26 September 2019
Ms Miranda O’Reagan
E
) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx
Dear Ms O’Reagan
FOI REQUEST– REFERENCE NUMBER 201920-020
I refer to your email of 6 September 2019 in which you sought access to the fol owing under the
Freedom of Information Act 1982 (the FOI Act):
1. Al documents created, accessed or held by the ABC and its staff that relate to Department of
Defence or Australian Defence Force material obtained from Mr David McBride.
2. Al documents that relate to ABC staff communicating with, or meeting with Mr David
McBride regarding the accessing or provision of material as outlined in point 1.
Authorisation
I am authorised by the Managing Director under Section 23 of the FOI Act to make decisions in respect
of requests made under that Act. Fol owing is my decision in relation to your request.
Decision – Section 7(2) (program material)
The ABC is specifical y excluded from the operation of the FOI Act in relation to its program material,
and documents in relation to its program material, by virtue of Section 7(2) and Division 1 of Part II of
Schedule 2 of the FOI Act.
'Program material' is not defined in the FOI Act. However, it has been the subject of judicial
consideration. The FOI Guidelines issued by the Australian Information Commissioner (the Guidelines)
summarise this case law at paragraph 2.16:
1538250_2
link to page 2 link to page 2 link to page 2 link to page 2 link to page 2 link to page 2
The exemption for ‘program material’ of the ABC and SBS has been considered in Federal
Court,1 AAT2 and IC review cases.3 Australian Broadcasting Corporation and Herald and Weekly Times
Pty Limited, the AAT held that program material means a document ‘which is the program and
all versions of the whole or any part of the program, any transmission broadcast or publication
of the program, and includes a document of any content or form embodied in the program and
any document acquired or created for the purpose of creating the program, whether or not
incorporated into the complete program’.4
When it comes to documents ‘in relation to’ program material, the Guidelines adopt the ‘reasonably
direct relationship’ test in
ABC and HWT.
5 I consider this the correct approach, i.e. that the ABC
exemption applies to documents comprising ‘program material’ in the sense described above, as wel as
documents which have a reasonably direct relationship with that program material. The Guidelines
contrast ‘reasonably direct’ with a connection that is “indirect, remote or tenuous”.
6 I have taken the
same approach.
Mr McBride is an external party to the ABC and is therefore not party to or involved in any
administrative or other day-to-day operational functions of the ABC. Any contact Mr McBride would
have had with the ABC in respect of source material for a piece of ABC content could only be in relation
to the creation of that content, and its substantive matter. Any document held by the ABC relating to
Department of Defence or Australian Defence Force material obtained from Mr McBride, any document
concerning communications between the ABC and Mr McBride, and any document containing internal
discussions relating to source material, would by its nature, if it existed, be ABC program material or
have a direct relationship with program material.
It is clear you are seeking access to documents which are, or have a direct relationship to, the source
material for a specific piece of ABC content. Those documents are ‘program material’ for the purposes
of the FOI Act, and the ABC is exempt from the operation of the Act in relation to them. On that basis,
no further steps wil be taken in this matter.
Review rights
You have rights in relation to this decision. Those rights are set out in
Annexure A to this decision.
Yours sincerely,
Connie Carnabuci
ABC General Counsel & FOI Coordinator
xxx.xxx@xxx.xxx.xx
1 See Australian Broadcasting Corporation v University of Technology, Sydney [2006] FCA 964; and Bel v
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation [2008] FCAFC 40.
2 Australian Broadcasting Corporation and Herald and Weekly Times Pty Limited [2012] AATA 914
3 Herald and Weekly Times Pty Ltd and Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2012] AICmr 7;
‘F’ and Australian
Broadcasting Corporation [2012] AICmr 8;
‘ER’ and Special Broadcasting Service [2015] AICmr 12; and Fist and
Australian Broadcasting Corporation [2014] AICmr 14.
4 [2012] AATA 914 [57].
5 [2.16]
6 OAIC Guidelines, [2.16]
1538250_2
Annexure A – Review rights
If you are dissatisfied with this decision you can apply for Internal or Information Commissioner (IC) Review. You do
not have to apply for Internal Review before seeking IC Review.
Application for Internal Review
You have the right to apply for an internal review of the decision refusing to grant access to documents in
accordance with your request. If you make an application for review, the Managing Director wil appoint an officer
of the Corporation (not the person who made the initial decision) to conduct a review and make a completely fresh
decision on the merits of the case.
You must apply in writing for a review of the decision within 30 days of receipt of this letter. No particular form is
required to apply for review, although it would help if you set out the reasons for review in your application.
Application for a review of the decision should be addressed to:
The FOI Coordinator
ABC
Level 13
700 Harris Street
ULTIMO NSW 2007
Or sent to
: xxx.xxx@xxx.xxx.xx
Application for Information Commissioner (IC) Review
Alternatively, you have the right to apply for a review by the Information Commissioner of the decision refusing to
grant access to documents in accordance with your request. Your application must:
• be in writing
• be made within 60 days of receipt of this letter
• give details of how notices may be sent to you (for instance, by providing an email address)
• include a copy of the decision for which a review sought.
You should be aware that the Information Commissioner has a discretion not to undertake a review (see Division 5,
FOI Act).
Please refer to the OAIC website FOI review process page for further information and/or to access the online form
for applying for IC review:
https://www.oaic.gov.au/freedom-of-information/foi-review-process
Application for a review of the decision by the Information Commissioner should be addressed to:
Director of FOI Dispute Resolution
GPO Box 5218
Sydney NSW 2001
Or sent to
: xxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx
Complaints to the Information Commissioner
You may complain to the Information Commissioner about any action taken by the ABC in the performance of
functions, or exercise of powers, under the FOI Act. The Information Commissioner may make inquiries for the
purpose of determining whether or not to investigate a complaint.
Complaints should be made in writing to the fol owing address:
Office of the Australian Information Commissioner
GPO Box 5218
Sydney NSW 2001
1538250_2
