Information on vulnerability index definition and number with this marker

LJ made this Freedom of Information request to Department of Human Services

The request is waiting for clarification. If you are LJ, please sign in to send a follow up message.

From: LJ

Delivered

Dear Department of Human Services,

In an interview with Tom Tilley from Triple J Hack on 21 February 2017, Minister Alan Tudge said, "Now, if a person that we know is vulnerable and they've got a vulnerability indicator on their file, they will not be sent any sort of notice. They simply are not covered…"

ALAN TUDGE:
Well, as I said, if they've got any sort of vulnerability index written on his file, then they don't get sent these notices.

Transcript: https://www.mhs.gov.au/transcripts/2017-...

The Freedom of Information request is for clarification and information on:

1. What constitutes "vulnerability"?

2. What is the description and definition of the Vulnerability index and descriptions of individual index items?

3. How many people on the Centrelink system have this marker on their file currently? How many people on the Centrelink system had this marker on their file at any time in 2016 calendar year?

4. Please provide workflow information on the process that this marker gets added to a file, what can trigger it and by whom?

5. When and how can the vulnerability marker be updated, change or expire? Which markers expire and how is does this occur? Manual or automatic? How are reviews conducted before expiration?

6. Which agencies and individual roles have access to this information? Including external agencies such as debt collectors?

Yours faithfully,

Lyndsey Jackson

Link to this

Alex Sadleir left an annotation ()

Link to this

From: FOI.LEGAL.TEAM
Department of Human Services


Attachment image001.png
2K Download

Attachment LEX 27725 Correspondence Your Freedom of Information Request.pdf
155K Download View as HTML


Dear Lyndsey

 

Please find attached correspondence in relation to your Freedom of
Information request (LEX 27725).

 

Regards

 

Authorised FOI Decision Maker

Freedom of Information Team

FOI and Litigation Branch | Legal Services Division

Department of Human Services

[1][email address]

[2]cid:image001.png@01D29900.36429A70

show quoted sections

 

**********************************************************************
IMPORTANT: This e-mail is for the use of the intended recipient only and
may contain information that is confidential, commercially valuable and/or
subject to legal or parliamentary privilege. If you are not the intended
recipient you are notified that any review, re-transmission, disclosure,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon,
this information is prohibited and may result in severe penalties. If you
have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender immediately
and delete all electronic and hard copies of this transmission together
with any attachments. Please consider the environment before printing this
e-mail
**********************************************************************

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]

Link to this

LJ left an annotation ()

The response I got was that I'm not asking for specific documents there for no comply right?

On the whole the vulnerability indicators have general information online, and I'd seen that - and thanks to Alex for the additional links.

3-6 aren't covered though. But from the Departments response I need to ask for a specific document no?

Link to this

Bill Tarte left an annotation ()

Your requests seem like things that would be in a documents so prefacing each section with something like "any document that contains or describes XXX" should cover it. Most other agencies respond with a suggestion to do something similar to that when general questions are asked through FOI (or work on administrative access but that isn't the DHS way it seems).

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Department of Human Services only: