We don't know whether the most recent response to this request contains information or not – if you are steven please sign in and let everyone know.

I Am Requesting Information From Fines Victoria - IMES

We're waiting for steven to read a recent response and update the status.

Dear Victorian Department of Justice & Regulation,
I understand that the Department of Justice is made up of many different separate departments.

My request is directed to Fines Victoria- IMES

Under the Freedom of Information Act 1982

I would like clarification on a certain issue that has come to my attention
When Fines Victoria issue a fine, for example a speed camera infringement , they send out a notice demanding that payment be made for and offence that was committed , on the back of the notice its states that " you are alleged to have committed an offence"

So in other words we are not required to pay the fine ? is that correct?
and the payments of he fines in a guilty plea or admission ?
The fact that the very notice that is demanding payments, uses the word alleged is prima facie evidence that we are not required to pay the fine, and at that point we can exercise our 2 inherent rights, presumption of innocence and the right to remain silent in order to not incriminate ourselves and naturally it would be up to the party making the claim to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused is guilty.

The staff/officers at fines Victoria seem to disagree, they claim that the fine must be paid regardless of the the fact that the notice states its an allegation.

can you please clarify

Why doesn't fines Victoria use " you are guilty of committing an offence " on the notice

Yours faithfully,

steven

DJR-IIA-FOI (DJCS), Victorian Department of Justice & Regulation

Good afternoon Steven

Thank you for your email.

The Freedom of Information Act 1982 (FOI Act) gives you the right to access documents held by the department. It does not provide a mechanism for making enquiries or asking questions.

As you have indicated that you are seeking clarification on an issue, rather than access to a document, I have referred your query to the appropriate area in Fines and Enforcement Services who will respond to your enquiry outside the FOI Act.

Kind regards

Natasha Haslem
A/Team Leader, Freedom of Information
Department of Justice and Community Safety

-----Original Message-----
From: steven <[FOI #7861 email]>
Sent: Monday, 13 September 2021 6:17 PM
To: DJR-IIA-FOI (DJCS) <[Victorian Department of Justice &amp; Regulation request email]>
Subject: Freedom of Information request - I Am Requesting Information From Fines Victoria - IMES

Dear Victorian Department of Justice & Regulation, I understand that the Department of Justice is made up of many different separate departments.

My request is directed to Fines Victoria- IMES

Under the Freedom of Information Act 1982

I would like clarification on a certain issue that has come to my attention When Fines Victoria issue a fine, for example a speed camera infringement , they send out a notice demanding that payment be made for and offence that was committed , on the back of the notice its states that " you are alleged to have committed an offence"

So in other words we are not required to pay the fine ? is that correct?
and the payments of he fines in a guilty plea or admission ?
The fact that the very notice that is demanding payments, uses the word alleged is prima facie evidence that we are not required to pay the fine, and at that point we can exercise our 2 inherent rights, presumption of innocence and the right to remain silent in order to not incriminate ourselves and naturally it would be up to the party making the claim to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused is guilty.

The staff/officers at fines Victoria seem to disagree, they claim that the fine must be paid regardless of the the fact that the notice states its an allegation.

can you please clarify

Why doesn't fines Victoria use " you are guilty of committing an offence " on the notice

Yours faithfully,

steven

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #7861 email]

Is [Victorian Department of Justice &amp; Regulation request email] the wrong address for Freedom of Information requests to Victorian Department of Justice & Regulation? If so, please contact us using this form:
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url...

This request has been made by an individual using Right to Know. This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. More information on how Right to Know works can be found at:
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url...

Please note that in some cases publication of requests and responses will be delayed.

If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
The content of this e-mail and any attachments may be private and confidential, intended only for use of the individual or entity named. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you must not read, forward, print, copy, disclose, use or store in any way the information this e-mail or any attachment contains.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and delete or destroy all copies of this e-mail and any attachments.
Our organisation respects the privacy of individuals. For a copy of our privacy policy please go to our website or contact us.

hide quoted sections

Dear DJR-IIA-FOI (DJCS),
You mean to tell me, that there is no procedure on file that stipulates how people are determined guilty when the Sheriff sends threats by carriage service.

Are people guilty or do they still remain an accused as is stated in the first notice of the infringement.

Can you please provide,(if they exist) any documents pertaining to fines Victoria having approval from the people Victoria.

A copy of Fines Victoria company constitution. .

Yours sincerely,

steven

DJR-IIA-FOI (DJCS), Victorian Department of Justice & Regulation

2 Attachments

Dear Mr Steven,

 

Please find attached a letter requesting payment of the application fee
for your FOI request.

 

Kind regards,

 

Will

___________________________________________________________

 

William Ng

Freedom of Information Officer

Information Integrity & Access

Department of Justice and Community Safety

 

I am currently working from home and working flexibly. I am sending this
email at a time convenient to me which may include outside of business
hours. There is no expectation that you will respond to this email outside
of business hours.

 

Our values: Community - Together - Integrity - Respect - Happen

 

   

This office is based on the land of the Traditional Owners, the people
of the Kulin Nations.

We acknowledge their history, culture and Elders both past and present.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL
The content of this e-mail and any attachments may be private and
confidential, intended only for use of the individual or entity named. If
you are not the intended recipient of this message you must not read,
forward, print, copy, disclose, use or store in any way the information
this e-mail or any attachment contains.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately and delete or destroy all copies of this e-mail and any
attachments.
Our organisation respects the privacy of individuals. For a copy of our
privacy policy please go to our website or contact us.

hide quoted sections

We don't know whether the most recent response to this request contains information or not – if you are steven please sign in and let everyone know.