Right to Information Request — Operational Deployment Records of Tasmania Police Officer Donna Adams (Port Arthur Incident, April 1996)
To the Freedom of Information Officer, Tasmania Police,
This is a formal request for access to documents under the Right to Information Act 2009 (Tas).
I request access to all records capable of confirming the operational status, deployment, and duties of the Tasmania Police officer Donna Adams in connection with the Port Arthur incident of April 1996.
For the avoidance of doubt, all references in this request to “the officer” or “the relevant officer” refer specifically to Donna Adams (Tasmania Police).
This request relates to records capable of confirming the operational involvement of this specific officer, and searches may be limited to files reasonably expected to record her personnel deployment.
This request includes all primary-source documentation sufficient to establish:
• the officer’s rank, posting, and unit assignment in April 1996
• whether the officer was deployed to Port Arthur in any operational or investigative capacity
• the timing of any such deployment
• the operational function performed (including investigative, perimeter, witness, intelligence, control-room, or follow-up roles)
• the documentary basis for any commendation, citation, or formal recognition linked to Port Arthur service
To avoid incomplete searches, this request expressly includes (without limitation) the following record classes wherever held:
OPERATIONAL COMMAND / INCIDENT RECORDS
• Incident Control Room logs
• Situation Reports (SITREPs)
• operational running sheets
• tasking registers
• deployment authorisation records
• radio dispatch logs
• call-out lists
• staging-area personnel lists
PERSONNEL & DUTY DOCUMENTATION
• duty rosters for Hobart District and CIB units
• shift allocation sheets
• overtime authorisations tied to the incident
• secondment or temporary deployment records
• transport allocation sheets or convoy records
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION / CIB RECORDS
• Glenorchy CIB files
• Hobart CIB assignment sheets
• Bellerive CIB personnel applications or transfer documentation relevant to 1995–1997
• investigative task allocations
• witness coordination assignments
• scene examination personnel listings
COMMENDATION / HONOURS FILES
• commendation recommendations
• citation drafts
• supervisory justification memoranda
• award approval correspondence
• internal review documents supporting recognition of Port Arthur service
ARCHIVAL / LEGACY STORAGE (EXPRESSLY INCLUDED)
This request requires searches of:
• active electronic records
• historical internal police databases
• archived paper operational files
• off-site government archive storage
• commendation series files
• historical personnel service jackets
• legacy microfilm or scanned archive repositories
If any historical operational files were transferred to the Tasmanian Archive and Heritage Office (TAHO) or any successor repository, this request includes any copies, indexes, transfer lists, or retrieval references retained by Tasmania Police.
PUBLIC-INTEREST TEST (STATUTORY CONSIDERATION)
The Port Arthur massacre remains one of the most historically significant criminal incidents in Australian history. The accurate identification of responding personnel and their operational roles forms part of the enduring public historical record.
Disclosure of nearly 30-year-old deployment records:
• promotes transparency in public administration
• ensures historical accuracy of official accounts
• supports accountability regarding official commendations
• involves events sufficiently historical that operational sensitivity is substantially diminished
Any exemption relied upon must therefore be interpreted narrowly and balanced against the substantial public interest in preserving an accurate and document-supported historical record.
REASONABLE SEARCH OBLIGATION
For clarity, a lawful response requires Tasmania Police to conduct reasonable and properly scoped searches across all relevant repositories, not solely current electronic systems.
If no documents are located, the decision notice must:
• identify the repositories searched
• describe the search methods used
• specify the archival locations checked
• confirm whether personnel service files and commendation files were examined
A bare statement that “no documents were found” without describing the searches undertaken will not constitute a meaningful decision under the Act.
PARTIAL ACCESS / REDACTIONS
If any document is considered exempt in whole or part:
• I request release of all reasonably severable material
• I request that redactions be applied only where strictly necessary
• I request identification of the precise statutory exemption relied upon for each redaction
• I request a description of each withheld document sufficient to permit external review
ASSISTANCE TO REFINE (IF REQUIRED)
If Tasmania Police considers any portion of this request unclear or overly broad, the Act requires reasonable assistance to refine the request rather than immediate refusal. I am willing to cooperate in narrowing scope where genuinely necessary, but I expect this request to be processed in good faith with the presumption in favour of disclosure.
FORM OF ACCESS
Electronic copies of documents are preferred where available.
Please confirm receipt of this request and advise the statutory decision timeframe.
Yours faithfully,
Katarina Liptakova
Good afternoon
Please find attached.
Kind regards
Jo
-----Original Message-----
From: Katarina Liptakova <[FOI #14308 email]>
Sent: Monday, 16 February 2026 4:33 PM
To: Right to Information <[Tasmania Police request email]>
Subject: CM: Right to Information request - Right to Information Request - Operational Deployment Records of Tasmania Police Officer Donna Adams (Port Arthur Incident, April 1996)
[You don't often get email from [FOI #14308 email]. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentific... ]
To the Freedom of Information Officer, Tasmania Police,
This is a formal request for access to documents under the Right to Information Act 2009 (Tas).
I request access to all records capable of confirming the operational status, deployment, and duties of the Tasmania Police officer Donna Adams in connection with the Port Arthur incident of April 1996.
For the avoidance of doubt, all references in this request to "the officer" or "the relevant officer" refer specifically to Donna Adams (Tasmania Police).
This request relates to records capable of confirming the operational involvement of this specific officer, and searches may be limited to files reasonably expected to record her personnel deployment.
This request includes all primary-source documentation sufficient to establish:
* the officer's rank, posting, and unit assignment in April 1996
* whether the officer was deployed to Port Arthur in any operational or investigative capacity
* the timing of any such deployment
* the operational function performed (including investigative, perimeter, witness, intelligence, control-room, or follow-up roles)
* the documentary basis for any commendation, citation, or formal recognition linked to Port Arthur service
To avoid incomplete searches, this request expressly includes (without limitation) the following record classes wherever held:
OPERATIONAL COMMAND / INCIDENT RECORDS
* Incident Control Room logs
* Situation Reports (SITREPs)
* operational running sheets
* tasking registers
* deployment authorisation records
* radio dispatch logs
* call-out lists
* staging-area personnel lists
PERSONNEL & DUTY DOCUMENTATION
* duty rosters for Hobart District and CIB units
* shift allocation sheets
* overtime authorisations tied to the incident
* secondment or temporary deployment records
* transport allocation sheets or convoy records
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION / CIB RECORDS
* Glenorchy CIB files
* Hobart CIB assignment sheets
* Bellerive CIB personnel applications or transfer documentation relevant to 1995-1997
* investigative task allocations
* witness coordination assignments
* scene examination personnel listings
COMMENDATION / HONOURS FILES
* commendation recommendations
* citation drafts
* supervisory justification memoranda
* award approval correspondence
* internal review documents supporting recognition of Port Arthur service
ARCHIVAL / LEGACY STORAGE (EXPRESSLY INCLUDED)
This request requires searches of:
* active electronic records
* historical internal police databases
* archived paper operational files
* off-site government archive storage
* commendation series files
* historical personnel service jackets
* legacy microfilm or scanned archive repositories
If any historical operational files were transferred to the Tasmanian Archive and Heritage Office (TAHO) or any successor repository, this request includes any copies, indexes, transfer lists, or retrieval references retained by Tasmania Police.
PUBLIC-INTEREST TEST (STATUTORY CONSIDERATION)
The Port Arthur massacre remains one of the most historically significant criminal incidents in Australian history. The accurate identification of responding personnel and their operational roles forms part of the enduring public historical record.
Disclosure of nearly 30-year-old deployment records:
* promotes transparency in public administration
* ensures historical accuracy of official accounts
* supports accountability regarding official commendations
* involves events sufficiently historical that operational sensitivity is substantially diminished
Any exemption relied upon must therefore be interpreted narrowly and balanced against the substantial public interest in preserving an accurate and document-supported historical record.
REASONABLE SEARCH OBLIGATION
For clarity, a lawful response requires Tasmania Police to conduct reasonable and properly scoped searches across all relevant repositories, not solely current electronic systems.
If no documents are located, the decision notice must:
* identify the repositories searched
* describe the search methods used
* specify the archival locations checked
* confirm whether personnel service files and commendation files were examined
A bare statement that "no documents were found" without describing the searches undertaken will not constitute a meaningful decision under the Act.
PARTIAL ACCESS / REDACTIONS
If any document is considered exempt in whole or part:
* I request release of all reasonably severable material
* I request that redactions be applied only where strictly necessary
* I request identification of the precise statutory exemption relied upon for each redaction
* I request a description of each withheld document sufficient to permit external review
ASSISTANCE TO REFINE (IF REQUIRED)
If Tasmania Police considers any portion of this request unclear or overly broad, the Act requires reasonable assistance to refine the request rather than immediate refusal. I am willing to cooperate in narrowing scope where genuinely necessary, but I expect this request to be processed in good faith with the presumption in favour of disclosure.
FORM OF ACCESS
Electronic copies of documents are preferred where available.
Please confirm receipt of this request and advise the statutory decision timeframe.
Yours faithfully,
Katarina Liptakova
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #14308 email]
Is [Tasmania Police request email] the wrong address for Right to Information requests to Tasmania Police? If so, please contact us using this form:
https://www.righttoknow.org.au/change_re...
This request has been made by an individual using Right to Know. This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. More information on how Right to Know works can be found at:
https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...
Please note that in some cases publication of requests and responses will be delayed.
If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER
The information in this transmission may be confidential and/or protected by legal professional privilege, and is intended only for the person or persons to whom it is addressed. If you are not such a person, you are warned that any disclosure, copying or dissemination of the information is unauthorised. If you have received the transmission in error, please immediately contact this office by telephone, fax or email, to inform us of the error and to enable arrangements to be made for the destruction of the transmission, or its return at our cost. No liability is accepted for any unauthorised use of the information contained in this transmission.