Food safety inspections for the years 2014, 2015, 2016

Nigel Gladstone made this Government Information (Public Access) request to Canterbury City Council as part of a batch sent to 149 authorities

This request has been closed to new correspondence from the public body. Contact us if you think it ought be re-opened.

The request was successful.

Nigel Gladstone

Dear Local Council,

Can you please provide me with the number of food safety inspections carried out in your area annually, for the last three years?

How many warning were issued each year and how many fines each year?

What percentage of all food outlets did the council inspect each year?

Have any outlets been shut down for non-compliance and if so what for and how many?

What were the worst offences/biggest fines for each year?

Yours faithfully,

Nigel Gladstone

Canterbury City Council

    

Thank you for contacting the City of Canterbury Bankstown.

 

This is an automatically generated reply acknowledging receipt of your
email. Please do not reply to this email address.

 

Your enquiry has now been forwarded to a responsible officer for
investigation.

 

If you wish to follow-up on the progress of your email, please contact the
Customer Service Centre on 9789 9300 during business hours.

1 Attachment

Hi Nigel, the following is for your background.  Happy to provide a
statement, if required.

 

 

+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Year |Food outlets |Inspections |Warnings |Fines |Closures |
|--------+---------------+--------------+-----------+--------+-----------|
|14/15 |1,440 |2,096 |553 |173 |27 |
|--------+---------------+--------------+-----------+--------+-----------|
|15/16 |1,540 |1,910 |588 |105 |15 |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+

 

 

All food outlets are inspected at least once each year.

 

The maximum fine that can be issued, under the Food Act 2003 and Food
Regulation 2015, is $880 per breach for companies and $440 for
individuals.

 

Reasons for closures vary but generally it’s for non-compliance after
warnings are given.  As you can see, there has been a significant drop in
fines and closures due to the success of our education campaign (this
includes free workshops based on safe food handling).

 

Regards

 

 

Paul Scott - Manager Communications

P 02 9707 9483
E [1][email address]

City of Canterbury Bankstown

 

References

Visible links
1. file:///tmp/[email address]

Nigel Gladstone

Dear Paul,

Thanks for this information, do you have the numbers for 2013/14, as I asked fo 3 years?

Also how many Formal Improvement notices were issued?

As I am trying to collate the information from 150 sources - all from the same forms sent to the food authority - I need to have consistent data and that includes the reporting of venues inspected as a percentage. The report I refer to uses the number of High to medium risk outlets and then the number of those inspected. From these, a number as a percentage of inspections can be derived. The number you have sent has more inspections than venues so it's not very useful.

I hope this makes my request clearer and if it's too hard I'm happy to get the numbers out of the reports if you send those.

Yours sincerely,

Nigel Gladstone

Nigel, the number of outlets is broken down into three categories. You can't remove temporary outlets, for example, in any particular year. They too need to be inspected. The reason why our inspections outnumber the number of outlets is because some are inspected more than once due to a warning having been given, and or a fine.

To simplify, our inspection rate is, at the very least, 100% every year.

I will attempt to provide the 13/14 data tomorrow.

Regards

Paul Scott - Manager Communications Business Liaison
P 02 9707 9483 | F 02 9707 9783 | M 0411 458 802 | E [email address]
www.canterburybankstown.nsw.gov.au

Important:
This email is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain legally privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient or believe that you may have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and then delete this message. You must not use, disclose or distribute this email without the author’s prior permission. City of Canterbury Bankstown cannot accept responsibility for any changes that may be made to this message after it was sent.

Think before you print.
-----Original Message-----
From: Nigel Gladstone [mailto:[FOI #2426 email]]
Sent: Thursday, 10 November 2016 3:39 PM
To: SCOTT Paul <[email address]>
Subject: Re: As requested - City of Canterbury Bankstown

Dear Paul,

Thanks for this information, do you have the numbers for 2013/14, as I asked fo 3 years?

Also how many Formal Improvement notices were issued?

As I am trying to collate the information from 150 sources - all from the same forms sent to the food authority - I need to have consistent data and that includes the reporting of venues inspected as a percentage. The report I refer to uses the number of High to medium risk outlets and then the number of those inspected. From these, a number as a percentage of inspections can be derived. The number you have sent has more inspections than venues so it's not very useful.

I hope this makes my request clearer and if it's too hard I'm happy to get the numbers out of the reports if you send those.

Yours sincerely,

Nigel Gladstone

-----Original Message-----

Hi Nigel, the following is for your background.  Happy to provide a statement, if required.

 

 

+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Year |Food outlets |Inspections |Warnings |Fines |Closures | |--------+---------------+--------------+-----------+--------+-----------|
|14/15 |1,440 |2,096 |553 |173 |27 |
|--------+---------------+--------------+-----------+--------+-----------|
|15/16 |1,540 |1,910 |588 |105 |15 |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+

 

 

All food outlets are inspected at least once each year.

 

The maximum fine that can be issued, under the Food Act 2003 and Food Regulation 2015, is $880 per breach for companies and $440 for individuals.

 

Reasons for closures vary but generally it’s for non-compliance after warnings are given.  As you can see, there has been a significant drop in fines and closures due to the success of our education campaign (this includes free workshops based on safe food handling).

 

Regards

 

 

Paul Scott - Manager Communications

P 02 9707 9483
E [1][email address]

City of Canterbury Bankstown

 

References

Visible links
1. file:///tmp/[email address]

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #2426 email]

This request has been made by an individual using Right to Know. This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. More information on how Right to Know works can be found at:
https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...

If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

hide quoted sections

Nigel Gladstone

Dear Paul,

The forms sent to the food authority do remove temporary outlets and are very specific when asking in Q16. "Number of high and medium risk, fixed premises food businesses inspected? *

Q1 and Q2 give you the Total Number of High-Risk and Med-Risk Fixed Premises.

These are the numbers I want and I'm happy to extract them from the forms as I have done from many other councils to save your staff some time.

Can you also please tell me how many Formal Improvement notices were issued each year?

Yours sincerely,

Nigel Gladstone

Hi Nigel, 13/14 figures included, as requested.

Year Food outlets Inspections Warnings Fines Closures
13/14 1,571 2,060 426 205 25
14/15 1,440 2,096 553 173 27
15/16 1,540 1,910 588 105 15

Paul Scott - Manager Communications Business Liaison
P 02 9707 9483 | F 02 9707 9783 | M 0411 458 802 | E [email address]
www.canterburybankstown.nsw.gov.au

Important:
This email is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain legally privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient or believe that you may have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and then delete this message. You must not use, disclose or distribute this email without the author’s prior permission. City of Canterbury Bankstown cannot accept responsibility for any changes that may be made to this message after it was sent.

Think before you print.
-----Original Message-----
From: Nigel Gladstone [mailto:[FOI #2426 email]]
Sent: Thursday, 10 November 2016 5:49 PM
To: SCOTT Paul <[email address]>
Subject: RE: As requested - City of Canterbury Bankstown

Dear Paul,

The forms sent to the food authority do remove temporary outlets and are very specific when asking in Q16. "Number of high and medium risk, fixed premises food businesses inspected? *

Q1 and Q2 give you the Total Number of High-Risk and Med-Risk Fixed Premises.

These are the numbers I want and I'm happy to extract them from the forms as I have done from many other councils to save your staff some time.

Can you also please tell me how many Formal Improvement notices were issued each year?

Yours sincerely,

Nigel Gladstone

-----Original Message-----

Nigel, the number of outlets is broken down into three categories. You can't remove temporary outlets, for example, in any particular year. They too need to be inspected. The reason why our inspections outnumber the number of outlets is because some are inspected more than once due to a warning having been given, and or a fine.

To simplify, our inspection rate is, at the very least, 100% every year.

I will attempt to provide the 13/14 data tomorrow.

Regards

Paul Scott - Manager Communications Business Liaison P 02 9707 9483 | F 02 9707 9783 | M 0411 458 802 | E [email address] www.canterburybankstown.nsw.gov.au

Important:
This email is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain legally privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient or believe that you may have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and then delete this message. You must not use, disclose or distribute this email without the author’s prior permission. City of Canterbury Bankstown cannot accept responsibility for any changes that may be made to this message after it was sent.

Think before you print.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #2426 email]

This request has been made by an individual using Right to Know. This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. More information on how Right to Know works can be found at:
https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...

If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

hide quoted sections

Nigel Gladstone

Dear Paul,

Thanks you very much for this information. Can you please clarify if the warnings you have provided include both Warnings AND Formal Improvement notices or are these seperate?

Yours sincerely,

Nigel Gladstone

No, they are just warnings.

Improvement notices are as follows:

13/14 - 26

14/15 - 24

15/16 - 94

Paul Scott - Manager Communications Business Liaison
P 02 9707 9483 | F 02 9707 9783 | M 0411 458 802 | E [email address]
www.canterburybankstown.nsw.gov.au

Important:
This email is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain legally privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient or believe that you may have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and then delete this message. You must not use, disclose or distribute this email without the author’s prior permission. City of Canterbury Bankstown cannot accept responsibility for any changes that may be made to this message after it was sent.

Think before you print.

-----Original Message-----
From: Nigel Gladstone [mailto:[FOI #2426 email]]
Sent: Friday, 11 November 2016 12:52 PM
To: SCOTT Paul <[email address]>
Subject: RE: As requested - City of Canterbury Bankstown

Dear Paul,

Thanks you very much for this information. Can you please clarify if the warnings you have provided include both Warnings AND Formal Improvement notices or are these seperate?

Yours sincerely,

Nigel Gladstone

-----Original Message-----

Hi Nigel, 13/14 figures included, as requested.

Year Food outlets Inspections Warnings Fines Closures
13/14 1,571 2,060 426 205 25
14/15 1,440 2,096 553 173 27
15/16 1,540 1,910 588 105 15

Paul Scott - Manager Communications Business Liaison P 02 9707 9483 | F 02 9707 9783 | M 0411 458 802 | E [email address] www.canterburybankstown.nsw.gov.au

Important:
This email is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain legally privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient or believe that you may have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and then delete this message. You must not use, disclose or distribute this email without the author’s prior permission. City of Canterbury Bankstown cannot accept responsibility for any changes that may be made to this message after it was sent.

Think before you print.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #2426 email]

This request has been made by an individual using Right to Know. This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. More information on how Right to Know works can be found at:
https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...

If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

hide quoted sections

Nigel Gladstone

Dear Paul,

Thank you for your help with this information.

Yours sincerely,

Nigel Gladstone

Nigel, there appears to be some confusion.

As referred to by yourself below, you confirmed receipt of the required information you sought from the City of Canterbury Bankstown.

However, I understand there is email correspondence from yourself saying you are still awaiting a response.

Paul Scott - Manager Communications Business Liaison
P 02 9707 9483 | F 02 9707 9783 | M 0411 458 802 | E [email address]
www.canterburybankstown.nsw.gov.au

Important:
This email is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain legally privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient or believe that you may have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and then delete this message. You must not use, disclose or distribute this email without the author’s prior permission. City of Canterbury Bankstown cannot accept responsibility for any changes that may be made to this message after it was sent.

Think before you print.
-----Original Message-----
From: Nigel Gladstone [mailto:[FOI #2426 email]]
Sent: Tuesday, 15 November 2016 4:37 PM
To: SCOTT Paul <[email address]>
Subject: RE: As requested - City of Canterbury Bankstown

Dear Paul,

Thank you for your help with this information.

Yours sincerely,

Nigel Gladstone

-----Original Message-----

No, they are just warnings.

Improvement notices are as follows:

13/14 - 26

14/15 - 24

15/16 - 94

Paul Scott - Manager Communications Business Liaison P 02 9707 9483 | F 02 9707 9783 | M 0411 458 802 | E [email address] www.canterburybankstown.nsw.gov.au

Important:
This email is for the use of the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain legally privileged or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient or believe that you may have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and then delete this message. You must not use, disclose or distribute this email without the author’s prior permission. City of Canterbury Bankstown cannot accept responsibility for any changes that may be made to this message after it was sent.

Think before you print.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #2426 email]

This request has been made by an individual using Right to Know. This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. More information on how Right to Know works can be found at:
https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...

If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

hide quoted sections

Nigel Gladstone

Dear Paul,

Sorry about this, indeed we do have your information, wires must have been crossed. Apologies, i have all the info I need from you, thanks.

Yours sincerely,

Nigel Gladstone