8 Sofronoff ACTP internal communications

Currently waiting for a response from Australian Federal Police, they should respond promptly and normally no later than (details).

Reasonable Prospects

Dear Australian Federal Police,

I request a copy of any document created on or after 1 August 2023 that is, or could be understood to be, a communication to ACT Policing or a subset of ACT Policing regarding the Sofronoff inquiry

For example, an email to all AFP employees (ACT Policing and Federal) is included because ACT Policing is a subset of all AFP and therefore a communication to all AFP is necessarily a communication to ACT Policing

For example, an email to all SACAT officers (or similar / however described) is included because SACAT is a subset of ACT Policing

For example, an email to the investigator/s in a specific investigation is not included because individual investigator/s are not a subset of ACT Policing in the relevant way, and/or, their sergeant giving them advice about a specific investigation is a communication regarding that investigation, not regarding the Sofronoff inquiry

Exclusions: non-SES personal information (SES includes acting SES), direct phone numbers, and non-public email addresses excluding the domain.

Yours faithfully,

Reasonable Prospects