8 Sofronoff ACTP internal communications

Response to this request is long overdue. By law, under all circumstances, Australian Federal Police should have responded by now (details). You can complain by requesting an internal review.

Reasonable Prospects

Dear Australian Federal Police,

I request a copy of any document created on or after 1 August 2023 that is, or could be understood to be, a communication to ACT Policing or a subset of ACT Policing regarding the Sofronoff inquiry

For example, an email to all AFP employees (ACT Policing and Federal) is included because ACT Policing is a subset of all AFP and therefore a communication to all AFP is necessarily a communication to ACT Policing

For example, an email to all SACAT officers (or similar / however described) is included because SACAT is a subset of ACT Policing

For example, an email to the investigator/s in a specific investigation is not included because individual investigator/s are not a subset of ACT Policing in the relevant way, and/or, their sergeant giving them advice about a specific investigation is a communication regarding that investigation, not regarding the Sofronoff inquiry

Exclusions: non-SES personal information (SES includes acting SES), direct phone numbers, and non-public email addresses excluding the domain.

Yours faithfully,

Reasonable Prospects