Strategic management of JJ Kelly sporting precinct.
Dear Wollongong City Council,
For the period covering the last 2 years, November, 2013 until the present, could you please provide WCC plans regarding the short term and long term options regarding the management, maintenance, proposed improvements or proposed development of the JJ Kelly Park sporting complex. Please provide any proposed WCC management plans for this precinct both of a tactical and strategic nature. Please provide any WCC minutes of internal WCC meetings that have taken place regarding the on going management and tactical and strategic use of the precinct.
Yours faithfully,
Martin L Littler
4/60-62 Cliff Road
Wollongong NSW 2500
Ratepayer
Dear Wollongong City Council,
I have asked for an FOI request on the strategic management plan for JJ Kelly sporting and council free space. By law you should have responded promptly to my request by December 18, 2015. This has not occurred.
Yours faithfully,
citygreenspace
Automated Reply: Thank you for your email. It has been received by Wollongong City Council and will be forwarded to the appropriate division
This email, including attachments, is intended for the recipient only. The email may contain confidential or privileged information or be subject to copyright. If you are not the intended recipient you must not disclose, copy or use any part of the e-mail. Any opinion stated in this e-mail is not the opinion of Wollongong City Council unless stated or apparent from its contents. Wollongong City Council believes this e-mail to be free of virus or defect however the recipient is responsible to ensure it is virus-free.
If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and delete the e-mail immediately.
Wollongong City Council respects your privacy and our Privacy Management Plan is located at: www.wollongong.nsw.gov.au
Good morning
I am in receipt of an e-mail entitled “Internal review of Government
Information (Public Access) request – Strategic Management of JJ Kelly
sporting precinct.”
I advise that Wollongong City Council has not received an access
application for this information and as the e-mail I received on Monday 21
December 2015 did not have any contact details I am unable to discuss this
with the applicant.
My contact details are below and I would be grateful if you could please
make direct contact to discuss this application so we may provide
assistance / information as requested.
Kind Regards
Heather Kennedy | Right to Information Officer
Wollongong City Council | 41 Burelli St, Wollongong DC NSW 2500
P (02) 4227 7367 | F (02) 4227 7277
E [1][email address]
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
Where copyright exists in a document, it is provided for information
purposes only in accordance with Council’s statutory obligations and
copyright laws still apply. The copyright owner’s consent is required if
any part of the document is used for any other purpose.
This email, including attachments, is intended for the recipient only. The email
may contain confidential or privileged information or be subject to copyright.
If you are not the intended recipient you must not disclose, copy or use any
part of the e-mail. Any opinion stated in this e-mail is not the opinion of
Wollongong City Council unless stated or apparent from its contents. Wollongong
City Council believes this e-mail to be free of virus or defect however the
recipient is responsible to ensure it is virus-free.
If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender and delete the
e-mail immediately.
Wollongong City Council respects your privacy and our Privacy Management Plan is
located at: [2]www.wollongong.nsw.gov.au
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address] mailto:[email address]
mailto:[email address]
2. http://www.wollongong.nsw.gov.au/
Henare Degan left an annotation ()
Thanks for your great and helpful annotations Locutus!
>Right to Know adds a message to emails to say that the Right to Know address is a valid address for the purpose of section 15(2) of the FOI Act. Unfortunately that is only relevant to the legislation of the Commonwealth of Australia, and not to the state legislation.
This is no longer the case - you can read our reasoning on the commit: https://github.com/openaustralia/rightto...
Locutus Sum left an annotation ()
This is very strange. The officer who writes the final response says that the original email was not received ... but there is a reply to the original email.
The other problem is that the officer thinks that the Right to Know address is not the way to contact the applicant, so the officer writes the email as if she is writing to the Right to Know administrators.
Suggestion to the applicant: Write again. Explain that the email address on the request is the email address for how they can contact you. Then ask them please to attend to the original request. Note: To exercise your rights under the GIPA law of the State of New South Wales, you must pay a fee, so you must find a way that you can do this and still keep the correspondence on Right to Know.
Note to other readers: Right to Know adds a message to emails to say that the Right to Know address is a valid address for the purpose of section 15(2) of the FOI Act. Unfortunately that is only relevant to the legislation of the Commonwealth of Australia, and not to the state legislation.