FOI Request for Detail Incident Report 1-4VNA03

Tim Bateson made this Freedom of Information request to Department of Home Affairs

This request has been closed to new correspondence from the public body. Contact us if you think it ought be re-opened.

The request was refused by Department of Home Affairs.

To the Department of Immigration and Citizenship,

Dear Sir/Madam,

Under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth) I request the following document:

Incident Detail Report 1-4VNA03 from the Department's Compliance, Case Management, Detention and Settlement Portal. I also request any documents attached to the detailed report.

Kind Regards,

Tim Bateson

1 Attachment

UNCLASSIFIED

Dear Mr Bateson

Please see the attached notice.

Regards

Linda Rossiter
Director
FOI and Privacy Policy
Department of Immigration and Citizenship

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Bateson [mailto:[FOI #219 email]]
Sent: Sunday, 16 June 2013 8:25 PM
To: FOI
Subject: Freedom of Information request - FOI Request for Detail Incident Report 1-4VNA03

To the Department of Immigration and Citizenship,

Dear Sir/Madam,

Under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth) I request the
following document:

Incident Detail Report 1-4VNA03 from the Department's Compliance,
Case Management, Detention and Settlement Portal. I also request
any documents attached to the detailed report.

Kind Regards,

Tim Bateson

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #219 email]

Is [email address] the wrong address for Freedom of Information
requests to Department of Immigration and Citizenship? If so,
please contact us using this form:
http://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/contact

Write your response as plain text. Only send PDF documents as a
last resort. Government guidelines make it clear that PDF is not an
acceptable format for you to use in the delivery of government
information.
http://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offic...

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be
published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
http://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offic...

If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your
web manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.


-------------------------------------------------------------------

UNCLASSIFIED

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Important Notice: If you have received this email by mistake, please advise
the sender and delete the message and attachments immediately. This email,
including attachments, may contain confidential, sensitive, legally privileged
and/or copyright information. Any review, retransmission, dissemination
or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited. DIAC respects your privacy and has
obligations under the Privacy Act 1988. The official departmental privacy
policy can be viewed on the department's website at www.immi.gov.au. See:
http://www.immi.gov.au/functional/privac...

---------------------------------------------------------------------

hide quoted sections

Dear Ms Rossiter,

Thank you for your email. I disagree with your assertion that my request can be linked to other requests in accordance with s 24(2) of the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth). My request and the others you refer to are not requests by the same person. This is a condition precedent for the application of this section of the act.

The Office of Australian Information Commissioner Guidelines state that the section is relevant: "two or more requests from the same applicant may be treated as a single request where the agency or minister is satisfied that the requests relate to substantially the same document or documents.” (See Guidelines 3.62)

You must have regard to these guidelines in performing a function or exercising a power under the FOI Act (s 93A(2)).

In addition you wrongly conclude that the requests relate to documents the subject matter which is substantially the same. My request and other requests relate to incident reports involving different individuals, different types of events, and events at different times and places. The subject matter in each case is likely to be unique not substantially the same.

Your reliance on these grounds for any decision to refuse access for the practical refusal reason that processing the request would substantially and unreasonably divert the resources of the agency from its other operations is misplaced.

Based on this I would like to indicate that I will be declining to vary or revise my request further. You estimate that dealing with my request would take three hours and as such this would not substantially and unreasonably divert the resources of the agency from its other operations. In any event there are strong public interest factors, reflected in the objects of the act, in favour of disclosure of the requested document.

I look forward to true determination of my application.

Yours sincerely,

Tim Bateson

UNCLASSIFIED

Dear Mr Bateson

Thank you for your response. I recognise that paragraph 3.62 of the FOI Guidelines refers to a single applicant. It does not, however, preclude the treatment of multiple requests from multiple individuals as the same request. As stated in my notice of 24 June, section 24 the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (FOI Act) does not require the requests to be made from the same applicant. It should also be noted that, even if there was an inconsistency between the FOI Guidelines and the FOI Act, the FOI Act would take precedence over the FOI Guidelines.

These are requests all from a single source, the department’s Compliance, Case Management, Detention and Settlement (CCMDS) portal, and all consist of incident reports and their attachments.

It therefore remains my view that the requests relate to subject matter that is substantially the same for each of the requests. The FOI Act does not require the subject matter to be identical, or for the documents in scope to be the same documents, rather the test employed is that the subject matter is substantially the same. Although the requests were for unique incidents the subject matter, namely ‘incidents in detention’, is substantially the same.

I note your comment that I have estimated that the time required to deal with your request would be three hours. My notice of 24 June advised that, based on the department’s previous experience, assessing incident detail reports and their attachments would take an average of three hours per report. I have not quantified the time required just for your request.

I note also your advice that you do not intend to vary or revise your request further. As stated in my notice of 24 June, I require agreement from each of the applicants in order to accept a position, including that of not wishing to revise the scope of the request. To simplify this process, you may wish to appoint (or nominate yourself as) a representative to take part in consultation with the department. I note that we require that each individual contact the department to nominate a representative rather than a representative appointing him/herself. A lack of response from any of the applicants by the required date will result in the request being deemed withdrawn under s.24AB(7) of the FOI Act.

I note that the subject line of your email mentions an internal review. Please note that my notice of 24 June did not constitute an access refusal decision. Consequently, you are unable to seek review of this notice. Rather, the notice encourages you to consult with the department on the scope of the request. If you are not happy with the department’s handling of the request you may make a complaint to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner. Details of how to do this are in the notice you received and are also available from www.oaic.gov.au.

Regards

Linda Rossiter
Director
FOI and Privacy Policy
Department of Immigration and Citizenship

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Bateson [mailto:[FOI #219 email]]
Sent: Sunday, 30 June 2013 10:47 AM
To: FOI
Subject: Internal review of Freedom of Information request - FOI Request for Detail Incident Report 1-4VNA03

Dear Ms Rossiter,

Thank you for your email. I disagree with your assertion that my
request can be linked to other requests in accordance with s 24(2)
of the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth). My request and the
others you refer to are not requests by the same person. This is a
condition precedent for the application of this section of the act.

The Office of Australian Information Commissioner Guidelines state
that the section is relevant: "two or more requests from the same
applicant may be treated as a single request where the agency or
minister is satisfied that the requests relate to substantially the
same document or documents.” (See Guidelines 3.62)

You must have regard to these guidelines in performing a function
or exercising a power under the FOI Act (s 93A(2)).

In addition you wrongly conclude that the requests relate to
documents the subject matter which is substantially the same. My
request and other requests relate to incident reports involving
different individuals, different types of events, and events at
different times and places. The subject matter in each case is
likely to be unique not substantially the same.

Your reliance on these grounds for any decision to refuse access
for the practical refusal reason that processing the request would
substantially and unreasonably divert the resources of the agency
from its other operations is misplaced.

Based on this I would like to indicate that I will be declining to
vary or revise my request further. You estimate that dealing with
my request would take three hours and as such this would not
substantially and unreasonably divert the resources of the agency
from its other operations. In any event there are strong public
interest factors, reflected in the objects of the act, in favour of
disclosure of the requested document.

I look forward to true determination of my application.

Yours sincerely,

Tim Bateson

-----Original Message-----

UNCLASSIFIED

Dear Mr Bateson

Please see the attached notice.

Regards

Linda Rossiter
Director
FOI and Privacy Policy
Department of Immigration and Citizenship

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #219 email]

Write your response as plain text. Only send PDF documents as a
last resort. Government guidelines make it clear that PDF is not an
acceptable format for you to use in the delivery of government
information.
http://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offic...

Disclaimer: This message and any reply that you make will be
published on the internet. Our privacy and copyright policies:
http://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offic...

If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your
web manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

UNCLASSIFIED

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Important Notice: If you have received this email by mistake, please advise
the sender and delete the message and attachments immediately. This email,
including attachments, may contain confidential, sensitive, legally privileged
and/or copyright information. Any review, retransmission, dissemination
or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited. DIAC respects your privacy and has
obligations under the Privacy Act 1988. The official departmental privacy
policy can be viewed on the department's website at www.immi.gov.au. See:
http://www.immi.gov.au/functional/privac...

---------------------------------------------------------------------

hide quoted sections

1 Attachment

UNCLASSIFIED

 

Dear Mr Bateson

 

Please see the attached notice.

 

Regards

 

Linda Rossiter
Director

FOI and Privacy Policy   
Department of Immigration and Citizenship

 

 

UNCLASSIFIED

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Important Notice: If you have received this email by mistake, please
advise
the sender and delete the message and attachments immediately. This email,
including attachments, may contain confidential, sensitive, legally
privileged
and/or copyright information. Any review, retransmission, dissemination
or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the
intended recipient is prohibited. DIAC respects your privacy and has
obligations under the Privacy Act 1988. The official departmental privacy
policy can be viewed on the department's website at www.immi.gov.au. See:
http://www.immi.gov.au/functional/privac...

---------------------------------------------------------------------

hide quoted sections