This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Policies, guidelines or procedures on the handling and processing of Model Litigant Obligation investigations'.



Our reference: FOI 24/25-1119 
 
GPO Box 700 
Canberra   ACT   2601 
1800 800 110 
4 July 2025 
ndis.gov.au 
 
 
David Wright 
 
By email: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx 
 
 
Dear David Wright 
 
Freedom of Information request — Notice of Decision 
Thank you for your correspondence of 16 January 2025, seeking access under the Freedom 
of Information Act 1982 (FOI Act) to documents held by the National Disability Insurance 
Agency (NDIA). 
I apologise for the delay in processing your request. 
The purpose of this letter is to provide you with a decision on your request. 
Scope of your request  
You have requested access to the following documents: 
"I request copies of any policies, guidelines or procedures concerning the agency's 
handling and processing of Model Litigant Obligation complaints." 
Timeframe 
The FOI Act provides 30 calendar days for the processing of an FOI request after it is 
received. As your valid FOI request was received on16 January 2025, the original due date 
for your FOI request was 15 February 2025. 
I acknowledge that this time has lapsed and as a result we are deemed to have refused your 
request under section 15AC of the FOI Act. The effect of this is that you do not have a right 
seek an internal review of my decision. However, I confirm that you retain your right to seek 
external review by the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC).  
I note that despite this, I have continued processing your request and I extend my apologies 
for the delay in providing you with a decision on access.  
 


Search efforts   
The FOI Guidelines provide that agencies and ministers should undertake a reasonable 
search on a flexible and common-sense interpretation of the terms of the request. At a 
minimum, an agency is required to have regard to the following in undertaking these 
searches: 
•  the subject matter of the documents 
•  the current and past file management systems 
•  the record management systems in place 
•  the individuals and line areas within an agency or minister’s office who may be able 
•  to assist with the location of documents, and 
•  the age of the documents. 
Having regard to these Guidelines, I engaged in search consultations with the following 
internal business area to obtain documents within their possession which may fall within the 
scope of your FOI request: 
•  Legal Practice and Capability Branch  
 
I advise that senior staff in the business area conducted searches for the documents and 
have located 1 document relevant to the scope of your request. 
 
Decision on access to documents 
I am authorised to make decisions under section 23(1) of the FOI Act. My decision on your 
request and the reasons for my decision are set out below.  
I have identified 1 document, which falls within the scope of your request.  
Please note that the document to be released was finalised after the date of your request.  
On 26 June 2025, you agreed to only receive the final version of the requested document, 
which has been provided. 
I have decided to grant access to 1 document in part. 
In reaching my decision, I took the following into account: 
•  your correspondence outlining the scope of your request 
•  the nature and content of the documents falling within the scope of your request 
•  the FOI Act  
2 

•  the FOI Guidelines published under section 93A of the FOI Act 
•  relevant case law concerning the operation of the FOI Act  
•  consultation with relevant NDIA staff 
•  factors relevant to my assessment of whether or not disclosure would be in the public 
interest 
•  the NDIA’s operating environment and functions. 
Reasons for decision 
Certain operations of agencies (section 47E(d)) 
Section 47E(d) of the FOI Act conditionally exempts a document if its disclosure would, or 
could reasonably be expected to, have a substantial adverse effect on the proper and 
efficient conduct of the operations of an agency. 
Document 1 contains information relating to certain operations of the NDIA, specifically, an 
internal email address, for use only by NDIA staff in their work managing complaints made 
against the Agency by members of the public. 
The disclosure of this information would reveal an internal email address to the wider public. 
This could result in the inappropriate use an internal communication channel and impact the 
effectiveness of the Agency’s operational methods and procedures, resulting in the need for 
the Agency to change those methods and procedures to ensure the future effectiveness of 
the Agency. 
Accordingly, I have decided that the relevant information in Document 1 is conditionally 
exempt under section 47E(d) of the FOI Act. 
Public interest considerations – section 47E(d) 
Section 11A(5) of the FOI Act provides that access to a document covered by a conditional 
exemption must be provided unless disclosure would be contrary to the public interest.  
I have not considered any of the irrelevant factors as set out under section 11B(4) of the FOI 
Act in making this decision. 
In favour of disclosure, I have considered the factors outlined in section 11B(3) of the FOI 
Act, and I have determined that disclosure of the relevant information in Document 1 would 
promote the objects of the FOI Act by providing access to documents held by the 
government and providing access to information. 
Against disclosure, I consider that disclosure of the relevant information in Document 1:  
3 


•  would not contribute to the publication of information of sufficient public interest to justify 
the likely harm caused by release 
•  would not enhance Australia’s representative democracy in the ways described in 
section 11B(3) of the FOI Act 
•  would not inform any debate on a matter of public importance, or promote oversight of 
public expenditure. 
While there is limited public interest in the disclosure of information conditionally exempt 
under section 47E(d) of the FOI Act, the harm that would result from disclosure is that it 
could reasonably be expected to:  
•  prejudice the ability of the Agency to protect established contact points and procedures 
of the Agency. 
In summary, I am satisfied that the factors against disclosure of the information outweigh the 
factors in favour of disclosure and that, on balance, it would be contrary to the public interest 
to release this information to you. Accordingly, I have decided that the relevant information in 
Document 1 is exempt under section 47E(d) of the FOI Act. 
Release of documents 
The document for release, as referred to in the Schedule of Documents at Attachment A, is 
enclosed. 
Rights of review 
Your rights to seek a review of my decision, or lodge a complaint, are set out at 
Attachment B
Should you have any enquiries concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me 
by email at xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx. 
Yours sincerely 
 
 
Kate (KIM627) 
A/Assistant Director – Freedom of Information 
Non Personals Team 
Information Release, Privacy and Legal Operations Branch 
Reviews and Information Release Division
4 


 
Attachment A 
 
Schedule of Documents for FOI 24/25-1119 
 
Document 
Page 
Description 
Access Decision 
number 
number 
SOP: Model Litigant Obligation Complaints 
PARTIAL ACCESS 

1-24 
 
Exemption claimed: 
Date: March 2025 
s47E(d) – certain operations of agencies 
 
 
 



 
Attachment B 
Your review rights  
 
As this matter was a deemed refusal, internal review of this decision is not an option. 
However, if you have concern with any aspect of this decision, please contact the NDIA FOI 
team by email xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx or by post: 
 
Freedom of Information Section 
Information Release, Privacy and Legal Operations Branch 
Reviews and Information Release Division 
GPO Box 700 
CANBERRA ACT 2601 
 
Review by the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner 
The FOI Act gives you the right to apply to the Office of the Australian Information 
Commissioner (OAIC) to seek a review of this decision. 
 
If you wish to have the decision reviewed by the OAIC, you may apply for the review, in 
writing, or by using the online merits review form available on the OAIC’s website at 
www.oaic.gov.au, within 60 days of receipt of this letter.  
 
Applications for review can be lodged with the OAIC in the following ways: 
 
Online: 
www.oaic.gov.au  
Post:  
GPO Box 5218, Sydney NSW 2001 
Email: 
xxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx 
Phone: 
1300 363 992 (local call charge) 
 
Complaints to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner or the 
Commonwealth Ombudsman 
You may complain to either the Commonwealth Ombudsman or the OAIC about actions 
taken by the NDIA in relation to your request. The Ombudsman will consult with the OAIC 
before investigating a complaint about the handling of an FOI request. 
 
Your complaint to the OAIC can be directed to the contact details identified above. Your 
complaint to the Ombudsman can be directed to: 
 
Phone: 
1300 362 072 (local call charge) 
Email:  
xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx  
 
Your complaint should be in writing and should set out the grounds on which it is considered 
that the actions taken in relation to the request should be investigated.