David McBride
Dear Australian Federal Police,
This is a request under the Freedom of Information Act 1982.
1. Please provide all documents created, accessed or held by the AFP and it's staff that relate to, or are associated with, or an outcome of Mr David McBride's 2014 complaint to the AFP regarding his inital whistle-blower disclosure about the ADF.
2. Please provide all documents created, accessed or held by the AFP and it's staff, relating to, associated with, or an outcome of the decision or advice as to whether or not to charge ABC journalist, Mr Dan Oakes.
Yours faithfully,
Steve McKenzie
Journalists for Freedom
OFFICIAL
Dear Mr McKenzie,
YOUR FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST 2021/308
I refer to your request dated 18 November 2020, seeking access to
documents under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (the Act) as follows:
1. All documents created, accessed or held by the AFP and its staff that
relate to, or are associated with, or an outcome of Mr David McBride's
2014 complaint to the AFP regarding his initial whistle-blower disclosure
about the ADF.
2. All documents created, accessed or held by the AFP and its staff,
relating to, associated with, or an outcome of the decision or advice as
to whether or not to charge ABC journalist, Mr Dan Oakes.
Timeframe
Your request was received by the AFP on 18 November 2020, and the 30 day
statutory period for processing your request commenced from that date. The
due date for your request is 18 December 2020.
As the AFP focuses its efforts on managing the impact of COVID-19 on its
critical operations, our ability to process requests for information under
the Act may be affected or not delivered within expected timeframes. We
apologise for the inconvenience and appreciate your patience during this
period. Should this occur we will contact you as soon as practicable, and
seek to extend processing timeframes in accordance with the Act.
Information irrelevant to the scope of your request
The AFP, in its management of FOI requests, excludes the following
information on the basis that is irrelevant to the scope of a request:
- duplicate documents, including duplicate emails (the AFP will only
provide emails where they form a final email chain and the
authors/recipients are contained within the final email); and
- information that is publicly available, for example, newspaper
articles, online publications including information available on the AFP
Information Publication Scheme and the AFP disclosure log.
Please advise this office that you also consent to exclude the following
information:
- Names of AFP members, other than the Senior Executive; and
- Direct telephone numbers, middle names of AFP members, signatures
and mobile telephone numbers of AFP members.
Disclosure of your identity
The AFP may be required to consult with third parties in accordance with
sections 26A, 27 and 27A of the Act. Please advise us if you consent to
the AFP identifying you as the FOI applicant for the purposes of the
consultation. If we do not receive your consent, we will not disclose
your identity to third parties.
Information Publication Scheme
Please be advised that effective 1 May 2011 and in accordance with section
8(2) of the Act, an agency is required to publish information on the AFP
website following the notification of a decision in respect of a freedom
of information request. Details of the decision will be published in a
Disclosure Log which can be found at
[1]https://www.afp.gov.au/about-us/informat....
The requirement to publish information released under FOI reinforces the
objectives of the FOI Act to promote a pro-disclosure culture across
government, and to increase recognition that information held by
government is a national resource. Exceptions to the requirement to
publish information would apply to personal information and information
concerning the business affairs of a person if it was considered
‘unreasonable’ to do so.
If however, after noting the above, you wish to raise any concerns about
the publication of information concerning your request prior to the
notification of a decision, please advise the AFP in writing before 18
December 2020.
Yours sincerely
ISABEL (AFP24268)
PARALEGAL
CHIEF LEGAL COUNSEL
[2]www.afp.gov.au
[3]Australian Federal Police
**********************************************************************
WARNING
This email message and any attached files may contain information
that is confidential and subject of legal privilege intended only for
use by the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you
are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient be advised that you
have received this message in error and that any use, copying,
circulation, forwarding, printing or publication of this message or
attached files is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the
information contained therein. If you have received this message in
error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your
inbox.
AFP Web site: http://www.afp.gov.au
**********************************************************************
References
Visible links
1. https://www.afp.gov.au/about-us/informat...
2. http://www.afp.gov.au/
3. http://www.afp.gov.au/
Dear Isabel,
Thank you for acknowledging my request.
I consent to the AFP excluding the following:
- Names of AFP members, other than the Senior Executive; and
- Direct telephone numbers, middle names of AFP members, signatures and mobile telephone numbers of AFP members.
I do not consent to my identity being disclosed to third parties.
Yours sincerely,
Steve McKenzie
Journalists for Freedom
OFFICIAL
Dear McKenzie
Please see attached correspondence in this matter.
Kind regards
NATALIE WOODBERRY
A/g SENIOR LAWYER / TEAM LEADER, FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
CHIEF COUNSEL PORTFOLIO
[1]www.afp.gov.au
[2]Australian Federal Police
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve McKenzie <[FOI #6907 email]>
Sent: Thursday, 19 November 2020 5:42 PM
To: FOI <[email address]>
Subject: Re: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST - 2021/308 [SEC=OFFICIAL]
Dear Isabel,
Thank you for acknowledging my request.
I consent to the AFP excluding the following:
- Names of AFP members, other than the Senior Executive; and
- Direct telephone numbers, middle names of AFP members, signatures
and mobile telephone numbers of AFP members.
I do not consent to my identity being disclosed to third parties.
Yours sincerely,
Steve McKenzie
Journalists for Freedom
-----Original Message-----
OFFICIAL
Dear Mr McKenzie,
YOUR FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST 2021/308
I refer to your request dated 18 November 2020, seeking access to
documents under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (the Act) as follows:
1. All documents created, accessed or held by the AFP and its staff that
relate to, or are associated with, or an outcome of Mr David McBride's
2014 complaint to the AFP regarding his initial whistle-blower disclosure
about the ADF.
2. All documents created, accessed or held by the AFP and its staff,
relating to, associated with, or an outcome of the decision or advice as
to whether or not to charge ABC journalist, Mr Dan Oakes.
Timeframe
Your request was received by the AFP on 18 November 2020, and the 30 day
statutory period for processing your request commenced from that date.
The due date for your request is 18 December 2020.
As the AFP focuses its efforts on managing the impact of COVID-19 on its
critical operations, our ability to process requests for information
under the Act may be affected or not delivered within expected
timeframes. We apologise for the inconvenience and appreciate your
patience during this period. Should this occur we will contact you as
soon as practicable, and seek to extend processing timeframes in
accordance with the Act.
Information irrelevant to the scope of your request
The AFP, in its management of FOI requests, excludes the following
information on the basis that is irrelevant to the scope of a request:
- duplicate documents, including duplicate emails (the AFP will only
provide emails where they form a final email chain and the
authors/recipients are contained within the final email); and
- information that is publicly available, for example, newspaper
articles, online publications including information available on the AFP
Information Publication Scheme and the AFP disclosure log.
Please advise this office that you also consent to exclude the following
information:
- Names of AFP members, other than the Senior Executive; and
- Direct telephone numbers, middle names of AFP members, signatures
and mobile telephone numbers of AFP members.
Disclosure of your identity
The AFP may be required to consult with third parties in accordance with
sections 26A, 27 and 27A of the Act. Please advise us if you consent to
the AFP identifying you as the FOI applicant for the purposes of the
consultation. If we do not receive your consent, we will not disclose
your identity to third parties.
Information Publication Scheme
Please be advised that effective 1 May 2011 and in accordance with section
8(2) of the Act, an agency is required to publish information on the AFP
website following the notification of a decision in respect of a freedom
of information request. Details of the decision will be published in a
Disclosure Log which can be found at
[1][3]https://www.afp.gov.au/about-us/informat....
The requirement to publish information released under FOI reinforces the
objectives of the FOI Act to promote a pro-disclosure culture across
government, and to increase recognition that information held by
government is a national resource. Exceptions to the requirement to
publish information would apply to personal information and information
concerning the business affairs of a person if it was considered
‘unreasonable’ to do so.
If however, after noting the above, you wish to raise any concerns about
the publication of information concerning your request prior to the
notification of a decision, please advise the AFP in writing before 18
December 2020.
Yours sincerely
ISABEL (AFP24268)
PARALEGAL
CHIEF LEGAL COUNSEL
[2][4]www.afp.gov.au
[3]Australian Federal Police
References
Visible links
1.
[5]https://www.afp.gov.au/about-us/informat...
2. [6]http://www.afp.gov.au/
3. [7]http://www.afp.gov.au/
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[8][FOI #6907 email]
This request has been made by an individual using Right to Know. This
message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet.
More information on how Right to Know works can be found at:
[9]https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...
If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web
manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
**********************************************************************
WARNING
This email message and any attached files may contain information
that is confidential and subject of legal privilege intended only for
use by the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you
are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient be advised that you
have received this message in error and that any use, copying,
circulation, forwarding, printing or publication of this message or
attached files is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the
information contained therein. If you have received this message in
error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your
inbox.
AFP Web site: http://www.afp.gov.au
**********************************************************************
References
Visible links
1. http://www.afp.gov.au/
2. http://www.afp.gov.au/
3. https://www.afp.gov.au/about-us/informat...
4. http://www.afp.gov.au/
5. https://www.afp.gov.au/about-us/informat...
6. http://www.afp.gov.au/
7. http://www.afp.gov.au/
8. mailto:[FOI #6907 email]
9. https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...
Dear Natalie,
Re your letter and expressed intention to refuse.
Subject to the FOI Act, every person has a legally enforceable right to obtain access to government documents, the functions and powers given by the FOI Act are to be performed and exercised, as far as possible, to facilitate and promote public access to information, promptly. You do not appear to be acting in the spirit of the legislation.
Considering that Commissioner Kershaw himself stated that "what I've said is if we're going to be FOIed or taken to the Supreme Court or wherever it is, and we're going to hand over the material anyway, why don't we just do it without all those processes having to be taken. So we're going to give that a go." It will be embarrassing when I write direct to him and his media advisor pointing out how obstructionist the AFP is being, despite what the Commissioner himself has stated, with regards to the Australian people's right to know.
For clarity,
1. I am requesting the AFP provide documents, relating to Mr David McBride's initial complaint to the AFP in 2014, in which he blew the whistle on the ADF. The documents I am requesting are copies of any letters and minutes, briefing documents, case management system notes, copies of notes made in police diaries or notebooks, emails.
I can't imagine there would be too many instances of Mr McBride trying to make a war crime report in 2014 so as to amount to thousands of documents and 39 days of searching?
2. I am requesting the AFP provide documents relating to the decisions arrived at by the AFP to prosecute Mr Dan Oakes, and then not to. The documents I am requesting are letters and minutes, briefing documents, emails, electronic messaging (SMS/WhatsApp etc), and copies of notes made in police diaries or notebooks.
Whilst it would be likely the full investigation would amount to thousands of documents, I highly doubt that there are thousands of documents around the decision whether to charge or not, and you are just trying to dodge the request and breach my right to know. To be clear, I am not requesting the brief of evidence or criminal investigation documentation, I am requesting administrative decision-making documents. Again, it would be a highly dubious claim, bordering on ridiculous, that it would take 39 days to search for and process this request.
Due to the AFP's time wasting tactics, I do not agree to a time extension.
Yours sincerely,
Steve McKenzie
Journalists for Freedom
OFFICIAL
Dear Mr McKenzie
Thank you for your email of 11 December 2020.
As set out in our letter of 9 December 2020, the purpose of our
correspondence is to provide you with an opportunity to consult with the
AFP to attempt to remove the practical refusal reason. An extension of
time was not being sought, rather you were being provided with a period of
time to undertake such a consultation with the AFP (as set out in the FOI
Act).
Based on your correspondence of 11 December 2020, we now understand that
you are seeking:
1) “documents, relating to Mr David McBride's initial
complaint to the AFP in 2014, in which he blew the whistle on the ADF...”
. The AFP understands that you seek documents relating to the complaint
only and not any subsequent investigative documents.
2) ‘documents relating to the decisions arrived at by the
AFP to prosecute Mr Dan Oakes, and then not to. The documents I am
requesting are letters and minutes, briefing documents, emails, electronic
messaging (SMS/WhatsApp etc), and copies of notes made in police diaries
or notebooks’. The AFP understands that you seek only documents regarding
such a decision.
If we have understood the scope of your request correctly, the AFP will be
able to proceed with processing your request. Grateful if you could please
confirm as soon as possible.
Kind regards
NATALIE WOODBERRY
A/g SENIOR LAWYER / TEAM LEADER, FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
CHIEF COUNSEL PORTFOLIO
[1]www.afp.gov.au
[2]Australian Federal Police
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve McKenzie <[FOI #6907 email]>
Sent: Friday, 11 December 2020 10:21 AM
To: FOI <[email address]>
Subject: RE: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST - 2021/308 - Section 24AB(2)
Notice [SEC=OFFICIAL]
Dear Natalie,
Re your letter and expressed intention to refuse.
Subject to the FOI Act, every person has a legally enforceable right to
obtain access to government documents, the functions and powers given by
the FOI Act are to be performed and exercised, as far as possible, to
facilitate and promote public access to information, promptly. You do not
appear to be acting in the spirit of the legislation.
Considering that Commissioner Kershaw himself stated that "what I've said
is if we're going to be FOIed or taken to the Supreme Court or wherever it
is, and we're going to hand over the material anyway, why don't we just do
it without all those processes having to be taken. So we're going to give
that a go." It will be embarrassing when I write direct to him and his
media advisor pointing out how obstructionist the AFP is being, despite
what the Commissioner himself has stated, with regards to the Australian
people's right to know.
For clarity,
1. I am requesting the AFP provide documents, relating to Mr David
McBride's initial complaint to the AFP in 2014, in which he blew the
whistle on the ADF. The documents I am requesting are copies of any
letters and minutes, briefing documents, case management system notes,
copies of notes made in police diaries or notebooks, emails.
I can't imagine there would be too many instances of Mr McBride trying to
make a war crime report in 2014 so as to amount to thousands of documents
and 39 days of searching?
2. I am requesting the AFP provide documents relating to the decisions
arrived at by the AFP to prosecute Mr Dan Oakes, and then not to. The
documents I am requesting are letters and minutes, briefing documents,
emails, electronic messaging (SMS/WhatsApp etc), and copies of notes made
in police diaries or notebooks.
Whilst it would be likely the full investigation would amount to thousands
of documents, I highly doubt that there are thousands of documents around
the decision whether to charge or not, and you are just trying to dodge
the request and breach my right to know. To be clear, I am not requesting
the brief of evidence or criminal investigation documentation, I am
requesting administrative decision-making documents. Again, it would be a
highly dubious claim, bordering on ridiculous, that it would take 39 days
to search for and process this request.
Due to the AFP's time wasting tactics, I do not agree to a time extension.
Yours sincerely,
Steve McKenzie
Journalists for Freedom
-----Original Message-----
OFFICIAL
Dear McKenzie
Please see attached correspondence in this matter.
Kind regards
NATALIE WOODBERRY
A/g SENIOR LAWYER / TEAM LEADER, FREEDOM OF INFORMATION CHIEF COUNSEL
PORTFOLIO [1][3]www.afp.gov.au [2]Australian Federal Police
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[4][FOI #6907 email]
This request has been made by an individual using Right to Know. This
message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet.
More information on how Right to Know works can be found at:
[5]https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...
If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web
manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
**********************************************************************
WARNING
This email message and any attached files may contain information
that is confidential and subject of legal privilege intended only for
use by the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you
are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient be advised that you
have received this message in error and that any use, copying,
circulation, forwarding, printing or publication of this message or
attached files is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the
information contained therein. If you have received this message in
error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your
inbox.
AFP Web site: http://www.afp.gov.au
**********************************************************************
References
Visible links
1. http://www.afp.gov.au/
2. http://www.afp.gov.au/
3. http://www.afp.gov.au/
4. mailto:[FOI #6907 email]
5. https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...
Dear Natalie,
Thank you for you email on 17 December 2020.
I can confirm that you seem to understand my request, however to be certain, I clarify by advising -
1. I am requesting the AFP provide documents, relating to Mr David McBride's initial complaint to the AFP in 2014, in which he blew the whistle on the ADF. The documents I am requesting are copies of any letters and minutes, briefing documents, case management system notes, copies of notes made in police diaries or notebooks, emails.
You understanding of this part of the request appears flawed when you advise that I "seek documents relating to the complaint only and not any subsequent investigative documents." This incorrect and this request may include investigative documents if they exist. I think the Australian people have a right to know whether Mr McBride's inital complaint was acted upon, and if not, why not.
2. I am requesting the AFP provide documents relating to the decisions arrived at by the AFP to prosecute Mr Dan Oakes, and then not to. The documents I am requesting are letters and minutes, briefing documents, emails, electronic messaging (SMS/WhatsApp etc), and copies of notes made in police diaries or notebooks.
You are correct for this part of the request, in that I am only seeking documents related to the AFP's decisions to, and than not to prosecute Mr Oakes. This would include documents relating to the descision making.
I look forward to receiving the FOI documents as requested.
Yours sincerely,
Steve McKenzie
Journalists for Freedom
OFFICIAL
Dear Mr McKenzie
Thank you for clarifying the scope of your request.
The AFP will continue to review your request and consider if we are able
to proceed with processing the request. Should we have any further queries
we will contact you.
Please be advised that as your requests relates to a third party (that is
someone other than yourself), if the AFP proceeds with processing your
request we will be required to undertake third party consultations before
making a decision on the release of those documents.
Sub-section 15(6) of the Act provides for an extension of 30 days to the
statutory 30 day time limit for processing requests. The time limit for
processing your request and notification of a decision will now expire on
26 January 2021.
If you have any queries, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Kind regards
NATALIE WOODBERRY
A/g SENIOR LAWYER / TEAM LEADER, FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
CHIEF COUNSEL PORTFOLIO
[1]www.afp.gov.au
[2]Australian Federal Police
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve McKenzie <[FOI #6907 email]>
Sent: Thursday, 17 December 2020 6:04 PM
To: FOI <[email address]>
Subject: RE: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST - 2021/308 - Section 24AB(2)
Notice [SEC=OFFICIAL]
Dear Natalie,
Thank you for you email on 17 December 2020.
I can confirm that you seem to understand my request, however to be
certain, I clarify by advising -
1. I am requesting the AFP provide documents, relating to Mr David
McBride's initial complaint to the AFP in 2014, in which he blew the
whistle on the ADF. The documents I am requesting are copies of any
letters and minutes, briefing documents, case management system notes,
copies of notes made in police diaries or notebooks, emails.
You understanding of this part of the request appears flawed when you
advise that I "seek documents relating to the complaint only and not any
subsequent investigative documents." This incorrect and this request may
include investigative documents if they exist. I think the Australian
people have a right to know whether Mr McBride's inital complaint was
acted upon, and if not, why not.
2. I am requesting the AFP provide documents relating to the decisions
arrived at by the AFP to prosecute Mr Dan Oakes, and then not to. The
documents I am requesting are letters and minutes, briefing documents,
emails, electronic messaging (SMS/WhatsApp etc), and copies of notes made
in police diaries or notebooks.
You are correct for this part of the request, in that I am only seeking
documents related to the AFP's decisions to, and than not to prosecute Mr
Oakes. This would include documents relating to the descision making.
I look forward to receiving the FOI documents as requested.
Yours sincerely,
Steve McKenzie
Journalists for Freedom
-----Original Message-----
OFFICIAL
Dear Mr McKenzie
Thank you for your email of 11 December 2020.
As set out in our letter of 9 December 2020, the purpose of our
correspondence is to provide you with an opportunity to consult with the
AFP to attempt to remove the practical refusal reason. An extension of
time was not being sought, rather you were being provided with a period
of time to undertake such a consultation with the AFP (as set out in the
FOI Act).
Based on your correspondence of 11 December 2020, we now understand that
you are seeking:
1) “documents, relating to Mr David McBride's initial
complaint to the AFP in 2014, in which he blew the whistle on the ADF...”
. The AFP understands that you seek documents relating to the complaint
only and not any subsequent investigative documents.
2) ‘documents relating to the decisions arrived at by
the AFP to prosecute Mr Dan Oakes, and then not to. The documents I am
requesting are letters and minutes, briefing documents, emails,
electronic messaging (SMS/WhatsApp etc), and copies of notes made in
police diaries or notebooks’. The AFP understands that you seek only
documents regarding such a decision.
If we have understood the scope of your request correctly, the AFP will
be able to proceed with processing your request. Grateful if you could
please confirm as soon as possible.
Kind regards
NATALIE WOODBERRY
A/g SENIOR LAWYER / TEAM LEADER, FREEDOM OF INFORMATION CHIEF COUNSEL
PORTFOLIO [1][3]www.afp.gov.au [2]Australian Federal Police
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[4][FOI #6907 email]
This request has been made by an individual using Right to Know. This
message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet.
More information on how Right to Know works can be found at:
[5]https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...
If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web
manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
**********************************************************************
WARNING
This email message and any attached files may contain information
that is confidential and subject of legal privilege intended only for
use by the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you
are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient be advised that you
have received this message in error and that any use, copying,
circulation, forwarding, printing or publication of this message or
attached files is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the
information contained therein. If you have received this message in
error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your
inbox.
AFP Web site: http://www.afp.gov.au
**********************************************************************
References
Visible links
1. http://www.afp.gov.au/
2. http://www.afp.gov.au/
3. http://www.afp.gov.au/
4. mailto:[FOI #6907 email]
5. https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...
OFFICIAL
Dear Mr McKenzie
Further to my below email, I confirm that the AFP will progress with
undertaking third party consultations.
As noted in my below email a decision will be due to you by 26 January
2021.
Kind regards
NATALIE WOODBERRY
A/g SENIOR LAWYER / TEAM LEADER, FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
CHIEF COUNSEL PORTFOLIO
[1]www.afp.gov.au
[2]Australian Federal Police
From: Woodberry, Natalie On Behalf Of FOI
Sent: Friday, 18 December 2020 5:50 PM
To: 'Steve McKenzie' <[FOI #6907 email]>; FOI
<[email address]>
Subject: RE: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST - 2021/308 - Section 24AB(2)
Notice [SEC=OFFICIAL]
OFFICIAL
Dear Mr McKenzie
Thank you for clarifying the scope of your request.
The AFP will continue to review your request and consider if we are able
to proceed with processing the request. Should we have any further queries
we will contact you.
Please be advised that as your requests relates to a third party (that is
someone other than yourself), if the AFP proceeds with processing your
request we will be required to undertake third party consultations before
making a decision on the release of those documents.
Sub-section 15(6) of the Act provides for an extension of 30 days to the
statutory 30 day time limit for processing requests. The time limit for
processing your request and notification of a decision will now expire on
26 January 2021.
If you have any queries, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Kind regards
NATALIE WOODBERRY
A/g SENIOR LAWYER / TEAM LEADER, FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
CHIEF COUNSEL PORTFOLIO
[3]www.afp.gov.au
[4]Australian Federal Police
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve McKenzie <[5][FOI #6907 email]>
Sent: Thursday, 17 December 2020 6:04 PM
To: FOI <[6][email address]>
Subject: RE: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST - 2021/308 - Section 24AB(2)
Notice [SEC=OFFICIAL]
Dear Natalie,
Thank you for you email on 17 December 2020.
I can confirm that you seem to understand my request, however to be
certain, I clarify by advising -
1. I am requesting the AFP provide documents, relating to Mr David
McBride's initial complaint to the AFP in 2014, in which he blew the
whistle on the ADF. The documents I am requesting are copies of any
letters and minutes, briefing documents, case management system notes,
copies of notes made in police diaries or notebooks, emails.
You understanding of this part of the request appears flawed when you
advise that I "seek documents relating to the complaint only and not any
subsequent investigative documents." This incorrect and this request may
include investigative documents if they exist. I think the Australian
people have a right to know whether Mr McBride's inital complaint was
acted upon, and if not, why not.
2. I am requesting the AFP provide documents relating to the decisions
arrived at by the AFP to prosecute Mr Dan Oakes, and then not to. The
documents I am requesting are letters and minutes, briefing documents,
emails, electronic messaging (SMS/WhatsApp etc), and copies of notes made
in police diaries or notebooks.
You are correct for this part of the request, in that I am only seeking
documents related to the AFP's decisions to, and than not to prosecute Mr
Oakes. This would include documents relating to the descision making.
I look forward to receiving the FOI documents as requested.
Yours sincerely,
Steve McKenzie
Journalists for Freedom
-----Original Message-----
OFFICIAL
Dear Mr McKenzie
Thank you for your email of 11 December 2020.
As set out in our letter of 9 December 2020, the purpose of our
correspondence is to provide you with an opportunity to consult with the
AFP to attempt to remove the practical refusal reason. An extension of
time was not being sought, rather you were being provided with a period
of time to undertake such a consultation with the AFP (as set out in the
FOI Act).
Based on your correspondence of 11 December 2020, we now understand that
you are seeking:
1) “documents, relating to Mr David McBride's initial
complaint to the AFP in 2014, in which he blew the whistle on the ADF...”
. The AFP understands that you seek documents relating to the complaint
only and not any subsequent investigative documents.
2) ‘documents relating to the decisions arrived at by
the AFP to prosecute Mr Dan Oakes, and then not to. The documents I am
requesting are letters and minutes, briefing documents, emails,
electronic messaging (SMS/WhatsApp etc), and copies of notes made in
police diaries or notebooks’. The AFP understands that you seek only
documents regarding such a decision.
If we have understood the scope of your request correctly, the AFP will
be able to proceed with processing your request. Grateful if you could
please confirm as soon as possible.
Kind regards
NATALIE WOODBERRY
A/g SENIOR LAWYER / TEAM LEADER, FREEDOM OF INFORMATION CHIEF COUNSEL
PORTFOLIO [1][7]www.afp.gov.au [2]Australian Federal Police
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[8][FOI #6907 email]
This request has been made by an individual using Right to Know. This
message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet.
More information on how Right to Know works can be found at:
[9]https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...
If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web
manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
**********************************************************************
WARNING
This email message and any attached files may contain information
that is confidential and subject of legal privilege intended only for
use by the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you
are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient be advised that you
have received this message in error and that any use, copying,
circulation, forwarding, printing or publication of this message or
attached files is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the
information contained therein. If you have received this message in
error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your
inbox.
AFP Web site: http://www.afp.gov.au
**********************************************************************
References
Visible links
1. http://www.afp.gov.au/
2. http://www.afp.gov.au/
3. http://www.afp.gov.au/
4. http://www.afp.gov.au/
5. mailto:[FOI #6907 email]
6. mailto:[email address]
7. http://www.afp.gov.au/
8. mailto:[FOI #6907 email]
9. https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...
Dear Natalie
As per your email of 23 December 2020, the AFP were required to provide me with a decision by 26 January 2021.
The time limit for processing my request has expired. It is now been over a week past that date and the AFP has still not provided that decision or the requested material as required by law.
Unless there is a legal impediment, please provide the requested material.
Yours sincerely,
Steve McKenzie
Journalists for Freedom
OFFICIAL
Dear Mr McKenzie
Natalie is currently out of the office and I have been assigned this matter.
By way of update, a decision is expected to be notified to you by 16 February 2021.
We acknowledge that the request is overdue, however we are currently completing our clearance steps and are endeavouring to finalise the matter as a priority.
We apologise for the delay and any inconvenience this has caused.
regards
JACQUELINE ELLERY
PRINCIPAL FOI OFFICER/TEAM LEADER, FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
CHIEF COUNSEL
AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL POLICE
www.afp.gov.au
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve McKenzie <[FOI #6907 email]>
Sent: Wednesday, 3 February 2021 5:41 PM
To: FOI <[email address]>
Subject: RE: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST - 2021/308 - Third Party Consultations [SEC=OFFICIAL]
Dear Natalie
As per your email of 23 December 2020, the AFP were required to provide me with a decision by 26 January 2021.
The time limit for processing my request has expired. It is now been over a week past that date and the AFP has still not provided that decision or the requested material as required by law.
Unless there is a legal impediment, please provide the requested material.
Yours sincerely,
Steve McKenzie
Journalists for Freedom
-----Original Message-----
OFFICIAL
Dear Mr McKenzie
Further to my below email, I confirm that the AFP will progress with
undertaking third party consultations.
As noted in my below email a decision will be due to you by 26 January
2021.
Kind regards
NATALIE WOODBERRY
A/g SENIOR LAWYER / TEAM LEADER, FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
CHIEF COUNSEL PORTFOLIO
[1]www.afp.gov.au
[2]Australian Federal Police
From: Woodberry, Natalie On Behalf Of FOI
Sent: Friday, 18 December 2020 5:50 PM
To: 'Steve McKenzie' <[FOI #6907 email]>; FOI
<[email address]>
Subject: RE: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST - 2021/308 - Section 24AB(2)
Notice [SEC=OFFICIAL]
OFFICIAL
Dear Mr McKenzie
Thank you for clarifying the scope of your request.
The AFP will continue to review your request and consider if we are able
to proceed with processing the request. Should we have any further queries
we will contact you.
Please be advised that as your requests relates to a third party (that is
someone other than yourself), if the AFP proceeds with processing your
request we will be required to undertake third party consultations before
making a decision on the release of those documents.
Sub-section 15(6) of the Act provides for an extension of 30 days to the
statutory 30 day time limit for processing requests. The time limit for
processing your request and notification of a decision will now expire on
26 January 2021.
If you have any queries, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Kind regards
NATALIE WOODBERRY
A/g SENIOR LAWYER / TEAM LEADER, FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
CHIEF COUNSEL PORTFOLIO
[3]www.afp.gov.au
[4]Australian Federal Police
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #6907 email]
This request has been made by an individual using Right to Know. This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. More information on how Right to Know works can be found at:
https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...
If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
**********************************************************************
WARNING
This email message and any attached files may contain information
that is confidential and subject of legal privilege intended only for
use by the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you
are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient be advised that you
have received this message in error and that any use, copying,
circulation, forwarding, printing or publication of this message or
attached files is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the
information contained therein. If you have received this message in
error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your
inbox.
AFP Web site: http://www.afp.gov.au
**********************************************************************
UNOFFICIAL
Dear Mr McKenzie
Please find attached a decision in relation to your FOI request.
Regards,
JACQUELINE (AFP12306)
PRINCIPAL FOI OFFICER/TEAM LEADER, FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
CHIEF COUNSEL
[1]www.afp.gov.au
[2]Australian Federal Police
**********************************************************************
WARNING
This email message and any attached files may contain information
that is confidential and subject of legal privilege intended only for
use by the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you
are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for
delivering the message to the intended recipient be advised that you
have received this message in error and that any use, copying,
circulation, forwarding, printing or publication of this message or
attached files is strictly forbidden, as is the disclosure of the
information contained therein. If you have received this message in
error, please notify the sender immediately and delete it from your
inbox.
AFP Web site: http://www.afp.gov.au
**********************************************************************
References
Visible links
1. http://www.afp.gov.au/
2. http://www.afp.gov.au/