This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Budgeted costs for Prince Harry attachment'.


Information Management  
and Access Branch 
Department of Defence 
 
 
 
CP1-6-001 
PO Box 7910 
 
CANBERRA BC  ACT  2610 
 
Tel: 02 626 62200 
 
Fax: 02 626 62112 
xxx@xxxxxxx.xxx.xx 
 
 
 
 
Our reference:   FOI 353/14/15 
 
 
Mr Nicholas Golsvelt 
 
By email: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx 
 
 
Dear Mr Golsvelt 
NOTICE OF DECISION ON FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST 
1. 
I refer to your email, dated 2 May 2015, in which you requested access, under the 
Freedom of Information Act 1982 (FOI Act), to: 
“…the budgeted costs related to Price [sic] Harry of the United Kingdom's attachment 
to the Australian Defence Forces, that are above and beyond normal operating 
costs…”
 
Background 
2. 
The purpose of this letter is to provide you with the decision relating to the documents 
that are the subject of your request. 
FOI decision maker 
3. 
Lieutenant Colonel (LTCOL) Damien Spendelove, Chief Legal Officer, Office of the 
Chief of Army, is the authorised officer pursuant to section 23 of the FOI Act to make a 
decision on this FOI request. 
Documents identified 
4. 
LTCOL Spendelove identified one document as matching the description of your 
request. The document in the form approved for release is at Enclosure 1. 
Decision 
5. 
LTCOL Spendelove has decided to partially release the document with deletions made 
in accordance with subsection 22(1) [Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter 
deleted] of the FOI Act, on the grounds that the deleted material is considered exempt under 
section 47F [personal privacy] of the FOI Act. 
Defending Australia and its National Interests 
 

 
2
Material taken into account 
6. 
In making his decision, LTCOL Spendelove had regard to: 
a. 
the terms of the request; 
b. 
the content of the identified document in issue; 
c. 
relevant provisions in the FOI Act; and 
d. 
the Guidelines published by the Office of the Australian Information 
Commissioner under section 93A of the FOI Act (the Guidelines). 
Reasons for decision   
Personal privacy – Section 47F of the FOI Act 
7. 
The document contains signatures of APS personnel and the PMKeyS number of an 
ADF member.  
8. 
To determine whether the disclosure of the identified personal information was 
unreasonable, LTCOL Spendelove had regard to the criteria specified in section 47F(2) of the 
FOI Act: 
 
a. 
the extent to which the information is well known; 
 
b. 
whether the persons to whom the information relates are known to be (or to 
have been) associated with the matters dealt with in the document; and 
 
c. 
the availability of the information from publicly accessible sources. 
9. 
Against these three criteria, LTCOL Spendelove found: 
 
a. 
the specific personal information listed is not well known; 
 
b. 
the individuals whose personal information is contained in the document are 
not widely known to be associated with the matters dealt with in the documents; and 
 
c. 
the information is not readily available from publicly accessible sources. 
 
10. 
With reference to the assessment above, LTCOL Spendelove considers that the release 
of signatures and PMKeyS numbers would be an unreasonable disclosure of personal 
information and therefore conditionally exempt under section 47F(1) of the FOI Act. 
11. 
Section 11 (5) of the FOI Act requires Defence to allow access to conditionally 
exempt documents unless access to the documents would be contrary to the public interest. 
Public interest considerations – Section 47F  
12. 
When assessing whether disclosure is on balance, contrary to the public interest, 
LTCOL Spendelove has considered the guidelines provided by the Australian Information 
Commissioner, together with a range of factors that favour access to a document as set out in 
section 11B(3) [Public interest exemptions – factors] of the FOI Act.  
13. 
LTCOL Spendelove has considered the public interest in promoting the objects of the 
FOI Act. In this regard, he is satisfied that the identified personal information would not 
inform public debate on any matter of public importance. Additionally, the disclosure of this 
information would not promote oversight on public expenditure or allow a person to access 
his or her own personal information.  


 
3
14. 
In coming to his decision, LTCOL Spendelove also considered subsection 11B(4) 
[public interest exemptions – irrelevant factors] of the FOI Act listing factors that must not be 
taken into account in deciding whether access would, on balance, be contrary to the public 
interest.  None of the factors he took into account were listed under subsection 11B(4) of the 
FOI Act. 
15. 
LTCOL Spendelove found that the public interest factors against disclosure outweigh 
the factors for disclosure of the identified personal information and deem the information 
exempt under section 47F of the FOI Act.  
Disclosure Log 
16. 
In accordance with the requirements of section 11C of the FOI Act, Defence is 
required to publish details of information released under the FOI Act.  Defence publishes 
identified documents relating to requests five working days following receipt by the applicant.  
Defence will also publish this decision notice with privacy deletions.   
Rights of review 
17. 
The FOI Act provides for rights of review of decisions. A copy of the fact sheet, 
“Freedom of Information – Your Review Rights”, setting out your rights of review is at 
Enclosure 2. 
Further information 
18. 
The FOI Act may be accessed at: http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/C2015C00013. 
19. 
All departmental action on your request is now complete. Should you have any 
questions in regard to this matter please contact this office. 
Yours sincerely 
 
 
 
John Peterson 
Case Officer 
Freedom of Information 
 
18 May 2015  
 
Enclosures: 
1. 
Document in the form for release 
2. 
Fact Sheet: Freedom of Information – Your Review Rights 




s47F
s47F
s47F
s47F






 
 
 
 
 
Freedom of Information – Your Review Rights 
 
If you disagree with the decision made by the Department of Defence or the Minister under the Freedom 
of Information Act 1982 
(the FOI Act), you can ask for the decision to be reviewed. You may want to seek 
review if you sought certain documents and were not given full access, if you have been informed that 
there will be a charge for processing your request, if your application to have your personal information 
amended was not accepted or your comments in response to formal consultation were not accepted.  
 
There are two ways you can ask for review of a decision: internal review by Defence, or external review by 
the Australian Information Commissioner.  
 
Internal review 
Post: Freedom of Information Directorate 
          Department of Defence 
If  Defence  makes  an  FOI  decision  that  you 
          CP1‐6‐029 
disagree with, you can ask Defence to review its 
          PO Box 7910 
decision.  The  review  will  be  conducted 
          CANBERRA BC   ACT   2610 
independently  to  the  FOI  Directorate.  There  is 
 
NO charge for internal review.  
 
External Review 
You must apply within 30 days of being notified 
of  the  decision,  unless  you  have  sought  an 
Do  I  have  to  go  through  the  Defence’s  internal 
extension from Defence. 
review process first? 
 
No.  You  may  apply  directly  to  the  Information 
Defence must make a review decision within 30 
Commissioner,  within  60  days  of  receiving  your 
days.  Where  Defence  has  not  met  its  review 
decision.  However,  going  through  the  Defence 
obligation,  you  may  then  approach  the 
internal  review  process  gives  Defence  the 
Information Commissioner.  
opportunity to reconsider its initial decision and 
 
your  concerns  will  most  likely  be  addressed 
Internal review is not available if the Minister or 
more  quickly,  without  undergoing  an  external 
the  principal  officer  of  the  agency  made  the 
review process. 
decision personally. 
 
 
When can I go to the Administrative Appeals 
How to apply for internal review 
Tribunal (AAT)? 
 
 
You  must  apply  in  writing  and  should  include  a 
Under the revised FOI Act, you must seek 
copy of the notice of the decision provided and 
external review through the Information 
the points to which you are objecting and why. 
Commissioner prior to applying to the AAT for 
 
such a review. 
You  can  lodge  your  application  in  one  of  the 
 
following ways: 
Making a complaint 
 
 
Email: xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxx.xxx.xx 
You  may  make  a  complaint  to  Defence  or  the 
Fax: +61 2 626 62112 
Commonwealth  Ombudsman  about  actions 
 
taken by Defence in relation to your application.  
 
 
 

Contacting the Information Commissioner 
 
Further information about the external review process is available at the following: 
 
Online: www.oaic.gov.au  
Post: GPO Box 2999, Canberra ACT 2601 
Fax: +61 2 9284 9666 
Email: xxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx 
Contacting the Commonwealth Ombudsman 
The Commonwealth Ombudsman investigates complaints about action taken by agencies under the FOI 
Act.   Further details on how to contact or find out more about making a complaint to the Commonwealth 
Ombudsman are available at the following: 
 
http://www.ombudsman.gov.au/pages/making‐a‐complaint/ 
 
Complaints  can  be  made  in  writing,  by  phone,  in  person  or  by  using  an  online  form  available  on  the 
website: http://www.ombudsman.gov.au/pages/contact‐us/ 
 
 
Post: GPO Box 442, CANBERRA ACT 2601 
Phone 1300 362 072 (calls from mobile phones at mobile phone rates) 
Fax: 02 6276 0123 
 
 
Defence FOI contacts 
 
Freedom of Information Directorate 
Department of Defence 
CP1‐6‐029 
PO Box 7910 
CANBERRA BC   ACT   2610 
 
Ph: +61 2 626 63664 
Fax: +61 2 626 62112 
 
Email: xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxx.xxx.xx 
Website: www.defence.gov.au/foi 
 
 
 

Document Outline