This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Public Service Wage Policy'.


 
 
 
Andorra Loom 
By email: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx  
 
 
Our reference: LEX 373 
Dear Andorra 
Freedom of Information request 
1.  I  am  writing  about  your  Freedom  of  Information  (FOI)  request  under  the  Freedom  of 
Information Act 1982 (FOI Act) made on 22 November 2022 for access to documents held 
by the  Australian Public Service Commission (Commission). 
 
2.  The FOI Act and all other Commonwealth legislation referred to in this letter are publicly 
available from www.legislation.gov.au 
 
Documents relevant to your request 
3.  On 22 November 2022, you requested access to documents in the following terms: 
 
“I am seeking all correspondence between the Commission and the Government relating 
to  the  announcement  of  a  new  interim  workplace  relations  policy  by  the  Minister  for 
Finance, Senator the Hon Katy Gallagher. 
 
I am not seeking drafts of the above documents.” 
 

4.  On 13 December 2022, you agreed to extend the timeframe for providing a response to your 
request until 10 January 2023. 
 
5.  On 18 January 2023, the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (the OAIC) 
granted a further extension for providing a response to your request until 9 February 2023.  
 
6.  I have identified 27 documents in scope of your request. 
 
Decision 
7.  I am authorised under subsection 23(1) of the FOI Act to make FOI decisions. 
 
8.  I have decided to: 
 
  grant access in full to Documents 6b, 6c and 6d; and 
 
  grant partial access to Documents 1 – 6a and Documents 7 – 27 because I consider 
parts of the documents are exempt.  
 
 


 
9.  Attachment A sets out the grounds, where applicable, on which the documents are exempt. 
 
10. My reasons are set out in Attachment B
 
Contacts 
11. If  you require clarification on matters in this letter please contact the Commission’s FOI 
Officer by telephone on (02) 6202 3720 or by email at xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx. 
 
Review rights 
12. You  are  entitled  to  seek  review  of  this  decision. Your  review  rights  are  set  out  at 
Attachment C.   
 
Yours sincerely 
 
James O’Reilly 
Authorised FOI decision maker   
9 February 2023 
 
 

ATTACHMENT A 
SCHEDULE OF DOCUMENTS 
 
Document 
Exemption 

Released in part. Section 47F (personal privacy) of the FOI Act applies. 

Released in part. Section 47F (personal privacy) of the FOI Act applies. 

Released in part. Section 47F (personal privacy) and section 34 (Cabinet 
documents) of the FOI Act applies. 

Released in part. Section 47F (personal privacy) and section 34 (Cabinet 
documents) of the FOI Act applies. 

Released in part. Section 47F (personal privacy) and section 34 (Cabinet 
documents) of the FOI Act applies. 

Released in part. Section 47F (personal privacy) of the FOI Act applies. 
6a 
Released in part. Section 34 (Cabinet documents) of the FOI Act applies. 
6b 
Released in full. 
6c 
Released in full. 
6d 
Released in full. 

Released in part. Section 47F (personal privacy) of the FOI Act applies. 

Released in part. Section 47F (personal privacy) of the FOI Act applies. 

Released in part. Section 47F (personal privacy) of the FOI Act applies. 
10 
Released in part. Section 47F (personal privacy) of the FOI Act applies. 
11 
Released in part. Section 47F (personal privacy) of the FOI Act applies. 
12 
Released in part. Section 47F (personal privacy) of the FOI Act applies. 
13 
Released in part. Section 47F (personal privacy) of the FOI Act applies. 
14 
Released in part. Section 47F (personal privacy) of the FOI Act applies. 
15 
Released in part. Section 47F (personal privacy) of the FOI Act applies. 
16 
Released in part. Section 47F (personal privacy) of the FOI Act applies. 
17 
Released in part. Section 47F (personal privacy) of the FOI Act applies. 
18 
Released in part. Section 47F (personal privacy) of the FOI Act applies. 
19 
Released in part. Section 47F (personal privacy) of the FOI Act applies. 
20 
Released in part. Section 47F (personal privacy) of the FOI Act applies. 
21 
Released in part. Section 47F (personal privacy) of the FOI Act applies. 
22 
Released in part. Section 47F (personal privacy) of the FOI Act applies. 
 
 

23 
Released in part. Section 47F (personal privacy) of the FOI Act applies. 
24 
Released in part. Section 47F (personal privacy) of the FOI Act applies. 
25 
Released in part. Section 47F (personal privacy) of the FOI Act applies. 
26 
Released in part. Section 47F (personal privacy) of the FOI Act applies. 
27 
Released in part. Section 47F (personal privacy) of the FOI Act applies. 
 
 
 
 

 
ATTACHMENT B 
Reasons for decision 
 
1.  The following paragraphs outline my reasons for determining the specified exemptions set 
out in Attachment A for the documents falling within scope of your request.  
 
2.  In making my decision I have had regard to:  
 
  the terms of your request;  
  the contents of the documents;  
  the FOI Act; and 
  the FOI Guidelines issued by the Australian Information Commissioner (the 
Guidelines).  
 
Section 34 of the FOI Act – Cabinet documents 
 
3.  Section 34 of the FOI Act provides that: 
 
(1)  A document is an exempt document if: 
 
(a)   both of the following are satisfied: 
(i) it has been submitted to the Cabinet for its consideration, or is or 
was proposed by a Minister to be so submitted; 
(ii) it was brought into existence for the dominant purpose of 
submission for consideration by the Cabinet; or 
(b)   it is an official record of the Cabinet; or 
(c)   it was brought into existence for the dominant purpose of briefing a 
Minister on a document to which paragraph (a) applies; or 
(d)   it is a draft of a document to which paragraph (a), (b) or (c) applies. 
 
(2)  A document is an exempt document to the extent that it is a copy or part of, or 
contains an extract from, a document to which subsection (1) applies. 
 
(3)  A document is an exempt document to the extent that it contains information the 
disclosure of which would reveal a Cabinet deliberation or decision, unless the 
existence of the deliberation or decision has been officially disclosed. 
 
4.  Paragraph 5.55 of the Guidelines provides that the Cabinet exemption in section 34 of the 
FOI Act is designed to protect the confidentiality of the Cabinet process and to ensure that 
the principle of collective ministerial responsibility (fundamental to the Cabinet system) is 
not undermined. As public interest is implicit in the purpose of the exemption itself, the 
section 34 exemption is not subject to the public interest test. 
 
5.  I am satisfied that the material contained with Documents 3, 4, 5 and 6a contains Cabinet 
deliberations regarding the Public Sector Interim Workplace Arrangements 2022. To my 
knowledge, these deliberations have not been officially disclosed. For this reason, I 
consider the material within Documents 3, 4, 5 and 6a to be exempt from disclosure under 
subsection 34(3) of the FOI Act to the extent that the relevant material would reveal 
Cabinet deliberations. 
 
 
 

6.  Additionally, I am satisfied that the material in Document 6a contains an exact extract 
from a document that was submitted to Cabinet for consideration. Under Paragraph 5.72 
of the Guidelines, a document that refers to a Cabinet meeting date or Cabinet document 
reference number contains an extract from a Cabinet document for the purposes for 
section 34(2) of the FOI Act. Further, the Guidelines provide that the section 34(2) 
exemption does not require that the decision maker be satisfied that disclosure would 
cause damage, it is enough that the document in question quotes any information from a 
document described in section 34(1).  
 
7.  For this reason, I consider the material in Document 6a that is an exact extract from a 
document that was submitted to the Cabinet for its consideration and brought into 
existence for the dominant purpose of submission for consideration by Cabinet, to be 
exempt from disclosure under subsection 34(2) of the FOI Act to the extent that it 
contains an extract from, a document to which subsection (1) applies. 
 
8.  I have had regard to the public statements made by Minister for the Public Service, 
Senator the Hon Katy Gallagher, in relation to the matter, and I do not consider that 
disclosure of Cabinet deliberations or Cabinet meeting dates and references contained in 
the Documents 3, 4, 5 and 6a have occurred. Accordingly, I am satisfied that Documents 
3, 4, 5 and 6a are exempt from release in part under subsection 34(3) of the FOI Act. I am 
also satisfied that Document 6a is exempt from release in part under subsection 34(2) of 
the FOI Act. 
 
Conditional exemptions 
 
Section 47F – personal information  
 
9.  Section 47F of the FOI Act provides a document is conditionally exempt if its disclosure 
would involve the unreasonable disclosure of personal information of any person.  
 
10. Personal information means information or an opinion about an identified individual, or 
an individual who is reasonably identifiable:  
  whether the information or opinion is true or not; and  
  whether the information or opinion is recorded in a material form or not.  
 
11. I consider the nature of Documents 1 – 6 and 7 – 27, being documents relating to 
implementation and administration of the Public Sector Interim Workplace Arrangements 
2022,
 contain personal information of both public servants and ministerial staff that is not 
publicly known or accessible. Specifically, the names and position details of non-SES 
level staff and ministerial staff, and the direct telephone numbers of staff at all levels.  
 
12. I have had regard to the matters I must consider under subsection 47F(2) of the FOI Act in 
determining whether disclosure would involve the unreasonable disclosure of personal 
information. 
  
13. In considering what is unreasonable, the Administrative Appeals Tribunal in Re Chandra 
and Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1984] AATA 437 at 259 stated: 
 
…whether a disclosure is ‘unreasonable’ requires… a consideration of all the 
circumstances, including the nature of the information that would be disclosed, the 
circumstances in which the information was obtained, the likelihood of the 

 
 

information being information that the person concerned would not wish to have 
disclosed without consent, and whether the information has any current relevance… 
and to weigh that interest in the balance against the public interest in protecting the 
personal privacy of a third party… 

 
14. Other factors to be considered include the nature, age and current relevance of the 
information, any opposition to disclosure held by the person that the personal information 
relates to, and the circumstances of an agency’s collection and use of the information 
(‘FG’ and National Archives of Australia [2015] AICmr 26 at [47]). 
 
15. I note that in Warren; Chief Executive Officer, Services Australia and (Freedom of 
information) [2020] AATA 4557 (9 November 2020), Deputy President S A Forgie found 
(at [130]): 
 
An individual may include his or her direct telephone number in correspondence 
directed to other persons. Unless published on an agency’s website or made public in 
some other way, such as on a pamphlet or report available to the public, I consider 
that disclosure of an individual’s telephone number in his or her place of employment 
is unreasonable. Its disclosure will provide an avenue by which others may choose to 
express their displeasure with the individual or with that for which he or she is 
responsible but its disclosure does not make any positive contribution to increasing 
public participation in Government processes or in increasing scrutiny, discussion, 
comment and review of the Government’s activities.
 
 
16. In relation to the question of whether disclosure would be unreasonable, the FOI 
Guidelines provide, at paragraphs 6.144 and 6.145: 
 
For example, in Colakovski v Australian Telecommunications Corp, Heerey J 
considered that ‘... if the information disclosure were of no demonstrable relevance to 
the affairs of government and was likely to do no more than excite or satisfy the 
curiosity of people about the person whose personal affairs were disclosed ... 
disclosure would be unreasonable’. This illustrates how the object of the FOI Act of 
promoting transparency in government processes and activities needs to be balanced 
with the purpose of s 47F to protect personal privacy, although care is needed to 
ensure that an FOI applicant is not expected to explain their reason for access 
contrary to s 11(2). 
 

17. Relevant to personal information of certain public servants, under the FOI Act there is no 
presumption that agencies and ministers should start from the position that the inclusion 
of the full names of staff in documents increases transparency and the objects of the FOI 
Act: Warren; Chief Executive Officer, Services Australia and (Freedom of information) 
[2020] AATA 4557 at [83]. 
 
18. I have identified the following factors that, in my view, do not support release of the 
personal information under section 47F of the FOI Act: 
    the individuals’ personal information, in particular their names, will identify them; 
  the names, position details, direct work emails and work numbers of non-SES level staff 
and ministerial staff are generally not well known or publicly available; 
  the direct telephone numbers of SES staff are generally not well known or publicly 
available; 
 
 

  it would prejudice the relevant individuals’ right to privacy; 
  the FOI Act does not control or restrict the subsequent use or dissemination of 
information released under the FOI Act; 
  the disclosure of this information will not advance scrutiny of any decisions falling 
within the scope of your FOI request, particularly with regard to staff who are not the 
relevant decision-makers and non-SES level staff who are acting under the direction of 
senior staff within relevant agencies in the course of their ordinary duties; 
  the disclosure of this information could expose public servants to unsolicited and 
inappropriate approaches by external parties;  
  the release of some of the individuals’ personal information may cause stress for them or 
other detriment; and 
  no public purpose or interest in increasing transparency of government would be 
achieved through the release of this personal information. 
 
19. Considering the above factors, I strongly consider it would be unreasonable to disclose the 
personal information of non-SES level staff and ministerial staff, and the phone numbers 
of SES staff in the documents. Therefore, I have decided that to the extent Documents 1 – 
6 and 7 – 27 include this type of personal information, those parts of the documents are 
conditionally exempt from disclosure under section 47F of the FOI Act. 
 
Section 11B – public interest test  
 
20. In relation to the personal information of both non-SES and SES level staff contained in 
Documents 1 – 6 and 7 – 27, I have considered the public interest factors in favour of 
disclosure at subsection 11B(3) of the FOI Act, including the extent to which access to the 
documents would promote the objects of the FOI Act and inform debate on a matter of 
public importance.  
 
21. I have identified the following factors as weighing against disclosure:  
 
  disclosure could be expected to interfere with the privacy of individuals; 
  disclosure could prejudice the protection of the individuals’ right to privacy; 
  disclosure of certain personal information will not advance any scrutiny of any 
decisions falling within the scope of your FOI request;  
  disclosure could lead to unwarranted approaches to public servants which would 
adversely impact their ability to perform their role and functions, noting that general 
inquiry phone numbers and email addresses are available; and 
  there is a public interest in APS employers fulfilling their obligations under the Work 
Health and Safety Act 2011, in particular by preventing the exposure of staff members 
from potential harassment or threats in a public forum. 
 
22. Subsection 11B(4) of the FOI Act lists factors that are irrelevant to determining whether 
access would be in the public interest. I have not considered these factors. 
 
23. On balance, I find that the public interest factors against disclosure outweigh the public 
interest factors favouring disclosure. 
 
24. Accordingly, I am satisfied that the conditionally exempt material contained in 
Documents 1 – 6, and 7 – 27 is contrary to the public interest. 
 
 
 
 

ATTACHMENT C 
 
 
 

Rights of Review 
 
Asking for a full explanation of a Freedom of Information decision 
If you are dissatisfied with this decision, you may seek review.  Before you seek review of a 
Freedom of Information (FOI) decision, you may contact us to discuss your request and we 
will explain the decision to you. 
Seeking review of a Freedom of Information decision 
If you still believe a decision is incorrect, the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (the FOI Act) 
may give you the right to apply for a review of the decision. Under sections 54 and 54L of 
the  FOI Act, you can apply for a review of an FOI decision by seeking: 
1.  an internal review by an different officer of the Australian Public 
Service  Commission; and/or 
2.  external review by the Australian Information Commissioner. 
There are no fees applied to either review option. 
Applying for a review by an Internal Review Officer 
If you apply for internal review, a different decision maker to the departmental delegate 
who  made the original decision will carry out the review. The Internal Review Officer will 
consider all aspects of the original decision and decide whether it should change. An 
application for internal review must be made in writing within 30 days of receiving this 
letter  to: 
Email
xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx 
Post
The FOI Officer 
Australian Public Service 
Commission  B Block, Treasury 
Building 
GPO Box 3176 
Parkes Place West 
PARKES ACT 2600 
You do not need to fill in a form. However, it is a good idea to set out any relevant 
submissions you would like the Internal Review Officer to further consider, and your 
reasons  for disagreeing with the decision. 
 
 
 
 

Applying for external review by the Australian Information Commissioner 
If you do not agree with the original FOI decision or the internal review decision, you can 
ask  the Australian Information Commissioner to review the decision.  You have 60 days to 
apply  in writing for a review by the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner 
(the OAIC)  from the date you received this letter or any subsequent internal review 
decision. 
 
You can lodge your application
 
Online: 
www.oaic.gov.au 
Post: 
Australian Information Commissioner 
GPO Box 5218 
SYDNEY NSW 2001 
Email: 
xxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx 
The OAIC encourage applicants to apply online.  Where possible, to assist the OAIC you 
should include your contact information, a copy of the related FOI decision and provide 
details of your reasons for objecting to the decision. 
Complaints to the Information Commissioner and Commonwealth Ombudsman 
Information Commissioner 
You may complain to the Information Commissioner concerning action taken by an agency 
in the exercise of powers or the performance of functions under the FOI Act. There is no fee 
for making a complaint. A complaint to the Information Commissioner must be made in 
writing. The Information Commissioner's contact details are: 
Telephone: 
1300 363 992 
Website: 
www.oaic.gov.au 
Commonwealth Ombudsman 
You may complain to the Ombudsman concerning action taken by an agency in the exercise 
of powers or the performance of functions under the FOI Act. There is no fee for making a 
complaint. A complaint to the Ombudsman may be made in person, by telephone or in 
writing. The Ombudsman's contact details are: 
Phone: 
1300 362 072 
Website: 
www.ombudsman.gov.au