This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'News Corp Google Rudd Petition Outrage ACCC'.


 
 
 
 
23 Marcus Clarke Street
 
Canberra ACT 2601
 
 
GPO Box 3131
 
Canberra ACT 2601
 
Our ref: 
PRJ1004830 
tel: (02) 6243 1111
Contact officer: 
FOI Team 
fax: (02) 6243 1199
Contact phone: 
02 6243 1244 
 
www.accc.gov.au
1 March 2021 
 
JS 
 
Sent via email: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx 
 
Dear JS  
Access refusal – documents do not exist 
I refer to your email dated 28 January 2021 in which you have requested access, 
under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth) (Act), to: 
 
‘(a) 
copies of policies and procedures used by the ACCC to assess and 
determine ‘public outrage’; 

(b) 
documents containing the material relied on by the ACCC to determine the 
public outrage against News Corp was disproportionate; 

(c) 
documents containing the material relied on by the ACCC to assert that 
Google have managed to convince people News Corps are the big, bad 
guy.’ 

Decision 
I have decided to refuse your request under section 24A(1) of the Act on the basis 
that the documents do not exist. 
I am authorised under section 23 of the Act to make this decision. 
Reasons for decision 
Section 24A(1) of the Act relevantly provides as follows: 
An agency or Minister may refuse a request for access to a document if:  
(a)  all reasonable steps have been taken to find the document; and  
(b)  the agency or Minister is satisfied that the document:  
 
(i)  
is in the agency’s or Minister’s possession but cannot be found; or  
 
(ii)  
does not exist.  
Therefore, we may refuse a request for access to a document if we take all 
reasonable steps to find that document and we are satisfied that the document does 
not exist. 


 
Your application refers to comments attributed to the Chair of the ACCC, Mr Rod 
Sims, in an article that appeared in the Australian Financial Review on 
14 January 2021 titled ‘ACCC goes into battle against Facebook, Apple and Google’.  
With reference to particular comments attributed to Mr Sims in that article, your 
application requests the policies, procedures and documents that were used or relied 
upon by the ACCC in an assessment and determination by the ACCC of a level of 
‘public outrage’ and disproportionality in respect of that public outrage. 
The particular comments that you have referred to in your application are in the 
nature of an observation. The basis of the observation is stated in the AFR article 
and the extracts that are referred to in your application, and it is further informed by 
the context of the broader article itself. The particular comments draw a comparison 
between what is observed to be the level of ‘public outrage’ toward one company (ie. 
News Corp) relative to the sentiment toward companies that are much larger (ie. the 
digital platforms referred to in the article).  
The ACCC’s role in relation to digital platforms includes undertaking inquiries in 
relation to digital platform markets. More information about those inquiries may be 
found on the ACCC’s website. The particular comments from the AFR article that you 
have referred to in your application were not directed at the right to petition the 
Federal Parliament, and there is no ACCC ‘assessment’ of ‘public outrage’ against a 
particular entity.   
The ACCC took the following steps to locate the documents that you have requested: 
  A thorough search of our databases to locate any information or documents that 
relate to your request; 
  Confirmation with relevant ACCC staff that no such document exists; 
  A thorough search by the relevant ACCC branch for documents matching, or 
similar to, the scope of the request provided by you. 
Based on the nil results of these steps, I conclude that the requested document does 
not exist within the records of the ACCC. 
Rights of review 
Your rights of review are set out in Attachment A. 
 
Yours sincerely  
 
 
 
 
Melissa McDonnell 
a/g Principal Lawyer 
ACCC Legal Group 
 
 
 
Sent by email 1/03/2021 
 
 
 


ATTACHMENT A 
 
INFORMATION ON RIGHTS OF REVIEW 
 
 
1. 
ACCC Internal Review 
Under s.54 of the FOI Act, you can apply for an internal review of my decision by writing 
to the ACCC within 30 days of receipt of this letter indicating that you seek an internal 
review of this decision.  
If you make an application for review, another officer of the ACCC will review and make 
another decision in regards to these documents. 
There is no charge payable for requesting an internal review. No particular form is 
required to apply for review. You will need to set why the decision should be changed. 
Please send any correspondence to: 
FOI Team 
Australian Competition & Consumer Commission 
GPO Box 3131 
Canberra ACT 2601 
Email: xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx  
 
If you make an application for internal review and we do not make a decision within 30 
days or such further period as the IC allows, the original decision is considered affirmed. 
In such circumstances, you can seek review of our deemed decision by the IC.  
 
2. 
Review by the Information Commissioner 
You may ask for a review of a decision by the Australian Information Commissioner (IC).     
You do not have to go through our internal review process first for this process. If you do 
choose to seek an internal review, you can still seek IC review for the internal review 
decision if we refuse access to the documents. 
You must apply in writing and you can lodge your application in one of the following ways: 
Online: www.oaic.gov.au 
Post:  GPO Box 5218, Sydney NSW 2001 
Fax: +61 2 9284 9666 
Email:  xxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx 
If you disagree with the Information Commissioner’s review decision, you can appeal to 
the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT). 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
The Tribunal is a completely independent review body with the power to make a fresh 
decision. A filing fee of $920.00 (as at 1 July 2018) should accompany your application, 
unless you are granted legal aid or you come within an exempt category of persons 
(check with the Tribunal registry in your State). The Registrar or Deputy Registrar may 
waive the fee on the ground that its payment would impose financial hardship on you. The 
fee may be refunded if you are successful. 
 
3. 
Complaint to the Information Commissioner 
You may request the Information Commissioner to investigate action taken by the ACCC 
in relation to this Freedom of Information request. There is no fee for making a complaint. 
The Information Commissioner will consider your complaint and, if appropriate, conduct 
an investigation into it. Any investigation will be completely independent. 
You must lodge your complaint in writing and do so in one of the following ways: 
Online: www.oaic.gov.au 
Post:  GPO Box 5218, Sydney NSW 2001 
Fax: +61 2 9284 9666 
Email:  xxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx