This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'SARS-COV-2 causes the disease known as COVID-19'.


 
 
Department Reference: FOI 3127 
 
Susan Stokes 
By email: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx 
 
Dear Susan Stokes 
 
NOTICE OF DECISION UNDER SECTION 24A 
OF THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 1982 
 
I refer to your request of 26 September 2021 to the Department of Health (the 
department) seeking access under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth) (the FOI 
Act) to documents related to COVID-19. Your request is in the following terms: 
 
1.  There has been evidence that the isolated virus known as SARS-COV-2 causes the 
disease known as COVID-19, or; 
2.  The four criteria known as Koch’s postulates have been satisfied to show that the virus 
known as SARS-COV-2 causes the disease known as COVID-19, and; 
3.  There has been documentable and real-life cases of asymptomatic transmission of the 
virus known as SARS-COV-2, and;  
4.  There is a scientifically accurate test, which can detect the existence of the virus 
known as SARS-COV-2. 
 
Information about COVID-19 
 
SARS-CoV-2, the virus which causes COVID-19, is real. Multiple scientific studies 
across the world demonstrate that highly reputable laboratory medicine experts 
have isolated and sequenced the virus that causes COVID-19, demonstrating that the 
virus exists, that it exists in variant forms, that it is different from the influenza virus, 
and that it causes a disease that has resulted in over 5 million deaths worldwide in 
just over 22 months.  
 
While the department is not the custodian of the scientific studies establishing the 
existence of SARS-CoV-2, this research has informed the Australian Government’s 
response to the pandemic. You can find those scientific studies in the public domain. 
 
The department is a government agency and does not conduct scientific studies or 
laboratory testing for the SARS-CoV-2 in a laboratory. Diagnostic assays using 
reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) are conducted by testing 
laboratories throughout Australia. For more information, please see the Public 


 
Health Laboratory Network guidance on laboratory testing for SARS-CoV-2, which 
is available online:  
https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/phln-guidance-on-laboratory-
testing-for-sars-cov-2-the-virus-that-causes-covid-19 
 
 
In Australia, scientists at the Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory at 
The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity were the first to isolate 
SARS-CoV-2 outside of China, winning the 2020 MJA/MDA National Prize for 
Excellence in Medical Research. This critical information was immediately shared 
with local and overseas reference laboratories and major North American and 
European virus culture collections. These peer-reviewed, evidence-based 
publications provide scientific evidence for the existence of this deadly virus. 
 
Attached to this email is an article published in the Daily Telegraph on  
13 August 2021 that may be of interest to you. 
 
Information about asymptomatic transmission 
 
The department does not hold or collate specific data on asymptomatic cases and 
whether they were the source of infection for another case.  
 
The National Interoperable Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System (NINDSS) 
collects data on the symptomatic status of cases at the time of their case interview, 
and depending on the jurisdiction where it is collected, this field may be updated 
throughout the period of public health management for a case. This data therefore 
represents a mix of cases that are either asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic and are 
not a reliable source for interpreting the true asymptomatic status of people who 
have tested positive. The term asymptomatic refers to a person who tests positive for 
SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19) who does not develop symptoms 
across the duration of their infection while the term pre-symptomatic refers to a 
person who at the time of testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 did not have symptoms of 
the virus but in the time following, goes on to develop symptoms, no matter how 
mild. 
 
More broadly, it is difficult to determine how many people infected with 
SARS-CoV-2 are truly asymptomatic via surveillance data. Cases that are truly 
asymptomatic may not be aware of their infection status and therefore will not seek 
testing; some of these people may only be identified as part of contact tracing or 
other testing activities.  
 
Additionally, the NINDSS does not contain data on whether an asymptomatic case 
was the source of infection for another case. Some studies estimate that the 
asymptomatic proportion of cases ranges from 18% to 42%. Transmission can occur 
from persistently asymptomatic persons, although they seem to be less likely to 
transmit. The risk of transmission from symptomatic or pre-symptomatic cases is 
considered to be higher than from asymptomatic cases, as viral shedding is higher at 


 
symptom onset. The secondary attack rate of symptomatic index cases was higher 
than asymptomatic cases (see below articles for reference). 
 
More specific information on instances of asymptomatic transmission for cases 
reported in states and territories may be available from state and territory health 
departments. Australia continues to review the latest literature on COVID-19, 
including on the occurrence of asymptomatic cases and their transmission potential 
to inform its public health advice, including with regard to the Communicable 
Diseases Network Australia COVID-19: National Guideline for Public Health Units, 
see: https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/cdna-
song-novel-coronavirus.htm 
 
 
FOI decision  
 
I am authorised under subsection 23(1) of the FOI Act to make decisions in relation 
to Freedom of Information requests. I am writing to notify you of my decision in 
response to your request.  
 
The FOI Act provides a mechanism for individuals to request access to documents 
held by relevant entities. It is not a mechanism for asking questions or seeking 
information that the entity does not hold in documents.  
 
Appropriate steps have been taken to find documents you have requested including 
consultation with relevant departmental officers and searches of departmental file 
management systems.  
 
I am satisfied, based on the consultation undertaken and the searches conducted, 
that the department, including the Therapeutic Goods Administration, does not hold 
any documents referred to in your request. This research and information is 
available in the public domain as described above. 
 
As a consequence, relying on section 24A of the FOI Act, I cannot provide access to 
the documents you requested. 
 
FOI review rights
 
 
If you are dissatisfied with my decision, you may apply for a review. 
 
Internal review 
 
Under section 54 of the FOI Act, you may apply for internal review of this decision.  
In accordance with section 54B of the FOI Act, an application for internal review 
must be made in writing within 30 days after the day you are notified of this 
decision (or such further period as the department allows). To assist in the internal 
review process, please provide reasons you consider the review of my decision is 
necessary. 
 


 
The internal review will be carried out by another officer of this department within 
30 days of receipt of your application. 
 
An application for an internal review should be addressed to: 
Email: xxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx  
Mail:   FOI Unit (MDP 516) 
Department of Health  
GPO Box 9848 
CANBERRA ACT 2601 
 
Information Commissioner review 
 
Under section 54L of the FOI Act, you may apply to the Office of the Australian 
Information Commissioner (OAIC) for review of my decision by the Information 
Commissioner (IC).  
 
In accordance with subsection 54S(1) of the FOI Act, an IC review application in 
relation to a decision covered by subsection 54L(2) (access refusal decisions) must be 
made in writing within 60 days after the day you are notified of this decision (if you 
do not request an internal review). 
 
More information about IC review is available on the OAIC website at: 
https://www.oaic.gov.au/freedom-of-information/reviews/ 
 
The OAIC can be contacted by: 
Phone:  1300 363 992 
Email:  xxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx 
 
Complaints 
 
If you are dissatisfied with action taken by the department, you may also make a 
complaint.  
 
Complaint to the department 
 
Complaints to the department are covered by the department’s privacy policy. A 
form for lodging a complaint directly to the department is available on the 
department’s website: 
https://www.health.gov.au/about-us/contact-us/complaints  
 
Complaint to the IC 
 
Information about making a complaint to the IC about action taken by the 
department is available on the OAIC website: 
https://www.oaic.gov.au/freedom-of-information/reviews-and-complaints/make-
an-foi-complaint/ 
 
 



 
Relevant provisions of the FOI Act 
 
The FOI Act, including the provisions referred to in this letter, can be accessed from 
the Federal Register of Legislation website:  
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2021C00382  
 
Contacts 
 
If you require clarification of any of the matters discussed in this letter you should 
contact the department’s Freedom of Information Unit on (02) 6289 1666 or at 
xxx@xxxxxx.xxx.xx.  
 
 
Yours sincerely 
 
Megan Lancaster  
Assistant Secretary  
Public Health and Surveillance Branch 
 
23 November 2021