What constitutes a religious duty to abstain from voting

Sophia Wrightman made this Freedom of Information request to Australian Electoral Commission

The request was refused by Australian Electoral Commission.

From: Sophia Wrightman

Delivered

Dear Australian Electoral Commission,

For the purposes of the FOI Act I am seeking documentation that expands or clarifies exactly what the AEC regards as "religious duty" in relation to:

"under subsection 245(14) of the Act the fact that an
elector believes it to be a part of his or her religious
duty to abstain from voting constitutes a valid and
suficient reason for not voting."

Yours faithfully,

Sophia Wrightman

Link to this

Australian Electoral Commission

Thank you for contacting us.

This is an automatic response from the Australian Electoral Commission to confirm we have received your email.

For more information on enrolling to vote, federal elections or the AEC, visit www.aec.gov.au.

Please do not respond to this email.

Link to this

Locutus Sum left an annotation ()

This is a very interesting question and it will be of interest to see what is the response from the Australian Electoral Commission. I think one must expect (and hope) that there will be no "guidelines" and for a very good reason. Section 245(14) (http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodi... does not connect to the opinion of the Australian Electoral Commission. It describes the religious exemption in terms of "the fact that an elector believes ...". Facts are facts. They can be assessed from evidence about their truth and an elector might be demanded to show evidence of "the fact" but that is all. If an elector who has the belief is fined or prosecuted by the Australian Electoral Commission then they will have opportunities to show to a court the evidence of the fact of their belief.

The only important opinion for the Australian Electoral Commission is to consider whether a prosecution is likely to produce a conviction. If they have the opinion "yes, it can succeed" then they will prosecute. If they have the opinion it will not succeed then one must expect no prosecution.

Tak til KP igen om hjælp.

Link to this

Sophia Wrightman left an annotation ()

In the absence of guidelines, if someone says he or she has a religious
duty to abstain from voting as an elector and acknowledges in court that they are an elector at the same time, the prosecution would be of the opinion "yes, it can succeed". It is rather a mute case without proper guidance.

Link to this

From: Owen Jones
Australian Electoral Commission


Attachment image001.gif
4K Download

Attachment image005.gif
0K Download

Attachment image002.png
19K Download

Attachment image004.png
0K Download

Attachment LS4917 Letter to S Wrightman notifying decision 20131223.pdf
1.2M Download View as HTML


For-Official-Use-Only

Dear Ms Wrightman

I refer to your email dated 19 December 2013 4:08 PM in which you make the
above FOI Request.

I enclose a scanned letter to you from Paul Pirani, Chief Legal Officer,
acknowledging receipt of your request and notifying you of his decision
about it.

Regards

Owen Jones

Owen Jones | Senior Lawyer

Legal Services Section | Legal & Compliance Branch

Australian Electoral Commission

T: (02) 6271 4528 | F: (02) 6293 7657

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

[1]Australian Electoral Commission logo [2]Australian Electoral
Commission

This email may contain legal advice that is subject to legal professional
privilege. Care should be taken to avoid unintended waiver of that
privilege. The Australian Electoral Commission’s Chief Legal Officer
should be consulted prior to any decision to disclose the existence or
content of any advice contained in this email to a third party.

show quoted sections

Link to this

Things to do with this request

Anyone:
Australian Electoral Commission only: