Private use of social media advice provided to employees

James Smith made this Right to Information request to Queensland Department of Education as part of a batch sent to 204 authorities

This request has been closed to new correspondence from the public body. Contact us if you think it ought be re-opened.

The request was refused by Queensland Department of Education.

Dear Queensland Department of Education and Training,

This is a request under the Freedom of Information Act.

I request documents related to the ten most recent instances where an employee has sought information, advice, guidance, or opinion on their social media use in a private capacity.

I limit the scope of documents to:
- the original request from the employee
- the agency/department's response
- any follow-up questions and response
- only those sent to a relevant HR / conduct / social media (or similar) team (rather than managers across all areas of the organisation)
- where the original request was created in the last 2 years

Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me.

Yours faithfully,

James Smith

ADMINLAW, rti,

2 Attachments

Dear Mr Smith

 

Thank you for your email.

 

Please note that in Queensland the Freedom of Information Act was repealed
in July 2009. It was replaced with the Right to Information Act 2009 (the
RTI Act).

 

If you wish to pursue your request then you will need to make the
application under the RTI Act.

 

RTI applications can be lodged by using the online application portal
which can be found at this link - [1]http://www.rti.qld.gov.au - or by
filling out the attached application form.

 

As you are seeking access to records that do not contain your personal
information you will be required to pay the $48.00 application fee.

 

Please note that the online application portal allows this payment to be
made by credit/debit card. If you intend to pay the fee by cheque or money
order please make it out to “Department of Education and Training”.

 

If you have any questions regarding your request or the process more
generally then please contact our office on (07) 3513 5879.

 

Regards

 

Andrew Smith

Principal Information Officer

 

Legal and Administrative Law Branch

Department of Education and Training

 

P: 07 3513 5879

E: [2][email address]

Level 19 | Education House | 30 Mary Street | Brisbane QLD 4000

PO Box 15033 | City East QLD 4002

 

Inspiring minds. Creating opportunities. Shaping Queensland’s future.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

 

IMPORTANT: This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain legally
privileged, confidential or private information and may be protected by
copyright. You may only use it if you are the person or persons it was
intended to be sent to and if you use it in an authorised way. No one is
allowed to use, review, alter, transmit, disclose, distribute, print or
copy this e-mail without appropriate authority.

 

If this e-mail was not intended for you and was sent to you by mistake,
please telephone or e-mail me immediately, destroy any hardcopies of this
e-mail and delete it and any copies of it from your computer system. Any
legal privilege and confidentiality attached to this e-mail is not waived
or destroyed by that mistake.

 

It is your responsibility to ensure that this e-mail does not contain and
is not affected by computer viruses, defects or interference by third
parties or replication problems (including incompatibility with your
computer system).

 

 

 

Regards

 

Andrew Smith

Principal Information Officer

Legal and Administrative Law Branch

Department of Education and Training

P: 07 3513 5879

 

 

-----Original Message-----

From: James Smith [mailto:[FOI #3921 email]]

Sent: Tuesday, 8 August 2017 7:22 PM

To: ADMINLAW, rti

Subject: Right to Information request - Private use of social media advice
provided to employees

 

Dear Queensland Department of Education and Training,

 

This is a request under the Freedom of Information Act.

 

I request documents related to the ten most recent instances where an
employee has sought information, advice, guidance, or opinion on their
social media use in a private capacity.

 

I limit the scope of documents to:

- the original request from the employee

- the agency/department's response

- any follow-up questions and response

- only those sent to a relevant HR / conduct / social media (or similar)
team (rather than managers across all areas of the organisation)

- where the original request was created in the last 2 years

 

Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

James Smith

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:

[FOI #3921 email]

 

Is [Queensland Department of Education and Training request email] the wrong address for Right to Information requests
to Queensland Department of Education and Training? If so, please contact
us using this form:

https://www.righttoknow.org.au/change_re...

 

This request has been made by an individual using Right to Know. This
message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet.
More information on how Right to Know works can be found at:

https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...

 

If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web
manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.

 

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

***************************************************************************************************

IMPORTANT: This email (including any attachments) may contain legally
privileged, confidential or private information and may be protected by
copyright. You may only use it if you are the person(s) to whom it was
intended to be sent and if you use it in an authorised way. No one is
allowed to use, review, alter, transmit, disclose, distribute, print or
copy this email without appropriate authority.

If the email was not intended for you and was sent to you by mistake,
please telephone or email me immediately, destroy any hard copies of this
email, and delete it and any copies of it from your computer system. Any
legal privilege and confidentiality attached to the email is not waived or
destroyed by that mistake.

It is your responsibility to ensure that this email does not contain and
is not affected by computer viruses, defects or interference by third
parties or replication problems (including incompatibility with your
computer system).

***************************************************************************************************

References

Visible links
1. http://www.rti.qld.gov.au/
2. mailto:[email address]

hide quoted sections

Locutus Sum left an annotation ()

Note 1: Mostly I classify a response like this one to say "clarification requested" because the agency has told the applicant that some more information (or money!) is needed before the request will be processed. This time, I have put the response in the category of "refused" because it is more than 1 year since the agency responded and the applicant has not made a follow-up. This does not mean that the agency will refuse the request when an application is made in the correct (required).

Note 2: Although an application under the Freedom of Information Act 1983 of the Commonwealth of Australia does not require an application fee, this is not the case with applications in the states and territories of Australia. Then an applicant must usually pay a fee, or the request is not valid. Also, the Commonwealth agencies might demand payment of a fee to cover extra processing costs. If the fee is not paid, the request will not be processed.

Note 2: It can be a problem when an applicant sends out a very large bulk request. Although it is convenient for the applicant, very often the application will not be valid. This is usually the fact when an applicant uses Right to Know to apply to an agency of a state or territory; see Note 2. When so many responses are received it is inconvenient to work out how to continue ... or even to classify the responses and often an applicant does not classify the responses so they create a backlog of unclassified responses on Right to Know.