This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'OAIC MR18/00724 & MR18/00692 & s 70 Referral - Australian Digital Health Agency'.


 
Our reference: FOIREQ18/00179 
Ms Verity Pane 
By email: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx 
Your Freedom of Information request – decision on access 
Dear Ms Pane   
I refer to your request for access to documents, made under the Freedom of Information 
Act 1982 
(Cth) (the FOI Act) and received by the Office of the Australian Information 
Commissioner (OAIC) on 2 November 2018. 
You have sought access to: 
Under FOI I request copy of all documents (the full meaning of the defined term ‘documents’, 
including any text messages) held by the OAIC dealing with OAIC MR18/00724 & MR18/00692 
and the s 70 referral made on 26 September 2018 to the OAIC, including s 17 compilation of 
any RESOLVE entries. 
On 20 November 2018, I wrote to you seeking your confirmation of the scope of your FOI 
request. 
On 21 November 2018, you responded and advised that: 
I *exclude* from scope any emails sent by me, unless they are part of a chain of the OAIC’s 
communications. My email address is to be redacted. 
Decision 
I am an officer authorised under s 23(1) of the FOI Act to make decisions in relation to FOI 
requests. 
I have identified 32 documents falling within the scope of your request. I have decided to 
give you access to the documents, redacting only material irrelevant to your request.  
Irrelevant material (s 22) 
Section 22 of the FOI Act provides that irrelevant information can be deleted from a 
document if it is reasonably practicable to prepare a copy of the document modified by 
deletions, and the modified copy would not disclose the irrelevant material.  
 
1300 363 992 
T +61 2 9284 9749 
GPO Box 5218 
www.oaic.gov.au 
xxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx 
F +61 2 9284 9666 
Sydney NSW 2001 
ABN 85 249 230 937 
 


I have considered your advice of 21 November 2018 and I have excluded from scope, emails 
sent by you, unless they are part of a chain of the OAIC’s communications. I have also 
deleted your email address as irrelevant to your request. 
Documents 18, 19, 22 and 24 contain diagnostic information about emails in which delivery 
to the recipient failed, which are not relevant to the IC reviews that are the subject of your 
request. Accordingly, I have deleted the diagnostic information from documents 18, 19, 22 
and 24. 
A schedule describing the documents and the access decision I have made is at Appendix A 
to this request. 
Yours sincerely, 
 
Megan McKenna 
FOI Officer 
Legal Services 
30 November 2018   
 
 

 

If you disagree with my decision 
Internal review 
You have the right to apply for an internal review of my decision under Part VI of the FOI Act. 
An internal review will be conducted, to the extent possible, by an officer of the OAIC who 
was not involved in or consulted in the making of my decision. If you wish to apply for an 
internal review, you must do so in writing within 30 days. There is no application fee for 
internal review. 
If you wish to apply for an internal review, please mark your application for the attention of 
the FOI Coordinator and state the grounds on which you consider that my decision should be 
reviewed. 
Further Review 
You have the right to seek review of this decision by the Information Commissioner and the 
Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT). 
You may apply to the Information Commissioner for a review of my decision (IC review). If 
you wish to apply for IC review, you must do so in writing within 60 days. Your application 
must provide an address (which can be an email address or fax number) that we can send 
notices to, and include a copy of this letter. A request for IC review can be made in relation to 
my decision, or an internal review decision.  
It is the Information Commissioner’s view that it will usually not be in the interests of the 
administration of the FOI Act to conduct an IC review of a decision, or an internal review 
decision, made by the agency that the Information Commissioner heads: the OAIC. For this 
reason, if you make an application for IC review of my decision, it is likely that the 
Information Commissioner will decide (under s 54W(b) of the FOI Act) not to undertake an IC 
review on the basis that it is desirable that my decision be considered by the AAT. 
Section 57A of the FOI Act provides that, before you can apply to the AAT for review of an FOI 
decision, you must first have applied for IC review. 
Applications for internal review or IC review can be submitted to: 
Office of the Australian Information Commissioner 
GPO Box 5218 
SYDNEY NSW 2001 
Alternatively, you can submit your application by email to xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx, or by fax on 
02 9284 9666. 

 

Accessing your information 
If you would like access to the information that we hold about you, please 
contact xxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx. More information is available on the Access our 
information 
page on our website. 
Disclosure log 
Section 11C of the FOI Act requires agencies to publish online documents released to 
members of the public within 10 days of release, except if they contain personal or business 
information that it would be unreasonable to publish.  
The documents I have decided to release to you do not contain business or personal 
information that would be unreasonable to publish. As a result, the documents will be 
published on our disclosure log shortly after being released to you. 
 
 

 


Appendix 1: Schedule of documents – Freedom of Information request no FOIREQ18/00179 
Document No. 
Date 
Description 
Decision on Access 
CP18/02858 

4 October 2018 
Draft 
Release in full 

9 October 2018 
Email 
Release in full 
2a 
9 October 2018 
Letter 
Release in full 

10 October 2018 
Email 
Release in full 

11 October 2018 
Email 
Release in full 

13 November 2018 
Resolve report 
Release in full 
MR18/00692 
1300 363 992 
T +61 2 9284 9749 
GPO Box 5218 
www.oaic.gov.au 
xxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx 
F +61 2 9284 9666 
Sydney NSW 2001 
ABN 85 249 230 937 


19 September 2018 
Email 
Release in full 
6a 
13 September 2018 
Attachment to email 
Release in full 

19 September 2018 
Email 
Release in full 

19 September 2018 
Document 
Release in full 

19 September 2018 
Draft 
Release with irrelevant material redacted under s 22 
10 
19 September 2018 
Email 
Release with irrelevant material redacted under s 22 
11 
5 October 2018 
Email 
Release in full 
11a 
19 September 2018 
Attachment to email 
Release in full 
11b 
19 September 2018 
Attachment to email 
Release in full 
12 
10 October 2018 
Email 
Release in full 
13 
11 October 2018 
Email 
Release in full 
 

14 
17 October 2018 
Email 
Release in full 
15 
17 October 2018 
Email 
Release in full 
16 
17 October 2018 
Email 
Release in full 
17 
17 October 2018 
Email 
Release in full 
18 
16 October 2018 
Undeliverable email 
Release with irrelevant material redacted under s 22 
19 
17 October 2018 
Undeliverable email 
Release with irrelevant material redacted under s 22 
20 
2 November 2018 
Email 
Release in full 
21 
2 November 2018 
Email 
Release in full 
22 
2 November 2018 
Undeliverable email 
Release with irrelevant material redacted under s 22 
23 
2 November 
Email 
Release in full 
24 
2 November 2018 
Undeliverable email 
Release with irrelevant material redacted under s 22 
 

25 
13 November 2018 
Resolve report 
Release with irrelevant material redacted under s 22 
MR18/00724 
26 
21 September 2018 
Letter 
Release with irrelevant material redacted under s 22 
27 
26 September 2018 
Email 
Release with irrelevant material redacted under s 22 
28 
10 October 2018 
Email 
Release in full 
29 
11 October 2018 
Email 
Release in full 
30 
16 October 2018 
Email 
Release in full 
30a 
16 October 2018 
Attachment to email 
Release in full 
30b 
21 September 2018 
Attachment to email 
Release in full 
31 
16 October 2018 
Email 
Release in full 
32 
13 November 2018 
Resolve report 
Release in full