Our reference: FOI 22/23-0311
GPO Box 700
Canberra ACT 2601
1800 800 110
ndis.gov.au
7 November 2022
William Green
By email: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx
Dear William Green
Freedom of Information request — Notification of Decision
Thank you for your correspondence of 17 August 2022, in which you requested access to
documents held by the National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA), under the
Freedom of
Information Act 1982 (FOI Act).
The purpose of this letter is to provide you with a decision on your request.
Scope of your request
You have requested access to the following documents:
…all the names of all law firms engaed [sic] for legal services both past and present. An
example would be Clayton Utz as recently reported by The Guardian to be representing
the NDIA/NDIS against a participant.
Can you also kindly provide anonymised statistics of how many legal disputes each
currently engaged legal firm is representing the NDIA/NDIS against NDIS participants? An example would be if Clayton UTZ is representing the NDIA/NDIS against five
participants, ten participants.
We emailed you on the 5 September 2022 seeking confirmation of our interpretation of the
scope of your request. Given that we have not received a response, we have interpreted the
second part of your request seeking statistics about the legal firms representing the NDIA to
be limited to statistics about firms involved in disputes relating to participant’s plans.
Extension of time
On 16 September 2022, we sought a 14-day extension of time under section 15AB of the
FOI Act from the Office of the Australia Information Commissioner (OAIC). If granted, this
will make 30 September 2022 the new date to provide you with a decision on access.
On 30 September, we sought a further 16-day extension of time under section 15AB of the
FOI Act from OAIC. On 13 October 2022, we contacted the OAIC, to seek to revise the
length of this extension to 37 days. If granted, the new deadline for our decision will be 6
November 2022.
Decision on access to documents
I am authorised to make decisions under section 23(1) of the FOI Act. My decision on your
request and the reasons for my decision are set out below.
1
Section 17(1)(c) of the FOI Act provides that an agency can produce a written document
containing the requested information, by the use of a computer or other equipment that is
ordinarily available for retrieving or collating stored information. We have been able to
produce a document containing the information you requested. I have, therefore, treated
your request as if it were a request for access to this document in accordance with section
17(1)(c) of the FOI Act.
I have identified 1 document which falls within the scope of your request.
This document was identified by consulting with relevant NDIA staff who could be expected
to be able to identify documents within the scope of the request.
I have decided to grant access to this document in full.
In reaching my decision, I took the following into account:
• your correspondence outlining the scope of your request
• the nature and content of the documents falling within the scope of your request
• the FOI Act
• the FOI Guidelines published under section 93A of the FOI Act
• relevant case law concerning the operation of the FOI Act
• consultation with relevant NDIA staff.
Release of documents
The document for release, as referred to in the Schedule of Documents at
Attachment A, is
enclosed.
Rights of review
Your rights to seek a review of my decision, or lodge a complaint, are set out at
Attachment B.
Should you have any enquiries concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me
by email at
xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx. Yours sincerely
Jasper Senior Freedom of Information Officer
Parliamentary, Ministerial & FOI Branch
Government Division
2
Attachment A
Schedule of Documents for FOI 22/23-0311
Document
Page
Description
Access Decision
Comments
number
number
Law Firms Engaged by NDIS for Legal
FULL ACCESS
Document created under
1
1-2
Services (Past and Present)
section 17 of the FOI Act
3
Attachment B
Your review rights
Internal Review
The FOI Act gives you the right to apply for an internal review of this decision. The review
will be conducted by a different person to the person who made the original decision.
If you wish to seek an internal review of the decision, you must apply for the review, in
writing, within 30 days of receipt of this letter.
No particular form is required for an application for internal review, but to assist the review
process, you should clearly outline your grounds for review (that is, the reasons why you
disagree with the decision). Applications for internal review can be lodged by email to
xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx or sent by post to:
Freedom of Information Section
Parliamentary, Ministerial & FOI Branch
Government Division
National Disability Insurance Agency
GPO Box 700
CANBERRA ACT 2601
Review by the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner
The FOI Act also gives you the right to apply to the Office of the Australian Information
Commissioner (OAIC) to seek a review of this decision.
If you wish to have the decision reviewed by the OAIC, you may apply for the review, in
writing, or by using the online merits review form available on the OAIC’s website at
www.oaic.gov.au, within 60 days of receipt of this letter.
Applications for review can be lodged with the OAIC in the following ways:
Online:
www.oaic.gov.au
Post:
GPO Box 5218, Sydney NSW 2001
Email:
xxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx
Phone:
1300 363 992 (local call charge)
Complaints to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner or the
Commonwealth Ombudsman
You may complain to either the Commonwealth Ombudsman or the OAIC about actions
taken by the NDIA in relation to your request. The Ombudsman will consult with the OAIC
before investigating a complaint about the handling of an FOI request.
Your complaint to the OAIC can be directed to the contact details identified above. Your
complaint to the Ombudsman can be directed to:
Phone:
1300 362 072 (local call charge)
Email:
xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx
Your complaint should be in writing and should set out the grounds on which it is considered
that the actions taken in relation to the request should be investigated.
4
