28 May 2021
Ms Eleanor Davey
BY EMAIL: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx
In reply please quote:
FOI Request:
FA 21/03/01196
File Number:
OBJ2021/9882
Dear Ms Davey
Freedom of Information (FOI) request - Access Decision
On 23 March 2021, the Department of Home Affairs (the Department) received a request for
access to a document under the
Freedom of Information Act 1982 (the FOI Act).
The purpose of this letter is to provide you with a decision on your request for access under the
FOI Act.
1
Scope of request
You have requested access to the following document:
I would like to access a copy of the risk assessment developed for the performance
management of Save the Children Australia as part of that organisation's work
associated with the Regional Processing Centre on Nauru. According to ANAO
report no 32 of 2016-17, p.13, this risk assessment was agreed in December 2014.
If this document is already publicly available or can be released administratively I
would be pleased to have notification of its availability.
2
Authority to make decision
I am an officer authorised under section 23 of the FOI Act to make decisions in respect of
requests to access documents or to amend or annotate records.
6 Chan Street Belconnen ACT 2616
PO Box 25 Belconnen ACT 2616 • Telephone: 02 6264 1111 • Fax: 02 6225 6970 • www.homeaffairs.gov.au
3
Relevant material
In reaching my decision I referred to the following:
• the terms of your request
• the document relevant to the request
• the FOI Act
• Guidelines published by the Office of the Information Commissioner under section 93A
of the FOI Act (the FOI Guidelines)
• advice from departmental officers with responsibility for matters relating to the
document to which you sought access
4
Document in scope of request
The Department has identified one document as falling within the scope of your request.
This document was in the possession of the Department on 23 March 2021 when your
request was received.
Attachment A is a schedule which describes the relevant document and sets out my
decision in relation to each of them.
5
Decision
The decision in relation to the document in the possession of the Department which falls
within the scope of your request is as follows:
• Exempt one document in full from disclosure
6
Reasons for Decision
Detailed reasons for my decision are set out below.
Where the schedule of documents indicates an exemption claim has been applied to a
document or part of document, my findings of fact and reasons for deciding that the
exemption provision applies to that information are set out below.
6.1 Section 33 of the FOI Act – Documents affecting National Security, Defence or
International Relations
Section 33(a)(i i) of the FOI Act permits exemption of a document if disclosure of the
document would, or could reasonably be expected to, cause damage to the international
relations of the Commonwealth.
The phrase 'international relations' has been interpreted as meaning the ability of the
Australian Government to maintain good working relations with other governments and
international organisations and to protect the flow of confidential information between them.
The expectation of damage to international relations must be reasonable in all the
circumstances, having regard to the nature of the information; the circumstances in which
it was communicated; and the nature and extent of the relationship. There must be real and
substantial grounds for the conclusion that are supported by evidence.
The information contained in the documents relate to the Nauru Regional Processing
Centre. The Republic of Nauru is a sovereign nation and the Government of Nauru is
responsible for regional processing in Nauru.
- 2 –
I consider releasing the information marked ‘
s33(a)(iii)’ would adversely impact on the
ability of the Department to maintain good working relations with the Government of Nauru.
This assessment is made considering the nature of the information contained within the
document and the current nature and extent of the Australia Government’s relationship with
the Government of Nauru.
As such I have decided that the information redacted under '
s33(a)(iii)" is exempt from
disclosure under section 33(a)(i i) of the FOI Act.
6.2 Section 47E of the FOI Act – Operations of Agencies
Section 47E(d) of the FOI Act provides that documents are conditionally exempt if
disclosure would, or could reasonably be expected to, have a substantial adverse effect on
the proper and efficient conduct of the operations of an agency.
I consider that the disclosure of the document would, or could reasonably be expected to,
have a substantial adverse effect on the proper and efficient conduct of the operations of
the Department.
Managing the security and integrity of Australia's borders is integral to the operations of the
Department. Any prejudice to the effectiveness of the operational methods and procedures
used in undertaking that role would result in a substantial adverse effect on the operations
of the Department, including those that support or contribute to regional processing
arrangements, including possible future arrangements.
Any disclosure resulting in the prejudice of the effectiveness of the Department’s
operational methods and procedures would result in the need for this Department, and
potentially its partners, to change those methods and/or procedures to avoid jeopardising
their future effectiveness.
I have decided that the document is conditionally exempt under section 47E(d) of the FOI
Act. Access to a conditionally exempt document must generally be given unless it would
be contrary to the public interest to do so. I have turned my mind to whether disclosure of
the information would be contrary to the public interest, and have included my reasoning in
that regard at paragrap
h 6.3 below.
6.3 The public interest – section 11A of the FOI Act
As I have decided that parts of the document are conditionally exempt, I am now required
to consider whether access to the conditionally exempt information would be contrary to
the public interest (section 11A of the FOI Act).
A part of a document which is conditionally exempt must also meet the public interest test
in section 11A(5) before an exemption may be claimed in respect of that part.
In summary, the test is whether access to the conditionally exempt part of the document
would be, on balance, contrary to the public interest.
- 3 –
In applying this test, I have noted the objects of the FOI Act and the importance of the other
factors listed in section 11B(3) of the FOI Act, being whether access to the document would
do any of the following:
(a) promote the objects of this Act (including all the matters set out in sections 3
and 3A)
(b) inform debate on a matter of public importance
(c) promote effective oversight of public expenditure
(d) allow a person to access his or her own personal information.
Having regard to the above I am satisfied that:
•
Access to the document would promote the objects of the FOI Act.
•
The subject matter of the document does not seem to have a general characteristic
of public importance. The matter has a limited scope and, in my view, would be of
interest to a very narrow section of the public.
•
No insights into public expenditure wil be provided through examination of the
document.
•
You do not require access to the document in order to access your own personal
information.
I have also considered the following factors that weigh against the release of the
conditionally exempt information in the document:
•
Disclosure of the parts of the documents that are conditionally exempt under
section 47E(d) of the FOI Act could reasonably be expected to prejudice the functions
of the Department and, as a result, the ability of the Department to protect Australia's
borders. I consider there to be a strong public interest in ensuring that the ability of
the Department to conduct its functions is not compromised or prejudiced in any way.
I consider that this would be contrary to the public interest and that this factor weighs
strongly against disclosure.
I have also had regard to section 11B(4) which sets out the factors which are irrelevant to
my decision, which are:
a)
access to the document could result in embarrassment to the Commonwealth
Government, or cause a loss of confidence in the Commonwealth Government
b)
access to the document could result in any person misinterpreting or
misunderstanding the document
c)
the author of the document was (or is) of high seniority in the agency to which
the request for access to the document was made
d)
access to the document could result in confusion or unnecessary debate.
I have not taken into account any of those factors in this decision.
Upon balancing all of the above relevant public interest considerations, I have concluded
that the disclosure of the conditionally exempt information in the documents would be
contrary to the public interest and it is therefore exempt from disclosure under the FOI Act.
- 4 –
7
Legislation
A copy of the FOI Act is available at https:/ www.legislation.gov.au/Series/C2004A02562.
If you are unable to access the legislation through this website, please contact our office
for a copy.
8
Your Review Rights
Internal Review
If you disagree with this decision, you have the right to apply for an internal review by the
Department of this decision. Any request for internal review must be provided to the
Department within 30 days of you being notified of the decision. Where possible please
attach reasons why you believe a review of the decision is necessary. The internal review
wil be carried out by an officer other than the original decision maker and the Department
must make a review decision within 30 days.
Applications for review should be sent to:
By email to: xxx.xxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx
OR
By mail to:
Freedom of Information Section
Department of Home Affairs
PO Box 25
BELCONNEN ACT 2617
Review by the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner
You may apply directly to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) for
a review of this decision. You must apply in writing within 60 days of this notice. For further
information about review rights and how to submit a request for a review to the OAIC,
please see Fact Sheet 12 "Freedom of information – Your review rights", available online
at https:/ www.oaic.gov.au/freedom-of-information/foi-review-process.
9
Making a Complaint
You may complain to the Australian Information Commissioner about action taken by the
Department in relation to your request.
Your enquiries to the Australian Information Commissioner can be directed to:
Phone 1300 363 992 (local call charge)
Email xxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx
There is no particular form required to make a complaint to the Australian Information
Commissioner. The request should be in writing and should set out the grounds on which
it is considered that the action taken in relation to the request should be investigated and
identify the Department of Home Affairs as the relevant agency.
- 5 –
10 Contacting the FOI Section
Should you wish to discuss this decision, please do not hesitate to contact the FOI Section
at xxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx.
Long
Position Number: 60045752
Authorised Decision Maker
Department of Home Affairs
- 6 –