This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Briefings by Matthew Swainson'.



 
Our reference:
 FOI 25/26-0105 (LEXD 1458)  
 
 
 
GPO Box 700 
15 September 2025 
Canberra   ACT   2601 
 
1800 800 110 
 
ndis.gov.au 
David Wright 
Right to Know 
 
By email: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx  
 
 
Dear David Wright 
 
Freedom of Information request — Request consultation process 
 
Thank you for your correspondence of 15 July 2025, in which you requested access under 
the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (FOI Act) to documents held by the National Disability 
Insurance Agency (NDIA). 
 
Scope of your request 
You have requested access to the fol owing documents: 
 
FOI 24/25-0251, document 2 includes a Ministerial Brief that records Matthew 
Swainson, Chief Counsel, as the contact officer. 
 
I request copies of all briefings provided to the Minister for the NDIS, and/or to the 

CEO of the NDIA, which record Matthew Swainson as the contact officer. 
 
Practical refusal 

I am authorised to make decisions under section 23(1) of the FOI Act. 
 
I am writing to advise that the work involved in processing your request in its current form 
would substantially and unreasonably divert the resources of the NDIA from its other 
operations due to its size. This is called a ‘practical refusal reason’ under section 24AA of 
the FOI Act.  
 
On this basis, I intend to refuse your request. However, before I make a final decision, I am 
writing to provide you with an opportunity to revise your request. This is called a ‘request 
consultation process’ as set out under section 24AB of the FOI Act. You have 14 days to 
respond to this notice in one of the ways set out below. 
 
Why I intend to refuse your request 
On 13 August 2025, we advised you that your request did not satisfy section 15(2)(b) of the 
FOI Act, as the terms of your request were too broad and we were unable to identify the 
specific documents sought. We sought further information from you about the documents 
you were requesting access to. 
 
On 14 August 2025, you provided the following clarification: 
 
1)           I am referring to all NDIS Ministers and all CEOs who occupied those roles 
once Mr Swainson was appointed to the position of Chief Counsel. 
 
2)           I refer to all briefings that are in the form contained in FOI 24/25-0251, 

document 2, i.e. formal briefing notes with standardised fields. I note that the briefing 
 
1  
 

 
at FOI 24/25-0251, document 2 is given the file name ‘MB22-000042’. I assume all 
such Ministerial briefings in this form are also given a discrete briefing number in the 
‘MB’ sequence, and that there is also a standardised briefing note file 
pathway/sequence for al  briefings to the CEO. I am not requesting other forms of 
briefings, such as email briefings.  
 
3)           The method of confirming Mr Swainson as the contact officer would be as 

listed in that field of the formal briefing note. I assume ‘Contact’ (or an equivalent 
such title in the CEO briefing note template, should it be slightly different) is a 
standard field of the briefing note template, so this should be readily searchable to 
identify the requested briefings.  Please also include all briefings where Mr 
Swainson’s name is listed in the ‘Cleared by’ field. 
 
4)           The date range is from the time Mr Swainson was appointed to the position 

of Chief Counsel. 
 
On 15 August 2025, my colleague Laura explained how we would be conducting searches, 
and the search terms we would use to identify documents that may be relevant to your 
request. Following that correspondence, we have now completed the preliminary searches 
for documents within PDMS. These searched have identified that there are more than 500 
documents that may fall within the scope of your request, not including any attachments 
which may be contained within those documents. 
 
Given the nature of the documents that you are seeking access to, the identified documents 
span across multiple business areas. To process the request as currently worded, it will 
require engagement with multiple staff across these business areas who would need to be 
taken offline from their core duties to work in close consultation with the FOI team to conduct 
a detailed review of each of these documents for any sensitivities and possible exemption 
under the FOI Act, and consider any internal or external consultations and carry these out if 
required. A decision wil  need to be made on each document, the documents wil  need to be 
scheduled and a decision letter prepared.  
 
I estimate that it wil  take at least one hour per document to process your request as 
currently worded, meaning it wil  take over 500 hours. This equates to more than 13 weeks 
of ful  time work to process this request. 
 
As a result, I am of the view that the work involved in the processing of this request would 
substantial y and unreasonably divert the resources of the NDIA from its other operations. 
 
Request consultation process 
You now have an opportunity to revise your request to enable it to proceed. 
 
Revising your request can mean narrowing the scope of the request to make it more 
manageable or explaining in more detail the documents you wish to access. For example, by 
providing more specific information about exactly what documents you are interested in, the 
NDIA wil  be able to pinpoint the documents more quickly and avoid using excessive 
resources to process documents you are not interested in. 
 
To reduce the scope of your request, you might like to consider: 
•  reducing the date scope of your request 
•  selecting a particular topic/subject that you may be interested in. 
 
 
 
 
 

 


 
You have 14 days from the date you receive this letter to contact me and do one of the 
following: 
 
a.  withdraw your request 
b.  make a revised request 
c.  indicate that you do not wish to revise the request. 
 
During this period, you are welcome to seek assistance to revise your request. If you revise 
your request in a way that adequately addresses the practical refusal reason outlined above, 
we wil  recommence processing it. 
 
Please note that the time taken to consult with you regarding the scope of your request is not 
taken into account for the purposes of the timeframe for processing your request. 
 
You can contact me by email at xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx. 
 
Alternatively, you can reply in writing to the following address:  
  Freedom of Information Section 
Information Release, Privacy and Legal Operations Branch   
Reviews and Information Release Division 
National Disability Insurance Agency 
GPO Box 700 
CANBERRA   ACT   2601 
 
If you do not contact me within this period, that is by 5pm, 29 September 2025, your FOI 
request wil  be taken to have been withdrawn under subsection 24AB(7) and wil  not be dealt 
with any further. 
 
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. 
 
Yours sincerely 
 
 
 
 
Carolyn [CJW205] 
Senior Freedom of Information Officer 
Information Release, Privacy and Legal Operations Branch 
Reviews and Information Release Division