahpra’s financial data is captured and reported at an aggregate level, without delineation by specific
subject area of training. To create a document sourcing data across multiple financial years that
would meet your request would require significant manual intervention in reviewing historical
expense items and classifying them according to a taxonomy that does not already apply at a
systems level.
In addition to this, over the period requested, Ahpra has undergone major systems changes and
account restructuring that would make the meaningful comparison and reporting of the requested
data across financial years impractical, without significant manual intervention and labour
expenditure.
Having considered all of the information available to me, I am of the view that the production of a
document in the terms you have requested would require the use of a computer in a manner that is
not ordinarily available to Ahpra and is outside of Ahpra’s ordinary or usual conduct and operations.
Accordingly, I find that section 17(1) does not apply to your request, and consequently there is no
obligation for Ahpra to create a document to satisfy your request.
Even if section 17(1) did apply, I would find that the work involved in creating the document would
amount to an unreasonable diversion of Ahpra’s resources under section 17(2). I make this finding
based on the description of the time and resources that would need to be expended to create the
document and undertake the processes under the FOI Act. I consider that the time and effort
required to produce the information to you would substantially and unreasonably divert Ahpra’s
resources away from the achievement of its statutory objectives and functions.
Further information
Although I have found that no existing document would meet your request and that Ahpra would be
unable to create such a document for you under the FOI Act, I would like to draw to your attention to
Ahpra’s annual report which does record the cost of ‘Staff development and amenities’ as an
aggregated item
8. Ahpra publishes a considerable amount of financial information in line with its
reporting obligations and this can be found publicly through our website.
Charges
No charges have been imposed for processing your request.
5 Australian Information Commissioner,
FOI Guidelines (combined June 2020) 3.204-3.210.
6
Collection Point Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2013] FCAFC 67 [43]-[44].
7
Collection Point Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2013] FCAFC 67 [48].
8 See for example,
Ahpra Annual Report 2020/21 at page 123.
Page 3 of 5
link to page 4 link to page 4
Review rights
If you disagree with my decision, you can ask for the decision to be reviewed.
Review of this decision by Ahpra
You may apply to Ahpra for a review of this decision.
9 Your application must be made by whichever
date is the later between:
•
30 days of you receiving this notice, or
•
15 days of you receiving the documents to which you have been granted access.
This review would not be conducted by me. To apply, it would help your case to explain why you
believe the original decision is not correct.
An application for a review of the decision should be addressed to:
Mailing address:
Mr Robert Green
Senior Legal Adviser
Ahpra
GPO Box 9958
MELBOURNE VIC 3001
Email address:
xxx@xxxxx.xxx.xx
If you choose to seek a review and disagree with that decision, you would subsequently have a right
to apply to the National Health Practitioner Privacy Commissioner (the Commissioner) for a review of
our decision. However, if you wish, you may choose to instead apply directly for review of this
decision to the Commissioner, as I describe below.
Review by the Commissioner
You can apply to the Commissioner to review an FOI decision made by Ahpra.
10 Your application
must be made within 60 days of receiving our decision.
The Commissioner is an independent office holder who may review decisions of Ahpra under the FOI
Act. You can contact them to seek review of this decision at the details listed below. An FOI review
application form is available on the National Health Practitioner Ombudsman (the Ombudsman)
website:
https://nhpo.gov.au/.
Complaints about the way we’ve managed your matter
If you want to provide feedback or make a complaint about Ahpra or a National Board then you can
contact our Complaints and Feedback team. Information about how to do this can be found on our
website:
https://www.ahpra.gov.au/About-AHPRA/Complaints.aspx.
If you’re unhappy with our response to your complaint, you can contact the Ombudsman. The details
are:
Mailing address:
National Health Practitioner Ombudsman
GPO Box 2630
MELBOURNE VIC 3001
9 Under section 54 of the
Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth).
10 Under section 54L of the
Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth).
Page 4 of 5
Email address:
xxxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx
Telephone enquiries: 1300 795 265
Contact
If you have any questions about anything in this letter please contact us at xxx@xxxxx.xxx.xx
quoting the reference number below.
Yours sincerely
Matthew Reghenzani
Senior Freedom of Information Officer
National Information Release Unit
Reference Number:
FOI34931
Page 5 of 5