This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Question re: Staffing'.



Our reference: FOI 22/23-1672 
 
 
21 June 2023 
GPO Box 700 
Canberra   ACT   2601 
 
1800 800 110 
Robert Stokes 
ndis.gov.au 
Right to Know 
 
By email: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx  
 
 
Dear Robert Stokes 
Freedom of Information request — Notification of Decision 
Thank you for your correspondence of 11 June 2023. I have chosen to treat your request as 
a request for access to documents held by the National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA), 
under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (FOI Act). 
The purpose of this letter is to provide you with a decision on your request. 
Scope of your request 
You have queried: “Are Scott Britton and Jason Ryman stil  employed by the agency?” 
You have not provided any further information to direct searches for documents. Also, I am 
not satisfied that you have the any authority or consent to receive the requested information 
about a third party. 
Decision on access to documents 
I am authorised to make decisions under section 23(1) of the FOI Act. My decision on your 
request and the reasons for my decision are set out below.  
I have decided to refuse your request under section 47F of the FOI Act. In reaching my 
decision, I took the following into account:  
•  your correspondence outlining the scope of your request 
•  the nature and content of the documents falling within the scope of your request 
•  the FOI Act  
•  the FOI Guidelines published under section 93A of the FOI Act 
•  Decisions and guidance published by the Office of the Australian Information 
Commissioner which address personal information, and  
•  the NDIA’s operating environment and functions. 
Reasons for decision 
Personal privacy (section 47F)  
Section 47F of the FOI Act conditionally exempts a document if its disclosure would involve 
the unreasonable disclosure of personal information about any person (including a deceased 
person). 
 

 
Paragraph 6.127 of the FOI Guidelines states that The FOI Act shares the same definition of 
‘personal information’ as the Privacy Act, which regulates the handling of personal 
information about individuals (see s 4(1) of the FOI Act and s 6 of the Privacy Act). The 
cornerstone of the Privacy Act’s privacy protection framework is the Australian Privacy 
Principles (APPs), a set of legally binding principles that apply to both Australian 
Government agencies and private sector organisations that are subject to the Act. Detailed 
guidance about the APPs is available in the Information Commissioner’s APP Guidelines. 
 
Paragraphs 6.128 of the FOI Guidelines provides that personal information means 
information or an opinion about an identified individual, or an individual who is reasonably 
identifiable: 
a.  whether the information or opinion is true or not 
b.  whether the information or opinion is recorded in a material form or not. 
 
Paragraph 6.129 of the FOI Guidelines provides that personal information is: 
•  information about an identified individual or an individual who is reasonably identifiable 
•  says something about a person 
•  may be opinion 
•  may be true or untrue 
•  may be recorded in material form or not. 
 
I am satisfied that documents that fall within the scope of your request, were they to exist, 
would meet the definition of ‘personal information’. 
 
Section 47F(2) of the FOI Act provides that in determining whether the disclosure of 
documents would involve unreasonable disclosure of personal information, regard must be 
had to: 
a.  the extent to which the information is well known 
b.  whether the person to whom the information relates is known to be (or to have been) 
associated with the matters dealt with in the document 
c.  the availability of the information from publicly accessible sources 
d.  any other matters that the agency considers relevant. 
With reference to this assessment, and without any evidence before me that you are 
authorised to obtain any documents on behalf of or about either named individual, I have 
decided that it would be unreasonable to publicly disclose any personal information to you, 
were it to exist. 
Accordingly, I have decided that any information, if it were to exist, would be conditionally 
exempt under section 47F of the FOI Act. My considerations of the public interest test are 
set out below. 
Public interest considerations – section 47F 
Section 11A(5) of the FOI Act provides that access to a document covered by a conditional 
exemption must be provided unless disclosure would be contrary to the public interest. 
Irrelevant factors 
I have not considered any of the irrelevant factors as set out under section 11B(4) of the FOI 
Act in making this decision. 
Factors favouring disclosure 



In favour of disclosure, I have considered the factors outlined in section 11B(3) of the FOI 
Act, and have determined that disclosure of documents, were they to exist, would promote 
the objects of the FOI Act by providing access to documents held by the government. 
Factors against disclosure 
Against disclosure, I consider that disclosure of documents, were they to exist: 
•  Would not contribute to the publication of information of sufficient public interest value to 
justify impinging on personal privacy rights 
•  Would not enhance Australia’s representative democracy in the ways described in 
section 11B(3) of the FOI Act 
•  Would not inform any debate on a matter of public importance or promote oversight of 
public expenditure 
•  Would cause stress on the third party 
•  Would serve no public purpose through release. 
Consideration of harm factors 
While there is limited public interest in the disclosure of personal information, the harm that 
may result from the disclosure of any such exempt information is that it may unreasonably 
affect an individual’s right to privacy by having their personal information in the public 
domain.   
Weighing the relevant factors to determine where the public interest lies 
In summary the factors against disclosure of the information, were it to exist, outweigh the 
factors in favour of disclosure.  I am satisfied that if the information were to exist, it would be 
contrary to the public interest to release this information to you, and would be exempt under 
section 47F of the FOI Act. 
 
Rights of review 

Your rights to seek a review of my decision, or lodge a complaint, are set out at 
Attachment A
 
Please contact us at xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx if you have any questions or require help. 
 
Yours sincerely 
 
Cooper 
Senior Freedom of Information Officer   
Parliamentary, Ministerial & FOI Branch 
Government Division 
 
 


Attachment A 
Your review rights  
 
Internal Review 
The FOI Act gives you the right to apply for an internal review of this decision. The review 
wil  be conducted by a different person to the person who made the original decision. 
 
If you wish to seek an internal review of the decision, you must apply for the review, in 
writing, within 30 days of receipt of this letter. 
 
No particular form is required for an application for internal review, but to assist the review 
process, you should clearly outline your grounds for review (that is, the reasons why you 
disagree with the decision). Applications for internal review can be lodged by email to 
xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx or sent by post to: 
  Freedom of Information Section 
Parliamentary, Ministerial & FOI 
Government Division 
National Disability Insurance Agency 
GPO Box 700 
CANBERRA   ACT   2601 
 
Review by the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner 
The FOI Act also gives you the right to apply to the Office of the Australian Information 
Commissioner (OAIC) to seek a review of this decision. 
 
If you wish to have the decision reviewed by the OAIC, you may apply for the review, in 
writing, or by using the online merits review form available on the OAIC’s website at 
www.oaic.gov.au, within 60 days of receipt of this letter.  
 
Applications for review can be lodged with the OAIC in the following ways: 
 
Online: 
www.oaic.gov.au 
Post:  
GPO Box 5218, Sydney NSW 2001 
Email:  
xxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx 
Phone:   1300 363 992 (local cal  charge) 
 
Complaints to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner or the 
Commonwealth Ombudsman 
You may complain to either the Commonwealth Ombudsman or the OAIC about actions 
taken by the NDIA in relation to your request. The Ombudsman wil  consult with the OAIC 
before investigating a complaint about the handling of an FOI request. 
 
Your complaint to the OAIC can be directed to the contact details identified above. 
Your complaint to the Ombudsman can be directed to: 
 
Phone: 
1300 362 072 (local cal  charge) 
Email:  
xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx  
 
Your complaint should be in writing and should set out the grounds on which it is considered 
that the actions taken in relation to the request should be investigated.