This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'NDIA Decison Making Panel'.



 
Our reference:
 FOI 25/26-0177 (LEXD 1690)  
 
 
 
GPO Box 700 
Canberra   ACT   2601 
1800 800 110 
ndis.gov.au 
15 December 2025 
 
Justin Elks  
 
By email: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx  
 
 
Dear Justin Elks 
 
Freedom of Information request — Request consultation process 
 
Thank you for your correspondence of 18 July 2025, in which you requested access under 
the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (FOI Act) to documents held by the National Disability 
Insurance Agency (NDIA). 
 
Scope of your request  
 
You have requested access to the following documents: 
 
…The decision-making process of the NDIA Decision Panel, including but not limited to 
documented procedures, policies, frameworks, guidance material, and internal manuals 
that describe: 
 
The role, composition, and authority of the NDIA Decision Panel; 
 
The process followed by the NDIA Decision Panel when reviewing recommendations 
made by NDIA planners and/or technical advisory teams. 
 
The processes, policies, and criteria by which an NDIA delegate or the Decision Panel 
can override, vary, or decline to adopt recommendations or advice provided by the 
technical advisory team and/or a planner. 
 
Any internal governance policies, directives, or guidance material applicable to Decision 
Panels or delegates about exercising discretion when their decision departs from the 
advice of technical specialists or planners, including any requirements for documenting 
reasons for doing so. 
 
If possible, I request that these documents include any current versions as well as 
versions that have been in force at any time during the past three (3) years. 

 
 
Practical refusal 
I am authorised to make decisions under section 23(1) of the FOI Act. 
 
I am writing to advise that your request does not provide enough information about the 
documents you are seeking as is reasonably necessary to allow us to identify them.  
 
 
 
1  
 

 
Section 15(2) of the FOI Act provides that in order for a request to be considered a valid 
request, it must: 
 
(a)  be in writing; and 
(aa)  state that the request is an application for the purposes of this Act; and 
(b)  provide such information concerning the document as is reasonably necessary to 
enable a responsible officer of the agency, or the Minister, to identify it; and 
(c)  give details of how notices under this Act may be sent to the applicant (for 
example, by providing an electronic address to which notices may be sent by 
electronic communication). 
 
Section 24AA(1) of the FOI Act provides that: 
 
For the purposes of section 24, a practical refusal reason exists in relation to a 
request for a document if: 
… 
 
(b)  the request does not satisfy the requirement in paragraph 15(2)(b) (identification 
of documents). 
 
As we are unable to identify the documents you are seeking, I intend to refuse your request, 
as a practical refusal reason exists. However, before I make a final decision, I am writing to 
provide you with an opportunity to revise your request. This is called a ‘request consultation 
process’ as set out under section 24AB of the FOI Act. You have 14 days to respond to this 
notice in one of the ways set out below. 
 
Why I intend to refuse your request  
 
Preliminary searches of NDIA’s document management systems have been conducted 
using reasonable search terms that could potentially return documents relevant to your 
request. We have also consulted with NDIA staff who are familiar with the systems and 
processes for locating documents within scope. 
 
These searches and consultations indicate that the NDIA operates with many different 
decision panels across different areas of the Agency. Due to the broad nature of your 
request, we are currently unable to identify which specific decision panels you are referring 
to. As a result, your request, in its current form, does not allow us to identify the documents 
you are seeking access to. 
 
To assist us in progressing your request, we seek further clarification from you about the 
particular decision panel you are interested in. 
 
Request consultation process 
You now have an opportunity to revise your request to enable it to proceed. 
 
Revising your request can mean narrowing the scope of the request to make it more 
manageable or explaining in more detail the documents you wish to access. For example, by 
providing more specific information about exactly what documents you are interested in, the 
NDIA will be able to pinpoint the documents more quickly and avoid using excessive 
resources to process documents you are not interested in. 
 
To reduce the scope of your request, we need to know which decision panel you are 
referring to. For example, the Home and Living Panel, or the Complex Assessment Panel.  
 
 

 


 
You have 14 days from the date you receive this letter to contact me and do one of the 
following: 
 
a.  withdraw your request 
b.  make a revised request 
c.  indicate that you do not wish to revise the request. 
 
During this period, you are welcome to seek assistance to revise your request. If you revise 
your request in a way that adequately addresses the practical refusal reason outlined above, 
we will recommence processing it. 
 
Please note that the time taken to consult with you regarding the scope of your request is not 
taken into account for the purposes of the timeframe for processing your request. 
 
You can contact me by email at xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx. 
 
Alternatively, you can reply in writing to the following address:  
 
Freedom of Information Section 
Information Access and Privacy Branch   
Reviews and Information Release Division 
National Disability Insurance Agency 
GPO Box 700 
CANBERRA   ACT   2601 
 
If you do not contact me within this period, that is by 29 December 2025, I will issue you a 
formal decision letter that confirms my reasons for refusing your request. 
 
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. 
 
Yours sincerely 
 
 
 
 
Carolyn (CJW205) 
A/g Assistant Director – Freedom of Information  
Information Access and Privacy Branch 
Reviews and Information Release Division