This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Runway 30 Noise Abatement Trial - Number of Survey Respondents Living Directly Under the Current Flight Path'.

Dr Andrew Terhorst 
Office of General Counsel 
By email: 
GPO Box 367 
Dear Mr Terhost 
ABN 59 698 720 886 
FOI 23-19 - Decision on Access 
I refer to the request made under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth) (FOI Act) to 
Airservices Australia (Airservices) on 15 July 2023 (the request). It seeks access to: 
  a document that sets out the amount of respondents to the Hobart NAPs survey that were living 
directly under the flight path. 
I am authorised under section 23 of the FOI Act and the Airservices Instrument of Delegation and 
Authorisation to make decisions on primary requests under the FOI Act. 
Section 24A Decision – Documents do not exist 

Section 24A of the FOI Act provides in part that an agency may refuse a request for access to a 
document if all reasonable steps have been taken to find the document and the agency is satisfied 
that it does not exist. 
The FOI request seeks a breakdown of the respondents to the Hobart NAPs survey by location, 
specifically between those living directly under the flight path and those that were not. As part of 
conducting the survey we collected information on the suburbs and wider areas that the respondents 
lived in, but not whether they lived directly under the flight paths.  
Given that suburbs can vary in size along with respondents locations within those suburbs we 
cannot say that the location data held by Airservices is not definitive proof as to whether those 
respondents live directly under a flight path or simply close to one. 
As a result we do not have the documents sought by this request and have decided to refuse it 
under section 24A of the FOI Act. 
Review rights and complaints 
Information about your rights of review and how you can make a complaint about the handling of 
your request is at Attachment A
If you wish to discuss my decision please contact me at 
Yours sincerely 
Alan Hilvert-Bruce 
Authorised FOI Decision Maker 
11 August 2023 

The Freedom of Information Act 1982 (the FOI Act) gives you the right to apply for a review of this 
decision via: 
an internal review; or 
the Australian Information Commissioner (Information Commissioner). 
Internal review 

If you apply for internal review, it wil  be carried out by a different decision-maker who wil  make a 
fresh decision on your application.  An application for review must be: 
made in writing; 
made within 30 days of receiving this letter; and 
sent to 
No particular form is required, but it is desirable to set out in the application the grounds upon which 
you consider the decision should be reviewed. 
If the internal review results in you not being provided access to all of the documents to which you 
have requested access, you have the right to seek a review of that decision by the Information 
Information Commissioner review 
You can opt to instead seek external review by the Information Commissioner. To seek review you 
must apply to the Information Commissioner within 60 days of the receipt of this decision letter. 
Further details on this process can be found on their website at 
You wil  also have the opportunity to seek Information Commissioner review of an Internal Review if 
you are dissatisfied with its outcome. 
Complaints to the Information Commissioner 
Information Commissioner 

You may also complain to the Information Commissioner concerning action taken by an agency in 
the exercise of powers or the performance of functions under the FOI Act. There is no fee for 
making a complaint. A complaint to the Information Commissioner must be made in writing. Further 
details on this process can be found on their website at 

Document Outline