This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Inconsistency with noise cancelling headphone being approved for people with Autism'.



Our reference: FOI 23/24-0503 
GPO Box 700 
Canberra   ACT   2601 
1800 800 110 
20 November 2023 
ndis.gov.au 
Sam 
 
By email: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx 
 
Dear Sam 
Freedom of Information request — Notification of Decision 
Thank you for your correspondence of 24 October 2023, in which you requested access to 
documents held by the National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA), under the Freedom of 
Information Act 1982
 (FOI Act). 
Scope of your request  
 You have requested access to the following documents: 
“Noise cancelling headphones seem to be a common item claimed under low cost 
assistive technology through the NDIS for people with Autism 
 
This time however i was rejected, this was the email received from NDIS 
 
"After consideration of the participant's circumstances and the physio therapists 
report, delegate is not satisfied this request meets the reasonable and necessary 
criteria of the NDIS Act 2013 due to not meeting 34(1).(e) and is declined. 
 
Rule 5.1(d) requires that supports which relate to day-to-day living costs, which are 
not related to a participants’ disability support needs, cannot be funded in a plan. 
 
Noise cancellation earphones are an item that average Australians with or without a 
disability can purchase for daily use. This item is NOT a DISABILITY-SPECIFIC 
support. Whilst it may used to address sensory issues, NDIS does not fund sensory 
equipment as there is not enough research or evidence to suggest that this is 
effective and will reduce the needs of other supports in the future." 
 
Why is it usually approved, but in this case rejected? 
 
Is it up to the individual NDIS worker to interpret the NDIS Act however they want? 
 
How are these decisions made?”
 
 
Decision on access to documents 
I am authorised to make decisions under section 23(1) of the FOI Act. My decision on your 
request and the reasons for my decision are set out below.  
I have decided to refuse your request for access under section 24A of the FOI Act. The 
reasons for my decision are set out below.  
As mentioned in our previous email, we are only able to provide documents that exist on a 
NDIS file. Your scope is requesting information only. No documents exist on our system that 
specifically address the scope of your request.  
 
 

 


In reaching my decision, I took the following into account: 
•  your correspondence outlining the scope of your request the FOI Act 
•  the FOI Guidelines published under section 93A of the FOI Act  
•  consultation with relevant officers of the NDIA 
•  the NDIA’s operating environment and functions. 
Reasons for decision - Refuse a request for access (section 24A) 
Section 24A of the FOI Act provides that an agency may refuse a request for access to a 
document if all reasonable steps have been taken to find the document and the agency is 
satisfied that the document cannot be found or does not exist.  
I have conducted searches of the NDIA’s documents management systems and made 
enquiries with NDIA staff. These enquiries have revealed that the NDIA is not in possession 
of documents matching the scope of your request. This is because no documents exist on 
our system that specifically address the scope of your request.  
 
I am satisfied that all reasonable steps have been taken to locate the documents you have 
requested and that the documents do not exist. I have, therefore, decided to refuse access 
to your request in accordance with section 24A(1)(b)(ii) of the FOI Act. 
Rights of review 
Your rights to seek a review of my decision, or lodge a complaint, are set out at Attachment A
Should you have any enquiries concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me 
by email at xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx. 
 
Yours sincerely 
 
Ankit 
Senior Freedom of Information Officer 
Parliamentary, Ministerial & FOI Branch 
Government Division 
 
 
 
2  
 

Attachment A 
Your review rights  
 
Internal Review  
The FOI Act gives you the right to apply for an internal review of this decision. The review 
will be conducted by a different person to the person who made the original decision. 
 
If you wish to seek an internal review of the decision, you must apply for the review, in 
writing, within 30 days of receipt of this letter. 
 
No particular form is required for an application for internal review, but to assist the review 
process, you should clearly outline your grounds for review (that is, the reasons why you 
disagree with the decision). Applications for internal review can be lodged by email to 
xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx or sent by post to: 
 
Freedom of Information Section  
Parliamentary, Ministerial & FOI Branch  
Government Division 
National Disability Insurance Agency 
GPO Box 700 
CANBERRA   ACT   2601 
 
Review by the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner 
The FOI Act also gives you the right to apply to the Office of the Australian Information 
Commissioner (OAIC) to seek a review of this decision. 
 
If you wish to have the decision reviewed by the OAIC, you may apply for the review, in 
writing, or by using the online merits review form available on the OAIC’s website at 
www.oaic.gov.au, within 60 days of receipt of this letter.  
 
Applications for review can be lodged with the OAIC in the following ways: 
 
Online: 
www.oaic.gov.au  
Post:  
GPO Box 5218, Sydney NSW 2001 
Email: 
xxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx 
Phone: 
1300 363 992 (local call charge) 
 
Complaints to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner or the 
Commonwealth Ombudsman 
You may complain to either the Commonwealth Ombudsman or the OAIC about actions 
taken by the NDIA in relation to your request. The Ombudsman will consult with the OAIC 
before investigating a complaint about the handling of an FOI request. 
 
Your complaint to the OAIC can be directed to the contact details identified above. Your 
complaint to the Ombudsman can be directed to: 
 
Phone: 
1300 362 072 (local call charge) 
Email:  
xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx  
 
Your complaint should be in writing and should set out the grounds on which it is considered 
that the actions taken in relation to the request should be investigated 
 
 
3