Decision to decline an extension of time under
s 15AB of the
Freedom of Information Act 1982
Agency
Department of Home Affairs
Applicant
O
Decision date
2 February 2026
OAIC reference number
RQ26/00682
Agency reference number
FA25/11/00215
Decision
1. On 27 January 2026, the Department of Home Affairs (the Agency) applied under
s 15AB(1) of the
Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth) (FOI Act) to the Information
Commissioner for an extension of 30 days to 7 March 2026 to process O’s (the
Applicant) request of 2 November 2025 (the FOI request). This application was made
on the basis that the processing period is insufficient to deal adequately with the FOI
request because it is complex and/or voluminous.
1.
As a delegate of the Information Commissioner, I am authorised to make decisions on
extension of time applications made under s 15AB(2) of the FOI Act.
2.
On the information before the Information Commissioner, I have decided to decline
the Agency’s request to extend the processing period. A decision on the Applicant’s
request therefore is due by 5 February 2026. My reasons are outlined below.
Background
3. The background to this application is summarised in
Attachment A.
4. A copy of the Agency’s reasons for seeking an extension are included at
Attachment B.
Reasons for decision
2. Subsection 15AB(2) of the FOI Act requires that I consider whether the application is
justified on the basis that the processing period referred to in s 15(5)(b) is insufficient
for dealing with the request, on the basis that the request is complex or voluminous.
1
oaic.gov.au
5. In making my decision under s 15AB(2), I have considered the information provided by
the Agency and the FOI Guidelines issued by the Information Commissioner under s
93A of the FOI Act, in particular paragraphs [3.259] – [3.264].
6. On the information before the OAIC, I am not satisfied that the application to extend
the processing period is justified, for the following reasons:
• The application provides limited evidence of appropriate work being undertaken
by the Agency to process the FOI request to date. As such, it appears the Agency
has not utilised the initial processing period effectively and I cannot find that the
processing period was insufficient on the basis of complexity or volume.
• The Agency has not provided sufficient explanation of why the FOI request is
complex.
7. In declining this extension, I have also considered:
• The limited explanation as to the steps involved, and processing time required, to
finalise the request to justify the extension sought.
8.
If the Agency does not provide the Applicant a decision by
5 February 2026, the
Applicant may seek review by the Information Commissioner of the Agency’s deemed
access refusal decision of
5 February 2026. Further information
on applying for IC
review is available on the OA
IC website. Any application for IC review should be made
within 60 days of the Agency’s decision or deemed decision. It also remains open to
the Agency to apply for a further extension of time from the Information Commissioner
if considered appropriate.
9.
For further information, the OAIC website provides a resource containing information
on applying for an extensions of time to process freedom of information requests.
10. This extension of time matter is now closed. Your review rights are set out below.
11. If you wish to discuss this matter, please contact us by email a
t xxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx
quoting reference number RQ26/00682.
Yours sincerely,
A De Ieso
Andriana De Ieso
Review Advisor
Freedom of Information Case Management Branch
Office of the Australian Information Commissioner
2 February 2026
2
oaic.gov.au
Attachment A
Background to processing period
Background
Processing period
Due date
FOI request made
30 days
2 December 2025
on 2 November 2025
Applicant’s
Extended by 30 days
1 January 2026
agreement to
extend the
processing period
under s 15AA
Suspension to
Suspended by 5 days, under
6 January 2026
processing period to s 24AB(8)
allow for request
consultation
process
Third party
Extended by 30 days, under s 15(6)
5 February 2026
consultation
undertaken under
ss 26A, 27 or 27A
3
oaic.gov.au
Attachment B
The Agency’s reasons for requesting an extension of time, as included in the extension
of time request form.
4
oaic.gov.au
Review rights
If you disagree with the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner’s (OAIC) decision you can
apply to the Federal Court of Australia or the Federal Circuit Court for a review of a decision of the
Information Commissioner, if you think that a decision by the Information Commissioner to grant an
extension of time is not legally correct. You can make this application under the
Administrative
Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977.
The Court will not review the merits of your case, but it may refer the matter back to the Information
Commissioner for further consideration if it finds the decision was wrong in law or the Information
Commissioner’s powers were not exercised properly.
An application for review must be made to the Court within 28 days of the OAIC sending the decision
to you. You may wish to seek legal advice as the process can involve fees and costs. Please contact the
Federal Court registry in your state or territory for more information or visit the Federal Court website
at http://www.fedcourt.gov.au/.
Further information
Further information about how applications to extend the timeframe to process an FOI request are
handled by the OAIC can be found published on our website:
For Applicants: How to make an FOI request: Extensions of time
For agencies and Ministers: Guidance and advice: Extension of time for processing requests
The OAIC has the power to investigate complaints about an agency’s actions under the
Freedom of
Information Act 1982 (FOI Act). This is a separate process from asking for an Information Commissioner
review following a decision made under the FOI Act. Complaints usually focus on how an agency has
handled your FOI request or complied with other obligations under the FOI Act, rather than the
decision itself.
In some cases, the Information Commissioner’s investigation of a complaint may lead to the agency
addressing the issues that you have complained about. In other cases, the Information Commissioner
may make suggestions or recommendations that the agency should implement. The Information
Commissioner can only make non-binding recommendations as a result of a complaint. You and the
agency will be notified of the outcome of the investigation.
FOI complaints to the OAIC must be made in writing. Our preference is for you to use th
e online FOI
complaint form if at all possible.
Further information about how to make a complaint can be found published on our website:
https://www.oaic.gov.au/freedom-of-information/your-freedom-of-information-rights/freedom-of-
information-complaints/make-an-foi-complaint .
Making a complaint to the Commonwealth Ombudsman
If you believe you have been treated unfairly by the OAIC, you can make a complaint to the
Commonwealth Ombudsman (the Ombudsman). The Ombudsman's services are free. The
Ombudsman can investigate complaints about the administrative actions of Australian Government
agencies to see if you have been treated unfairly.
If the Ombudsman finds your complaint is justified, the Ombudsman can recommend that the OAIC
reconsider or change its action or decision or take any other action that the Ombudsman considers is
appropriate. You can contact the Ombudsman's office for more information on 1300 362 072 or visit
the Commonwealth Ombudsman’s website a
t http://www.ombudsman.gov.au .
5
oaic.gov.au
