This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Documents Relating to the Determination of Assistance with Daily Living (ADL) Funding for NDIS Participants Under the Age of 6'.



Our reference: FOI 24/25-1599 (LEXD 24) 
 
GPO Box 700 
Canberra   ACT   2601 
1800 800 110 
27 June 2025 
ndis.gov.au 
 
 
Gemma Jones 
Right to Know 
 
By email: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx  
 
 
Dear Gemma Jones 
 
Freedom of Information request — Notice of Decision 
 
Thank you for your correspondence of 21 March 2025 (your correspondence), seeking 
access under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (FOI Act) to documents held by the 
National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA)
 
The purpose of this letter is to provide you with a decision on your request. 
 
Scope of your request  
You have requested access to the following documents: 
 
“…All documents, guidelines, policies, assessment tools, and internal 
communications relating to the determination and approval of Assistance with Daily 
Living (ADL) funding for NDIS participants under the age of six…” 

 
Request Consultation  
On 12 June 2025, I sent you an email with a letter initiating a consultation process under 
section 24AB of the FOI Act. In my letter I advised you that I intended to refuse access to 
your request on the grounds that processing your request would unreasonably and 
substantially divert the Agency’s resources from its other operations. My letter, which I have 
attached separately from this decision notice, detailed the reasons for my view.  
To date, I have not received a response from you and have continued to process your 
request based on your original scope.   
 
Timeframes 
The FOI Act provides 30 calendar days for the processing of an FOI request after it is 
received. As your valid FOI request was received on 21 March 2025, the original due date 
for your request was 20 April 2025. 
 
I acknowledge that this time has lapsed and as a result we are deemed to have refused your 
request under section 15AC of the FOI Act. The effect of this is that you do not have a right 
seek an internal review of my decision. However, I confirm that you retain your right to seek 
external review by the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC).  
 
 



I note that despite this, I have continued processing your request and I extend my apologies 
for the delay in providing you with a decision on access.  
 
Details are set out in Attachment B to this letter. 
 
Decision 
I am the authorised officer pursuant to section 23(1) of the FOI Act to make a decision on 
this FOI request. 
 
I have decided to refuse your request pursuant to section 24(1)(b) of the FOI Act on the 
grounds that a practical refusal reason exists as per 24AA(1)(a)(i). 
 
Reason for Decision  
A statement of reasons for this decision are set out in Attachment A. 
 
Rights of review 
Your rights to seek a review of my decision, or lodge a complaint, are set out at 
Attachment B

 
Should you have any enquiries concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me 
by email at xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx. 
Yours sincerely 
 
 
 
 
 
Wendy (WNN633) 
Senior Freedom of Information Officer 
Information Release, Privacy and Legal Operations Branch 
Reviews and Information Release Division 
2 

link to page 3
 
Attachment A 
Statement of Reasons 
FOI 24/25-1599 
_________________________________________________________________________ 
 
Practical refusal reason 

Relevant law – s24AA 
A practical refusal reason exists in relation to a request for documents if the work involved in 
processing the request would substantially and unreasonably divert the resources of the 
agency from its other operations1. 
In determining whether processing the request would substantially and unreasonably divert 
the agency’s resources, I am required to consider the resources that would have to be used 
for the following components: 
•  identifying, locating or collating the documents within the Agency 
•  deciding whether to grant, refuse or defer access to a document, including resources 
used for examining the document and consulting with any person or body in relation 
to the request  
•  making a copy or an edited copy of the document 
•  notifying the decision on the request 
Searches and advice for documents 
The FOI Guidelines provide that agencies and ministers should undertake a reasonable 
search on a flexible and common-sense interpretation of the terms of the request. At a 
minimum, an agency is required to have regard to the following in undertaking these 
searches: 
•  the subject matter of the documents 
•  the current and past file management systems 
•  the record management systems in place 
•  the individuals and line areas within an agency or minister’s office who may be able 
•  to assist with the location of documents, and 
•  the age of the documents. 
Having regard to these Guidelines, I engaged in search consultations with the following 
internal business area and staff to obtain documents within their possession which may fall 
within the scope of your FOI request: 
•  Children’s Strategy and Services 
•  Service Guidance  
•  Scheme Policy  
 
1 24AA(1)(a)(i) of the FOI Act. 


At the conclusion of my searches, senior staff in the aforementioned business areas advised 
that processing your request in its current form would substantially and unreasonably divert 
the resources of the NDIA from its other operations due to its broad scope. 
Taking the searches and advice into consideration, on 12 June 2025, I wrote to you advising 
that, based on the search results, a practical refusal reason existed for this FOI application. 
In circumstances where an Agency is considering a practical refusal, it is required to 
undertake a request consultation process under section 24AB of the FOI Act. I invited you to 
do one of following things within the 14 days consultation period.  
 
•  withdraw your request; 
•  make a revised request; or 
•  indicate that you do not wish to revise the request (in which case the current scope of 
your request will stand).  
 
During this period, I advised that you were welcome to seek assistance in revising your 
request, in a way that adequately addresses the practical refusal reason outlined above. 
I confirm, to date, I have not received a response from you, and I am satisfied that a practical 
refusal reason still exists.  
I therefore refuse your request on the basis of a ‘practical refusal reason’ under section 
24(1)(b) of the FOI Act. 
4 


 
Attachment B 
Your review rights  
 
As this matter was a deemed refusal, internal review of this decision is not an option. 
However, if you have concern with any aspect of this decision, please contact the NDIA FOI 
team by email xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx or by post: 
 
Freedom of Information Section 
Information Release, Privacy and Legal Operations Branch  
Reviews and Information Release Division 
GPO Box 700 
CANBERRA ACT 2601  
 
Review by the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner 
The FOI Act gives you the right to apply to the Office of the Australian Information 
Commissioner (OAIC) to seek a review of this decision. 
 
If you wish to have the decision reviewed by the OAIC, you may apply for the review, in 
writing, or by using the online merits review form available on the OAIC’s website at 
www.oaic.gov.au, within 60 days of receipt of this letter.  
 
Applications for review can be lodged with the OAIC in the following ways: 
 
Online: www.oaic.gov.au  
Post:   GPO Box 5218, Sydney NSW 2001 
Email:  xxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx 
Phone: 1300 363 992 (local call charge) 
 
Complaints to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner or the 
Commonwealth Ombudsman 
You may complain to either the Commonwealth Ombudsman or the OAIC about actions 
taken by the NDIA in relation to your request. The Ombudsman will consult with the OAIC 
before investigating a complaint about the handling of an FOI request. 
 
Your complaint to the OAIC can be directed to the contact details identified above. Your 
complaint to the Ombudsman can be directed to: 
 
Phone: 1300 362 072 (local call charge) 
Email:  xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx  
 
Your complaint should be in writing and should set out the grounds on which it is considered 
that the actions taken in relation to the request should be investigated.