This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Previously disclosed documents'.

[redactions made under s47F of the FOI Act]
From:
Duggan, Geraint
Sent:
Thursday, 21 March 2019 3:06 PM
To:
Mark Bellgrove
Cc:
Clinical Guidelines
Subject:
RE: ADHD clinical guidelines [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Attachments:
Procedures & Requirements.pdf
Hi Mark 
It was good to talk to you yesterday. As promised here is some follow up information. 
1. What do NHMRC approved guidelines look like?
NHMRC has developed a national clinical practice guidelines portal which hosts evidence based guidelines, both
NHMRC approved and not approved . If you use the advanced search function you can filter by ‘NHMRC
approved’ which will give you a list of the currently approved (i.e. <5 years old) guidelines. I particularly draw
your attention to the Hip and knee osteoarthritis guideline which contains a large number of recommendations
against commonly used but ineffective treatments, and the National stroke guidelines which were developed
using MagicApp and are published on that platform, which is one of the best examples of living guidelines and
which are supported by a sophisticated national clinical audit program.
2. What do I have to do to develop an NHMRC approved guideline?
You will need to meet the NHMRC Guideline development standards and the Procedures and requirements for
meeting the 2011 NHMRC standard for clinical practice guidelines 
(attached). The latter is a step by step guide of
what to do. In addition NHMRC has developed a ‘Guidelines for Guidelines’ online resource ‐ a modular guide to
meeting some of the NHMRC standards. I would encourage you to become familiar with the overall content but
you may find the Identifying and managing conflicts of interest, Consumer involvement, Organisation and
budgeting, Guideline development group and Adapt, adopt or start from scratch modules helpful now as you
plan your guideline.  
3. Training and staffing
As we discussed NHMRC advocates the use of GRADE for guideline development. Training is provided through
one of two approved training centres in Melbourne (Monash) and Adelaide (Joanna Briggs Institute). Both are
recommended.
To recruit methodologists and writers you may wish to get the advice of Cochrane Australia (which may be able
to help Monash affiliated projects, or at least give you advice). You could also look through recent NHMRC
approved guidelines to identify the methodologists used in guidelines you like. Unfortunately NHMRC cannot
recommend individuals or businesses for guideline developers seeking NHMRC approval.
4. Register your guideline
Once you are ready to start the preparatory work you should register your guideline on the NHMRC Guidelines
in development register, checking the box indicating that you will seek NHMRC approval. This will trigger a
formal request to the NHMRC CEO to accept the guideline onto our work plan. You should include as much
information as possible when you register, noting it will be posted on a public facing website.
I hope this is helpful. Please get in touch if you need more information. 
Regards 
Geraint 
1




xxxx.xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx
Australian ADHD Professionals Association Inc 
Inaugural President  
www.ausadhd.com.au
ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0186-8349 
http://www.monash.edu.au/research/profiles/profile.html?sid=1985044&pid=6456 
 
 
 
 
 
M
 
 
 
m
 
   
 
  m 
 
http://www.monash.edu/neuro-institute/ 
I acknowledge the Traditional Owners and Custodians of the lands on which I live and work and pay my respect to Elders both past and 
present
--  
PROFESSOR MARK A. BELLGROVE
Director of Research, Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences 
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Senior Research Fellow
Monash Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neurosciences 
School of Psychological Sciences
Monash University
18 Innovation Walk 
Clayton Campus, Clayton VIC 3800
Australia
xxxx.xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx
Australian ADHD Professionals Association Inc 
Inaugural President  
www.ausadhd.com.au
3


ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0186-8349 
http://www.monash.edu.au/research/profiles/profile.html?sid=1985044&pid=6456 
 
 
 
M
 
 
m
 
 

 
http://www.monash.edu/neuro-institute/ 
I acknowledge the Traditional Owners and Custodians of the lands on which I live and work and pay my respect to Elders both past and 
present
4



Electronic document
© Commonwealth of Australia 2011 
This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce the whole or part of this 
work in unaltered form for your own personal use or, if you are part of an organisation, for internal 
use within your organisation, but only if you or your organisation do not use the reproduction for 
any commercial purpose and retain this copyright notice and all disclaimer notices as part of that 
reproduction. Apart from rights to use as permitted by the Copyright Act 1968 or allowed by this 
copyright notice, all other rights are reserved and you are not allowed to reproduce the whole or  
any part of this work in any way (electronic or otherwise) without first being given the specific  
written permission from the Commonwealth to do so. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction 
and rights are to be sent to Strategic Communications, National Health and Medical Research Council, 
GPO Box 1421, Canberra ACT 2600 or via email to xxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx.xx.  
ISBN Online: 1864964642
This document replaces NHMRC standards and procedures for externally developed guidelines (2007).
This document will apply to all externally developed clinical practice guidelines for which intention 
to seek NHMRC approval is registered on or after 1 January 2011.
Preferred citation
National Health and Medical Research Council. Procedures and requirements for meeting the 2011 
NHMRC standard for clinical practice guidelines
. Melbourne: National Health and Medical Research 
Council; 2011.
Revision history
The following table describes a summary of the changes made to this document since original 
publication.
Version
Date
Amendment notes
1
May 2011
First publication
1.1
January 2012
Minor formatting corrections
Contact: 
National Health and Medical Research Council 
Level 1  
16 Marcus Clarke Street 
Canberra ACT 2601
GPO Box 1421
Canberra ACT 2601
Ph: 61 2 6217 9000
Fax: 61 2 6217 9100
Email: xxxxx@xxxxx.xxx.xx
Website: www.nhmrc.gov.au 
NHMRC Reference code: CP133

PRoceduRes aNd ReQuiReMeNts FoR MeetiNG tHe 2011 NHMRc staNdaRd FoR cliNical PRactice GuideliNes
table of contents
table of contents
How to contact NHMRC 
1
About NHMRC approval 
1
1. Introduction 
2
Purpose 
2
Scope 
3
Before starting guideline development 
4
2. Procedures for seeking NHMRC approval 
6
Summary 
6
Document preparation 
8
Stage 1  Register intention to seek NHMRC approval 
9
Stage 2  Develop guideline in accordance with NHMRC requirements 
10
Stage 3  Release draft guideline for public consultation 
11
Stage 4  Submit final draft guideline 
13
Stage 5  Publish approved clinical practice guideline 
14
3. Requirements for meeting the NHMRC standard 
16
Introduction 
16
A.  Governance and stakeholder involvement 
16
B.  Scope and purpose 
17
C.  Evidence review 
18
D.  Guideline recommendations 
19
E.  Guideline structure and style 
21
F.  Public consultation 
22
G.  Dissemination and implementation of guidelines 
23
Abbreviations and special terms used 
24
References 
29
List of tables and figures
Box 1.1 
Summary of NHMRC standard for clinical practice guidelines 
2
Box 1.2 
Summary of what has changed 
4
Box 1.3 
NHMRC resources for guideline developers 
5
Table 2.1  Summary of procedures to seek NHMRC approval of clinical practice guidelines 
6
Table 2.2  Summary of documents required for NHMRC approval of clinical practice guidelines 
8
ii
NatioNal HealtH aNd Medical ReseaRcH couNcil

PRoceduRes aNd ReQuiReMeNts FoR MeetiNG tHe 2011 NHMRc staNdaRd FoR cliNical PRactice GuideliNes
How to contact NHMRC
Email: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx.xx
Telephone: 03 8866 0400
At any time please contact NHMRC to:
• provide updates on the timeline for development of a clinical practice guideline seeking 
NHMRC approval 
• ask for more information, including dates of NHMRC Council meetings to facilitate timing of 
guideline submission for consideration for approval
• submit documents as required
• enquire about a guideline submission.
Information on clinical practice guidelines developed for use in Australian health care settings 
can be accessed through the Clinical Practice Guidelines Portal www.clinicalguidelines.gov.au.
Proposed clinical practice guidelines should be listed on Guidelines in Development Register: 
www.clinicalguidelines.gov.au/in-development/register.
About NHMRC approval
NHMRC approval of a clinical practice guideline is generally valid for a maximum of five years, and 
applies only to the version of the guideline that was approved by NHMRC. Subsequent versions 
must be resubmitted for approval.
Approval of an externally developed clinical practice guideline indicates that NHMRC considers that 
the guideline is based on the systematic identification and synthesis of the best available scientific 
evidence and makes clear recommendations for health professionals practising in Australia.
NHMRC will only approve guidelines that meet all the mandatory requirements listed in Part 3 of 
this document. Developers are encouraged to meet the desirable requirements to improve guideline 
quality and implementability.
Guidelines with NHMRC approval are recognised in Australia and internationally as representing 
current medical knowledge and best practice in health care.
More information 
Resources for developers of clinical practice guidelines and up-to-date information about the approval 
process is available at www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines/developers.htm.
NatioNal HealtH aNd Medical ReseaRcH couNcil
1

PRoceduRes aNd ReQuiReMeNts FoR MeetiNG tHe 2011 NHMRc staNdaRd FoR cliNical PRactice GuideliNes
introduction
1. introduction
The National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) has a statutory responsibility to 
provide leadership in the development of high-quality clinical practice guidelines in Australia. 
Under Section 14A of the Commonwealth National Health and Medical Research Council 
(NHMRC) Act 19921, NHMRC can also approve selected clinical practice guidelines developed 
by other organisations.
As part of this role, NHMRC sets standards in clinical practice guideline development (outlined in 
Box 1.1). Clinical practice guidelines should be based on the systematic identification and synthesis 
of the best available scientific evidence and make clear recommendations for health professionals 
practising in an Australian health care setting. The NHMRC requirements for developing clinical 
practice guidelines are designed to ensure that this standard is upheld. 
The Procedures and requirements for meeting the 2011 NHMRC standard for clinical practice 
guidelines 
replace those described in NHMRC standards and procedures for externally developed 
guidelines 
(2007). The new procedures and requirements draw on Australian and international best 
practice and incorporate dimensions from internationally validated guideline appraisal instruments.2-4
This document applies to all new and revised clinical practice guidelines seeking NHMRC approval 
from 1 January 2011. Key changes to the approval process are outlined in Box 1.2.
Box 1.1  Summary of NHMRC standard for clinical practice guidelines
To meet the NHMRC standard, clinical practice guidelines must:
•  provide guidance on a clearly defined clinical problem based on an identified need 
•  be developed by a multidisciplinary group that includes relevant experts, end users and consumers 
affected by the clinical practice guideline
•  include a transparent process for declaration and management of potential conflicts of interest by  
each member of the guideline development group
•  be based on the systematic identification and synthesis of the best available scientific evidence
•  make clear and actionable recommendations in plain English for health professionals practising in an 
Australian health care setting
•  be easy to navigate for end-users
•  undergo a process of public consultation and independent external clinical expert review 
•  incorporate a plan for dissemination including issues for consideration in implementation
Purpose
The purposes of this document are to:
• describe the NHMRC standard for clinical practice guidelines
• outline the procedures for NHMRC approval of clinical practice guidelines developed by  
external organisations (Part 2)
• set out the requirements that must be met in the preparation of clinical practice guidelines  
to ensure that the NHMRC standard is upheld (Part 3).
Further information, including forms and templates for aspects of the approval process, are 
available at http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines/information-guideline-developers.   
2
NatioNal HealtH aNd Medical ReseaRcH couNcil

PRoceduRes aNd ReQuiReMeNts FoR MeetiNG tHe 2011 NHMRc staNdaRd FoR cliNical PRactice GuideliNes
introduction
Scope
Target users
This information is provided for developers of clinical practice guidelines who intend to seek 
NHMRC approval. Ideally, it should be read before beginning the process of developing a clinical 
practice guideline. This document may also be useful to funders of clinical practice guidelines  
who wish to be informed by the NHMRC standard.
NHMRC will consider for approval guidelines that have been produced under the auspices of 
expert organisationsi including medical colleges, peak bodies representing medical specialists, 
medical special interest associations, professional societies, public or private health organisations, 
non-government agencies and federal or state government agencies.
The NHMRC does not consider for approval clinical practice guidelines:
• developed and issued by individuals who are not officially sponsored or supported by one of  
the above types of organisations
• developed, published or funded by industry groups (or organisations whose main source of 
funding is derived from industry groups) with a financial interestii in the guideline clinical area.
Types of guidelines to which this document applies
These procedures and requirements apply to clinical practice guidelines developed for national  
use within Australia and published in full-text format.
New editions of previously published clinical practice guidelines seeking NHMRC approval 
(whether or not they were previously approved by NHMRC) should also follow the Procedures and 
requirements for meeting the 2011 NHMRC standard for clinical practice guidelines
 (2011), each 
time they are revised to include new clinical evidence. This document does not apply to guidelines 
published only in a web-based format with frequent, rapid updating.

For an overview of the types of organisations that have developed NHMRC-approved guidelines, visit the NHMRC Clinical 
Practice Guidelines Portal (www.clinicalguideline.gov.au) and in the 'Browse by' field choose 'NHMRC approved' from  
the menu.
ii  Information about conflict of interest is currently under development by NHMRC.
NatioNal HealtH aNd Medical ReseaRcH couNcil
3

PRoceduRes aNd ReQuiReMeNts FoR MeetiNG tHe 2011 NHMRc staNdaRd FoR cliNical PRactice GuideliNes
introduction
Box 1.2  Summary of what has changed
Procedures and requirements for meeting the 2011 NHMRC standard for clinical practice guidelines (2011) 
replaces NHMRC standards and procedures for externally developed guidelines (2007). Developers should 
note the following key differences:
•  All clinical practice guidelines seeking NHMRC approval must now register on the Guidelines in 
Development Register (www.clinicalguidelines.gov.au/in-development) at the beginning of the process 
(Part 2: Procedures, Stage 1). Early notification prior to commencement will enable NHMRC to 
process this request and notify developers in a timely manner. Developers should ensure that timing  
of registration will enable them to submit progress reports at required intervals.
•  All clinical practice guidelines approved by NHMRC must now include a brief (1-page) plain English 
summary (Part 3: Requirements, E.3).
•  Developers are now required to circulate the public consultation draft to relevant government 
agencies, including the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory 
Committee (PBAC) and Medical Services Advisory Committee (MSAC), and to the Director-
General, Chief Executive or Secretary of each Australian health department (state, territory and 
Commonwealth) as part of the public consultation process.
•  Developers are now required to identify and consult with key professional organisations (such 
as specialty colleges) and consumer organisations that will be involved in, or affected by, the 
implementation of the clinical recommendations of the guideline.
•  Developers are now required to engage at least 2 reviewers, who must be independent of the 
guideline development process, to assess the guideline using the AGREE II instrument3, 5 prior to 
submission of the final draft guideline to NHMRC for approval. This enables the assessment of 
guidelines against internationally accepted appraisal instruments (Part 3: Requirements, D.15). 
•  Developers will be asked to nominate up to 6 potential reviewers who are clinical experts in area/s 
covered by the guideline and are independent of the guideline development process. NHMRC will engage 
independent clinical expert reviewers as part of the approval process (Part 2: Procedures, Stage 4). 
•  As part of the public consultation process, NHMRC will notify NHMRC Council Members that the 
public consultation draft is available for their comment as individuals or on behalf of their jurisdictions 
(Part 2: Procedures, Stage 2).
•  The NHMRC Guidelines Assessment Register (GAR) program has ceased. Guideline developers are 
now responsible for accessing methodological expertise (Part 1: Introduction, Expertise and resources).
Before starting guideline development
Expertise and resources
Guideline development is a complex, lengthy and resource-intensive task. It is the responsibility 
of the developer organisation to ensure that the resources required (financial support, access to 
clinical and methodological expertise, and project management and administrative capacity) have 
been considered and secured prior to commencement. 
During guideline development, NHMRC staff are available to provide developers with further 
information or clarification of the NHMRC standard. Developers are strongly advised to access 
methodological expertise, in addition to and separate from clinical or content expertise, to assist 
them in the systematic identification, appraisal and interpretation of clinical evidence.
In addition, NHMRC resources (Box 1.3) have been published to provide further guidance for 
developers. These resources are scheduled for revision by NHMRC from 2011.
4
NatioNal HealtH aNd Medical ReseaRcH couNcil

PRoceduRes aNd ReQuiReMeNts FoR MeetiNG tHe 2011 NHMRc staNdaRd FoR cliNical PRactice GuideliNes
introduction
Box 1.3. NHMRC resources for guideline developers
A guide to the development, evaluation and implementation of clinical practice guidelines (1999) 
This publication includes the accompanying handbooks:
How to review the evidence: systematic identification and review of scientific literature (2000)
How to present the evidence for consumers: preparation of consumer publications (2000)
How to prepare and present evidence-based information for consumers of health services: a literature review (1999)
How to put evidence into practice: implementation and dissemination strategies (2000)
How to use the evidence: assessment and application of scientific evidence (2000)
How to compare the costs and benefits: evaluation of the economic evidence (2001)
Using socioeconomic evidence in clinical practice guidelines (2003) 
These publications are available at http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines/resources-guideline-developers
Managing timelines
Indicative times taken for NHMRC to respond at each stage of the approval process are summarised 
in Table 2.1 in Part 2. Developers are requested to make an accurate estimate of the guideline 
development timelines and key milestones (public consultation and submission of the final draft 
guideline for consideration for approval) at the beginning of the development process. It is the 
developer’s responsibility to notify NHMRC if the timelines change during the development  
process. Delays may affect eligibility for consideration of the final draft guideline for approval  
(Part 2: Procedures, Stage 2: Providing a timetable of key milestones). 
Version control
A clinical practice guideline seeking NHMRC approval should not be disseminated, prior to 
approval, other than for public consultation purposes. Drafts circulated for this purposes should  
be clearly marked as such.
For administrative purposes, the final draft guideline should be submitted electronically as plain 
text (e.g. Word document, rich text format document or PDF). Developers should be aware that 
amendments may be requested by NHMRC prior to approval.
Guideline implementation
NHMRC recognises that implementation of guideline recommendations is critical for clinical 
practice improvement. It should be considered throughout the development of the guideline.  
In practice, however, many organisations that develop clinical practice guidelines do not have a 
role in implementation, or do not have access to funding to implement guideline recommendations. 
Often, the working group responsible for developing the guideline recommendations is not the 
same group responsible for implementation. 
In recognition of this, a set of requirements are included in Part 3: Requirements, G. It is a 
mandatory requirement that clinical practice guidelines seeking NHMRC approval must, as a 
minimum, contain a plan for dissemination of the guideline (Requirement G.1) and should 
highlight key guideline recommendations that are most likely to lead to improvements in health 
outcomes for consideration in implementation (Requirement G.2). It is a desirable requirement 
(Requirement G.3) that, where possible, a plan for implementing the guideline is also provided.
NHMRC requires that a document with the dissemination and /or implementation plan along with 
the key recommendations for implementation is submitted as a separate document to the main 
body of the clinical practice guideline for consideration of approval at Stage 4. NHMRC approval 
will cover the full guideline, but not the specific activities or the identified key recommendations 
contained within the dissemination or implementation plan. It will be the guideline developer’s 
responsibility to liaise with the relevant authorities to put these activities into action.
NatioNal HealtH aNd Medical ReseaRcH couNcil
5

PRoceduRes aNd ReQuiReMeNts FoR MeetiNG tHe 2011 NHMRc staNdaRd FoR cliNical PRactice GuideliNes
Procedures for seeking NHMRc approval
2.   Procedures for seeking NHMRc approval
Summary
The procedures are described as five stages in the following section. The responsibilities of the 
guideline developer and NHMRC at each stage are summarised in Table 2.1.
TaBle 2.1. Summary of procedures to seek NHMRC approval of clinical practice guidelines 
STAGE
WHAT THE DEVELoPER MuST Do
WHAT NHMRC WILL Do
Stage 1. 
As soon as possible:
Register 
intention to 
Notify NHMRC of the intention to seek  
Formally advise developer, in writing,  
seek NHMRC 
NHMRC approval via the Guidelines in 
of the CEO’s decision whether to 
approval
Development Register. 
consider the guideline for approval. 
NB. Developers should ensure that the timing  
Normally this takes 2–4 weeks from  
of registration of their guideline will enable  
date of registration, unless the CEO  
them to submit progress report/s at the  
seeks advice from Council. 
required intervals (see Stage 2).
Notify AHMAC if NHMRC agrees  
to consider guideline
MILESToNE: NHMRC AGREES To CoNSIDER GuIDELINE FoR APPRoVAL
Stage 2. 
As soon as possible:
Develop 
guideline in 
Submit timeline of key milestones. An accurate 
Acknowledge the proposed timeline  
accordance 
estimate of date for planned public consultation  
in writing.
with NHMRC 
is required. 
requirements
3–6 months before planned public consultation period:
Submit progress report (including nominations  
Inform developer in writing if any major 
of potential clinical expert reviewers).
issues or gaps in the development 
Address any issues identified by NHMRC  
process are identified (4–8 weeks from 
within one month from receipt of response to 
receipt of progress report).
progress report. 
At any time:
Notify NHMRC in writing if timelines change.
Advise developer of any updates  
as required.
6
NatioNal HealtH aNd Medical ReseaRcH couNcil

PRoceduRes aNd ReQuiReMeNts FoR MeetiNG tHe 2011 NHMRc staNdaRd FoR cliNical PRactice GuideliNes
Procedures for seeking NHMRc approval
STAGE
WHAT THE DEVELoPER MuST Do
WHAT NHMRC WILL Do
Stage 3. 
Confirm the start date of the public consultation 
Notify Council members of the public 
Release draft 
period with NHMRC 2 weeks prior to the 
consultation period and how to access 
guideline 
publication of the first notice of public consultation. 
the draft. 
for public 
Provide the draft guideline and details of public 
Request that Council members who 
consultation 
consultation, including dates, web links and 
wish to provide comments as individuals† 
submission requirements to NHMRC five days prior 
do so directly to developer during the 
the start date of the public consultation period.
specified public consultation period.
Release draft guideline for public consultation in 
Encourage Council members to seek 
accordance with requirements (Refer to Part 3: 
advice from their jurisdictions or other 
F. Public consultation).
expert sources within their networks,  
Provide draft guideline to relevant stakeholders, 
as they see fit.
including TGA, PBAC and MSAC, the Director-
General, Chief Executive or Secretary of state, 
territory and Commonwealth departments of 
health, and key professional organisations (such 
as specialty colleges) and consumer organisations 
that will be involved in or affected by the 
implementation of guideline recommendations.
Document and address all comments received 
during public consultation. 
Notify NHMRC of intended date for submission  
of final guideline draft for approval (at least  
2 months prior to submission date).
Stage 4.  
Submit final draft guideline to NHMRC for approval 
Arrange independent methodological 
Submit final 
(at least two months prior to the Council meeting 
and clinical expert review of final draft  
draft guideline 
at which developer requests the final draft guideline 
of guideline.
to be considered).*
Consider methodological and clinical 
Address any issues raised by reviewers as 
expert reviewers’ comments. Seek 
requested by NHMRC.
further information from developer 
Address any issues raised at or prior to Council 
in preparation of papers for Council 
meeting.
consideration (if required). 
Inform developer in writing whether  
the guideline is approved by NHMRC  
(up to 4 weeks after Council meeting).
MILESToNE: NHMRC APPRoVES GuIDELINE
Stage 5.  
Publish and disseminate guideline within 16 weeks 
Inform developer of the NHMRC 
Publish 
of date of NHMRC approval, in accordance with 
publishing obligations and requirements.
approved 
NHMRC publishing requirements.
Once published, assess guideline for 
clinical practice 
inclusion on Clinical Practice Guidelines 
guideline
Portal§ and announce in NHMRC 
publications (NHMRC Tracker6 and 
NICS Update7).
AHMAC: Australian Health Ministers Advisory Council 
CEO: NHMRC Chief Executive Officer
Council: Council of the NHMRC 
MSAC: Medical Services Advisory Committee
PBAC: Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee 
TGA: Therapeutic Goods Administration 
Contact details for these agencies are available from NHMRC.
* Developers should approach NHMRC to request information on upcoming Council Meeting dates.
†  Comments submitted at this Stage represent those of individual Council members and/or their jurisdictions, 
and not those of the NHMRC Council.
§  All clinical practice guidelines produced in Australia are assessed prior to inclusion on the NHMRC Clinical 
Practice Guidelines Portal (www.clinicalguidelines.gov.au/about.php).
NatioNal HealtH aNd Medical ReseaRcH couNcil
7

PRoceduRes aNd ReQuiReMeNts FoR MeetiNG tHe 2011 NHMRc staNdaRd FoR cliNical PRactice GuideliNes
Procedures for seeking NHMRc approval
Document preparation
It is the responsibility of the guideline developer to document all processes and to demonstrate 
how they meet the NHMRC mandatory requirements for approval. A list of documents required  
for submission to NHMRC is summarised in Table 2.2.
TaBle 2.2. Summary of documents required for NHMRC approval of clinical practice guidelines
DoCuMENT NAME
DESCRIPTIoN
SuBMISSIoN TIME
Progress report
Provides details of aspects of the guideline 
Approximately 6 months  
development process. The developer must submit 
(and not later than 3 months) 
a progress report to confirm the intention to 
before the draft guideline is 
seek NHMRC approval (progress report template 
released for public consultation.
available at http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines/
If the timeline is altered due to 
resources-guideline-developers). 
delays in guideline development, 
NHMRC may request further 
progress reports.
Draft guideline 
Draft guideline with content intended for use in 
Public consultation draft and 
clinical setting.
final draft versions required.
Technical report
A record of the evidence review process  
Submitted with final draft  
(refer to Part 3: Requirements for the 
for approval.
information to be included).
Should also be made available 
with public consultation draft.
Administrative report 
Non-technical information relating to process 
Submitted with final draft  
of guideline development (refer to Part 3: 
for approval.
Requirements for the information to be included).
May also be made available  
with public consultation draft.
Dissemination plan
A document separate from the main guideline 
Submitted with final draft  
document which contains, at a minimum, details  
or approval.
of the dissemination plan for the guideline.  
Should also be made available 
This document should also highlight key guideline 
with public consultation draft.
recommendations that are most likely to lead  
to improvements in health outcomes, for 
consideration in implementation. 
Public consultation 
Documents details of public consultation 
Submitted with final draft  
submissions summary
submissions and guideline developer responses 
or approval.
(further information on public consultation is 
available at: http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines/
resources-guideline-developers).
For NHMRC administrative purposes, developers must submit documents electronically in plain text 
(e.g. DOC, PDF or rich text format). Once approved, developers may choose to publish their final 
guideline in print, electronic or interactive online formats. 
The information that is required to be included in the guideline (including appendices), the 
administrative report and the technical report is detailed in Part 3: Requirements. All information 
in the technical and administrative reports must be readily accessible to the public when the 
guideline is published (Part 3: Requirements E.11–E.12).
8
NatioNal HealtH aNd Medical ReseaRcH couNcil

PRoceduRes aNd ReQuiReMeNts FoR MeetiNG tHe 2011 NHMRc staNdaRd FoR cliNical PRactice GuideliNes
Procedures for seeking NHMRc approval
Stage 1. Register intention to seek NHMRC approval
Registration
The NHMRC Guidelines in Development Register (www.clinicalguidelines.gov.au/in-development) 
provides a central point of reference for Australian clinical practice guidelines that are planned or 
under development. It is designed to reduce duplication of effort and foster greater collaboration 
between guideline developers. The Guidelines in Development Register also acts as the entry point 
for developers of clinical practice guidelines to identify their intention to seek NHMRC approval of 
their final draft guideline.
Before proposing a new clinical practice guideline, it is the responsibility of guideline developers to 
undertake a formal needs analysis to inform the guideline scope. This should draw on information 
listed in the NHMRC Clinical Practice Guidelines Portal and Register (www.clinicalguidelines.gov.au), 
and include an assessment of burden of disease and identification of the clinical problem (including 
variation in clinical practice). 
All developer organisations intending to seek NHMRC approval of clinical practice guidelines should 
register proposed guidelines on the NHMRC Guidelines in Development Register before starting the 
development process (www.clinicalguidelines.gov.au/in-development/registration-form).
NHMRC will notify developers when their proposed clinical practice guidelines have been listed on 
the NHMRC Guidelines in Development Register.
IMPORTANT
Early notification prior to commencement will enable NHMRC to process this request and notify 
developers in a timely manner. Developers should ensure that the timing of registration of a guideline 
seeking NHMRC approval will enable progress report submission timelines to be met. 
Initial assessment of eligibility for approval consideration
Following registration, NHMRC will assess the scope of the proposed clinical practice guideline  
to determine whether the registered guideline will be considered by NHMRC for approval. 
The final decision on whether to agree to consider a guideline for approval is made by the 
NHMRC’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO). The CEO may choose to seek further advice from  
NHMRC Council before making this decision. NHMRC will formally advise the developer, in  
writing, of the CEO’s decision.
Only guidelines intended to apply nationally will be considered for approval. NHMRC will not 
consider for approval guidelines developed for a specific local context or health service. 
If the CEO declines to consider a guideline for approval, a reason will be stated. 
When a guideline is accepted to be considered for NHMRC approval, NHMRC will routinely 
notify the Australian Health Ministers Advisory Council (AHMAC) to give state and territory health 
departments advance notice of current guidelines in development seeking NHMRC approval.
NatioNal HealtH aNd Medical ReseaRcH couNcil
9

PRoceduRes aNd ReQuiReMeNts FoR MeetiNG tHe 2011 NHMRc staNdaRd FoR cliNical PRactice GuideliNes
Procedures for seeking NHMRc approval
Stage 2.  Develop guideline in accordance with  
NHMRC requirements
Provide a timetable of key milestones
When beginning the guideline development process, it is essential that the developer determines 
an accurate estimate of when the guideline will be released for public consultation, as well as an 
estimate of the final submission date. 
At any time in the development process the developer must notify NHMRC if the dates of public 
consultation or final submission change, to allow the planned NHMRC-commissioned review 
process to be adjusted. At any time NHMRC may request more information from developer,  
if appropriate.
A realistic and accurate timeline is crucial, as it is a mandatory requirement (Part 3: Requirement C4) 
that the systematic review is current and includes evidence published within:iii
• 12 months of the date on which the draft guideline is released for public consultation
• 20 months of the date on which the final draft guideline is submitted to NHMRC for approval.
IMPORTANT
Estimates of timelines for public consultation and final submission must be as accurate as possible. 
Delays may affect eligibility for consideration of the final draft guideline for approval.
Evidence review
Each guideline should be based on a systematic review and critical appraisal of the current scientific 
literature (Part 3: Requirements, C). Further guidance on evidence review, including NHMRC levels 
of evidence and grades for recommendations for developers of clinical practice guidelines 
(2009), is 
available at http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines/resources-guideline-developers.
Progress report
To confirm the intention to seek NHMRC approval for a clinical practice guideline, the developer 
must submit the first progress report approximately six months (and not later than three months) 
before the draft guideline is released for public consultation (progress report template available at  
http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines/resources-guideline-developers). NHMRC will inform the 
developer in writing if any major issues or gaps in the development process are identified within 
4–8 weeks from receipt of the progress report.
If delays in guideline development occur that alter the timeframes for the public consultation  
and/or final submission dates, further progress reports may be requested by NHMRC. 
At this time developers will also be requested to nominate potential clinical expert reviewers  
for the final assessment at Stage 4. Guidance for developers on identifying appropriate 
potential clinical expert reviewers is available from 
http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines/resources-guideline-developers.
iii  This is to ensure that evidence base used to support guideline recommendations is within two years of the publication date 
of the guideline.
10
NatioNal HealtH aNd Medical ReseaRcH couNcil

PRoceduRes aNd ReQuiReMeNts FoR MeetiNG tHe 2011 NHMRc staNdaRd FoR cliNical PRactice GuideliNes
Procedures for seeking NHMRc approval
other documents the developer must prepare during Stage 2
In addition to the draft guideline, the draft technical and administrative reports  
(see Part 2: Document preparation) must be prepared during this stage.
The technical report must be submitted with final draft for approval. It should also be made 
available with public consultation draft.
The administrative report must also be submitted with final draft for approval. It may also be  
made available with the public consultation draft.
Stage 3. Release draft guideline for public consultation
Publishing a notice of public consultation
In accordance with Section 14A of the NHMRC Act 1992 (Cwlth)1 and NHMRC Regulations 2006 
(Cwlth)8,developers seeking NHMRC approval must publish a notice inviting public submissions 
on the draft guideline for a minimum period of 30 days (Part 3: Requirements F.1). In summary:
• The developer must publish a notice in at least one major national daily newspaper.  
The developer may also publish a notice in any other way the organisation or group of 
organisations considers appropriate.
• The notice must contain a summary of the draft guidelines and state where copies of the draft 
guidelines could be obtained. Developers should ensure that this public consultation draft 
guideline is clearly marked to indicate its draft status.
• The notice must identify the last day the developer will accept submissions, which must be,  
at a minimum, 30 days after the notice is first published.
Further detail regarding requirements for public consultation, including a suggested format  
for the consultation notice, is available at:  
http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines/resources-guideline-developers.
The developer may also undertake additional consultation at this time or at any time during 
guideline development.
Developers may wish to use additional methods to publicise their public consultation period 
(including media releases or public events). 
If the public consultation draft refers to NHMRC approval, it must clearly indicate that the guideline 
has not yet been approved by NHMRC and that approval, if granted, would apply to the final draft that 
is yet to be submitted for consideration following any amendments made after public consultation. 
Before public consultation, developers should contact NHMRC (see How to Contact NHMRC) for 
advice on the permitted wording of references to NHMRC and NHMRC approval.
Notifying NHMRC of public consultation 
Developers are requested to confirm the start date of the public consultation period with NHMRC 
two weeks prior to the publication of the first notice of public consultation.
Developers are requested liaise with the NHMRC staff to ensure the draft guideline and details 
of public consultation, including dates, web links and submission requirements are provided to 
NHMRC five days prior to the start date of the public consultation period.
NatioNal HealtH aNd Medical ReseaRcH couNcil
11

PRoceduRes aNd ReQuiReMeNts FoR MeetiNG tHe 2011 NHMRc staNdaRd FoR cliNical PRactice GuideliNes
Procedures for seeking NHMRc approval
When the draft clinical practice guideline is released for public consultation, NHMRC will notify 
Council members. Council members will be encouraged to consider the public consultation draft as 
individuals and/or seek expert advice from their jurisdictions or other expert sources within their 
networks, as they see fit. Comments and feedback from a Council member will be submitted the 
directly to the developer during the specified public consultation period.
Advice from relevant authorities
The guideline developer is required to send a public consultation draft guideline to the Director-
General, Chief Executive or Secretary of each state, territory and Commonwealth health department. 
The guideline developer is also required to send a public consultation draft guideline to relevant 
government agencies, including Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA), the Pharmaceutical 
Benefits Advisory Committee (PBAC) and the Medical Services Advisory Committee (MSAC), 
specifically highlighting recommendations in the draft clinical guideline that are relevant to these 
agencies (Part 3: Requirements, D.10 and F.3). These may include recommendations that: 
• specify interventions that are not available or restricted in Australia (e.g. the use of medicines that 
are not registered by the TGA or are outside registered indications, or the use or medicines that 
are not listed for reimbursement by the PBS) 
• require, or would be supported by, a change in service delivery (e.g. services for which patients 
and practitioners are not reimbursed through the Medicare Benefits Schedule). 
Contact details for these agencies are available from NHMRC.
Consulting with other stakeholders
The guideline developers is required to identify and consult with key professional organisations 
that will be involved in, or affected by, the implementation of the clinical recommendations of  
the guideline. This may include specialist colleges whose members are target users, or which  
will disseminate the guideline to members, and foundations whose interest area/s are covered  
by the guideline.
The guideline developer is required to identify and consult with key consumer organisations that 
will be affected by the guideline.
After public consultation
The developer must document all the submissions lodged in response to the public consultation 
notice and record them in a summary table that sets out each comment received and a justification 
as to why each comment resulted in an amendment of the guideline or not. Information on 
preparing a public consultation submissions summary is available at:  
http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines/resources-guideline-developers. 
Where advice has been specifically sought from relevant authorities and any other stakeholders,  
all responses (including nil response) should be documented and the resulting amendments or 
other actions clearly stated in the public consultation submissions summary table.
The public consultation submissions summary must be submitted to NHMRC with the final draft 
guideline at Stage 4. The final draft submitted for approval should include all amendments and 
changes made as a result of the public consultation comments.
12
NatioNal HealtH aNd Medical ReseaRcH couNcil

PRoceduRes aNd ReQuiReMeNts FoR MeetiNG tHe 2011 NHMRc staNdaRd FoR cliNical PRactice GuideliNes
Procedures for seeking NHMRc approval
Stage 4. Submit final draft guideline
Developers must notify NHMRC of the intended date for submission of the final draft guideline 
for approval at least two months prior to the intended submission date. Developers can request 
information from NHMRC (How to Contact NHMRC) on upcoming Council meeting dates. 
Final draft guidelines should be submitted at least two months prior the Council meeting at  
which developers request the draft guideline to be considered.
For example, developers who wish their guideline to be considered at a Council meeting scheduled 
for 1 July must notify NHMRC on or earlier than 1 March of their intention to submit. Developers 
must also submit the final draft guideline no later than 1 May.
Documents to be submitted at final draft stage 
For administrative purposes, the final draft guideline should be submitted electronically as plain 
text (e.g. a Word document, rich text format document or PDF). Developers may choose to publish 
their final guideline in print, electronic or interactive online formats.
Developers should be aware that amendments to the final draft guideline may be requested by 
NHMRC. Accordingly, the final draft guideline should be marked to indicate its draft status. Before 
being considered for approval by NHMRC, the final draft guideline should not be circulated, other 
than for purposes of review by the writing group or guideline committee.
The following documents must be submitted with the final draft guideline:
• the technical report (described in Part 2: Procedures, Document Preparation)
• the administrative report (described in Part 2: Procedures, Document Preparation)
• the public consultation submissions summary (described in Stage 3)
• the dissemination plan (and implementation plan, if one has been developed) (described in  
Part 2: Procedures, Document Preparation).
Guideline reviews prior to Council consideration for approval
NHMRC will initiate independent methodological and clinical expert reviews of the final  
draft guideline. 
Independent methodological review
The purpose of the independent methodological review is to assess the draft clinical practice 
guideline and related process documentation to determine whether the development process 
undertaken was appropriate to meet the NHMRC standard (i.e. NHMRC processes have been 
adhered to and NHMRC requirements have been met). Independent methodological reviewers  
will have expertise in evidence review methodology and guideline development. These reviewers 
will be selected by NHMRC after determining that they have no current or prior association with 
the guideline development process.
Independent clinical expert review
The purpose of the independent clinical expert review is to evaluate the appropriateness of the 
clinical recommendations, based on an overview of the body of evidence. 
NHMRC will select clinical expert reviewers with:
• appropriate clinical content expertise
• no current or prior association with guideline development process
• no affiliations with the developer organisation or funding bodies.
NatioNal HealtH aNd Medical ReseaRcH couNcil
13

PRoceduRes aNd ReQuiReMeNts FoR MeetiNG tHe 2011 NHMRc staNdaRd FoR cliNical PRactice GuideliNes
Procedures for seeking NHMRc approval
Clinical expert reviewers will be asked to consider whether:
• the appropriate evidence been identified and reviewed in line with the scope and clinical 
questions posed by this guideline
• the risks and potential harms of recommendations been fully considered in the context of  
clinical practice, including any medicolegal implications
• other relevant guidelines exist on the same topic (including Australian guidelines, international 
guidelines or other well-referenced guidance) and, if so, whether these are in conflict with 
recommendations made in the guideline. If such conflicts are identified, the clinical expert 
reviewers will consider whether the new guideline recommendations are justified by current 
evidence and their rationale is clearly explained. 
To streamline the time taken for NHMRC to engage appropriate clinical expert reviewers, 
developers are requested to nominate 6 potential clinical expert reviewers and provide a list  
of these with their progress report submitted at Stage 2. Guidance for developers on identifying 
appropriate potential clinical expert reviewers is available at:  
http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines/resources-guideline-developers.
After review
NHMRC may request amendments, clarification or further documentation as a result of reviewer 
comments prior to consideration by Council. This may need to occur quickly to meet timelines for 
Council meetings, and will be negotiated with developers individually, where appropriate.
Council and CEO will consider the final draft guideline and associated documentation along 
with the independent clinical expert and methodological reviewers’ reports. The Chair of the 
multidisciplinary group convened to develop the guideline may be invited to attend the Council 
session to address any outstanding issues raised.
NHMRC may request additional amendments to the guideline prior to approval.
NHMRC will formally notify the guideline developer of the CEO’s decision in writing up to four 
weeks after the Council meeting. If approved, NHMRC approval will be valid for a maximum of  
five years unless otherwise stipulated. Approval may be for a shorter period in clinical areas in 
which new evidence is emerging rapidly.
When NHMRC approval is declined
If a final draft guideline is not approved, NHMRC will advise the developer of the reasons for the 
decision. Any further matters arising, including matters relating to the reasons for refusal may be 
addressed to the CEO of the NHMRC for further consideration within 1 month of this notification.
Stage 5. Publish approved clinical practice guideline
Publishing obligations and requirements for NHMRC approved guidelines
After a clinical practice guideline is approved, NHMRC will inform the developer of publishing 
obligations. These include use of the mandatory NHMRC statement of approval and NHMRC logo. 
Guidelines developed by external organisations and approved by NHMRC may not be represented 
as developed or published by NHMRC. For example, a developer organisation may not use 
the expression ‘an NHMRC guideline’ or ‘NHMRC recommendations’ when promoting NHMRC 
approved clinical practice guidelines.
14
NatioNal HealtH aNd Medical ReseaRcH couNcil

PRoceduRes aNd ReQuiReMeNts FoR MeetiNG tHe 2011 NHMRc staNdaRd FoR cliNical PRactice GuideliNes
Procedures for seeking NHMRc approval
Developers should contact NHMRC (How to Contact NHMRC) to request further information 
on the publishing requirements following approval (including the use of the NHMRC logo and 
approval statement), and not proceed to printing or final layout until this had been addressed. 
The developer must publish the clinical practice guideline within 16 weeks of the date of approval 
stated in the official notification. Following this, NHMRC will publish an approval announcement in 
NHMRC Tracker6 subscription service and NICS Update7 newsletter and provide information on the 
NHMRC website for readers on how to obtain the guideline and associated documents. All clinical 
practice guidelines produced in Australia, including NHMRC approved externally developed clinical 
practice guidelines, are assessed prior to inclusion on the NHMRC Clinical Practice Guidelines 
Portal (www.clinicalguidelines.gov.au).
The NHMRC will not assume any responsibility for the publication or dissemination of externally 
developed guidelines beyond what is stipulated above.
Companion publications
Developers may choose to develop companion documents, based on the evidence found in the 
guideline document, for consumers and health care professionals such as general practitioners and 
nurses. It is recommended that the intended audience of the companion documents should be 
involved in its development and that the draft documents be focus-tested with appropriate target 
user groups prior to finalisation.9 
NHMRC does not provide approval for companion documents. Developers should not display the 
NHMRC logo or approval statement on companion documents.
NatioNal HealtH aNd Medical ReseaRcH couNcil
15

PRoceduRes aNd ReQuiReMeNts FoR MeetiNG tHe 2011 NHMRc staNdaRd FoR cliNical PRactice GuideliNes
Requirements for meeting the NHMRc standard
3.    Requirements for meeting the  
NHMRc standard
Introduction
This section sets out all the requirements that a guideline developer must fulfil before a clinical 
practice guideline will be considered for NHMRC approval. Developers should familiarise 
themselves with all the requirements before beginning the guideline development process.
The tables in this section indicate where each requirement must be documented as a minimum.
NHMRC will only approve guidelines that meet all of the conditions listed as “mandatory”. Developers 
are encouraged to meet the desirable requirements to improve guideline quality and implementability.
IMPORTANT
NHMRC will only approve guidelines that meet all of the requirements listed as “mandatory”. 
Developers are encouraged to meet the desirable requirements to improve guideline quality 
and implementability.
A. Governance and stakeholder involvement
REquIREMENT
DoCuMENTED IN:
Mandatory
The guideline/development process must meet all the fol owing conditions:
a.1 
The organisation/s responsible for developing and publishing the guideline 
Must be in Guideline 
is/are named.
but can also be in 
Administrative report
a.2 
Sources of funding for guideline development, publication and dissemination 
Must be in Guideline 
are stated. 
but can also be in 
Administrative report
a.3   A multidisciplinary group that includes end-users, relevant disciplines and clinical 
Must be in Guideline 
experts is convened to develop the purposes, scope and content of the guideline, 
but can also be in 
and the process and criteria for selecting member are described.
Administrative report
a.4   Consumers participate in the guideline development, and the processes employed 
Administrative report 
to recruit, involve and support consumer participants are described.
a.5    A complete list of all the people involved in the guideline development process is 
Must be in Guideline 
provided, including the following information for each person: name, profession or 
but can also be in 
discipline, organisational affiliation and role in the guideline development process. 
Administrative report
a.6    Potential competing interests are identified, managed and documented, and a 
Administrative report 
competing interest declaration is completed by each member of the guideline 
development group.
a.7 
A list of organisations formally endorsing the guideline is provided.
Must be in Guideline 
but can also be in 
Administrative report
16
NatioNal HealtH aNd Medical ReseaRcH couNcil

PRoceduRes aNd ReQuiReMeNts FoR MeetiNG tHe 2011 NHMRc staNdaRd FoR cliNical PRactice GuideliNes
Requirements for meeting the NHMRc standard
REquIREMENT
DoCuMENTED IN:
Desirable
The guideline/development process should meet the fol owing conditions, where applicable:
a.2.1   The amount and percentage of total funding received from each funding source is 
Administrative report
stated.
a.4.1   The guideline development process includes participation by representatives of 
Administrative report 
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and culturally and linguistically diverse 
communities (as appropriate to the clinical need and context), and the processes 
employed to recruit, involve and support these participants  
are described.iv
B. Scope and purpose
REquIREMENT
DoCuMENTED IN:
Mandatory
The guideline/development process must meet all the fol owing conditions:
B.1 
The purpose of the guideline is stated, including the clinical questions 
Must be in Guideline  
(see Requirement C.1), issue or problems the guideline addresses.
but can also be in 
Technical report
B.2 
 The health care setting to which the recommendations apply is described, 
Guideline
including the health system level (e.g. primary care, acute care) and clinical stage 
(e.g. whether the guideline covers prevention, screening, assessment, treatment, 
rehabilitation or monitoring).
B.3.    The intended end users of the guideline are clearly defined, and any relevant 
Guideline
exceptions are identified.
B.4 
 The population to which the guideline recommendations will apply is defined 
Guideline
(e.g. children, adolescents, adults or older adults) and population subgroups for 
which specific information is required are identified and described.
B.5 
 Issues relevant to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples (such as particular 
Guideline
risks, treatment considerations or sociocultural considerations) are identified  
and described. 
Desirable
The guideline/development process should meet the fol owing conditions, where applicable:
B.5.1   Issues relevant to special-needs groups such as culturally and linguistically 
Guideline
diverse communities or groups with low socioeconomic status (e.g. particular  
risks, treatment considerations or sociocultural considerations) are identified  
and described. 
iv  This is currently a desirable requirement due to insufficient best practice models for engagement with these groups. When 
appropriate guidance on how to meet this requirement has been developed it is intended that this will become mandatory.
NatioNal HealtH aNd Medical ReseaRcH couNcil
17

PRoceduRes aNd ReQuiReMeNts FoR MeetiNG tHe 2011 NHMRc staNdaRd FoR cliNical PRactice GuideliNes
Requirements for meeting the NHMRc standard
C. Evidence review
REquIREMENT
DoCuMENTED IN:
Mandatory
The guideline/development process must meet all the fol owing conditions:
C.1 
 Clinical questions addressed by the guideline are stated in a structured and 
Technical report 
consistent format to define the boundaries of the topic, i.e. by specifying 
Guideline
the relevant population, intervention/s (e.g. treatment/s or diagnostic test/s), 
comparator/s and outcomes measured.
C.2.   Systematic searches for evidence are undertaken and the search strategy is 
Technical report 
documented, including the search terms and databases searched.
C.3.   The population groups specified in the search strategy include Aboriginal and 
Technical report 
Torres Strait Islander peoples and any population subgroups that have been 
identified (see Requirement B.4 and B.5).
C.4.   The publication period covered by the searches is stated, and the latest date is 
Technical report
within 12 months of the first day of public consultation and within 20 months  
of submission of the final draft guideline to NHMRC for approval.
C.5.   The inclusion and exclusion criteria used to select studies for appraisal 
Technical report
are described. 
C.6.   For each clinical question, the developer has provided an evidence table, 
Technical report
which summarises the systematic assessment and critical appraisal of all 
studies that meet the inclusion criteria (i.e. the body of evidence on which a 
recommendation will be based). Each evidence table should include information 
on study design, outcomes, level of evidence, the findings of meta-analysis  
(if performed) and other relevant information. 
C.7 
For each clinical question, the developer has provided an evidence statement 
Technical report
form, which documents the synthesis and evaluation of the body of evidence to 
determine the grade of each recommendation, according to an NHMRC-approved 
method (NHMRC grades for recommendations10 or GRADE11).
C.8 
 For each recommendation, the developer has provided an evidence summary, 
Guideline
which briefly states the outcomes of each clinical studies on which the 
recommendation was based, their level of evidence and reference details.
C.9   A recommended date for future update of the guideline is identified.
Guideline
Desirable
The guideline/development process should meet the fol owing conditions, where applicable:
C.3.1  The population groups specified in the search strategy include groups such as 
Technical report 
culturally and linguistically diverse communities or other groups for whom specific 
sociocultural factors (including ethnicity, gender, age, disability, socioeconomic status 
and location) in treatment or prevention outcomes should be considered.
C.3.2  Search strategies include search terms to identify evidence related to consumers’ 
Technical report
perceptions and experiences.
C.3.3  Dependent on the guideline scope, the search strategy is designed to identify 
Technical report
evidence for all relevant alternatives for screening, prevention, diagnosis or 
treatment of the condition addressed by the guideline, including relevant 
complementary and alternative medicine approaches.
C.3.4  Search strategies include search terms to identify evidence related to cost 
Technical report
effectiveness and resource implications of practice.
C.8.1  If gaps in the evidence are identified during the evidence review, these are 
Guideline
described in the guideline and areas for further research are noted.
18
NatioNal HealtH aNd Medical ReseaRcH couNcil

PRoceduRes aNd ReQuiReMeNts FoR MeetiNG tHe 2011 NHMRc staNdaRd FoR cliNical PRactice GuideliNes
Requirements for meeting the NHMRc standard
D. Guideline recommendations
REquIREMENT
DoCuMENTED IN:
Mandatory
The guideline/development process must meet all the fol owing conditions:
D.1 
The wording of recommendations is specific, unambiguous, clearly describes 
Guideline
the action/s to be taken by users and matches the strength of the body of 
evidence.10-11
D.2 
The wording of recommendations is written in plain English and is consistent 
Guideline
throughout the guideline.
D.3 
For each evidence-based recommendation, the supporting references are listed 
Guideline
and the grade of recommendation is indicated according to an NHMRC-approved 
method (NHMRC grades for recommendations10 or GRADE11).
D.4 
Recommendations formulated in the absence of quality evidence (where a 
Guideline
systematic review of the evidence was conducted as part of the search strategy) 
are clearly labelled as such. The preferred term for this type of recommendation is 
a consensus-based recommendation.
D.5 
Any further recommendations included in the guideline, where the subject matter 
Guideline
is outside of the scope of search strategy, are clearly labelled as such. The preferred 
term for this type of recommendation is a practice point.
D.6 
The method used to arrive at consensus-based recommendations or practice 
Must be in Administrative 
points (Requirements D.4 and D.5) (e.g. voting or formal methods, such as Delphi)  report but can also be  
is documented.
in Guideline
D.7 
Areas of major debate about the evidence and the recommendations are 
Guideline
identified and the various significant viewpoints are outlined in the guideline  
text (even if the guideline development working group members eventually 
reached a decision). 
D.8 
The strengths and limitations of the body of evidence reviewed are described in 
Guideline
the guideline text and areas of uncertainty are acknowledged.
D.9 
The guideline acknowledges current national guidelines approved by NHMRC or 
Guideline
endorsed by major authorities, and any deviations from these are explicitly noted 
in the guideline text and the rationale provided.
D.10  Where a guideline makes any recommendation/s specifying intervention/s that 
Guideline
are not available or restricted in Australia,v the text clearly indicates this, and the 
developer has consulted the relevant authority/ies (see Requirements F.3).
D.11  Where evidence is identified showing that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander 
Guideline
peoples or other population groups have specific treatment or prevention 
outcomes, this evidence is clearly identified and considered in the formulation  
of the recommendations.
D.12  The harms (risks or side effects) and benefits of each recommended intervention 
Guideline
and its alternatives are described in the guideline text and the rationale for the 
recommendation is explained.
D.13  Any safety, legal or potential misuse issues related to the clinical recommendations 
Guideline
are identified and described in the guideline text.
D.14  The potential impact of each recommendation on clinical practice or outcomes is 
Guideline
described in the text.
v  Such as the use of medicines that are not registered by the Therapeutic Goods Administration or outside registered indications, 
the use of medicines that are not listed for reimbursement by the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, or services for which 
patients and practitioners are not reimbursed through the Medicare Benefits Schedule.
NatioNal HealtH aNd Medical ReseaRcH couNcil
19

PRoceduRes aNd ReQuiReMeNts FoR MeetiNG tHe 2011 NHMRc staNdaRd FoR cliNical PRactice GuideliNes
Requirements for meeting the NHMRc standard
REquIREMENT
DoCuMENTED IN:
D.15  The guideline and recommendations have been assessed by at least two 
Administrative report
reviewers, independent of the guideline development process, using the  
AGREE II instrument.3, 5
Desirable
The guideline/development process should meet the fol owing conditions, where applicable:
D.2.1  Recommendations are formulated using consistent grammar, syntax and 
Guideline
wordings, so they can readily be adapted for electronic implementation strategies 
(e.g. electronic decision support systems and automatic data collection).
D.8.1  Recommendations that are likely to be affected by new evidence after the 
Guideline
guideline has been approved (e.g. major clinical trials underway at the time 
of guideline publication) are identified and the implications for the guideline 
recommendations are explained in the guideline text.
D.9.1  Clinical recommendations that deviate from current practice are identified.
Guideline
D.9.2  The resource implications and cost effectiveness of any recommended practice, 
Guideline
compared with current or established practice, are explicitly stated in the  
guideline text.
D.11.1 Where evidence is identified showing that sociocultural factors (including ethnicity, 
Guideline
gender, age, disability, socioeconomic status and location) affect treatment or 
prevention outcomes (see Requirement C.3.1), this evidence is clearly identified 
and considered in the formulation of the recommendations.
D.12.1 Absolute measures of both efficacy and harm are stated for each management 
Guideline
option where evidence is available, e.g. expressed as number needed to treat 
(NNT), number needed to screen (NNS), or number needed to harm (NNH)  
as relevant to the recommendation.
D.13.1 Ethical issues are considered when formulating the recommendations and any 
Guideline
such issues identified and described.
D.16  If evidence for complementary and alternative medicine options is identified, 
Guideline
the risks and benefits of these are stated in the guideline text and appropriate 
recommendations included. 
D.17  If there is a lack of rigorous evidence for a complementary and alternative 
Guideline
medicine/therapy commonly used in practice, this is explicitly stated in the 
guideline text.
D.18  Recommendations that consider consumer self-management options are 
Guideline
included, where relevant.
D.19  Recommendations emphasise consumer and carer involvement in treatment 
Guideline
and care decisions, where relevant.
20
NatioNal HealtH aNd Medical ReseaRcH couNcil

PRoceduRes aNd ReQuiReMeNts FoR MeetiNG tHe 2011 NHMRc staNdaRd FoR cliNical PRactice GuideliNes
Requirements for meeting the NHMRc standard
E. Guideline structure and style
REquIREMENT
DoCuMENTED IN:
Mandatory
The guideline/development process must meet all the fol owing conditions:
e.1 
The guideline includes a title page listing:
Guideline
 
(i)  the date of publication
 
(ii)  the authorship (organisation or individuals)
 
(iii)  the publisher
 
(iv)  copyright information including the copyright holder
 
(v)  address for requesting permission to reproduce material in the text
 
(vi)  the ISBN numbervi
 
(vii)  a preferred citation for the guideline publication.
e.2 
The guideline is easy to navigate and includes a table of contents.
Guideline
e.3 
The guideline includes a brief (e.g. 1-page) plain English summary.
Guideline
e.4 
 The guideline includes an executive summary that lists all recommendations 
Guideline
and their grade using an NHMRC-approved method (NHMRC grades for 
recommendations10 or GRADE11).
e.5 
A glossary of technical terms, acronyms and abbreviations is provided, and terms 
Guideline
are used consistently throughout the guideline.
e.6 
Where medicines are mentioned in the guideline, generic namesvii are used and 
Guideline
brand names are avoided.
e.7 
The document design and layout enables recommendations to be identified easily 
Guideline
within the text. 
e.8 
References in the text are clearly identified and the citations clearly listed. 
Guideline
For electronic references, the source location (e.g. website address) and date 
accessed is stated.
e.9 
Chapter and heading levels are consistent, clearly distinguishable by the document 
Guideline
design and layout, and assist with the navigation throughout each topic of the 
guideline.
e.10  The guideline information is sequenced in a logical manner which is applicable to 
Guideline
the intended end user.
e.11  The technical report is either (i) included in the guideline document, or (ii) provided 
Guideline
in a readily accessible location, such as a website, which is indicated in the guideline.
e.12  The administrative report is either (i) included in the guideline document, or 
Guideline
(ii) provided in a readily accessible location, such as a website, which is indicated  
in the guideline.
vi   International Standard Book Numbers (ISBN) are obtained from an ISBN Agency and can only be obtained when the final 
document is available. Details available from the National Library of Australia: http://www.nla.gov.au/services/ISBN.html
vii   If use of the generic name (recommended international non-proprietary name) does not provide sufficient clarity for users, 
developers should consult NHMRC before final approval stage. 
NatioNal HealtH aNd Medical ReseaRcH couNcil
21

PRoceduRes aNd ReQuiReMeNts FoR MeetiNG tHe 2011 NHMRc staNdaRd FoR cliNical PRactice GuideliNes
Requirements for meeting the NHMRc standard
REquIREMENT
DoCuMENTED IN:
Desirable
The guideline/development process should meet the fol owing conditions, where applicable:
e.2.1  An index is included.
Guideline
e.2.2  If the guideline is published in PDF format, bookmarks are provided to facilitate 
Guideline
navigation.
e.2.3  If the guideline is published as a web page, hyperlinks are provided to facilitate 
Guideline
navigation.
e.3.1  Plain English is used for all guideline text.
Guideline
e.4.1  A summary of recommendations is available as a separate document, and the 
Guideline
guideline text states where to obtain this document.
e.7.1  The design of the guideline (printed or electronic) is suitable for people with 
Guideline
visual impairment.viii
 F. Public consultation  
REquIREMENT
DoCuMENTED IN:
Mandatory
The guideline/development process must meet all the fol owing conditions:
F.1 
The process for public consultation on the draft guideline complies with Section 14A 
Administrative report
of the Commonwealth National Health and Medical Research Council Act 19921 and 
accompanying regulations8.
F.2 
Details of submissions received during public consultation and the response of 
Public consultation 
the guideline development working group to the submissions (including whether, why  submissions summary
and how the guideline was altered) are provided as a separate document to  
the NHMRC.
F.3 
During the public consultation period, the developer has undertaken and documented  Administrative report
consultation with:
Public consultation 
 
–  the Director-General, Chief Executive or Secretary of each state, territory and 
submissions summary
Commonwealth health department
 
–  relevant authority/iesix, when a guideline makes any recommendation/s specifying 
interventions that are not available or restricted in Australia (see Requirement D.10).
F.4 
The developer has identified and consulted with key professional organisations (such 
Administrative report
as specialty colleges) and consumer organisations that will be involved in, or affected 
Public consultation 
by, the implementation of the clinical recommendations of the guideline.
submissions summary
Desirable
The guideline/development process should meet the fol owing conditions, where applicable:
F.2.1  A version of the public consultation submissions summary is publicly available, with 
Administrative report
submissions de-identified.
viii  Refer to Vision Australia (http://www.visionaustralia.org.au/info.aspx?page=1845&template=PrintReg).
ix  Such as the use of medicines that are not registered by the Therapeutic Goods Administration or outside registered indications, 
the use of medicines that are not listed for reimbursement by the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, or services for which 
patients and practitioners are not reimbursed through the Medicare Benefits Schedule.
22
NatioNal HealtH aNd Medical ReseaRcH couNcil

PRoceduRes aNd ReQuiReMeNts FoR MeetiNG tHe 2011 NHMRc staNdaRd FoR cliNical PRactice GuideliNes
Requirements for meeting the NHMRc standard
G. Dissemination and implementation of guidelines
REquIREMENT
DoCuMENTED IN:
Mandatory
The guideline/development process must meet all the fol owing conditions:
G.1   A plan for the dissemination of the guideline is submitted as a separate document 
Dissemination plan
from the clinical practice guideline.
G.2  Key recommendations that are most likely to lead to improvements in health 
Dissemination plan
outcomes are highlighted for consideration in implementation.
Desirable
The guideline/development process should meet the fol owing conditions, where applicable:
G.3  A practical implementation plan is provided as a separate document, based on 
Implementation plan 
considerations of the Australian health care context and identification of appropriate 
(may be part of 
organisation/s where the key recommendations may be directed.
dissemination plan)
G.4  Resources to support implementation of the guidelines are developed, such as 
Guideline
summaries and other tools for different health care professionals, and the guideline 
indicates where these can be obtained.
G.5  Accompanying consumer information is provided.
Guideline
G.6  Versions of the plain English summary and consumer information are available in 
Guideline
different languages, if appropriate.
G.7  Suggestions for local adaptation and adoption of the guideline are provided.
Guideline
G.8  Measures are developed for determining the extent to which key guideline 
Guideline
recommendations are implemented.
G.9  An evaluation strategy is developed and described to assess the extent to which 
Guideline
guideline recommendations are adopted into routine practice.
NatioNal HealtH aNd Medical ReseaRcH couNcil
23

PRoceduRes aNd ReQuiReMeNts FoR MeetiNG tHe 2011 NHMRc staNdaRd FoR cliNical PRactice GuideliNes
abbreviations
abbreviations and special terms used 
Administrative report
A report containing non-technical information about the 
guideline development process that must be made available 
to the public and NHMRC, but which is not required for 
inclusion in the guideline document. This report will include 
information such as a list of contributors, conflict of interest 
declaration and statement of funding (as detailed in Part 3: 
Requirements). The means by which this report can be 
accessed (electronic and/or in print) must be provided within 
the guideline.
AHMAC
Australian Health Ministers Advisory Council  
(http://www.ahmac.gov.au).
Body of evidence
All studies identified for each clinical question by the 
systematic literature search which meet the specified  
inclusion criteria.
Clinical practice guideline/s
Statements that include recommendations intended to 
optimise patient care that are informed by a systematic  
review of evidence and an assessment of the benefits and 
harms of alternative care options.12
Clinical practice
The performance of health professionals’ within any health 
care setting.
Consumers
Members of the population using a specified health service 
or receiving a specified type of health care. Consumers 
can include patients and potential patients, carers and 
organisations representing consumers’ interests. As a 
member of a committee, steering group or similar, consumer 
representatives voice the consumer perspective and takes  
part in the decision-making process on behalf of consumers.
Complementary medicine/s
Complementary medicines (also known as ‘traditional’, 
‘integrative’ or ‘alternative’ medicines’) include vitamin, 
mineral, herbal, aromatherapy and homoeopathic products. 
Refer to Schedule 14 of the Commonwealth Therapeutic 
Goods Regulations 1990 
for a list of the type of substances 
or products covered by the term ‘complementary’. Active 
complementary medicine substances are defined in Section 
52F of the Commonwealth Therapeutic Goods Act 1989
Essentially, if the substance is a designated active ingredient 
that has an established identity and tradition of use, it is a 
complementary medicine substance. 
Companion document
A secondary publication directly adapted or derived from a 
clinical practice guideline as guidance for a particular group 
(e.g. patients or a particular health professional discipline), 
such as a consumer version of a guideline, clinical practice 
algorithm or summary publication.
24
NatioNal HealtH aNd Medical ReseaRcH couNcil

PRoceduRes aNd ReQuiReMeNts FoR MeetiNG tHe 2011 NHMRc staNdaRd FoR cliNical PRactice GuideliNes
abbreviations
Consensus-based 
Recommendations formulated by the guideline development 
recommendations
group, using a consensus-reaching process, in the absence  
of high-quality evidence (where a systematic review of  
the evidence was conducted as part of the guideline  
search strategy).
Council
The Council of the NHMRC, as established under Section 20 
the Commonwealth National Health and Medical Research 
Council Act 1992.
1 The functions of the Council are to provide 
advice to the NHMRC Chief Executive Officer and perform 
other functions conferred on it.
Desirable requirement
Requirements which developers are encouraged to meet to 
improve guideline quality and implementability.
Evidence-based 
Recommendations formulated by the guideline development 
recommendation 
group based on high-quality evidence and graded according 
to an NHMRC-approved method (where a systematic review 
of the evidence was conducted as part of the guideline  
search strategy).
Evidence summary
A summary prepared for each clinical practice guideline 
recommendation, which briefly summarises the body of 
evidence on which the recommendation was based, including 
outcomes, level of evidence and reference citation of clinical 
studies. http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines/resources-
guideline-developers
Evidence tables
A table prepared for each clinical question addressed by a 
clinical practice guideline, which summarises the systematic 
assessment and critical appraisal of all studies that meet 
inclusion criteria (i.e. the body of evidence on which a 
recommendation will be based). Each evidence table should 
include information on study design, outcomes, level of 
evidence, the findings of meta-analysis (if performed) and 
other relevant information. http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/
guidelines/resources-guideline-developers
Evidence statement form
A form summarising the development group’s synthesis of 
the body of evidence for each clinical question, taking into 
account factors relating to the evidence base, consistency, 
clinical impact, generalisability and applicability of the body 
of evidence, which is used to support the formulation and 
grading of recommendations. An example of this form is 
found at Attachment 1 of NHMRC levels of evidence and 
grades for recommendations for guideline developers (2009)
.10
External guideline 
An organisation, other than NHMRC, that is responsible for 
developer (Developer)
developing a clinical practice guideline (previously referred  
to as a third-party developer).
NatioNal HealtH aNd Medical ReseaRcH couNcil
25

PRoceduRes aNd ReQuiReMeNts FoR MeetiNG tHe 2011 NHMRc staNdaRd FoR cliNical PRactice GuideliNes
abbreviations
Final draft guideline
The draft clinical practice guideline that is submitted to 
NHMRC for consideration for approval after addressing 
issues raised at public consultation stage. Developers should 
be aware that amendments to the final draft guideline may 
be requested by NHMRC and thus it should be marked to 
indicate its draft status. A final draft guideline should not be 
circulated for clinical use prior to consideration by NHMRC  
for approval.
Grade of recommendation
A rating assigned to a clinical practice recommendation 
according to the strength of the evidence on which it is based. 
The NHMRC-preferred system for grading recommendations 
is described in NHMRC levels of evidence and grades for 
recommendations for developers of guidelines
 (2009)10, 
where the overall grade of the recommendation based on 
consideration of the rating for each individual component  
of the body of evidence.
GRADE
The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development 
and Evaluation system11, which is an international system 
for grading evidence when developing clinical practice 
guidelines.
Health professionals
Any health workers who provide health care and related 
medical services, including doctors, nurses, Aboriginal health 
workers and allied health professionals.
Independent clinical  
An NHMRC-commissioned evaluation of draft clinical practice 
expert review
guidelines by experts in the relevant clinical area/s, who were 
not involved in the guideline development process.
Independent 
An NHMRC-commissioned evaluation of draft clinical practice 
methodological review
guideline and related process documentation (including 
technical reports and administrative reports) by an expert in 
evidence review methodology and guideline development 
who was not involved in the guideline development process.
Level/s of evidence
A numerical rating assigned to a piece of published clinical 
evidence, that reflects the risk of bias in its study design.  
The NHMRC-preferred system for grading evidence is 
described in NHMRC levels of evidence and grades for 
recommendations for developers of guidelines 
(2009).
Mandatory requirement
Requirements that must be met to obtain NHMRC approval.
MBS
Medicare Benefits Schedule (http://www.health.gov.au/
internet/mbsonline/publishing.nsf/Content/Medicare-
Benefits-Schedule-MBS-1)
26
NatioNal HealtH aNd Medical ReseaRcH couNcil

PRoceduRes aNd ReQuiReMeNts FoR MeetiNG tHe 2011 NHMRc staNdaRd FoR cliNical PRactice GuideliNes
abbreviations
MSAC
Medical Services Advisory Committee (http://www.msac.gov.
au). This committee advises the Australian Minister for Health 
and Ageing on evidence relating to the safety, effectiveness 
and cost-effectiveness of new medical technologies and 
procedures, in order to inform Australian Government 
decisions about public funding for new, and in some cases 
existing, medical procedures.
NHMRC
National Health and Medical Research Council.
PBAC
Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (http://www.
health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/
health-pbs-general-listing-committee3.htm), an independent 
statutory body established on 12 May 1954 under section 101 
of the Commonwealth National Health Act (1953) to make 
recommendations and give advice to the Minister about which 
drugs and medicinal preparations should be made available as 
pharmaceutical benefits.
PBS
Pharmaceutical Benefits Schedule (http://www.pbs.gov.au).
Practice points
Points of guidance included in the guideline used to support 
evidence-based recommendations, where the subject matter 
is outside of the scope of search strategy, and which were 
formulated based on expert opinion using a consensus 
process.
Procedures
A set of tasks which must be carried out by developers 
seeking NHMRC approval of clinical practice guidelines. 
Public consultation draft 
The interim version of the draft clinical practice guideline that 
guideline
is released for public consultation. Developers should ensure 
that this public consultation draft guideline is clearly marked 
to indicate its draft status.
Requirements
The set of conditions necessary for meeting the NHMRC 
standard for clinical practice guidelines.
Standard (NHMRC 
The NHMRC standard for high quality clinical practice 
standard)
guidelines (i.e. that clinical practice guidelines are based on 
the systematic identification and synthesis of the best available 
scientific evidence and make clear recommendations for 
health professionals practising in an Australian health care 
setting). This standard is met by fulfilling all the mandatory 
requirements set out in this document.
NatioNal HealtH aNd Medical ReseaRcH couNcil
27

PRoceduRes aNd ReQuiReMeNts FoR MeetiNG tHe 2011 NHMRc staNdaRd FoR cliNical PRactice GuideliNes
abbreviations
Technical report
A report containing information about the evidence review 
and recommendation formulation process used in the 
guideline development that must be made available to the 
public, but which is not required for inclusion in the main 
guideline document. This report will include information such 
as research questions, literature search strategies, evidence 
evaluation methodologies and evidence tables (as detailed in 
Part 3: Requirements). The means by which this report can 
be accessed (electronic and/or in print) must be provided 
within the guideline.
TGA
Therapeutic Goods Administration (http://www.tga.gov.au). 
The TGA carries out a range of assessment and monitoring 
activities to ensure therapeutic goods available in Australia are 
of an acceptable standard with the aim of ensuring that the 
Australian community has access, within a reasonable time,  
to therapeutic advances.
User (end users)
The specific group or range of health workers for whom the 
clinical practice guidelines are intended, to inform their work 
in a health setting.
28
NatioNal HealtH aNd Medical ReseaRcH couNcil

PRoceduRes aNd ReQuiReMeNts FoR MeetiNG tHe 2011 NHMRc staNdaRd FoR cliNical PRactice GuideliNes
References
References
1.   Commonwealth of Australia National Health and Medical Research Council Act (1992)
Available from: http://www.comlaw.gov.au/Details/C2006C00354.
2.  A guide to the development, implementation and evaluation of clinical practice guidelines: 
NHMRC; 1999 [cited 2011 March]. Available from:  
http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/cp30syn.htm.
3.  Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument. The AGREE 
Collaboration; 2010 [cited 2011 March]; Available from:  
http://www.agreetrust.org/resource-centre/agree-ii/.
4.  Shiffman RN, Dixon J, Brandt C, Essaihi A, Hsiao A, Michel G, et al. The GuideLine 
Implementability Appraisal (GLIA): development of an instrument to identify obstacles to 
guideline implementation. BMC medical informatics and decision making. 2005;5:23.
5.  Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument: Training tools.  
The AGREE Collaboration; 2010 [cited 2011 March]; Available from:  
http://www.agreetrust.org/resource-centre/training/.
6.  NHMRC Tracker. Available from: http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/media/newsletters.
7.  NICS Update. National Health and Medical Research Council; Available from:  
http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/media/newsletters/nics-updates/all.
8.  National Health and Medical Research Council Regulations 2006. Available from:  
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/num_reg/nhamrcr2006n353o2006534.
9.  How to present the evidence for consumers: preparation of consumer publications: NHMRC; 
2000 [cited 2011 March]. Available from:  
http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/publications/synopses/cp66syn.htm.
10.  NHMRC levels of evidence and grades for recommendations for developers of guidelines: 
NHMRC; 2009 [cited 2011 March]. Available from:  
http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/ files nhmrc/file/guidelines/evidence statement form.pdf.
11.  Guyatt G, Oxman A, Vist G, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE:  
an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.  
BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924-6.
12.   Institute of Medicine (IOM). Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington,  
DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.
NatioNal HealtH aNd Medical ReseaRcH couNcil
29