This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Hiding the names of APS employees terminated for gross misconduct - why the difference in standards?'.


 
Our reference: FOIREQ18/00156 
Ms Verity Pane   
By email: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx 
Your Freedom of Information request – Decision on access 
Dear Ms Pane   
I refer to your request for access to documents, made under the Freedom of Information Act 
1982 
(Cth) (the FOI Act) and received by the Office of the Australian Information 
Commissioner (OAIC) on 17 October 2018. 
You have sought access to: 
Under FOI I seek copy of all documents created by the OAIC that relate to the OAICs views on 
the publication of the names of public servants/APS employees in the Australian Public 
Service Gazette, whether about hiding the names of disgraced public servants or otherwise. 
In particular, I would be interested in any document contrasting the OAIC’s opinion here, with 
the previous opinions of the Commissioner that the disclosure by Minister’s and public sector 
agencies of the criminal history of private individuals is permissible under authorisation of 
the Public Service Act to inform and advise and to ‘correct the record’. 
Decision 
I am an officer authorised under s 23(1) of the FOI Act to make decisions in relation to FOI 
requests.  
I have identified five documents falling within the scope of your request. I have decided to 
give you access to the documents, redacting only material irrelevant to your request.  
Irrelevant material s 22 
Section 22 provides that an agency may prepare an edited copy of a document by deleting 
information that would reasonably be regarded as irrelevant to the request for access (s 
22(1)(a)(ii)). 
As your request is for ‘documents created by the OAIC that relate to the OAIC’s views’, I have 
deleted as irrelevant under s 22(1)(ii): 
-  material that was not created by the OAIC; and 
1300 363 992 
T +61 2 9284 9749 
GPO Box 5218 
www.oaic.gov.au 
xxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx 
F +61 2 9284 9666 
Sydney NSW 2001 
ABN 85 249 230 937 
 


-  material that does not relate to the OAIC’s view about the particulars of your request. 
A schedule describing the documents and the access decision I have made is at Appendix A 
to this request. 
Yours sincerely, 
 
Megan McKenna 
FOI Officer 
Legal Services 
15 November 2018   
 
 

 

If you disagree with my decision 
Internal review 
You have the right to apply for an internal review of my decision under Part VI of the FOI Act. 
An internal review will be conducted, to the extent possible, by an officer of the OAIC who 
was not involved in or consulted in the making of my decision. If you wish to apply for an 
internal review, you must do so in writing within 30 days. There is no application fee for 
internal review. 
If you wish to apply for an internal review, please mark your application for the attention of 
the FOI Coordinator and state the grounds on which you consider that my decision should be 
reviewed. 
Further Review 
You have the right to seek review of this decision by the Information Commissioner and the 
Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT). 
You may apply to the Information Commissioner for a review of my decision (IC review). If 
you wish to apply for IC review, you must do so in writing within 60 days. Your application 
must provide an address (which can be an email address or fax number) that we can send 
notices to, and include a copy of this letter. A request for IC review can be made in relation to 
my decision, or an internal review decision.  
It is the Information Commissioner’s view that it will usually not be in the interests of the 
administration of the FOI Act to conduct an IC review of a decision, or an internal review 
decision, made by the agency that the Information Commissioner heads: the OAIC. For this 
reason, if you make an application for IC review of my decision, it is likely that the 
Information Commissioner will decide (under s 54W(b) of the FOI Act) not to undertake an IC 
review on the basis that it is desirable that my decision be considered by the AAT. 
Section 57A of the FOI Act provides that, before you can apply to the AAT for review of an FOI 
decision, you must first have applied for IC review. 
Applications for internal review or IC review can be submitted to: 
Office of the Australian Information Commissioner 
GPO Box 5218 
SYDNEY NSW 2001 
Alternatively, you can submit your application by email to xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx, or by fax on 
02 9284 9666. 

 

Accessing your information 
If you would like access to the information that we hold about you, please 
contact xxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx. More information is available on the Access our 
information 
page on our website. 
Disclosure log 
Section 11C of the FOI Act requires agencies to publish online documents released to 
members of the public within 10 days of release, except if they contain personal or business 
information that it would be unreasonable to publish.  
The documents I have decided to release to you do not contain business or personal 
information that would be unreasonable to publish. As a result, the documents will be 
published on our disclosure log shortly after being released to you. 
 

 


 
Appendix A: Schedule of documents – Freedom of Information request no. FOIREQ18/00156 
Document 
Date 
Description 
Decision on Access 
Exemption 
no. 

24 May 2017 
Email chain 
Release in full 
 

24 May 2017 
Email to APSC 
Release in full 
 

1 July 2014 
Email chain 
Release in full 
 

22 April 2014 
Letter from OAIC to APSC 
Release in full 
 

19 March 2014 
Email from OAIC to APSC 
Release in full 
 
 
1300 363 992 
T +61 2 9284 9749 
GPO Box 5218 
www.oaic.gov.au 
xxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx 
F +61 2 9284 9666 
Sydney NSW 2001 
ABN 85 249 230 937