Compensatory Decision Making Model for Appropriate Fines for Il egal Tree Removal
Location:
Officer:
Date:
Weighting for each Main Criteria
0.125
Criteria
Tree1
Tree2
Significance of the tree
Species:
Species:
Type 2 for yes 1 for no for each item
Historical value
Commemorative tree
Significant tree (on register)
Exceptionally old or fine specimen
Curious growth habit or physical appearance
Horticultural/scientific value
Unusually large size
Rare to the area
Outstanding aesthetic quality
Valuable habitat or corridor
Key stone species
Contributes to landscape
TOTAL
0
WEIGHTED TOTAL
0
Life Cycle Stage
Type 3 for young, 10 for semi-mature, 42 for mature and 50 for 
overmature 
WEIGHTED TOTAL
0
Site
Type 1 for low profile, 2 for average profile and 3 for high profile
WEIGHTED TOTAL
0
Sule
Type 1for short, 2 for medium or 3 for long
WEIGHTED TOTAL
0
Environmental effects
Type 2  for yes and 1 for no
Wil  method cause problems eg poison contaminating water bodies
Wil  method cause problems eg erosion
Wil  method cause problems eg branches left on site
Habitat - Loss of nesting sites
Is the area able to be restored
Does poisoned tree impact threatened species
TOTAL
WEIGHTED TOTAL
0
Target
Type 1 for occasional, 2 intermittent, 3 frequent 0r 4 for constant
WEIGHTED TOTAL
0
Damage
Type 2 for major or 1 minor
WEIGHTED TOTAL
0
Cost of remediation
Type in actual amount divided by 1000
WEIGHTED TOTAL
0
TOTAL SCORE
0
TABLE
LOW
MEDIUM
HIGH
2.63-6.253
6.253-9.8763333
9.8763-13.5

---

---