Our ref:
FOI25/204; CM 25/6875-1
Your ref:
https://www.righttoknow.org.au/request/age_of_majority_project_25i_lega
5 May 2025
Applicant
: Foreign personal representative for Department of Ethnic affairs person-id: 41190156
By email: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx
Freedom of Information Request FOI25/204 - Decision to refuse to deal with request
The purpose of this letter is to give you a decision about your request for access to documents under the
Freedom of Information Act 1982 (the FOI Act) which you submitted to the Attorney-General's Department
(the department).
Your request
On 16 April 2025, you made an FOI request via the Right To Know (RTK) website to the Attorney-General's
Department.
Your request was made in the fol owing terms:
To: Law Administrator Office
Attn: Mark: dreyfus known-as Mark in his individual capacity and Commonwealth Attorney
General Office for service of process Commonwealth Attorney General as Trustee and Mark
Dreyfus known-as Mark in his private individual capacity with his heirs delegates and
assigns as Trustees and Authorised agents for service of process,
<b>Demend for information</b>
This demand for information is both simple and complex, and by the same token the
response from the Attorney General Offices the option of how to respond or if they wish to
propose and negotiate something else we wil consider it as any reasonable people would.
We will be satisfied for Mark in his private capacity to provide to our satisfaction:
(a) single point of contact to liaise with to transfer these assets
Upon our consideration of information provided and completion of transfer we wil be
content for this account and posts to be removed if it is deemed not to be of public interest
to remain on here once satisfied
Or
(b) an exhaustive procedural steps describing how these Testamentary trust & funds come
into existence, what their origins are , how to liquidate them and publish it as a matter of
public interest on Attorney-General’s website
Notice- Petition for Equitable Remedy for Breach of Trust in Form of Claim of Right
This claim of right to information for return of property in-specie is governed by the
International rules of Admiralty and Maritime jurisdictions whereby each of the people are
responsible for their own actions and inactions and fraud through misrepresentation,
concealing information, deceptive doublespeak through legalese, and hiding behind
corporate veil by fielding queries only in an online forum without their delegated authority
behind it.
This demand for information is both simple and complex, and by the same token the
response from the Attorney General Offices
To all and singular to whom these presents shall come, greeting,
WHEREAS, We, the several trustees, guardians, caretakers, elders, heirs and successors to
our patrilineal forefathers have come of age of reason, established our standing and
petitioned several ways to re-claim our ancestral property, presumed to be abandoned or
perhaps with a caretaker to protect it from people unable to manage their money, let alone
that of their future generations of young people yet to come.
WHEREAS, We, have filed with State Administrative Tribunal, Family Court, Supreme Court,
and appointed by wil and deed the Public Trustee Office, contacted the office for State
Treasurer as advised in the Working paper mentioned below, all and singular of the
members of the public servants employed to protect people and their interests have thus far
failed their fiduciary duty and knowingly and wil ingly breached the trust, and failed to
adhere to the beneficiaries, trustees, General executors wil and command to terminate all
unwated trusts created for our benefit due to unfaithful management of said trusts. That is
to say that their unwil ingless to fulfil their fiduciary duty and all funds, estate, interest,
perfected securities which we have beneficial entitlement to are in a sham trust and
fraudulently used by people who do not have respect for God and for their fel ow mankind
and instead steal from the beneficiaries for their own benefit through deception.
of our private several beneficiaries spanning three generations through our
the Western Australian Government website (www.wa.gov.au) has published a Law Reform
Commission completed 'year 1970 which among several dozen pieces of information states
the following:
Legal Capacity of Minors – Working Paper
https://www.wa.gov.au/government/publica..
(pages 4 and 5)
General Legal capacity - contractual and proprietary rights and liabilities
11. The New South Wales legislation effects its reform in this broad area by conferring the
capacities set out below. Comments have been appended in each case.
(a) To act in a fiduciary capacity.
(b) To freely enter into contracts and acquire and dispose of property.
(c) To acquire a domicile of choice.
(d) To conduct proceedings in any court.
(e) To require, if absolutely entitled as beneficiary, the trustee to transfer the trust property
to him.
Comment: Under the rule in Saunders v. Vautier (1841) 4 Beav. 115; 41 E.R. 482, this right is
given to a person who is sui juris. The South Australian legislation expressly provided that
this power did not apply to beneficiaries in respect of trusts already in existence, the reason
being that the Government felt that the application of the rule might embarrass a trustee
who had invested trust money for a fixed term on the assumption that the beneficiary would
not be entitled to call for the trust property until he had attained the age of 21 years
(Debates (S.A.) H. of A. 1970, p. 2011). The Committee has been informed that the
Attorney-General's Department Freedom of Information Request FOI25/204 Decision letter
Page 2 of 7
application of the rule is not likely to result in similar embarrassment to the Public Trustee or
to trustee companies in Western Australia. A restriction similar to that of South Australia
seems therefore unnecessary.
26 / Legal Capacity of Minors – Working Paper
https://www.wa.gov.au/government/publica..
PERPETUAL EXECUTORS, TRUSTEES & AGENCY CO. (WA) LTD. ACT
- The company may be appointed by a court or judge as guardian of the estate or person of
an infant.
- It is lawful for the guardian of an infant, with the approval of the court, to appoint the
company to discharge the guardian's duties.
- Persons entitled to moneys from the Testamentary & Trust Fund in the hands of the State
Treasurer have 12 years to apply to the court for their money. But no time during which a
claimant is an infant is taken into consideration when reckoning the 12 years.
--------------------
From our research, these funds are currently considered as a Loan to the Federal and State
government and we wish to immediately and without any delay rescind our signature to all
contracts and have the books brought forward for certification and transfer of several
trusts.
As per the rules of National Consumer Lending Code - your reply is required within 72 hours.
For avoidance of doubt and providing clarity, we expressly rescind our consent to have our
trust funds and those funds of our bloodline, siblings, decedent estates which are on loan to
the Government Treasury [c.f] “Loans (Taxation Exemption) Act 1978”
Loans (Taxation Exemption) Act 1978
In this Act, unless the contrary intention appears:
law means a law of the Commonwealth or of a State or Territory;
prescribed borrowing means a borrowing of moneys outside Australia by or on behalf of the
Commonwealth upon terms and conditions that do not provide for the issue of stock or
securities of a kind to which section 6B of the Loans Securities Act 1919 applies.
(2) A reference in this Act to tax or duty shall be read as including a reference to withholding
tax within the meaning of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 and to tax or duty in respect
of:
(a) the estates of deceased persons;
(b) property derived from deceased persons; and
(c) gifts or other dispositions of property.
Maritime Powers act definition of Australian national includes a 'body corporate' and
'Commonwealth' Prime minister and cabinet / federal government website define
Commonwealth as group of people.
Attorney-General's Department Freedom of Information Request FOI25/204 Decision letter
Page 3 of 7
This makes us the lender, and the government the borrower and we wish to call the loan in
immediately to provide neccessaries for our community.
Filed in good faith and clean conscience.
Yours faithfully,
Foreign personal representative for Department of Ethnic affairs person-id: 41190156
On 23 April 2025, the department wrote to you, advising you your request did not provide enough
information about the requested documents to enable an officer to identify them (see s 15(2)(b) of the FOI
Act).
We advised you that a practical refusal reason therefore exists in relation to your request under s 24AA of
the FOI Act.
We advised you that you had 14 days from the date of our email to make a revised request in writing that
detailed the documents to which you seek access. We also advised that if you did not wish to proceed with
your FOI request, you may choose to either withdraw your request or advise us that you do not wish to
revise your request. If you chose not to revise your request, we advised you that we will issue a decision
under s 24A of the FOI Act.
We invited you to contact us to discuss how to make a request to the department and provided the name
and contact details for an officer of the department who would be able to assist you.
On 24 April 2025, you replied to the department, and provided
OFFICE FOUND.
Dear Mark with his heirs successors and assigns,
Estoppel Conditions
Take Constructive Notice of Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Mark we received two unsolicited emails to our private email but we have not heard from
your office yet as we stipulated in our claim of right. We do not understand the
correspondence and do not recognize Joanna but on face of it it looks like someone is
attempting to use perceived delegated authority to derive statutory power and justify
unlawfully stealing from our International Organization and Foreign bank (Trust company)
which is a Commonwealth constitutional corporation as per the Australian Constitution.
We wish to remind Mark of the nature of the roles between people and appointed delegates
especially when it comes to people's equitable and beneficial interests and the right to
dispose to their person and Australian nationals as defined in the Admiralty & Maritime
laws, it being a Body Corporate, which is an ADI, which is a Constitutional corporation.
Reminder notice of wishing to privately settle
We remind Mark and his heirs and delegate that we are peaceful people wishing to be left
alone to live our life in peace and remind the Department further of the published content
on the departmental website: https://www.ag.gov.au/rights-and-protect...
Attorney-General's Department Freedom of Information Request FOI25/204 Decision letter
Page 4 of 7
Failure to provide a reply within three business days and publishing in the Commonwealth
Gazette to be filed for record and evidence wil be deemed as admission of facts and that
Mark is accepting of a commercial bil delivered to the office for Attorney General for the
full value of commercial life interest with actuarial amounts published on
https://fsc.org.au/news/value-of-life-in.. being $125,000 per day for 365 days x assumption
that life continues to exist for 100 years.
Signed, sealed, delivered.
by: General executor
P.P Foreign personal representative for Department of Ethnic affairs person-id: 41190156
Your correspondence of 24 April 2025 did not request assistance to make a valid FOI Request. Nor did your
correspondence address whether you would withdraw your request or provide a revised scope that would
provide enough information about the requested documents to enable an officer to identify them (see s
15(2)(b) of the FOI Act).
I am an officer authorised under s 23(1) of the FOI Act to make decisions in relation to freedom of
information requests made to the department.
Section 15(2) of the FOI Act sets out the requirements of a valid request. Those requirements include that
the request must provide such information as is reasonably necessary to enable a responsible officer of the
agency or the Minister to identify the document/s requested: s 15(2)(b).
Section 15(3) provides that an agency must take reasonable steps to assist the person make a request that
complies with s 15. An agency may refuse to deal with a request if satisfied that a practical refusal reason
exists, after undertaking the request consultation process.
I have undertaken a request consultation process with you as outlined in s 24AA and 24AB (a copy is at
Attachment A).
Your response of 24 April 2025 does not meet the requirements of a valid request, as it does not provide
such information as is reasonably necessary to enable me to identify the document/s that are requested.
I have therefore decided to refuse to deal with your request.
Your review rights are at
Attachment B.
If you wish to discuss this notice, I can be reached on (02) 6141 6666 or by email to
xxx@xx.xxx.xx.
Yours sincerely
Jess Hockings
Director
Freedom of Information and Privacy Section
Attachments
Attachment A:
Sections 24AA and 24AB of the FOI Act
Attachment B:
Review rights
Attorney-General's Department Freedom of Information Request FOI25/204 Decision letter
Page 5 of 7
Attachment A
Section 24AA of the FOI Act: When does a practical refusal reason exist?
(1) For the purposes of section 24, a
practical refusal reason exists in relation to a
request for
a
document if either (or both) of the following applies:
(a) the work involved in processing the
request:
(i) in the case o
f an agency--would substantial y and unreasonably divert the resources
of the
agency from its other operations; or
(ii) in the case of a Minister--would substantial y and unreasonably interfere with the
performance of the Minister's functions;
(b) the
request does not satisfy the requirement
in paragraph 15(2)(b) (identification
of
documents).
(2) Subject to
subsection (3), but without limiting the matters to which the
agency or Minister may
have regard, in deciding whether a
practical refusal reason exists, the
agency or Minister must
have regard to the resources that would have to be used for the fol owing:
(a) identifying, locating or collating the
documents within the filing system of the
agency, or
the office of the Minister;
(b) deciding whether to grant, refuse or defer access to a
document to which
the
request relates, or to grant access to an
edited copy of such a
document, including
resources that would have to be used for:
(i) examining the
document; or
(ii) consulting with any person or body in relation to the
request;
(c) making a copy, or
an edited copy, of the
document; (d) notifying any interim or final decision on the
request.
(3) In deciding whether a
practical refusal reason exists, an
agency or Minister must not have regard
to:
(a) any reasons that the
applicant gives for
requesting access; or
(b) the
agency's or Minister's belief as to what the
applicant's reasons are
for
requesting access; or
(c) any maximum amount, specified in the regulations, payable as a charge for processing
a
request of that kind.
Section 24AB of the FOI Act: What is a request consultation process?
Scope
(1) This section sets out what is a
request consultation process for the purposes of section 24.
Requirement to notify
(2) Th
e agency or Minister must give th
e applicant a written notice stating the following:
(a) an intention to refuse access to a
document in accordance with a
request; (b) the
practical refusal reason; (c) the name of an
officer of the
agency or member of staff of the Minister (the contact
person ) with whom th
e applicant may consult during a period;
Attorney-General's Department Freedom of Information Request FOI25/204 Decision letter
Page 6 of 7
(d) details of how the
applicant may contact the contact person;
(e) that the period (the consultation period ) during which the
applicant may consult with the
contact person is 14 days after the day th
e applicant is given the notice.
Assistance to revise request
(3) If th
e applicant contacts the contact person during the consultation period in accordance with the
notice, the
agency or Minister must take reasonable steps to assist the
applicant to revise
the
request so that th
e practical refusal reason no longer exists.
(4) For the purposes of
subsection (3), reasonable steps includes the fol owing:
(a) giving the
applicant a reasonable opportunity to consult with the contact person;
(b) providing the
applicant with any information that would assist th
e applicant to revise
the
request.
Extension of consultation period
(5) The contact person may, with the
applicant's agreement, extend the consultation period by
written notice to th
e applicant.
Outcome of request consultation process
(6) Th
e applicant must, before the end of the consultation period, do one of the fol owing, by written
notice to the
agency or Minister:
(a) withdraw the
request; (b) make a revised
request; (c) indicate that the
applicant does not wish to revise the
request.
(7) Th
e request is taken to have been withdrawn under
subsection (6) at the end of the consultation
period if:
(a) the
applicant does not consult the contact person during the consultation period in
accordance with the notice; or
(b) the
applicant does not do one of the things mentioned in
subsection (6) before the end of
the consultation period.
Consultation period to be disregarded in calculating processing period
(8) The period starting on the day a
n applicant is given a notice under
subsection (2) and ending on
the day the
applicant does one of the things mentioned in
paragraph (6)(b) or (c) is to be
disregarded in working out the 30 day period mentioned in
paragraph 15(5)(b).
Note:
Paragraph 15(5)(b) requires that an
agency or Minister take all reasonable steps to notify
an
applicant of a decision on the
applicant's request within 30 days after the
request is made.
No more than one request consultation process required
(9) To avoid doubt, this section only obliges th
e agency or Minister to undertake a
request
consultation process once for any particular
request.
Attorney-General's Department Freedom of Information Request FOI25/204 Decision letter
Page 7 of 7
