Our reference: RQ22/00505
Agency reference: FOI 21/22-0740
Lesley By email
: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx
Notification t
o: xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx
Extension of time under s 15AB
Dear Lesley
On 8 February 2022, the National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA) applied for further time
to make a decision on your FOI request of 21 December 2021 under the
Freedom of
Information Act 1982 (Cth) (the FOI Act).
This application was made on the basis that the processing period is insufficient to deal
adequately with your FOI request, because it is complex.
The NDIA attempted to obtain an agreement under s 15AA of the FOI Act for an extension of
time from you. The NDIA did not receive a response from you.
The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner has previously granted the NDIA an
extension of time under s 15AB(2) of the FOI Act for 14 days (OAIC reference: RQ22/00285).
This extended the decision period to 9 February 2022.
Contact with you
On 10 February 2022, the OAIC wrote to you to seek your view on the NDIA’s application. The
OAIC invited you to provide any comments by 14 February 2022. You have not responded to
those inquiries.
Decision
As a delegate of the Information Commissioner, I am authorised to make decisions on
applications for extensions of time under s 15AB of the FOI Act.
I have decided to grant the NDIA an extension of time under s 15AB(2) of the FOI Act
to
25 February 2022. I am satisfied that the NDIA’s application for an extension of time is
justified, because the request is complex. My reasons and considerations follow:
1300 363 992
T +61 2 9284 9749
GPO Box 5218
www.oaic.gov.au
xxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx
F +61 2 9284 9666
Sydney NSW 2001
ABN 85 249 230 937
• On 21 December 2021, the NDIA received your FOI request.
• After the latest extension of time application, the NDIA has advised that the
processing of your request has been impacted by staffing resources due to COVID
and the holiday period shutdown.
• An added complexity relates to the relevant officer having to obtain clearance to
access a database which is only accessible within the office as it is sensitive in nature
(as opposed to remotely). This was further impacted by the office having been
subject to COVID issues.
• Additional time is required to determine if third party consultation is required and to
finalise the decision.
Based on the information currently before the OAIC, I am satisfied that an extension until
25
February 2022 is appropriate at this time, particularly in consideration of the document
retrieval difficulties faced by the NDIA and the NDIA in the final stages to finalise your request
by
25 February 2022. I have also given significant weight to the fact that when consulted by
the OAIC, a response was not received.
If NDIA does not make a decision by
25 February 2022, you may wish to seek Information
Commissioner review of the NDIA’s deemed refusal of reques
t here. Further information on
applying for IC review is available on the OA
IC website.
Contact
If you have any questions, please contact me on (02) 9284 9847 or via email
xxxxxx.xxxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx. Please quote OAIC reference number at the top of this page in all
correspondence.
Yours sincerely
Jasmin Clarke Assistant Review and Investigation Advisor
FOI Regulatory Group
15 February 2022
2
Review rights
If you disagree with the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner’s (OAIC) decision
you can apply to the Federal Court of Australia or the Federal Circuit Court for a review of a
decision of the Information Commissioner if you think that a decision by the Information
Commissioner to grant an extension of time is not legally correct. You can make this
application under the
Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977.
The Court will not review the merits of your case but it may refer the matter back to the
Information Commissioner for further consideration if it finds the decision was wrong in law
or the Information Commissioner’s powers were not exercised properly.
An application for review must be made to the Court within 28 days of the OAIC sending the
decision to you. You may wish to seek legal advice as the process can involve fees and costs.
Please contact the Federal Court registry in your state or territory for more information, or
visit the Federal Court website a
t http://www.fedcourt.gov.au/.
Further information
Further information about how applications to extend the timeframe to process an FOI
request are handled by the OAIC can be found published on our website:
For FOI applicants: How to make an FOI request: Extensions of time
For agencies and ministers: Guidance and advice: Extension of time for processing
requests
The OAIC has the power to investigate complaints about an agency’s actions under the
Freedom of Information Act 1982 (FOI Act). This is a separate process from asking for an
Information Commissioner review following a decision made under the FOI Act. Complaints
usually focus on how an agency has handled your FOI request or complied with other
obligations under the FOI Act, rather than the decision itself.
In some cases, the Information Commissioner's investigation of a complaint may lead to the
agency addressing the issues that you have complained about. In other cases, the
Information Commissioner may make suggestions or recommendations that the agency
should implement. The Information Commissioner can only make non-binding
recommendations as a result of a complaint. You and the agency will be notified of the
outcome of the investigation.
FOI complaints to the OAIC must be made in writing. Our preference is for you to use
the online FOI complaint form if at all possible.
Further information about how to make a complaint can be found published on our website:
https://www.oaic.gov.au/freedom-of-information/reviews-and-complaints/make-an-foi-
complaint/ .
3
