This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Corruption at the APSC – John Lloyd, Marco Spaccavento, the Liberal Party and the IPA'.


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NTS 
 
By email: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx 
 
Our reference: LEX 640 
 
Dear Applicant 
 
Freedom of Information request  
 
1. I am writing about your request dated 8 September 2023 for access to documents under 
the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (FOI Act) held by the Australian Public Service 
Commission (Commission).  
 
2. I am an authorised officer under subsection 23(1) of the FOI Act able to make decisions in 
relation to Freedom of Information (FOI) requests.  
 
Your request  
 
3. You requested access to documents in the following terms:  
 
“Under the FOI Act, I seek a copy of any document prepared by the APSC from 1 January 
2023 onwards, and provided to any of the following: 
 
i) media organisations, 
 
ii) Commonwealth agency heads, or 
 
iii) lobby groups such as the IPA or the Centre for Independent studies 
in relation to the working conditions of the non-SES APS employees.” 
 
My decision 
 
 
4. As I advised you on 27 September 2023, I decided that a practical refusal reason existed 
for your FOI request under section 24AA of the FOI Act and initiated a ‘request consultation 
process’. In that letter I requested you withdraw your request, revise it or tell us you do not 
wish to revise it.  
 

 

5. You wrote to me on 28 September 2023, where you provided submissions and agreed to 
re-scope parts of your request.  
 
6. You narrowed down the scope of your request to: 
 
“A copy of any document prepared by the APSC from 1 January 2023 onwards, and provided 
to:  
 
i) media organisations, or  
 
ii) the Institute of Public Affairs (ie. www.ipa.org.au)   
 
in relation to the working conditions of the non-SES APS employees. 
 
I’m willing to exclude from my request, the personal information of any person who isn’t, or 
wasn’t at the relevant time, a Commonwealth public servant or a statutory officer. Noting 
paragraphs 6.153 and 6.154 of the FOI Guidelines issued under s.93A of the FOI Act, there’ll 
therefore be no need to consult with any person whose personal information is included in a 
relevant document.” 
 

7. I am writing to you now to advise that following a request consultation process, I am 
satisfied that a practical refusal decision still exists. I am therefore refusing your request under 
paragraph 24(1)(b) of the FOI Act. 
 
8. In making this decision I have had regard to: 
  the terms of your request.  
  the terms of your submissions in response to the request consultation process.  
  the FOI Act; and 
  the FOI Guidelines issued by the Australian Information Commissioner. 
 
Reasons 
 
8. I am of the view that processing your request would be a substantial diversion of the 
Commission's resources because:  
 
  identifying, locating and or collating documents would be onerous as it is estimated 
that the volume of documents found will be significant, for the timeframe you have 
specified in your request.  
 
9. I am also of the view that processing your request would be an unreasonable diversion of the 
Commission's resources because:  
 
  the Commission is a portfolio agency, with limited staffing resources available;  
  the Commission does not have, nor has ever previously required, any permanent 
dedicated FOI staffing resources as it has historically received a low number of FOI 
requests that are capable of being managed within the existing resources;  
  the Commission has limited capacity to obtain temporary resourcing in considering the 
impact of processing your request; and  
  the Commission is currently working on a number of priority matters and processing your 
request would unreasonably divert resources that would otherwise be dedicated to 

 

performing the essential operations of the agency, including in relation to the working 
conditions of non-SES APS employees.  
 
Review rights 
 
11. You are entitled to seek review of this decision. Your review rights are set out at 
Attachment A. 
 
Contacts 
 
12. If you require clarification on matters in this letter please contact the Commission’s FOI 
Officer by email at xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx. 
 
Yours sincerely 
 
 
 
Melanie McIntyre 
Authorised FOI decision maker 
6 October 2023 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 

ATTACHMENT A  
 
Rights of Review 
 
 
Asking for a full explanation of a Freedom of Information decision 
 
 
If you are dissatisfied with this decision, you may seek review. Before you seek review of a 
Freedom of Information (FOI) decision, you may contact us to discuss your request and we 
will explain the decision to you.  
 
Seeking review of a Freedom of Information decision 
 
 
If you still believe a decision is incorrect, the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (the FOI Act) 
may give you the right to apply for a review of the decision. Under sections 54 and 54L of the 
FOI Act, you can apply for a review of an FOI decision by seeking:  
 
1. an internal review by an different officer of the Australian Public Service Commission; 
and/or  
2. external review by the Australian Information Commissioner.  
 
There are no fees applied to either review option.  
 
Applying for a review by an Internal Review Officer 
 
 
If you apply for internal review, a different decision maker to the agency delegate who made 
the original decision will carry out the review. The Internal Review Officer will consider all 
aspects of the original decision and decide whether it should change. An application for 
internal review must be made in writing within 30 days of receiving this letter to:  
 
Email: 
xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx  
 
Post: The FOI Officer 
Australian Public Service Commission 
B Block, Treasury Building 
GPO Box 3176 
Parkes Place West 
PARKES ACT 2600 
 
You do not need to fill in a form. However, it is a good idea to set out any relevant 
submissions you would like the Internal Review Officer to further consider, and your reasons 
for disagreeing with the decision. 
  
Applying for external review by the Australian Information Commissioner  
 
If you do not agree with the original FOI decision or the internal review decision, you can ask 
the Australian Information Commissioner to review the decision. You have 60 days to apply 
in writing for a review by the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) 
from the date you received this letter or any subsequent internal review decision.  

 

You can lodge your application:  
 
Online: www.oaic.gov.au  
 
Post: Australian Information Commissioner  
GPO Box 5218  
SYDNEY NSW 2001  
 
Email: xxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx  
 
The OAIC encourage applicants to apply online. Where possible, to assist the OAIC you 
should include your contact information, a copy of the related FOI decision and provide 
details of your reasons for objecting to the decision.  
 
Complaints to the Information Commissioner and Commonwealth Ombudsman 
 
 
Information Commissioner 
 
 
You may complain to the Information Commissioner concerning action taken by an agency 
in the exercise of powers or the performance of functions under the FOI Act. There is no fee 
for making a complaint. A complaint to the Information Commissioner must be made in 
writing. The Information Commissioner's contact details are:  
 
Telephone: 1300 363 992  
 
Website: www.oaic.gov.au  
 
Commonwealth Ombudsman 
 
 
You may complain to the Ombudsman concerning action taken by an agency in the exercise 
of powers or the performance of functions under the FOI Act. There is no fee for making a 
complaint. A complaint to the Ombudsman may be made in person, by telephone or in 
writing. The Ombudsman's contact details are:  
 
Phone: 1300 362 072  
 
Website: www.ombudsman.gov.au