We don't know whether the most recent response to this request contains information or not – if you are illyria please sign in and let everyone know.

PROFITING from INDUE CASHLESS WELFARE CARD. LIBERALS receive $12000 from each card issued

illyria made this Freedom of Information request to Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet

This request has an unknown status. We're waiting for illyria to read a recent response and update the status.

From: illyria

Delivered

Dear Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet,

Dear Indue Ltd – its Board, Directors and Shareholders,
I am aware that the Commonwealth Human Services Minister in the Turnbull government, Alan Tudge, is intending to transfer all welfare recipients to the ‘Healthy Welfare Card’ for income management purposes in the near future. As an Australian citizen I am aware that levels of unemployment in Australia are high and unlikely to fall soon due to the policies of the Turnbull government and that, therefore, there is a high risk that I may become unemployed in the near future and, hence, subject to the income management welfare card scheme initiated by the LNP government and, specifically, by the Human Services Minister Alan Tudge and the Social Services Minister Christian Porter.
I am also aware that Indue and its owners are to be paid between $4000 and $7000 from the Australian budget as fees for each person on the income management card system including possibly for myself in the future. I understand that how much Indue actually receives of tax payer’s money for each person in its management scheme as an administrative fee, including possibly for myself in the future, will depend upon whether the person resides in an urban or regional location. However, given that the Turnbull government intends to extend the operation of the income management welfare card scheme to all welfare recipients soon then the profit Indue can anticipate making from the scheme is in the region of $4.6 billion dollars. I note this amount is an additional amount of expenditure on top of the existing welfare budget as I understand the implementation of the welfare card system does not create any savings for the government that can be accredited against the alleged budget deficit. In my view this money would be better spent on reducing the alleged debt or on the people of Australia as a whole and not on creating profits for a private company with political connections such as Indue.
I am further aware that those amounts are to be paid to Indue as fees from the Department of Human Services budget which departmental budget is itself obtained entirely from the Australian Consolidated Revenue Fund that belongs to all the Australian people. I am aware that the fee amounts Indue is to receive, or that it has already received so far, for performing its income management duties to welfare recipients, have been, or will be, appropriated by the Department of Human Services from the Consolidated Revenue Fund for the purported purpose of providing welfare for the Australian people and not for misuse as payment of profits to a private company such as Indue.
I consider that if I am compelled to participate in the card scheme and become subject to Indue’s income management scheme in the future then Indue would become my fiduciary. In the case Hospital Products Ltd v United States Surgical Corps Justice Mason of the High Court of Australia said the following:
The accepted fiduciary relationships are sometimes referred to as relationships of trust and confidence or confidential relations …The critical feature of these relationships is that the fiduciary undertakes or agrees to act for or on behalf of or in the interests of another person in the exercise of a power or discretion which will affect the interests of that other person in a legal or practical sense. The relationship between the parties is therefore one which gives the fiduciary a special opportunity to exercise the power or discretion to the detriment of that other person who is accordingly vulnerable to abuse by the fiduciary of his position. The expressions “for”, “on behalf of” and “in the interests of” signify that the fiduciary acts in a “representative” character in the exercise of his responsibility…
Given that the Turnbull government is intending to transfer all welfare recipients to the income management welfare card scheme in the near future and given that I am likely to become unemployed in the future, it is almost certain that Indue will manage my income in the future and that it will do so purportedly in my interests and on my behalf as my fiduciary. On that basis, Indue would owe me the duties and obligations that usually accompany fiduciaries. Those duties would include, but would not be limited to, the obligation of complete disclosure to me, the prohibition against personally profiting from the performance of its duties to me, the obligation to avoid a conflict of interests and duties and a duty to protect me from any possible or actual losses from its management of my income. Losses that I would likely sustain from the income management welfare card scheme would include losses of opportunities to buy cheap goods or services at a cash price that I could not obtain by use of the card due to the restrictions on access to cash in the card system. Anticipated losses would also extend to any additional financial service fees I will incur due to me being forced to use the card in being denied access to cash. In those circumstances, in its capacity as my fiduciary, I would be entitled to hold Indue liable for those and any other possible losses I incur due to the operation of the card and Indue’s management of my income.
I also note that in the Hospital Products case his Honour Chief Justice Gibbs said:
A person who occupies a fiduciary position may not use that position to gain a profit or advantage for himself, nor may he obtain a benefit by entering into a transaction in conflict with his fiduciary duty, without the informed consent of the person to whom he owes the duty.
By this correspondence then, and on the basis that Indue will likely seek to become my fiduciary in the near future and stands to gain from that capacity, as it has already done with the huge profits it has already obtained from the income management welfare card scheme so far, I give notice that I do not consent to Indue managing my income or becoming my fiduciary at any time or of obtaining fees from anyone, including from the Government, for any income management services it purports to undertake for me or on my behalf.
I give further notice that if I am compelled to participate in the card programme I will hold Indue and its owners liable for any and all losses or liabilities I sustain due to the operation of the welfare card and of the income management system. Those losses and liabilities will extend to any legal costs I incur in challenging or remedying Indue’s management of my income without my consent.
Regards,
An Australian Citizen 2017

Yours faithfully,
CARMEL CALLAGHAN

Link to this

Locutus Sum left an annotation ()

I do not know what the applicant means by any of this but it is not a request for documents under the Freedom of Information Act. We can expect that the Department will refuse to process the correspondence on the basis that it is not a valid application.

Link to this

From: illyria

Delivered

Dear Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet,

I request information as to the INDUE card and request to know did nationals and liberal party start this? and I request information showing that the aforementioned parties, stand to profit by the issuance of these cards and that each card issued results in liberals profiting from $4000 to $12000. I requested this information under the knowledge of the right to know if this is the case and that liberals are profiting from low incomed people.
Yours faithfully,

illyria

Link to this

From: FOI
Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet


Attachment image011.png
2K Download

Attachment image012.png
1K Download

Attachment image013.png
2K Download

Attachment image014.png
2K Download

Attachment image015.png
58K Download


UNCLASSIFIED

Dear Illyria,

 

Thank you for your below email to the Department of the Prime Minister and
Cabinet. Please be advised that the Freedom of Information Act 1982 allows
you to request documents of an agency, but not to request information from
an agency. The Department considers, in its current form, your email
constitutes a request for information rather than a request for documents,
and accordingly is not a valid Freedom of Information request.

 

If you wish to continue with your request, please note that the INDUE card
is managed by the [1]Department of Social Services, so any further
enquiries should be sent directly to that agency.

 

Regards,

 

Adviser | FOI & Privacy Section

Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet

p. (02) 6271 5849 | e. [2][DPMC request email] | w. [3]www.pmc.gov.au

[4]Title: Twitter icon (navy) - Description: Twitter icon (navy)[5]Title:
LinkedIn icon (navy) - Description: LinkedIn icon (navy)[6]Title: Twitter
icon (yellow) - Description: Twitter icon (yellow) [7]Title: Facebook icon
(yellow) - Description: Facebook icon (yellow)

[8]Title: Reconcilation branding and acknowledgment: The Department
acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of Country throughout Australia
and their continuing connections to the land, waters and community. We pay
respect to their Cultures, Country and Elders both past and present. -
Description: Reconcilation branding and acknowledgment: The Department
acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of Country throughout Australia
and their continuing connections to the land, waters and community. We pay
respect to their Cultures, Country and Elders both past and present.

 

show quoted sections

Link to this

We don't know whether the most recent response to this request contains information or not – if you are illyria please sign in and let everyone know.

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet only: