Our reference: FOI 23/24-0416
GPO Box 700
Canberra ACT 2601
1800 800 110
3 November 2023
ndis.gov.au
Emily Lacey
By email: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx
Dear Emily Lacey
Freedom of Information request — Notification of Decision
Thank you for your correspondence of 10 October 2023, in which you requested access to
documents held by the National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA), under the
Freedom of
Information Act 1982 (FOI Act).
The purpose of this letter is to notify you of my decision on your application.
Scope of your request
You have requested access to the fol owing documents:
“I am requesting access under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (FOI Act), to the
following documents as referred to in “Practice Guide - Determine Reasonable and
Necessary Supports” —
1. “Practice Guide - Disability-Related Health Supports”
2. “Practice Guide - Understanding Therapy Supports”
And additionally —
3. The “Standard Operating Procedure” documents related to “Disability-Related
Health Supports” and “Therapy Supports”
4. If "V25.0 (updated 2021-01-13)" of "Practice Guide - Determine Reasonable and
Necessary Supports" is not the most recent version of this document currently in use,
I also request access to the most current version of the "Practice Guide - Determine
Reasonable and Necessary Supports" document.”
Decision on access to documents
I made this decision as an authorised FOI decision maker under section 23(1) of the FOI Act.
I have identified 12 documents that fall within the scope of your request. These documents
are publicly available. Rather than provide you with an electronic copy of these documents,
we have provided you with a direct link to access to them on the NDIS website. Please let us
know if you would prefer an electronic copy of the documents by email.
The documents were identified by consulting with relevant NDIA staff from our Service
Guidance and Practice branch who could be expected to be able to identify documents within
the scope of the request.
1
Further, I have identified one document in addition to the publicly available documents. The
document was identified by conducting searches of NDIA’s disclosure log. Documents on the
NDIS FOI disclosure log are publicly available.
In reaching my decision, I took the fol owing into account:
• your correspondence outlining the scope of your request
• the nature and content of the documents falling within the scope of your request
• the FOI Act
• the FOI Guidelines published under section 93A of the FOI Act
• consultation with relevant NDIA staff
• the NDIA’s operating environment and functions.
Release of documents
The documents are public available via the following links:
Part 1
- Disability-related health supports | NDIS
Part 2 - The ‘Practice Guide – Understanding Therapy Supports’ document, as referred
to in the Schedule of Documents at
Attachment A, is enclosed. Please note the
document is for the current version at the date of decision.
Part 3 - Standard Operating Procedure documents related to ‘Disability Health Supports’
and ‘Therapy Supports’:
•
Assistive Technology | NDIS
•
Continence Supports | NDIS
•
Diabetes management supports | NDIS
•
Dysphagia supports | NDIS
•
Epilepsy Supports | NDIS
•
Mainstream and community supports | NDIS
•
Nutrition supports including meal preparation | NDIS
•
Podiatry and foot care supports | NDIS
•
Wound and Pressure Care Supports | NDIS
Part 4
–Reasonable and necessary supports | NDIS – Please note the link is for the
current version at the date of decision.
Rights of review
Your rights to seek a review of my decision, or lodge a complaint, are set out at
Attachment B.
Should you have any enquiries concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me
by email
at xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx.
Yours sincerely
Miriam
Senior Freedom of Information Officer
Parliamentary, Ministerial & FOI Branch
Government Division
2
Attachment A
Schedule of Documents for FOI 23/24-0416
Document
Description
Access Decision
number
1
FOI Disclosure Log - 22/23-0633 - Practice Guide - Understanding Therapy
FULL ACCESS
Supports
3
Attachment B
Your review rights
Internal Review
The FOI Act gives you the right to apply for an internal review of this decision. The review
wil be conducted by a different person to the person who made the original decision.
If you wish to seek an internal review of the decision, you must apply for the review, in
writing, within 30 days of receipt of this letter.
No particular form is required for an application for internal review, but to assist the review
process, you should clearly outline your grounds for review (that is, the reasons why you
disagree with the decision). Applications for internal review can be lodged by email to
xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx or sent by post to:
Freedom of Information Section
Parliamentary, Ministerial & FOI Branch
Government Division
National Disability Insurance Agency
GPO Box 700
CANBERRA ACT 2601
Review by the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner
The FOI Act also gives you the right to apply to the Office of the Australian Information
Commissioner (OAIC) to seek a review of this decision.
If you wish to have the decision reviewed by the OAIC, you may apply for the review, in
writing, or by using the online merits review form available on the OAIC’s website at
www.oaic.gov.au, within 60 days of receipt of this letter.
Applications for review can be lodged with the OAIC in the following ways:
Online:
www.oaic.gov.au
Post:
GPO Box 5218, Sydney NSW 2001
Email:
xxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx
Phone:
1300 363 992 (local cal charge)
Complaints to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner or the
Commonwealth Ombudsman
You may complain to either the Commonwealth Ombudsman or the OAIC about actions
taken by the NDIA in relation to your request. The Ombudsman wil consult with the OAIC
before investigating a complaint about the handling of an FOI request.
Your complaint to the OAIC can be directed to the contact details identified above. Your
complaint to the Ombudsman can be directed to:
Phone: 1300 362 072 (local cal charge)
Email:
xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx
Your complaint should be in writing and should set out the grounds on which it is considered
that the actions taken in relation to the request should be investigated.
1