24 June 2020
Mr J Smith
BY EMAIL: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx
In reply please quote:
FOI Request:
FA 20/03/00730
File Number:
OBJ2020/8141
Dear Mr Smith
Freedom of Information (FOI) request - Access Decision
On 12 March 2020, the Department of Home Affairs (the Department) received a request for
access to documents under the
Freedom of Information Act 1982 (the FOI Act).
The purpose of this letter is to provide you with a decision on your request for access under the
FOI Act.
1
Scope of request
You have requested access to the fol owing documents:
I wish to obtain a copy of all final reports delivered to the department, by either the
firm McKinsey & Co, or Boston Consulting Group; since 18 September 2013.
Additionally, I wish to obtain a copy of all powerpoint presentations delievered to the
department by either of those firms, since 18 September 2013.
Please narrow this request to only documents delivered by either of those groups to
the department, stored in either a PDF, powerpoint, or word document format.
On 26 March 2020 the Department issued you a notice under section 24AB of the FOI
Act advising you that a ‘practical refusal reason’ existed in relation to your request. You
were advised that your request met the definition of a practical refusal reason in section
24AA(1) of the Act, as it appeared that the work involved in processing the request would
‘substantially and unreasonably divert the resources’ of the Department from its other
operations.
6 Chan Street Belconnen ACT 2617
PO Box 25 Belconnen ACT 2616 • Telephone: 02 6264 1111 • Fax: 02 6225 6970 • www.homeaffairs.gov.au
On the same day, you replied to the Department and noted that under the FOI guidelines,
poor record-keeping practices are not a valid reason for a department to refuse an FOI.
You also agreed to revise the scope of your request to:
final reports, and final powerpoint presentations by McKinsey.
On 31 March 2020 the Department wrote to you to advise that the practical refusal
reason continued to exist as the quantity of data held by the Department is extensive
and you did not provide adequate detail to enable the Department of identify the
particular subject matter of the reports you were seeking access to. As an alternative,
you were provided the opportunity to limit your request to relevant records identified in
reasonable searches of the Department’s primary document management system
HPETRIM to enable the request to proceed on the basis that the search of one primary
system would not be an unreasonable diversion of resources.
On 1 April 2020 you agreed to limit your request to relevant records identified on the
Department’s primary document management system HPETRIM.
2
Authority to make decision
I am an officer authorised under section 23 of the FOI Act to make decisions in respect of
requests to access documents or to amend or annotate records.
3
Relevant material
In reaching my decision I referred to the following:
• the terms of your request
• the FOI Act
• Guidelines published by the Office of the Information Commissioner under section 93A
of the FOI Act (the FOI Guidelines)
4
Documents in scope of request
The Department has undertaken reasonable searches in relation to the documents you
have requested access to on the Department’s primary document management system
HPETRIM. The Department has not identified any final reports or presentations that were
delivered to the Department by McKinsey.
Having regard to your request and the types of documents that may fall within the scope of
your request I am satisfied that the searches conducted were extremely thorough and all
reasonable steps have been taken to locate any document relevant to your request.
5
Decision
Section 24A of the FOI Act provides that the Department may refuse a request for access
to a document if all reasonable steps have been taken to find the document and the
Department is satisfied that the document does not exist.
I am satisfied that the Department has undertaken reasonable searches in relation to your
request and that no documents were in the possession of the Department on 12 March
2020 when your FOI request was received. As such I am refusing access to the documents
requested by you based on the application of section 24A of the FOI Act.
- 2 –
6
Legislation
A copy of the FOI Act is available at https://www.legislation.gov.au/Series/C2004A02562.
If you are unable to access the legislation through this website, please contact our office
for a copy.
7
Your Review Rights
Internal Review
If you disagree with this decision, you have the right to apply for an internal review by the
Department of this decision. Any request for internal review must be provided to the
Department within 30 days of you being notified of the decision. Where possible please
attach reasons why you believe a review of the decision is necessary. The internal review
wil be carried out by an officer other than the original decision maker and the Department
must make a review decision within 30 days.
Applications for review should be sent to:
By email to: xxx.xxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx
OR
By mail to:
Freedom of Information Section
Department of Home Affairs
PO Box 25
BELCONNEN ACT 2617
Review by the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner
You may apply directly to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) for
a review of this decision. You must apply in writing within 60 days of this notice. For further
information about review rights and how to submit a request for a review to the OAIC,
please see Fact Sheet 12 "Freedom of information – Your review rights", available online
at https://www.oaic.gov.au/freedom-of-information/foi-review-process.
8
Making a Complaint
You may complain to the Australian Information Commissioner about action taken by the
Department in relation to your request.
Your enquiries to the Australian Information Commissioner can be directed to:
Phone 1300 363 992 (local call charge)
Email xxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx
There is no particular form required to make a complaint to the Australian Information
Commissioner. The request should be in writing and should set out the grounds on which
it is considered that the action taken in relation to the request should be investigated and
identify the Department of Home Affairs as the relevant agency.
- 3 –
9
Contacting the FOI Section
Should you wish to discuss this decision, please do not hesitate to contact the FOI Section
at xxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx.
[signed electronically]
Position Number: 60045423
Authorised Decision Maker
Department of Home Affairs
- 4 –