Government facebook takedown access

Response to this request is long overdue. By law, under all circumstances, eSafety Commissioner should have responded by now (details). You can complain by requesting an internal review.

Dear eSafety Commissioner,

Has the government, any division of the government, any member of the government, or any organisation acting on behalf of the government, ever had partner access to Facebook’s takedown portal previously found (since removed) at https://facebook.com/xtakedowns/login?

Yours faithfully,

Christoph Kuhlmann

FOI, eSafety Commissioner

Dear Mr Kuhlmann,

Thank you for your email.

Section 15(2) of the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth) (FOI Act) sets out the requirements for a valid FOI request. In order for a request to be a valid request for the purposes of the FOI Act, the request must:

• be in writing;
• state it is a request under the FOI Act;
• provide enough information to identify documents; and
• provide information on how to deliver notices to (or how to contact) the applicant.

As you have not provided us with sufficient information regarding the documents you are requesting, we cannot process your request in its current form.

However, as your question relates to matters pertaining to eSafety’s functions and activities, we could treat your request as an administrative access request and remove the need for you to re-make your request under the FOI Act.

Administrative access means the release of government information in response to a specific request, outside the processes in the FOI Act. Administrative access may be most readily used for release of information relating to an agency’s key functions and activities.

We would be happy to provide the answers to your question in line with the 30 day timeframe usually given under the FOI Act. This would allow you to receive the specific information you have asked for rather than documents that you would receive under the FOI.

If you agree to receive this information as an administrative access request rather than an FOI request, please respond to this email confirming that you agree for eSafety to process your request as an administrative access request.

Kind Regards,
FOI Coordinator

-----Original Message-----
From: Christoph Kuhlmann <[FOI #9644 email]>
Sent: Friday, 2 December 2022 9:00 PM
To: [eSafety Commissioner request email]
Subject: Freedom of Information request - Government facebook takedown access

Dear eSafety Commissioner,

Has the government, any division of the government, any member of the government, or any organisation acting on behalf of the government, ever had partner access to Facebook’s takedown portal previously found (since removed) at https://facebook.com/xtakedowns/login?

Yours faithfully,

Christoph Kuhlmann

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:

[FOI #9644 email]

Is [eSafety Commissioner request email] the wrong address for Freedom of Information requests to eSafety Commissioner? If so, please contact us using this form:

https://www.righttoknow.org.au/change_re...

This request has been made by an individual using Right to Know. This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. More information on how Right to Know works can be found at:

https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...

Please note that in some cases publication of requests and responses will be delayed.

If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all
copies of the original message.

hide quoted sections

Dear FOI,

I agree for eSafety to process my request as an administrative access request.

Yours sincerely,

Christoph Kuhlmann