This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Legal fees incurred by NDIS in pursuing matter 2023/3262 Davidson vs National Disability Insurance Scheme.'.



Our reference: FOI 23/24-0161 
GPO Box 700 
Canberra   ACT   2601 
1800 800 110 
13 October 2023 
ndis.gov.au 
 
 
D.Davidson 
 
By email: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx 
 
 
Dear D.Davidson 
 
Freedom of Information request — Notification of Decision 
 
Thank you for your correspondence of 15 August 2023, in which you requested access to 
documents held by the National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA), under the Freedom of 
Information Act 1982
 (FOI Act). 
 
The purpose of this letter is to provide you with a decision on your request. 
 
Scope of your request  
You have requested access to the following documents: 
 
Please provide all documents which are related to the costs charged to the National 
Disability Insurance Scheme and or any other Government Department (including costs 
borne by the department in relation to the Commonwealth, defending the matter 
2023/3262 Davidson vs National Disability Insurance Agency in the Administrative 
Appeals Tribunal (AAT), as well as in-house. 
 
This includes any documents; 
a. Hours worked and have not been charged to another government department; b. All 
invoices issued by Makinson d'Apice Lawyers; c. Fees and invoices issued by AGS 
(Australian Government Solicitor); d. Any other document which falls within the scope of 
this request that the department holds. 
 
This is from period January 2022 - current. 

 
Decision on access to documents 
I am authorised to make decisions under section 23(1) of the FOI Act. My decision on your 
request and the reasons for my decision are set out below.  
 
I have identified 1 document, which fall within the scope of your request.  
 
The document was identified by conducting searches of NDIA’s systems, using all 
reasonable search terms that could return documents relevant to your request, and 
consulting with relevant NDIA staff who could be expected to be able to identify documents 
within the scope of the request. 
 
I have decided to grant access to 1 document in part. 
 
In reaching my decision, I took the following into account: 
  your correspondence outlining the scope of your request 
 


  the nature and content of the documents falling within the scope of your request 
  the FOI Act  
  the FOI Guidelines published under section 93A of the FOI Act 
  relevant case law concerning the operation of the FOI Act  
  consultation with relevant NDIA staff 
  factors relevant to my assessment of whether or not disclosure would be in the public 
interest 
  the NDIA’s operating environment and functions. 
 
Reasons for decision 
 
Business Information (section 47G) 
Some documents falling within scope of your request contain information that is conditionally 
exempt from release under section 47G of the FOI Act.  
 
Section 47G of the FOI Act conditionally exempts a document if its disclosure would disclose 
information concerning a person in respect of their business or professional affairs or 
concerning the business, commercial or financial affairs of an organisation or undertaking, in 
which the disclosure of the information: 
  would or could reasonably be expected to, unreasonably affect that person adversely in 
respect of their lawful business or professional affairs of that organisation or undertaking 
in respect of its lawful business, commercial or financial affairs; or 
  could reasonably be expected to prejudice the future supply of information to the 
Commonwealth or an agency for the purpose of the administration of a law of the 
Commonwealth or of a Territory or the administration of matters administered by an 
agency. 
 
The information that is conditionally exempt includes sensitive business details of a third 
party that were provided to the Agency in confidence with an expectation that they would not 
be disclosed further. The third party has contended that the disclosure of this information 
would unreasonably affect their business affairs, in that it would infringe on confidentiality 
agreements and could unfairly affect the lawful operations of their business.  
 
I am satisfied that the disclosure of this information could unreasonably and adversely affect 
the business affairs of a third party and affect any potential or current business relationship 
with the Agency. 
 
Public interest considerations – section 47G 
Section 11A(5) of the FOI Act provides that access to a document covered by a conditional 
exemption must be provided unless disclosure would be contrary to the public interest.  
 
I have not considered any of the irrelevant factors as set out under section 11B(4) of the FOI 
Act in making this decision. 
 
In favour of disclosure, I have considered the factors outlined in section 11B(3) of the FOI 
Act, and I have determined that disclosure of the relevant information in Document 1 would 
promote the objects of the FOI Act by providing access to documents held by the 
government and providing access to information relating to the matter 2023/3262. 
 
Against disclosure, I consider that disclosure of the relevant information in Document 1:  
  would not contribute to the publication of information of sufficient public interest to justify 
the likely harm caused by release 
  would not enhance Australia’s representative democracy in the ways described in 
section 11B(3) of the FOI Act 
2 


  would not inform any debate on a matter of public importance, or promote oversight of 
public expenditure. 
 
While there is limited public interest in the disclosure of information conditionally exempt 
under section 47G of the FOI Act, the harm that would result from disclosure is that it could 
reasonably be expected to:  
  compromise the business or professional affairs of a third party and interfere with their 
ability to undertake their lawful business. 
 
In summary, I am satisfied that the factors against disclosure of the information outweigh the 
factors in favour of disclosure and that, on balance, it would be contrary to the public interest 
to release this information to you. Accordingly, I have decided that the relevant information in 
Document 1 is exempt under section 47G of the FOI Act. 
 
Release of documents 
The document for release, as referred to in the Schedule of Documents at Attachment A, is 
enclosed. 
 
Rights of review 
Your rights to seek a review of my decision, or lodge a complaint, are set out at 
Attachment B

 
Should you have any enquiries concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me 
by email at xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx. 
 
 
 
Ankit 
Senior Freedom of Information Officer 
Parliamentary, Ministerial & FOI Branch 
Government Division 
3 

Attachment A 
 
Schedule of Documents for FOI 23/24-0161 
 
Document 
Page 
Description 
Access Decision 
number 
number 
1 1-3 
Makinson d'Apice Invoice 235308  
PARTIAL ACCESS 
 
Exemption claimed: 
Date: 28 August 2023 
s47G – business information 
4 


 
Attachment B 
Your review rights  
 
Internal Review  
The FOI Act gives you the right to apply for an internal review of this decision. The review 
will be conducted by a different person to the person who made the original decision. 
 
If you wish to seek an internal review of the decision, you must apply for the review, in 
writing, within 30 days of receipt of this letter. 
 
No particular form is required for an application for internal review, but to assist the review 
process, you should clearly outline your grounds for review (that is, the reasons why you 
disagree with the decision). Applications for internal review can be lodged by email to 
xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx or sent by post to: 
 
Freedom of Information Section  
Parliamentary, Ministerial & FOI Branch  
Government Division 
National Disability Insurance Agency 
GPO Box 700 
CANBERRA   ACT   2601 
 
Review by the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner 
The FOI Act also gives you the right to apply to the Office of the Australian Information 
Commissioner (OAIC) to seek a review of this decision. 
 
If you wish to have the decision reviewed by the OAIC, you may apply for the review, in 
writing, or by using the online merits review form available on the OAIC’s website at 
www.oaic.gov.au, within 60 days of receipt of this letter.  
 
Applications for review can be lodged with the OAIC in the following ways: 
 
Online: 
www.oaic.gov.au  
Post:  
GPO Box 5218, Sydney NSW 2001 
Email: 
xxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx 
Phone: 
1300 363 992 (local call charge) 
 
Complaints to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner or the 
Commonwealth Ombudsman 
You may complain to either the Commonwealth Ombudsman or the OAIC about actions 
taken by the NDIA in relation to your request. The Ombudsman will consult with the OAIC 
before investigating a complaint about the handling of an FOI request. 
 
Your complaint to the OAIC can be directed to the contact details identified above. Your 
complaint to the Ombudsman can be directed to: 
 
Phone: 
1300 362 072 (local call charge) 
Email:  
xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx  
 
Your complaint should be in writing and should set out the grounds on which it is considered 
that the actions taken in relation to the request should be investigated