Dear Airservices Australia,

On 10 July at approximately 16:14, Flight JQ707 from Melbourne breached the NAP. I seek a complete transcript of the communication between Hobart ATC and the pilot of JQ707. I want to understand why Flight 7Q707 used the Runway 30 RNP-AR short track when it should have used the Runway 30 RNAV longer track. The excuse that JQ707 followed the short track for "operational reasons" without specifying the reason is unacceptable.

Yours faithfully,

Andrew Terhorst

MBX FOI, Airservices Australia

2 Attachments

OFFICIAL

Hi Andrew

 

Please see attached correspondence.

 

Thanks

Saira.

 

Saira Khan

FOI & Privacy Officer

Da Vinci Building 101, 2A Boronia Road,

Brisbane Airport QLD 4008, Australia

[1]www.airservicesaustralia.com

My work days are: Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday.

  

We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of Country throughout Australia and
recognise

their continuing connection to land, waters and culture. We pay our
respects to their

Elders past, present and emerging.

 

Important: This message may contain confidential or legally privileged
information. If you think it was sent to you by mistake, please delete all
copies and inform the sender.

 

IMPORTANT: This email and any attachments, may contain information that is
confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient, you must not review, copy, disseminate, disclose to others or
take action in reliance on, any material contained within this email. If
you have received this email in error, please let Airservices Australia
know by reply email to the sender informing them of the mistake and delete
all copies of this email and any attachments.

OFFICIAL

References

Visible links
1. http://www.airservicesaustralia.com/

MBX FOI, Airservices Australia

4 Attachments

OFFICIAL

Dear Mr Terhorst

 

I refer to your FOI request of 10 July 2024 and attach the decision letter
and document.

 

As this decision was not made within the relevant statutory timeframe, you
are not able to seek internal review despite details for internal review
being provided in the attached letter.

 

However, it is open to you to seek Information Commissioner review of the
decision should you wish to do so. Information Commissioner review details
are included in the attached letter.

 

Kind regards

Kathryn

 

FOI and Privacy

 

Alan Woods Building, 25 Constitution Ave

Canberra ACT 2600, Australia

 

Important: This message may contain confidential or legally privileged
information. If you think it was sent to you by mistake, please delete all
copies and inform the sender.

 

 

 

OFFICIAL

From: MBX FOI
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2024 10:20 AM
To: [FOI #11662 email]
Cc: MBX FOI <[Airservices request email]>; Saira Khan
<[email address]>
Subject: FOI 24-54 (Terhorst) - Acknowledgement of FOI request

 

Hi Andrew

 

Please see attached correspondence.

 

Thanks

Saira.

 

Saira Khan

FOI & Privacy Officer

Da Vinci Building 101, 2A Boronia Road,

Brisbane Airport QLD 4008, Australia

[1]www.airservicesaustralia.com

My work days are: Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday.

  

We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of Country throughout Australia and
recognise

their continuing connection to land, waters and culture. We pay our
respects to their

Elders past, present and emerging.

 

Important: This message may contain confidential or legally privileged
information. If you think it was sent to you by mistake, please delete all
copies and inform the sender.

 

IMPORTANT: This email and any attachments, may contain information that is
confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended
recipient, you must not review, copy, disseminate, disclose to others or
take action in reliance on, any material contained within this email. If
you have received this email in error, please let Airservices Australia
know by reply email to the sender informing them of the mistake and delete
all copies of this email and any attachments.

References

Visible links
1. http://www.airservicesaustralia.com/