2015 Review of WACHS Elective Surgical Waitlist practices and policies. Dr Hoffman

Mr Liddiard made this Freedom of Information request to WA Department of Health

This request has been closed to new correspondence. Contact us if you think it should be reopened.

The request was refused by WA Department of Health.

Dear WA Department of Health,

In 2015 Dr T Hoffman was seconded by the Department of Health WA to carry out a review of elective surgical practices by WACHS.

She was mindful how Elective Surgery Access and Waiting List Management Policy was being implemented.

http://www.health.wa.gov.au/circularsnew...

Please can you supply:
(1) The findings from Dr Hoffman as published in a report and correspondence with the Department of Health WA.
(2) All waitlist and theatre allocation documents that were requested by Dr Hoffman from WACHS in supporting her report. Whether specifically created for Dr Hoffman or internal Department of Health WA documents.

Yours faithfully,

Special-Is as Special-Does

DOH, FOI, WA Department of Health

2 Attachments

Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 02:58:16 +0000
Subject: FW: Freedom of Information request - 2015 Review of WACHS Elective Surgical Waitlist practices and policies. Dr Hoffman
From: Accountability <[email address]>
To: "DOH, FOI" <[WA Department of Health request email]>

Kind regards,

Catherine Williamson | Senior Ethical Standards Officer
System-Wide Integrity Services |
Governance and System Support Directorate
Department of Health
Level 2, C Block, 189 Royal Street, East Perth WA 6004
T: (08) 9222 4483
E: [email address]
www.health.wa.gov.au
Delivering a Healthy WA
The contents of this e-mail transmission are intended solely for the named recipient(s), may be confidential, and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure in the public interest. The use, reproduction, disclosure or distribution of the contents of this e-mail transmission by any person other than the named recipient(s) is prohibited. If you are not a named recipient please notify the sender immediately.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mr Liddiard [mailto:[FOI #4892 email]]
Sent: Saturday, 13 October 2018 1:12 PM
To: Accountability
Subject: Freedom of Information request - 2015 Review of WACHS Elective Surgical Waitlist practices and policies. Dr Hoffman

Dear WA Department of Health,

In 2015 Dr T Hoffman was seconded by the Department of Health WA to carry out a review of elective surgical practices by WACHS.

She was mindful how Elective Surgery Access and Waiting List Management Policy was being implemented.

http://www.health.wa.gov.au/circularsnew...

Please can you supply:
(1) The findings from Dr Hoffman as published in a report and correspondence with the Department of Health WA.
(2) All waitlist and theatre allocation documents that were requested by Dr Hoffman from WACHS in supporting her report. Whether specifically created for Dr Hoffman or internal Department of Health WA documents.

Yours faithfully,

Special-Is as Special-Does

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #4892 email]

Is [email address] the wrong address for Freedom of Information requests to WA Department of Health? If so, please contact us using this form:
https://www.righttoknow.org.au/change_re...

This request has been made by an individual using Right to Know. This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. More information on how Right to Know works can be found at:
https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...

If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

hide quoted sections

Locutus Sum left an annotation ()

Note 1: Mostly I classify a response like this one to say "clarification requested" because the agency has told the applicant that some more information (or money!) is needed before the request will be processed. With this request, I have put the response in the category of "refused" because it is some time since the agency responded and the applicant does not appear to have made a follow-up. It is possible that a follow-up has been made by the ordinary post or by private email but Right to Know has not heard anything about this. Even if the applicant did not follow-up agency questions, it does not mean that the agency will refuse the request when an application is made in the correct (required) manner.

Note 2: Although an application under the Freedom of Information Act 1983 of the Commonwealth of Australia does not require an application fee, this is not the case with applications in the states and territories of Australia. Then an applicant must usually pay a fee, or the request is not valid. Also, the Commonwealth agencies might demand payment of a fee to cover extra processing costs. If the fee is not paid, the request will not be processed.