Our reference: FOI 20/21-0853
GPO Box 700
Canberra ACT 2601
1800 800 110
19 August 2021
ndis.gov.au
Shirley
By email: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx
Dear Shirley
Freedom of Information request — Notification of Decision
Thank you for your correspondence of 9 June 2021, in which you requested access under
the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (FOI Act) to documents held by the National Disability
Insurance Agency (NDIA).
The purpose of this letter is to provide you with a decision on your request.
Scope of your request
You have requested access to documents about the National Disability Insurance Scheme
(NDIS). Specifically, you requested access to:
“…a copy of the NDIA's current Investigations Policy/ies [sic] and Procedure along with
all prior versions. That is, all NDIA Investigations Policies and Procedures since 2013
until Jun 2021…”
On 12 July 2021, we wrote to you regarding your request as set out under section 24AB of
the FOI Act.
On 15 July 2021, you revised your request to:
“The current, NDIS-wide, Investigations Policy and Procedure. For clarity, that is the
overarching, single, superior NDIS investigation policy and the supporting procedure.”
Decision on access to documents
I am authorised to make decisions under the FOI Act. My decision on your request and the
reasons for my decision are set out below.
We have conducted searches of the NDIA’s documents management systems and made
enquiries with NDIA staff. I note there is no singular overarching policy or procedure document
that applies to all investigations undertaken by the NDIA. Policy and procedure documents
differ based on the nature of the matter being investigated. This is standard practice across
government agencies. A nuanced approach is necessary to ensure that NDIA’s procedures
are robust and comply with relevant Commonwealth legislation and guidance for different
types of investigations and matters.
Noting the above, we have reasonably interpreted your request to relate to the key
investigations policy and procedure document used for investigations relating to fraud and
non-compliance.
I have identified one document which falls within the scope of your request.
1
The document was identified by conducting searches of NDIA’s systems, using all reasonable
search terms that could return documents relevant to your request, and consulting with
relevant NDIA staff who could be expected to be able to identify documents within the scope
of the request.
I have decided to refuse access to one document in full.
In reaching my decision, I took into account the following materials:
your correspondence outlining the scope of your request;
the nature and content of the documents falling within the scope of your request;
the FOI Act;
the FOI Guidelines;
relevant case law concerning the operation of the FOI Act;
consultation with relevant NDIA staff;
factors relevant to my assessment of whether or not disclosure would be in the public
interest; and
the NDIA’s operating environment and functions.
Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant material deleted (section 22)
I have decided that documents falling within the scope of your request contain material that is
exempt from disclosure under the FOI Act.
In accordance with section 22 of the FOI Act, I have considered whether it is possible to delete
the exempt material from the documents and have concluded that it is not reasonably
practicable to do so.
Reasons for decisions
Certain operations of agencies (section 47E(d))
Section 47E(d) of the FOI Act conditionally exempts a document if its disclosure would, or
could reasonably be expected to, have a substantial adverse effect on the proper and efficient
conduct of the operations of an agency.
The document within the scope of your request contains information relating to certain
operations of the NDIA, specifically, internal guidance and processes related to investigations
into fraud and non-compliance. The information relates to procedures and methods that may
be used in the course of investigations, and circumstances where investigations may be
undertaken.
The disclosure of this information would reveal operational information about how
investigations are conducted within the NDIA, and the internal systems and controls used
during investigations.
I am satisfied that the release of this information would potentially result in the public disclosure
of internal methodologies that, through improper use, would, or could, circumvent or
compromise investigations. This would had a significant adverse effect on the NDIA to conduct
appropriate and substantially and adversely affect the integrity of the NDIS and its financial
sustainability.
2
Public interest considerations – section 47E(d)
Under the FOI Act, access to a document covered by a conditional exemption must be
provided unless disclosure would be contrary to the public interest.
After considering the public interest factors outlined in section 11B(3) of the FOI Act, I have
determined that disclosure of the material identified as subject to conditional exemptions would
provide access to information relating to the applicant. However, I have considered that:
disclosure of the information would not contribute to the publication of information of
sufficient public interest to justify the likely harm caused by release;
disclosure of the information would not enhance Australia’s representative democracy in
the ways described in section 11B(3) of the FOI Act; and
disclosure of the information would not inform any debate on a matter of public importance
or promote oversight of public expenditure.
While there is limited public interest in the disclosure of information conditionally exempt under
section 47E(d) the harm that would result from disclosure is that it could reasonably be
expected to prejudice the ability of the Agency to undertake relevant investigations to protect
the integrity of the NDIA and the National Disability Insurance Scheme.
In summary, I am satisfied that the factors against disclosure of the information outweigh the
factors in favour of disclosure and that, on balance, it would be contrary to the public interest
to release this information to you.
Release of documents
The documents for release, as referred to in the Schedule of Documents at
Attachment A,
are enclosed.
Rights of review
Your rights to seek a review of my decision, or lodge a complaint, are set out at
Attachment B.
Should you have any enquiries concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me
by email
at xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx.
Yours sincerely
Ausilia Woodhead
Assistant Director
Parliamentary, Ministerial & FOI Branch
Government Division
3
Attachment A
Schedule of Documents for FOI 20/21-0853
Document
Page
Description
Access Decision
Comments
number
number
NDIA Investigations Handbook
REFUSED ACCESS
1
-
Date: January 2021
Exemption claimed:
S47E(d) – certain operations of agencies
4
Attachment B
Your review rights
Internal Review
The FOI Act gives you the right to apply for an internal review of this decision. The review
will be conducted by a different person to the person who made the original decision.
If you wish to seek an internal review of the decision, you must apply for the review, in
writing, within 30 days of receipt of this letter.
No particular form is required for an application for internal review, but to assist the review
process, you should clearly outline your grounds for review (that is, the reasons why you
disagree with the decision). Applications for internal review can be lodged by email to
xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx or sent by post to:
Freedom of Information Section
Parliamentary, Ministerial & FOI Branch
Government Division
National Disability Insurance Agency
GPO Box 700
Canberra ACT 2601
Review by the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner
The FOI Act also gives you the right to apply to the Office of the Australian Information
Commissioner (OAIC) to seek a review of this decision.
If you wish to have the decision reviewed by the OAIC, you may apply for the review, in
writing, or by using the online merits review form available on the OAIC’s website at
www.oaic.gov.au, within 60 days of receipt of this letter.
Applications for review can be lodged with the OAIC in the following ways:
Online:
www.oaic.gov.au
Post:
GPO Box 5218, Sydney NSW 2001
Email:
xxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx
Phone:
1300 363 992 (local call charge)
Complaints to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner or the
Commonwealth Ombudsman
You may complain to either the Commonwealth Ombudsman or the OAIC about actions
taken by the NDIA in relation to your request. The Ombudsman will consult with the OAIC
before investigating a complaint about the handling of an FOI request.
Your complaint to the OAIC can be directed to the contact details identified above. Your
complaint to the Ombudsman can be directed to:
Phone:
1300 362 072 (local call charge)
Email:
xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx
Your complaint should be in writing and should set out the grounds on which it is considered
that the actions taken in relation to the request should be investigated
1
