Selection of Age Assurance Stakeholder Advisory Board

eSafety Commissioner did not have the information requested.

Dear eSafety Commissioner (and eSafety FOI officer),

I wish to make a request under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 for documents relating to the selection of members for the Age Assurance Stakeholder Advisory Board, chaired by Professor Jon Rouse APM.

This request covers documents dated between 1 May 2025 and 24 July 2025, inclusive.

You may redact the names and identifying details of staff of eSafety other than the eSafety Commissioner.

You may redact the names and identifying details of public servants outside of eSafety so long as their department/agency and role are otherwise clear.

You may redact the contact details and personal addresses of other third parties so long as they are still identified by name and (where applicable) organisation/business.

I otherwise do not consent to other redactions, although feel free to ask if you think it's something I genuinely won't be interested in or which would significantly reduce the work involved in fulfilling the request.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Yours faithfully,

Greg Tannahill

Dear eSafety Commissioner,

Could you please acknowledge your receipt of my FOI requested dated 25 July 2025, relating to the Age Assurance Stakeholder selection process, sent by email to this address?

Yours faithfully,

Greg Tannahill

FOI, eSafety Commissioner

OFFICIAL
Dear Applicant

I am writing to acknowledge your request under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth) (FOI Act) received on 25 July 2025.

We note your consent to redact public servant staff information and certain other information from your request email below. Unless you advise otherwise, we will also proceed on the basis that you do not require duplicates or drafts of material in scope.

The FOI Act allows 30 days for processing your request. This period may be extended for charges and third-party consultation. We will let you know if this occurs.

We will contact you at the email address above unless you advise otherwise. Any documents released to you as part of this decision will be published on our disclosure log unless one of the relevant exceptions apply. Further information about the FOI Act, including eSafety’s publication obligations, is available on our website at https://www.esafety.gov.au/about-us/corp....

Kind regards

FOI Coordinator

esafety.gov.au

eSafety acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout Australia and their continuing connection to land, waters and community. We pay our respects to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, and to Elders past, present and emerging.
-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Tannahill <[FOI #13444 email]>
Sent: Friday, 25 July 2025 1:05 PM
To: FOI <[email address]>
Subject: Freedom of Information request - Selection of Age Assurance Stakeholder Advisory Board

[You don't often get email from [FOI #13444 email]. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentific... ]

Dear eSafety Commissioner (and eSafety FOI officer),

I wish to make a request under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 for documents relating to the selection of members for the Age Assurance Stakeholder Advisory Board, chaired by Professor Jon Rouse APM.

This request covers documents dated between 1 May 2025 and 24 July 2025, inclusive.

You may redact the names and identifying details of staff of eSafety other than the eSafety Commissioner.

You may redact the names and identifying details of public servants outside of eSafety so long as their department/agency and role are otherwise clear.

You may redact the contact details and personal addresses of other third parties so long as they are still identified by name and (where applicable) organisation/business.

I otherwise do not consent to other redactions, although feel free to ask if you think it's something I genuinely won't be interested in or which would significantly reduce the work involved in fulfilling the request.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Yours faithfully,

Greg Tannahill

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #13444 email]

Is [eSafety Commissioner request email] the wrong address for Freedom of Information requests to eSafety Commissioner? If so, please contact us using this form:
https://www.righttoknow.org.au/change_re...

This request has been made by an individual using Right to Know. This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. More information on how Right to Know works can be found at:
https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...

Please note that in some cases publication of requests and responses will be delayed.

If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.

-------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s)
and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all
copies of the original message.

hide quoted sections

FOI, eSafety Commissioner

7 Attachments

OFFICIAL

Dear Mr Tannahill

Please see attached a notice of decision in relation to your freedom of
information request to eSafety.

Kind regards

 

FOI Coordinator

 

[1]eSafety logo Email-Signautre

 

[2]Email-Footers icons3[3]esafety.gov.au

 

[4]Email-Footers iconsT[5]Email-Footers iconsF[6]Email-Footers iconsL

 

eSafety acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout
Australia and their continuing connection to land, waters and community.
We pay our respects to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, and
to Elders past, present and emerging.

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: FOI
Sent: Thursday, 31 July 2025 3:48 PM
To: Greg Tannahill
Subject: FOI 25155 - Acknowledgement [SEC=OFFICIAL]

 

 

OFFICIAL

Dear Applicant

 

I am writing to acknowledge your request under the Freedom of Information
Act 1982 (Cth) (FOI Act) received on 25 July 2025.

 

We note your consent to redact public servant staff information and
certain other information from your request email below. Unless you advise
otherwise, we will also proceed on the basis that you do not require
duplicates or drafts of material in scope.

 

The FOI Act allows 30 days for processing your request. This period may be
extended for charges and third-party consultation. We will let you know if
this occurs.

 

We will contact you at the email address above unless you advise
otherwise. Any documents released to you as part of this decision will be
published on our disclosure log unless one of the relevant exceptions
apply. Further information about the FOI Act, including eSafety’s
publication obligations, is available on our website at
[7]https://www.esafety.gov.au/about-us/corp....

 

Kind regards

 

FOI Coordinator

 

esafety.gov.au

 

eSafety acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of country throughout
Australia and their continuing connection to land, waters and community.
We pay our respects to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures, and
to Elders past, present and emerging.

-----Original Message-----

From: Greg Tannahill <[8][FOI #13444 email]>

Sent: Friday, 25 July 2025 1:05 PM

To: FOI <[9][email address]>

Subject: Freedom of Information request - Selection of Age Assurance
Stakeholder Advisory Board

 

[You don't often get email from
[10][FOI #13444 email]. Learn why this is
important at [11]https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentific... ]

 

Dear eSafety Commissioner (and eSafety FOI officer),

 

I wish to make a request under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 for
documents relating to the selection of members for the Age Assurance
Stakeholder Advisory Board, chaired by Professor Jon Rouse APM.

 

This request covers documents dated between 1 May 2025 and 24 July 2025,
inclusive.

 

You may redact the names and identifying details of staff of eSafety other
than the eSafety Commissioner.

 

You may redact the names and identifying details of public servants
outside of eSafety so long as their department/agency and role are
otherwise clear.

 

You may redact the contact details and personal addresses of other third
parties so long as they are still identified by name and (where
applicable) organisation/business.

 

I otherwise do not consent to other redactions, although feel free to ask
if you think it's something I genuinely won't be interested in or which
would significantly reduce the work involved in fulfilling the request.

 

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

Greg Tannahill

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:

[12][FOI #13444 email]

 

Is [13][eSafety Commissioner request email] the wrong address for Freedom of Information
requests to eSafety Commissioner? If so, please contact us using this
form:

[14]https://www.righttoknow.org.au/change_re...

 

This request has been made by an individual using Right to Know. This
message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet.
More information on how Right to Know works can be found at:

[15]https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...

 

Please note that in some cases publication of requests and responses will
be delayed.

 

If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web
manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.

 

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s)
and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy
all
copies of the original message.

References

Visible links
1. https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url...
3. https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url...
4. https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url...
5. https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url...
6. https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url...
7. https://www.esafety.gov.au/about-us/corp...
8. mailto:[FOI #13444 email]
9. mailto:[email address]
10. mailto:[FOI #13444 email]
11. https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentific...
12. mailto:[FOI #13444 email]
13. mailto:[eSafety Commissioner request email]
14. https://www.righttoknow.org.au/change_re...
15. https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...

hide quoted sections

Dear eSafety,

Thank you for your response. I appear to have conflated eSafety's recent call for consultation participants with the Age Assurance Stakeholder Advisory Group. I will follow up with an FOI to the Department regarding the Stakeholder Advisory Group, and follow up with your office with an FOI regarding the consultation engaged in by eSafety.

You may consider this FOI matter closed, and you may expect a new FOI directed to the consultation shortly.

With thanks,

Greg Tannahill