Private use of social media advice provided to employees

James Smith made this Freedom of Information request to SA Health as part of a batch sent to 204 authorities

This request has been closed to new correspondence from the public body. Contact us if you think it ought be re-opened.

The request was refused by SA Health.

Dear SA Health,

This is a request under the Freedom of Information Act.

I request documents related to the ten most recent instances where an employee has sought information, advice, guidance, or opinion on their social media use in a private capacity.

I limit the scope of documents to:
- the original request from the employee
- the agency/department's response
- any follow-up questions and response
- only those sent to a relevant HR / conduct / social media (or similar) team (rather than managers across all areas of the organisation)
- where the original request was created in the last 2 years

Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me.

Yours faithfully,

James Smith

Good morning

 

Please be advised, your email has been received by the Chief Executive’s
office, SA Health and is currently receiving attention.

 

Kind Regards

Corporate Administration

SA Health

 

-----Original Message-----
From: James Smith [mailto:[FOI #3964 email]]
Sent: Tuesday, 8 August 2017 6:53 PM
To: Health:CE
Subject: Freedom of Information request - Private use of social media
advice provided to employees

 

Dear SA Health,

 

This is a request under the Freedom of Information Act.

 

I request documents related to the ten most recent instances where an
employee has sought information, advice, guidance, or opinion on their
social media use in a private capacity.

 

I limit the scope of documents to:

- the original request from the employee

- the agency/department's response

- any follow-up questions and response

- only those sent to a relevant HR / conduct / social media (or similar)
team (rather than managers across all areas of the organisation)

- where the original request was created in the last 2 years

 

Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

James Smith

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:

[1][FOI #3964 email]

 

Is [2][SA Health request email] the wrong address for Freedom of Information
requests to SA Health? If so, please contact us using this form:

[3]https://www.righttoknow.org.au/change_re...

 

This request has been made by an individual using Right to Know. This
message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet.
More information on how Right to Know works can be found at:

[4]https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...

 

If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web
manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.

 

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[FOI #3964 email]
2. mailto:[SA Health request email]
3. https://www.righttoknow.org.au/change_re...
4. https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...

hide quoted sections

Brecknell, Vanessa (Health),

1 Attachment

Dear James

I refer to your below email.

Please find attached a Freedom of Information application form. Once complete please return with the application fee of $34.25 to SA Health PO Box 287 Rundle Mall Adelaide SA 5000.

Kind regards

Vanessa Brecknell
Senior Liaison Officer – Freedom of Information
Finance and Corporate Services
Department for Health & Ageing

-----Original Message-----
From: James Smith [mailto:[FOI #3964 email]]
Sent: Tuesday, 8 August 2017 6:53 PM
To: Health:CE
Subject: Freedom of Information request - Private use of social media advice provided to employees

Dear SA Health,

This is a request under the Freedom of Information Act.

I request documents related to the ten most recent instances where an employee has sought information, advice, guidance, or opinion on their social media use in a private capacity.

I limit the scope of documents to:
- the original request from the employee
- the agency/department's response
- any follow-up questions and response
- only those sent to a relevant HR / conduct / social media (or similar) team (rather than managers across all areas of the organisation)
- where the original request was created in the last 2 years

Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me.

Yours faithfully,

James Smith

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #3964 email]

Is [SA Health request email] the wrong address for Freedom of Information requests to SA Health? If so, please contact us using this form:
https://www.righttoknow.org.au/change_re...

This request has been made by an individual using Right to Know. This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. More information on how Right to Know works can be found at:
https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...

If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

hide quoted sections

Locutus Sum left an annotation ()

Mostly I classify a response like this one to say "clarification requested" because the agency has told the applicant that some more information (and money!) is needed before the request will be processed. This time, I have put the response in the category of "refused" because it is two months when the agency has responded and the applicant has not made a follow-up. This does not mean that the agency will refuse the request when an application is made in the correct (required) way and although I have made the classification of "refused", the applicant can use this same request page if he wishes to pursue the request.