This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Non-public policies and correspondence regarding ADHD'.



Our reference: FOI 22/23-0607 
GPO Box 700 
Canberra   ACT   2601 
1800 800 110 
25 August 2023 
ndis.gov.au 
 
 
Me 
 
By email: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx 
 
 
Dear Me 
 
Freedom of Information request — Notification of Decision 
 
Thank you for your correspondence of 5 October 2022, in which you requested access to 
documents held by the National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA), under the Freedom of 
Information Act 1982
 (FOI Act). I apologise for the delay in processing your request. 
The purpose of this letter is to provide you with a decision on your request. 
 
Scope of your request  
You have requested access to the following documents: 
 
I would like the following documents for the period 1 July 2020 through 30 September 
2022: 
- current versions of any internal or otherwise non-public policies or guidance with 
regards to deciding if ADHD can or should be approved in a plan. 
- current versions of any internal or otherwise non-public policies or guidance with 
regards to deciding how much funding should be allocated for ADHD in a plan once 
ADHD has been approved to be in that plan. 
- any correspondence (incl email, mincorro, carrier pigeon, etc.), including attachments if 
applicable, sent to an SES3 or higher that discuss whether and/or how ADHD fits into the 
NDIS. 
- any correspondence (incl email, mincorro, carrier pigeon, etc.), including attachments if 
applicable, sent from an SES3 or higher that discuss whether and/or how ADHD fits into 
the NDIS. 

 
You have revised the scope of your request in regard to points 3 and 4 to be for the following 
documents:  
 
  Limit it to correspondence discussing whether and/or how ADHD fits into the NDIS to 
and from the Agency’s current Chief Executive Officer and Deputy Chief Executive 
Officers; and 

  Seek access to more precisely defined correspondence e.g. correspondence 
discussing whether persons diagnosed with ADHD are or should be eligible to 
become NDIS participants. 

 
Extension of time 
On 28 October 2022, you agreed to a 30-day extension of time under section 15AA of the 
FOI Act, making 4 December 2022 the new date that this requested was deemed. 
 
 

 
 


I note this access decision is being released to you after the due date and apologise for the 
long delay. In the interests of providing you with our access decision without any further 
delays, I have decided not to apply for an extension to the processing period from the Office 
of the Australian Information Commissioner under section 15AC of the FOI Act.  
 
Search efforts  
Searches for documents were by conducted by relevant NDIA staff who could be expected 
to be able to identify documents within the scope of the request. I have been provided with 
27 documents, (including attachments), which fall within the scope of your request. 
 
Decision on access to documents 
I am authorised to make decisions under section 23(1) of the FOI Act. My decision on your 
request and the reasons for my decision are set out below.  
 
I have identified 27 documents, including attachments, which fall within the scope of your 
request.  
 
The documents were identified by conducting searches of NDIA’s systems, using all 
reasonable search terms that could return documents relevant to your request, and 
consulting with relevant NDIA staff who could be expected to be able to identify documents 
within the scope of the request. 
 
I have decided to grant access to 11 documents in full, and 16 documents in part. 
 
In reaching my decision, I took the following into account: 
  your correspondence outlining the scope of your request 
  the nature and content of the documents falling within the scope of your request 
  the FOI Act  
  the FOI Guidelines published under section 93A of the FOI Act 
  consultation with relevant NDIA staff 
  factors relevant to my assessment of whether or not disclosure would be in the public 
interest 
  the NDIA’s operating environment and functions. 
 
Reasons for decision 
Deliberative processes (section 47C) 
‘Deliberative matter’ is a shorthand term for ‘opinion, advice and recommendation’ and 
‘consultation and deliberation’ that is recorded or reflected in a document. Section 47C of the 
FOI Act conditionally exempts a document if its release would disclose deliberative matter in 
the nature of, or relating to, opinion, advice or recommendation obtained, prepared or 
recorded, or consultation or deliberation that has taken place, in the course of, or for the 
purposes of, the deliberative processes involved in the functions of an agency. 
 
Paragraph 6.59 of the FOI Guidelines further provides that deliberative process generally 
refers to the process of weighing up or evaluating competing arguments or considerations or 
to thinking processes – the process of reflection, for example, upon the wisdom and 
expediency of a proposal, a particular decision or a course of action. 
 
Section 47C conditionally exempts documents containing deliberative matter. Deliberative 
matter is content that is in the nature of, or relating to either: 
 
 
2 

  an opinion, advice or recommendation that has been obtained, prepared or recorded, 
or 
  a consultation or deliberation that has taken place, in the course of, or for the 
purposes of, a deliberative process of the government, an agency or minister (s 
47C(1) 
 
 
Document 9 contains deliberative matter in the form of opinion, advice and 
recommendations recorded in the course of NDIA staff performing their duties. I consider 
that disclosure of this information would have a substantial adverse effect on the 
management of NDIA personnel, in that staff may be reluctant to engage in discussions 
about sensitive material if they were aware that the subject matter of those discussions 
would be disclosed and made public. 
 
I am satisfied that information within document 9 contains information that is deliberative in 
nature and therefore, is conditionally exempt under section 47C of the FOI Act. I have 
considered whether it is possible to delete the exempt and deliberative material from the 
documents and have concluded that it is reasonably practicable to do so. Accordingly, I have 
prepared an edited copy of the documents with the exempt material removed. 
 
Personal privacy (section 47F)  
Section 47F of the FOI Act conditionally exempts a document(s) if its disclosure would 
involve the unreasonable disclosure of personal information about any person (including a 
deceased person). 
 
I have identified material in the documents falling within scope of your request which 
contains personal information of a third party / third parties.  
 
With reference to the assessment above, it would be unreasonable to disclose publicly this 
personal information and is therefore conditionally exempt under section 47F(1) of the FOI 
Act. 
 
Public interest considerations – section 47C and 47F 
Section 11A(5) of the FOI Act provides that access to a document covered by a conditional 
exemption must be provided unless disclosure would be contrary to the public interest.  
 
I have not considered any of the irrelevant factors as set out under section 11B(4) of the FOI 
Act in making this decision. 
 
In favour of disclosure, I have considered the factors outlined in section 11B(3) of the FOI 
Act, and I have determined that disclosure of the relevant information in Documents 9 to 14, 
16 and 17 to 23 would promote the objects of the FOI Act by providing access to documents 
held by the government. 
 
Against disclosure, I consider that disclosure of the relevant information in Documents 9 to 
14, 16, and 17 to 23:  
  would not contribute to the publication of information of sufficient public interest to justify 
the likely harm caused by release 
  would not enhance Australia’s representative democracy in the ways described in 
section 11B(3) of the FOI Act 
  would not inform any debate on a matter of public importance, or promote oversight of 
public expenditure. 
 
3 


While there is limited public interest in the disclosure of information conditionally exempt 
under section 47C and 47F of the FOI Act, the harm that would result from disclosure is that 
it could reasonably be expected to:  
  hinder the Agency’s thinking processes and the ability of Agency decision-makers to 
comply with their obligations and make informed decisions, which, in turn, helps to 
ensure the financial stability and integrity of the National Disability Insurance Scheme. 
  affect an individual’s right to privacy by having their personal information in the public 
domain. 
 
In summary, I am satisfied that the factors against disclosure of the information outweigh the 
factors in favour of disclosure and that, on balance, it would be contrary to the public interest 
to release this information to you. Accordingly, I have decided that the relevant information in 
Documents 9 to 14, 16, and 17 to 23 are exempt under sections 47C and 47F of the FOI Act. 
 
Release of documents 
The documents for release, as referred to in the Schedule of Documents at Attachment A
are enclosed. 
 
Rights of review 
Your rights to seek a review of my decision, or lodge a complaint, are set out at 
Attachment B

 
Should you have any enquiries concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me 
by email at xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx. 
 
Yours sincerely 
 
Jade 
Senior Freedom of Information Officer 
Parliamentary, Ministerial & FOI Branch 
Government Division 
4 

Attachment A 
 
Schedule of Documents for FOI 22/23-0607 
 
Document 
Page 
Description 
Access Decision 
number 
number 
1 1-32 
Creating Your Plan Guidelines Version 3 
FULL ACCESS 
 
Date: 1 April 2021 
2 33-66 
Creating Your Plan Guidelines Version 4 
FULL ACCESS 
 
Date: 26 June 2022 
3 67-100 
Determine Reasonable and Necessary Supports Practice Guide 
FULL ACCESS 
Version 21 
 
Date: 1 July 2020 
4 101-134 
Determine Reasonable and Necessary Supports Practice Guide 
FULL ACCESS 
Version 22 
 
Date: 29 July 2020 
5 135-170 
Determine Reasonable and Necessary Supports Practice Guide 
FULL ACCESS 
Version 24 
 
Date: 23 December 2020 
6 171-206 
Determine Reasonable and Necessary Supports Practice Guide 
FULL ACCESS 
Version 25 
 
Date: 13 January 2021 
7 207-223 
Referral Checklist: Eligibility Reassessment or Access Status Change - 
FULL ACCESS 
Early Intervention Version 3 
 
Date: 21 July 2022 
8 224-263 
Access Practice Guide - Psychosocial Disability 
FULL ACCESS 
 
Date: 15 August 2017 
5 

Document 
Page 
Description 
Access Decision 
number 
number 
9 264-266 
Email 
PARTIAL ACCESS 
Subject: RE: Huddle - New Disability Codes 
Exemption claimed: 
 
s47C – deliberative processes 
Date: 17 July 2020 
s47F – personal privacy 
10 267-272 
Email 
PARTIAL ACCESS 
Subject: FYI: BILL SHORTEN - TRANSCRIPT - RADIO INTERVIEW - ABC 
Exemption claimed: 
BREAKFAST NORTHERN TASMANIA WITH BELINDA KING - 
s47F – personal privacy 
THURSDAY, 15 JULY 2021 
 
Date: 15 July 2021 
11 273-275 
Email 
PARTIAL ACCESS 
Subject: RE: ACA request - 2PM QLD time deadline 
Exemption claimed: 
 
s47F – personal privacy 
Date: 5 November 2021 
12 276-278 
Email 
PARTIAL ACCESS 
Subject: Re: For clearance by Friday COB: ABC request: ADHD and the 
Exemption claimed: 
NDIS 
s47F – personal privacy 
 
Date: 19 May 2022 
13 279-281 
Email 
PARTIAL ACCESS 
Subject: RE: FOR REVIEW: Geelong Advertiser query 
Exemption claimed: 
 
s47F – personal privacy 
Date: 31 August 2022 
14 282 
Email 
PARTIAL ACCESS 
Subject: FOR INFO - MB22-000090 - Support available and handling of 
Exemption claimed: 
ADHD under the NDIS and outside the scheme - Returned from MO 
s47F – personal privacy 
 
Date: 7 September 2022 
14.1 283-285 
Attachment to Document 14 
FULL ACCESS 
Signed Ministerial Briefing MB22-00090 
 
Date: 3 September 2022 
6 

Document 
Page 
Description 
Access Decision 
number 
number 
15 286-293 
Email 
FULL ACCESS 
Subject: MINISTER FOR THE NDIS - TRANSCRIPT - DOORSTOP - 
MONDAY 26 SEPTEMBER 2022 
 
Date: 26 September 2022 
16 294 
Email 
PARTIAL ACCESS 
Subject: ADHD RESPONSE FOR MEDIA 
Exemption claimed: 
 
s47F – personal privacy 
Date: 27 September 2022 
16.1 295-296 
Attachment to Document 16 
FULL ACCESS 
Media Response  
 
Date: 27 September 2022 
17 297-304 
Email 
PARTIAL ACCESS 
Subject: FYI: MINISTER FOR THE NDIS - TRANSCRIPT - DOORSTOP - 
Exemption claimed: 
MONDAY 26 SEPTEMBER 2022 
s47F – personal privacy 
 
Date: 27 September 2022 
17.1 305-307 
Attachment to Document 17 
PARTIAL ACCESS 
Media Response  
Exemption claimed: 
 
s47F – personal privacy 
Date: 26 September 2022 
18 308-310 
Email 
PARTIAL ACCESS 
Subject: RE: Daily Telegraph enquiry for Minister Shorten 
Exemption claimed: 
 
s47F – personal privacy 
Date: 27 September 2022 
18.1 311-315 
Attachment to Document 18 
PARTIAL ACCESS 
Question Time Brief QB22-000078 
Exemption claimed: 
 
s47F – personal privacy 
Date: 27 September 2022 
19 316-317 
Ministerial Correspondence MC22-001616 
PARTIAL ACCESS 
 
Exemption claimed: 
Date: 12 August 2022 
s47F – personal privacy 
7 

Document 
Page 
Description 
Access Decision 
number 
number 
20 318-320 
Ministerial Correspondence MC22-001638 
PARTIAL ACCESS 
 
Exemption claimed: 
Date: 12 August 2022 
s47F – personal privacy 
21 321-323 
Ministerial Correspondence MC22-001458 
PARTIAL ACCESS 
 
Exemption claimed: 
Date: 23 August 2022 
s47F – personal privacy 
22 324-326 
Ministerial Correspondence MC22-002093 
PARTIAL ACCESS 
 
Exemption claimed: 
Date: 2 September 2022 
s47F – personal privacy 
23 327-328 
Ministerial Correspondence MC22-002313 
PARTIAL ACCESS 
 
Exemption claimed: 
Date: 19 September 2022 
s47F – personal privacy 
8 


 
Attachment B 
Your review rights  
 
Internal Review  
The FOI Act gives you the right to apply for an internal review of this decision. The review 
will be conducted by a different person to the person who made the original decision. 
 
If you wish to seek an internal review of the decision, you must apply for the review, in 
writing, within 30 days of receipt of this letter. 
 
No particular form is required for an application for internal review, but to assist the review 
process, you should clearly outline your grounds for review (that is, the reasons why you 
disagree with the decision). Applications for internal review can be lodged by email to 
xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx or sent by post to: 
 
Freedom of Information Section  
Parliamentary, Ministerial & FOI Branch  
Government Division 
National Disability Insurance Agency 
GPO Box 700 
CANBERRA   ACT   2601 
 
Review by the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner 
The FOI Act also gives you the right to apply to the Office of the Australian Information 
Commissioner (OAIC) to seek a review of this decision. 
 
If you wish to have the decision reviewed by the OAIC, you may apply for the review, in 
writing, or by using the online merits review form available on the OAIC’s website at 
www.oaic.gov.au, within 60 days of receipt of this letter.  
 
Applications for review can be lodged with the OAIC in the following ways: 
 
Online: 
www.oaic.gov.au  
Post:  
GPO Box 5218, Sydney NSW 2001 
Email: 
xxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx 
Phone: 
1300 363 992 (local call charge) 
 
Complaints to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner or the 
Commonwealth Ombudsman 
You may complain to either the Commonwealth Ombudsman or the OAIC about actions 
taken by the NDIA in relation to your request. The Ombudsman will consult with the OAIC 
before investigating a complaint about the handling of an FOI request. 
 
Your complaint to the OAIC can be directed to the contact details identified above. Your 
complaint to the Ombudsman can be directed to: 
 
Phone: 
1300 362 072 (local call charge) 
Email:  
xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx  
 
Your complaint should be in writing and should set out the grounds on which it is considered 
that the actions taken in relation to the request should be investigated