Breakdown of type of passenger jet aircraft arriving at Hobart International Airport between 1 July 2022 and 30 June 2023

The request was refused by Airservices Australia.

Dear Airservices Australia,

I know that the noise generated by aircraft operations can significantly vary based on the type of jet aircraft. For instance, the noise level of a B738 is noticeably higher than an A320 or a B717.

Given this, I am specifically interested in receiving a daily tally of different types of passenger jets landing at Hobart International Airport via Runway 30 RNP-AR from 1st July 2022 through 30th June 2023.

I would appreciate it if you could provide the data in the form of an Excel spreadsheet structured as follows:

'YYYY-MM-DD': This column should represent each day within the stated timeframe.
B738, B717, A320, A319, [plus any other prevalent passenger jet types]: These columns should indicate the daily count of each specific aircraft type that used Runway 30 RNP-AR.

I look forward to your cooperation in this regard.

Yours faithfully,

Dr Andrew Terhorst

MBX FOI, Airservices Australia

OFFICIAL

Good afternoon Andrew

I understand that you are seeking for Airservices to create a new document containing a breakdown of the different types of passenger jets landing at Hobart International Airport with the parameters specified in your request.

This information is available via a Tailored Data Request where you may access this data. As this type of access is subject to a fee, the document sought is not able to be requested via a Freedom of Information request.

You can make a tailored data request at through our webpage here: https://www.airservicesaustralia.com/ind...

Regards

FOI and Privacy Officer

This email (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. Any advice or information contained in this email (including any attachments) is provided only for the use of Airservices Australia or the intended recipient. You must not retransmit or distribute this email or any attachments unless you are specifically authorised to do so. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender, immediately delete this email from your mailbox and destroy any hard copies.

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Terhorst <[FOI #10439 email]>
Sent: Sunday, July 9, 2023 12:33 PM
To: MBX FOI <[Airservices request email]>
Subject: Freedom of Information request - Breakdown of type of passenger jet aircraft arriving at Hobart International Airport between 1 July 2022 and 30 June 2023

[You don't often get email from [FOI #10439 email]. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentific... ]

CAUTION: This email was sent from an external email address. Do not click any links or open any attachments unless you trust the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Airservices Australia,

I know that the noise generated by aircraft operations can significantly vary based on the type of jet aircraft. For instance, the noise level of a B738 is noticeably higher than an A320 or a B717.

Given this, I am specifically interested in receiving a daily tally of different types of passenger jets landing at Hobart International Airport via Runway 30 RNP-AR from 1st July 2022 through 30th June 2023.

I would appreciate it if you could provide the data in the form of an Excel spreadsheet structured as follows:

'YYYY-MM-DD': This column should represent each day within the stated timeframe.
B738, B717, A320, A319, [plus any other prevalent passenger jet types]: These columns should indicate the daily count of each specific aircraft type that used Runway 30 RNP-AR.

I look forward to your cooperation in this regard.

Yours faithfully,

Dr Andrew Terhorst

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #10439 email]

Is [Airservices request email] the wrong address for Freedom of Information requests to Airservices Australia? If so, please contact us using this form:
https://www.righttoknow.org.au/change_re...

This request has been made by an individual using Right to Know. This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. More information on how Right to Know works can be found at:
https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...

Please note that in some cases publication of requests and responses will be delayed.

If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

IMPORTANT: This email and any attachments, may contain information that is confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, copy, disseminate, disclose to others or take action in reliance on, any material contained within this email. If you have received this email in error, please let Airservices Australia know by reply email to the sender informing them of the mistake and delete all copies of this email and any attachments.

hide quoted sections

Dear MBX FOI,

I am writing in response to your previous communication in which you directed me to submit a Tailored Data Request for accessing information pertaining to the type of jet aircraft flying along a specific route.

I must express my dismay upon learning about the cost involved in obtaining this data. The fee of $960, in my opinion, is disproportionately high for accessing what seems to be a basic and integral part of the transparency that a public service organization like Airservices Australia should naturally offer.

The data I seek pertains directly to the flight path that was unilaterally decided to be directed over my residential area by Airservices Australia. It is reasonable, I believe, for any individual affected by such a decision to have access to the related data without incurring such substantial financial burden.

While I understand that there may be costs involved in preparing customized data, it seems essential to strike a balance between these costs and the duty of transparency, especially in instances like this where the requested information is of significant personal and public interest.

Hence, I kindly request that you reconsider your position and provide an alternative solution. It is important to understand the frequency and timings of the aircraft movements for the residents living under these flight paths. As such, I believe this information should be readily accessible without imposing prohibitive costs.

Thank you for your understanding and I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Yours sincerely,

Andrew Terhorst

MBX FOI, Airservices Australia

OFFICIAL

Dear Mr Terhost

For clarity, as access to the document is subject to a fee, there is no legal right to access it under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (see s12(1)).

Regards

FOI and Privacy Officer

This email (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. Any advice or information contained in this email (including any attachments) is provided only for the use of Airservices Australia or the intended recipient. You must not retransmit or distribute this email or any attachments unless you are specifically authorised to do so. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender, immediately delete this email from your mailbox and destroy any hard copies.

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Terhorst <[FOI #10439 email]>
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2023 4:14 PM
To: MBX FOI <[Airservices request email]>
Subject: Internal review of Freedom of Information request - Breakdown of type of passenger jet aircraft arriving at Hobart International Airport between 1 July 2022 and 30 June 2023

[You don't often get email from [FOI #10439 email]. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentific... ]

CAUTION: This email was sent from an external email address. Do not click any links or open any attachments unless you trust the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear MBX FOI,

I am writing in response to your previous communication in which you directed me to submit a Tailored Data Request for accessing information pertaining to the type of jet aircraft flying along a specific route.

I must express my dismay upon learning about the cost involved in obtaining this data. The fee of $960, in my opinion, is disproportionately high for accessing what seems to be a basic and integral part of the transparency that a public service organization like Airservices Australia should naturally offer.

The data I seek pertains directly to the flight path that was unilaterally decided to be directed over my residential area by Airservices Australia. It is reasonable, I believe, for any individual affected by such a decision to have access to the related data without incurring such substantial financial burden.

While I understand that there may be costs involved in preparing customized data, it seems essential to strike a balance between these costs and the duty of transparency, especially in instances like this where the requested information is of significant personal and public interest.

Hence, I kindly request that you reconsider your position and provide an alternative solution. It is important to understand the frequency and timings of the aircraft movements for the residents living under these flight paths. As such, I believe this information should be readily accessible without imposing prohibitive costs.

Thank you for your understanding and I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Yours sincerely,

Andrew Terhorst

-----Original Message-----

OFFICIAL

Good afternoon Andrew

I understand that you are seeking for Airservices to create a new document containing a breakdown of the different types of passenger jets landing at Hobart International Airport with the parameters specified in your request.

This information is available via a Tailored Data Request where you may access this data. As this type of access is subject to a fee, the document sought is not able to be requested via a Freedom of Information request.

You can make a tailored data request at through our webpage here: https://www.airservicesaustralia.com/ind...

Regards

FOI and Privacy Officer

This email (including any attachments) is confidential and may be privileged. Any advice or information contained in this email (including any attachments) is provided only for the use of Airservices Australia or the intended recipient. You must not retransmit or distribute this email or any attachments unless you are specifically authorised to do so. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender, immediately delete this email from your mailbox and destroy any hard copies.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #10439 email]

This request has been made by an individual using Right to Know. This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. More information on how Right to Know works can be found at:
https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...

Please note that in some cases publication of requests and responses will be delayed.

If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

IMPORTANT: This email and any attachments, may contain information that is confidential and privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, copy, disseminate, disclose to others or take action in reliance on, any material contained within this email. If you have received this email in error, please let Airservices Australia know by reply email to the sender informing them of the mistake and delete all copies of this email and any attachments.

hide quoted sections

Dear MBX FOI,

I think this is unfair. Your organisation is operating in a high-handed manner. Not only does it believe it can act with impunity in deciding where it locates flight paths, it denies noise impacted residents the right to assess the impact. This is a moral failing on your part, and you know it.

Yours sincerely,

Andrew Terhorst