Stork

Correspondence relating to the Australian Public Service Commissioner's representative's putative power of veto

Response by Federal Court of Australia to Stork on June 20, 2022.

Awaiting classification.

OFFICIAL Dear Stork Please find attached correspondence from the Federal Court of Australia. Kind regards FOI Officer Federal Court of Australia F...

Work practices manual

Response by Commonwealth Ombudsman to Stork on May 04, 2022.

Awaiting classification.

OFFICIAL Dear Stork I attach the following things in response to your Freedom of Information request of 4 April 2022: o My decision...

Untried lawyers score key positions

Response by Federal Court of Australia to Stork on April 29, 2022.

Refused.

Our reference: MR22/00669 By email: [FOI #8571 email] Receipt of your IC review application Thank you for your application for Information...

Australian Public Service Commissioner's power of veto over SES selection processes

Response by Attorney-General's Department to Stork on April 12, 2022.

Refused.

OFFICIAL Dear Applicant Freedom of Information Request FOI22/048 I refer to your request to the Attorney-General's Department (the departmen...

Record keeping documents

Response by Australian Public Service Commission to Stork on April 08, 2022.

Partially successful.

OFFICIAL Dear Applicant Reference is made to the attached. Regards FOI OFFICER Legal Services Australian Public Service Commiss...

Australian Public Service Commissioner's powers of veto over SES selection processes

Response by Commonwealth Ombudsman to Stork on March 23, 2022.

Long overdue.

OFFICIAL Dear Anonymous I attach correspondence in relation to your Freedom of Information request of 13 March 2022. Yours sincerely...

Vetoing SES selection decisions

Response by Federal Court of Australia to Stork on March 21, 2022.

Refused.

OFFICIAL Dear Stork Please find attached correspondence from the Federal Court of Australia. Kind regards FOI Officer Federal Court of Australia...

Merit selection and engaging people into roles when they do not meet essential criteria

Response by Federal Court of Australia to Stork on March 17, 2022.

Refused.

OFFICIAL Dear Stork Please find attached correspondence from the Federal Court of Australia. Kind regards FOI Officer Federal Court of Australia...

Selecting candidates for jobs who do not meet essential criteria

Response by Attorney-General's Department to Stork on March 08, 2022.

Refused.

OFFICIAL Dear Stork Freedom of Information Request FOI22/031 I refer to your request to the Attorney-General's Department (the department) u...

Merit based selection

Response by Australian Public Service Commission to Stork on March 03, 2022.

Successful.

OFFICIAL Dear Applicant Please find attached: · A Decision Notice; and · Document 1. Regards FOI OFFICER...

Veto on SES appointments

Response by Australian Public Service Commission to Stork on February 28, 2022.

Refused.

OFFICIAL Dear Applicant A decision notice is enclosed. Regards FOI OFFICER Legal Services Australian Public Service Commiss...

Untried lawyers score key positions

Request to Federal Court of Australia by Stork. Annotated by Stork on April 29, 2022.

Refused.

My IC review request, which was submitted on 29 April 2022: I would like the Information Commissioner to consider the correspondence provided by B He...

Right to Know

Track this person

On this page

This person's Freedom of Information requests (approximately 11)

This person's 1 annotation

Right to Know